torch.Tensor和torch.tensor

最新推荐文章于 2025-05-26 17:47:58 发布

原创最新推荐文章于 2025-05-26 17:47:58 发布 · 158 阅读

0 ·

CC 4.0 BY-SA版权

本文探讨了PyTorch中Tensor构造器的过载问题，解释了为什么将其拆分为torch.tensor和torch.empty。讨论了torch.tensor和torch.Tensor之间的相似性和效率，指出两者在传递数据时的工作方式类似，且效率相当，主要区别在于API的设计。

摘要生成于 C知道，由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持，前往体验 >

Our torch.Tensor constructor is overloaded to do the same thing as both torch.tensor and torch.empty. We thought this overload would make code confusing, so we split torch.Tensor into torch.tensor and `torch.empty.

So @yxchng yes, to some extent, torch.tensor works similarly to torch.Tensor (when you pass in data). @ProGamerGov no, neither should be more efficient than the other. It’s just that the torch.empty and torch.tensor have a nicer API than our legacy torch.Tensor constructor.

参考：
【PyTorch】Tensor和tensor的区别
 What is the difference between Tensor and tensor? Is Tensor going to be deprecated in the future?