Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
  3. Article

On the Use of Conjunctors With a Neutral Element in the Modus Ponens Inequality

  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 February 2020
  • Volume 13, pages 201–211, (2020)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript
On the Use of Conjunctors With a Neutral Element in the Modus Ponens Inequality
Download PDF
  • Ana Pradera1,
  • Sebastia Massanet2,3,
  • Daniel Ruiz2,3 &
  • …
  • Joan Torrens2,3 
  • 70 Accesses

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

The inference rule of Modus Ponens has been extensively investigated in the framework of approximate reasoning, especially for the case of t-norms. Recently, more general kinds of conjunctors have also been considered, like semi-copulas, copulas, and conjunctive uninorms. A common feature of all these kinds of conjunctors is the fact that they have a neutral element e ∈ ]0,1]. This paper is devoted to the study of Modus Ponens for conjunctors with a neutral element with no additional conditions. Many properties are proved to be necessary for a fuzzy implication function I to satisfy the Modus Ponens with respect to a conjunctor with neutral element e ∈ ]0,1]. Although the most usual families of fuzzy implication functions do not satisfy all these properties, other possibilities for I are presented showing many new examples and generalizing some already known results on this topic. Moreover, all fuzzy implication functions satisfying the Modus Ponens with respect to the least (and with respect to the greatest) conjunctor with neutral element e ∈ ]0,1[ are characterized. The particular case of e = 1, that provides semi-copulas, is studied separately, retrieving many known results that can be easily derived from the current study.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Logical Analysis
  • Formal Logic
  • Functions of a Complex Variable
  • General Logic
  • Logic
  • Functional Analysis
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. M. Baczyński, B. Jayaram, Fuzzy Implications, vol. 231 of Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.

  2. P. Hajek, The Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic, Kluwer, Springer, Netherlands, 1998.

  3. V. Novák, J. Mockor, I. Perfilieva, Mathematical Principles of Fuzzy Logic, Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computing Science, Kluwer, Boston, MA, 1999.

  4. E. Trillas, C. Alsina, A. Pradera, On MPT-implication functions for fuzzy logic. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Serie A: Matemáticas (RACSAM). 98 (2004), 259–271.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Trillas, L. Valverde, On mode and implication in approximate reasoning, in: M. Gupta (Ed.), Approximate Reasoning in Expert Systems, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 157–166.

  6. M. Baczyński, Fuzzy implication functions: recent advances, Mathw. Soft Comput. 19 (2012), 13–19.

  7. M. Baczyński, G. Beliakov, H. Bustince, A. Pradera (Eds.), Advances in Fuzzy Implication Functions, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013.

  8. M. Baczyński, B. Jayaram, S. Massanet, J. Torrens, Fuzzy implications: past, present, and future, in: J. Kacprzyk, W. Pedrycz (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Computational Intelligence, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015, pp. 183–202.

  9. M. Mas, M. Monserrat, J. Torrens, E. Trillas, A survey on fuzzy implication functions, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15 (2007), 1107–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Beliakov, A. Pradera, T. Calvo, Aggregation Functions: a Guide for Practitioners, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007.

  11. T. Calvo, G. Mayor, R. Mesiar (Eds.), Aggregation Operators, New Trends and Applications, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, New York, NY, 2002.

  12. M. Grabisch, J.L. Marichal, R. Mesiar, E. Pap, Aggregation Functions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.

  13. V. Torra, Y. Narukawa, Modeling Decisions: Information Fusion and Aggregation Operators, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007.

  14. M. Baczyński, P. Grzegorzewski, P. Helbin, W. Niemyska, Properties of the probabilistic implications and S-implications, Inf. Sci. 331 (2016), 2–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Mas, M. Monserrat, D. Ruiz-Aguilera, J. Torrens, RU and (U, N)-implications satisfying modus ponens, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 73 (2016), 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.P. Dimuro, B. Bedregal, J. Fernandez, M. Sesma-Sara, J.M. Pintor, H. Bustince, The law of O-conditionality for fuzzy implications constructed from overlap and grouping functions, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 105 (2019), 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G.P. Dimuro, B. Bedregal, Fuzzy implications and the law of O-conditionality: the case of residual implications derived from overlap functions, in Proceedings of 8th International Summer School on Aggregation Operators, Katowice, Poland, 2015, pp. 97–111.

  18. M. Mas, D. Ruiz-Aguilera, J. Torrens, Generalized Modus Ponens for (U,N)-implications, in: J. Medina et al. (Eds.), Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, Theory and Foundations, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 2018. pp. 649–660.

  19. M. Mas, D. Ruiz-Aguilera, J. Torrens, Uninorm based residual implications satisfying the Modus Ponens property with respect to a uninorm, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 359 (2019), 22–41.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Pradera, S. Massanet, D. Ruiz-Aguilera, J. Torrens, The noncontradiction principle related to natural negations of fuzzy implication functions, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 359 (2019), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Alsina, M.J. Frank, B. Schweizer, Associative Functions, Triangular Norms and Copulas, World Scientific, Singapore, 2006.

  22. E.P. Klement, R. Mesiar, E. Pap, Triangular Norms, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2000.

  23. K.C. Maes, B. De Baets, Negation and affirmation: the role of involutive negators, Soft Comput. 11 (2007), 647–654.

  24. K. Demirli, B. De Baets, Basic properties of implicators in a residual framework, Tatra Mountains Math. Publ. 16 (1999), 31–46.

  25. F. Durante, E. Klement, R. Mesiar, C. Sempi, Conjunctors and their residual implicators: characterizations and construction methods, Mediterr. J. Math. 4 (2007), 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Pradera, G. Beliakov, H. Bustince, B. De Baets, A review of the relationships between implication, negation and aggregation functions from the point of view of material implication, Inf. Sci. 329 (2016), 357–380.

  27. R.B. Nelsen, An Introduction to Copulas, second ed., Springer, New York, NY, 2006.

  28. M. Mas, S. Massanet, D. Ruiz-Aguilera, J. Torrens, A survey on the existing classes of uninorms. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 29 (2015), 1021–1037.

  29. J. Fodor, M. Roubens, Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1994.

  30. D. Hlinená, M. Kalina, P. Král, Implication functions generated using functions of one variable, in: M. Baczyński, G. Beliakov, H. Bustince, A. Pradera (Eds.), Advances in Fuzzy Implication Functions, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 125–154.

  31. S. Massanet, J. Torrens, An overview of construction methods of fuzzy implications, in: M. Baczyński, G. Beliakov, H. Bustince, A. Pradera (Eds.), Advances in Fuzzy Implication Functions, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 1–30.

  32. Y. Shi, B. Van Gasse, D. Ruan, E.E. Kerre, On dependencies and independencies of fuzzy implication axioms, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 161 (2010), 1388–1405.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Fodor, On fuzzy implication operators, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 42 (1991), 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Fodor, A new look at fuzzy connectives, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 57 (1993), 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Y. Ouyang, On fuzzy implications determined by aggregation operators, Inf. Sci. 193 (2012), 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  36. I. Aguiló, J. Suñer, J. Torrens, A characterization of residual implications derived from left-continuous uninorms, Inf. Sci. 180 (2010), 3992–4005.

    Google Scholar 

  37. B. De Baets, J.C. Fodor, Residual operators of uninorms, Soft Comput. 3 (1999), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  38. P. Grzegorzewski, Probabilistic implications, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 226 (2013), 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  39. S. Massanet, A. Pradera, D. Ruiz-Aguilera, J. Torrens, Equivalence and characterization of probabilistic and survival implications, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 359 (2019), 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  40. S. Massanet, A. Pradera, D. Ruiz-Aguilera, J. Torrens, From three to one: equivalence and characterization of material implications derived from co-copulas, probabilistic S-implications and survival S-implications, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 323 (2017), 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  41. I. Aguiló, J. Suñer, J. Torrens, A construction method of semicopulas from fuzzy negations, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 226 (2013), 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  42. M. Carbonell, J. Torrens, Continuous R-implications generated from representable aggregation functions, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 161 (2010), 2276–2289.

    Google Scholar 

  43. G. Mayor, J. Torrens, On a class of binary operations: non-strict archimedean aggregation functions, in Proceedings of ISMVL’88, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 1988, pp. 54–59.

  44. R. Mesiar, M. Komorníková, Triangular norm-based aggregation of evidence under fuzziness, in: B. Bouchon-Meunier (Eds.), Aggregation and Fusion of Imperfect Information, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1998, pp. 11–35.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ciencias de la Computación, Arquitectura de Computadores, Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos y Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, 28933, Spain

    Ana Pradera

  2. Soft Computing, Image Processing and Aggregation (SCOPIA) Research Group, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma, 07122, Spain

    Sebastia Massanet, Daniel Ruiz & Joan Torrens

  3. Balearic Islands Health Research Institute (IdISBa), Palma, 07010, Spain

    Sebastia Massanet, Daniel Ruiz & Joan Torrens

Authors
  1. Ana Pradera
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sebastia Massanet
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Ruiz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joan Torrens
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Pradera.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pradera, A., Massanet, S., Ruiz, D. et al. On the Use of Conjunctors With a Neutral Element in the Modus Ponens Inequality. Int J Comput Intell Syst 13, 201–211 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.200205.002

Download citation

  • Received: 14 May 2019

  • Accepted: 04 February 2020

  • Published: 14 February 2020

  • Issue Date: January 2020

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.200205.002

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Key words

  • Modus ponens
  • Fuzzy implication function
  • Conjunctor
  • Neutral element
  • Semi-copula
  • T-norm
  • Uninorm
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature