一、题目
我们提供了一个类:
public class Foo {
public void first() { print("first"); }
public void second() { print("second"); }
public void third() { print("third"); }
}
三个不同的线程将会共用一个 Foo 实例。
线程 A 将会调用 first() 方法
线程 B 将会调用 second() 方法
线程 C 将会调用 third() 方法
请设计修改程序,以确保 second() 方法在 first() 方法之后被执行,third() 方法在 second() 方法之后被执行。
示例 1:
输入: [1,2,3]
输出: “firstsecondthird”
解释:
有三个线程会被异步启动。
输入 [1,2,3] 表示线程 A 将会调用 first() 方法,线程 B 将会调用 second() 方法,线程 C 将会调用 third() 方法。
正确的输出是 “firstsecondthird”。
示例 2:
输入: [1,3,2]
输出: “firstsecondthird”
解释:
输入 [1,3,2] 表示线程 A 将会调用 first() 方法,线程 B 将会调用 third() 方法,线程 C 将会调用 second() 方法。
正确的输出是 “firstsecondthird”。
提示:
尽管输入中的数字似乎暗示了顺序,但是我们并不保证线程在操作系统中的调度顺序。
你看到的输入格式主要是为了确保测试的全面性。
来源:力扣(LeetCode)
链接:https://leetcode-cn.com/problems/print-in-order
著作权归领扣网络所有。商业转载请联系官方授权,非商业转载请注明出处。
二、解答
1、解法1
package day01;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
public class Foo {
private ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();
private Condition condition = lock.newCondition();
private int count = 1;
public Foo() {}
public void first(Runnable printFirst) throws InterruptedException {
lock.lock();
// printFirst.run() outputs "first". Do not change or remove this line.
printFirst.run();
count = 2;
//其实这里调用signal是有问题
//假设这里唤醒第三个线程
//第三个线程会再次调用await,进入等待池等待唤醒
//第二个线程此时也在等待池中
//这样就会导致第一个线程和第二个线程都在等待池中
//condition.signal();
condition.signalAll();
lock.unlock();
}
public void second(Runnable printSecond) throws InterruptedException {
lock.lock();
//为什么这里可以使用if,而下面必须使用while呢
//如果线程一运行完,线程三拿到了锁,则需要再次判断count值让其进入等待池
if(count != 2) {
condition.await();
}
// printSecond.run() outputs "second". Do not change or remove this line.
printSecond.run();
count = 3;
//这里可以调用signal方法,因为只剩下一个线程在等待了
condition.signal();
lock.unlock();
}
public void third(Runnable printThird) throws InterruptedException {
lock.lock();
while(count != 3) {
condition.await();
}
// printThird.run() outputs "third". Do not change or remove this line.
printThird.run();
lock.unlock();
}
}
2、解法2
package day01;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
class Foo2 {
private AtomicInteger firstJobDone = new AtomicInteger(0);
private AtomicInteger secondJobDone = new AtomicInteger(0);
public Foo2() {}
public void first(Runnable printFirst) throws InterruptedException {
// printFirst.run() outputs "first".
printFirst.run();
// mark the first job as done, by increasing its count.
firstJobDone.incrementAndGet();
}
public void second(Runnable printSecond) throws InterruptedException {
while (firstJobDone.get() != 1) {
// waiting for the first job to be done.
}
// printSecond.run() outputs "second".
printSecond.run();
// mark the second as done, by increasing its count.
secondJobDone.incrementAndGet();
}
public void third(Runnable printThird) throws InterruptedException {
while (secondJobDone.get() != 1) {
// waiting for the second job to be done.
}
// printThird.run() outputs "third".
printThird.run();
}
}
3、解法3
class Foo {
private AtomicInteger firstJobDone = new AtomicInteger(0);
public Foo() {}
public void first(Runnable printFirst) throws InterruptedException {
// printFirst.run() outputs "first".
printFirst.run();
// mark the first job as done, by increasing its count.
firstJobDone.incrementAndGet();
}
public void second(Runnable printSecond) throws InterruptedException {
while (firstJobDone.get() != 1) {
// waiting for the first job to be done.
}
// printSecond.run() outputs "second".
printSecond.run();
// mark the second as done, by increasing its count.
firstJobDone.incrementAndGet();
}
public void third(Runnable printThird) throws InterruptedException {
while (firstJobDone.get() != 2) {
// waiting for the second job to be done.
}
// printThird.run() outputs "third".
printThird.run();
}
}