From: pdahorek@... Date: 2020-01-10T11:35:32+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:96760] [Ruby master Misc#16487] Potential for SIMD usage in ruby-core Issue #16487 has been updated by ahorek (Pavel Rosick�). > Could you extend on that ? I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. for maximum portability, you should use `-march=x86-64` in this case, even if your current CPU supports AVX, the compiler can't use AVX instructions for a regular code https://godbolt.org/z/YSNeQB loading a few hand-crafted functions dynamically at runtime in order to overcome this limitation seems too hacky... @sam.saffron - a separate gem would be probably the best choice ---------------------------------------- Misc #16487: Potential for SIMD usage in ruby-core https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16487#change-83752 * Author: byroot (Jean Boussier) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- ### Context There are several ruby core methods that could be optimized with the use of SIMD instructions. I experimented a bit on `coderange_scan` https://github.com/Shopify/ruby/pull/2, and Pavel Rosick� experimented on `String#strip` https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/2815. ### Problem The downside of SIMD instructions is that they are not universally available. So it means maintaining several versions of the same code, and switching them either statically or dynamically. And since most Ruby users use precompiled binaries from repositories and such, it would need to be dynamic if we want most users to benefit from it. So it's not exactly "free speed", as it means a complexified codebase. ### Question So the question is to know wether ruby-core is open to patches using SIMD instructions ? And if so under which conditions. cc @shyouhei -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: