From: sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org Date: 2019-03-12T11:55:57+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:91789] [Ruby trunk Bug#15438] Threads can't switch faster than TIME_QUANTUM_(NSEC|USEC|MSEC) Issue #15438 has been updated by sylvain.joyeux (Sylvain Joyeux). ruby -v changed from ruby 2.5.1p57 (2018-03-29 revision 63029) [x86_64-linux-gnu] to trunk I'll check appveyor out I've `push --mirror` from the current ruby git repo to remove all dead references, and re-pushed the branch. I didn't realize it would force me to re-create the pull request, which is now https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2093. I'll make sure the AppVeyor build passes, and report here when it does. ---------------------------------------- Bug #15438: Threads can't switch faster than TIME_QUANTUM_(NSEC|USEC|MSEC) https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15438#change-77064 * Author: sylvain.joyeux (Sylvain Joyeux) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Target version: * ruby -v: trunk * Backport: 2.4: UNKNOWN, 2.5: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- Thread#priority can be set to negative values, which when looking at the code is meant to reduce the time allocated to the thread. However, as far as I could understand in the codebase, the quantum of time is definitely hard-coded to 100ms (TIME_QUANTUM_...). This means that the "lower allocated time" would only work for threads that would often yield one way or the other (sleep, blocking calls, ...) My projects would definitely benefit from a faster switching period. I was wondering how best to implement this ability ? I thought of the following: 1. globally using an environment variable 2. globally using an API 3. trying to adapt dynamically, using the highest needed period 4. lowering the period when a priority lower than 0 is set, leaving it at the lower period. Obviously (3) would seem to be the best, but I'm not sure I would be able to get it right in a decent amount of time. (4) seem to be a good trade-off between simplicity and performance (nothing changes if you never use priorities lower than 0, and if you were you basically get what you wanted). What do you think ? ---Files-------------------------------- 0001-dynamically-modify-the-timer-thread-period-to-accoun.patch (3.12 KB) 0001-2.6-fix-handling-of-negative-priorities.patch (8.43 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: