RAEmoLLM: Retrieval Augmented LLMs for Cross-DomainMisinformation Detection Using In-Context Learni

https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.806.pdfhttps://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.806.pdf

1. 概述

        互联网充斥着错误信息(Schuefele 和 Krause,2019),这对人们的生活和社会稳定产生了重大影响(Della Giustina,2023)。错误信息在教育、健康、科技等各个领域普遍存在,尤其是在互联网上,这要求人们花费大量时间和精力来辨别真相(Pérez-Rosas 等,2018)。然而,训练于特定已知领域的模型往往脆弱,并且在面对新领域的样本时容易做出错误的预测(Saikh 等,2020)。因此,检测跨领域错误

### Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks Implementation and Best Practices The method of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for knowledge-intensive natural language processing tasks aims to combine the strengths of dense vector representations with sparse exact match methods, thereby improving model performance on tasks that require access to external information not present during training[^1]. This approach ensures models can retrieve relevant documents or passages from a large corpus at inference time and generate responses conditioned on this retrieved context. #### Key Components of RAG Framework A typical implementation involves two main components: 1. **Retriever**: A component responsible for fetching potentially useful pieces of text based on input queries. 2. **Generator**: An encoder-decoder architecture like BART or T5 which generates outputs given both the query and retrieved contexts as inputs. This dual-stage process allows systems to leverage vast amounts of unstructured data without needing explicit retraining when new facts become available. #### Practical Steps for Implementing RAG Models To effectively implement such an architecture, one should consider several factors including but not limited to choosing appropriate pre-trained retrievers and generators fine-tuned specifically towards question answering or similar objectives where factual accuracy is paramount. Additionally, integrating these modules into existing pipelines requires careful consideration regarding latency constraints versus quality trade-offs especially under real-time applications scenarios. For instance, here's how you might set up a simple pipeline using Hugging Face Transformers library: ```python from transformers import RagTokenizer, RagTokenForGeneration tokenizer = RagTokenizer.from_pretrained("facebook/rag-token-nq") model = RagTokenForGeneration.from_pretrained("facebook/rag-token-nq") def rag_pipeline(question): inputs = tokenizer([question], return_tensors="pt", truncation=True) generated_ids = model.generate(input_ids=inputs["input_ids"]) output = tokenizer.batch_decode(generated_ids, skip_special_tokens=True)[0] return output ``` In practice, tuning hyperparameters associated with each stage separately could lead to better overall results compared to treating them monolithically due to their distinct roles within the system design. #### Best Practices When Working With RAG Systems When deploying RAG-based solutions, adhering to certain guidelines helps maximize effectiveness while minimizing potential pitfalls: - Ensure high-quality indexing over document collections used by the retriever part since poor recall directly impacts downstream generations negatively. - Regularly update underlying corpora so they remain current; stale resources may propagate outdated information through synthetic texts produced thereafter. - Monitor closely any changes made either upstream (e.g., modifications affecting source material accessibility) or inside your own infrastructure because alterations elsewhere often necessitate corresponding adjustments locally too. By following these recommendations alongside leveraging state-of-the-art techniques provided via frameworks like those mentioned earlier, developers stand well positioned to build robust conversational agents capable of delivering accurate answers across diverse domains requiring specialized domain expertise beyond what general-purpose pretrained models alone offer today. --related questions-- 1. How does multi-task learning compare against single-task approaches concerning adaptability? 2. What are some challenges faced when implementing keyword-based point cloud completion algorithms? 3. Can prompt engineering significantly influence outcomes in few-shot learning settings? 4. Are there specific industries benefiting most prominently from advancements in knowledge-intensive NLP technologies?
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包

打赏作者

樱花的浪漫

你的鼓励将是我创作的最大动力

¥1 ¥2 ¥4 ¥6 ¥10 ¥20
扫码支付:¥1
获取中
扫码支付

您的余额不足,请更换扫码支付或充值

打赏作者

实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值