Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
  3. Article

An Evolutionary Self-organizing Cost-Sensitive Radial Basis Function Neural Network to Deal with Imbalanced Data in Medical Diagnosis

  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 October 2020
  • Volume 13, pages 1608–1618, (2020)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript
An Evolutionary Self-organizing Cost-Sensitive Radial Basis Function Neural Network to Deal with Imbalanced Data in Medical Diagnosis
Download PDF
  • Jia-Chao Wu1,
  • Jiang Shen1,
  • Man Xu2 &
  • …
  • Fu-Sheng Liu1 
  • 126 Accesses

  • 8 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Class imbalance is a common issue in medical diagnosis. Although standard radial basis function neural network (RBF-NN) has achieved remarkably high performance on balanced data, its ability to classify imbalanced data is still limited. So far as we know, cost-sensitive learning is an advanced imbalanced data processing method. However, few studies have focused on the combination of RBF-NN and cost sensitivity. From our knowledge, only one paper has proposed a cost-sensitive RBF-NN for software defect prediction. However, the authors implemented a fixed RBF-NN structure. In this paper, a novel cost-sensitive RBF-NN that optimizes structure and parameters simultaneously is proposed to handle medical imbalanced data. Genetic algorithm (GA) and improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO) are used to optimize the structure and parameters of cost-sensitive RBF-NN respectively, and the optimization of cost-sensitive RBF-NN based on dynamic structure is realized. A cost-sensitive function determined adaptively by the sample distribution as the objective function of RBF-NN, so that it can adapt to datasets with different sample distributions. Experimental results show that the proposed cost-sensitive RBF-NN outperforms other state-of-the-art representative algorithms for five imbalanced medical diagnostic datasets in term of accuracy and area under curve (AUC). It can improve the accuracy of medical diagnosis and reduce the error rate of medical decisions.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Learning algorithms
  • Machine Learning
  • Personalized Medicine
  • Predictive medicine
  • Statistical Learning
  • Stochastic Learning and Adaptive Control
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. J.S.M. Alneamy, et al., Utilizing hybrid functional fuzzy wavelet neural networks with a teaching learning-based optimization algorithm for medical disease diagnosis, Comput. Biol. Med. 112 (2019), 103348.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Shilaskar, A. Ghatol, P. Chatur, Medical decision support system for extremely imbalanced datasets, Inf. Sci. 384 (2017), 205–219.

    Google Scholar 

  3. X. Tao, et al., Affinity and class probability-based fuzzy support vector machine for imbalanced data sets, Neural Netw. 122 (2020), 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Gan, et al., Integrating TANBN with cost sensitive classification algorithm for imbalanced data in medical diagnosis, Comput. Ind. Eng. 140 (2020), 106266.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. García, et al., Dynamic ensemble selection for multi-class imbalanced datasets, Inf. Sci. 445 (2018), 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Pouyanfar, S.-C. Chen, Automatic video event detection for imbalance data using enhanced ensemble deep learning, Int. J. Semant. Comput. 11 (2017), 85–109.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.J. Kuo, et al., Integrating cluster analysis with granular computing for imbalanced data classification problem - a case study on prostate cancer prognosis, Comput. Ind. Eng. 125 (2018), 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Z.-L. Zhang, et al., Cost-Sensitive back-propagation neural networks with binarization techniques in addressing multi-class problems and non-competent classifiers, Appl. Soft Comput. 56 (2017), 357–367.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Domingos, MetaCost: a general method for making classifiers cost-sensitive, in Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Diego, CA, USA, 1999.

  10. C.-h. Tsai, L.-c. Chang, H.-c. Chiang, Forecasting of ozone episode days by cost-sensitive neural network methods, Sci. Total Environ. 407 (2009), 2124–2135.

  11. S. Zhang, Cost-sensitive KNN classification, Neurocomput. 391 (2020), 234–242.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Ghodsi, D. Schuurmans, Automatic basis selection techniques for RBF networks, Neural Netw. 16 (2003), 809–816.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Yu, K. Wang, Y.-M. Wei, A hybrid self-adaptive particle swarm optimization–genetic algorithm–radial basis function model for annual electricity demand prediction, Energy Convers. Manag. 91 (2015), 176–185.

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Fathi, G.A. Montazer, An improvement in RBF learning algorithm based on PSO for real time applications, Neurocomput. 111 (2013), 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Amini, M. Taki, A. Rohani, Applied improved RBF neural network model for predicting the broiler output energies, Appl. Soft Comput. 87 (2020), 106006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Kumudha, R. Venkatesan, Cost-sensitive radial basis function neural network classifier for software defect prediction, Sci. World J. 2016 (2016), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Mohammadi, S.M.T. Fatemi Ghomi, F. Zeinali, A new hybrid evolutionary based RBF networks method for forecasting time series: a case study of forecasting emergency supply demand time series, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 36 (2014), 204–214.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Z.-Q. Li, et al., A proposed self-organizing radial basis function network for aero-engine thrust estimation, Aerospace Sci. Technol. 87 (2019), 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. Jia, D. Zhao, L. Ding, An optimized RBF neural network algorithm based on partial least squares and genetic algorithm for classification of small sample, Appl. Soft Comput. 48 (2016), 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G.A. Montazer, D. Giveki, An improved radial basis function neural network for object image retrieval, Neurocomputing. 168 (2015), 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Yu, Y.-M. Wei, K. Wang, Provincial allocation of carbon emission reduction targets in China: an approach based on improved fuzzy cluster and Shapley value decomposition, Energy Policy. 66 (2014), 630–644.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C.-F. Tsai, et al., Under-sampling class imbalanced datasets by combining clustering analysis and instance selection, Inf. Sci. 477 (2019), 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. Ofek, et al., Fast-CBUS: a fast clustering-based undersampling method for addressing the class imbalance problem, Neurocomputing. 243 (2017), 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  24. W.-C. Lin, et al., Clustering-based undersampling in classimbalanced data, Inf. Sci. 409 (2017), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Krawczyk, et al., Evolutionary undersampling boosting for imbalanced classification of breast cancer malignancy, Appl. Soft Comput. 38 (2016), 714–726.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Galar, et al., EUSBoost: enhancing ensembles for highly imbalanced data-sets by evolutionary undersampling, Pattern Recognit. 46 (2013), 3460–3471.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Cateni, V. Colla, M. Vannucci, A method for resampling imbalanced datasets in binary classification tasks for real-world problems, Neurocomputing. 135 (2014), 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  28. N.V. Chawla, et al., SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique, J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16 (2002), 321–357.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.A. Sáez, et al., SMOTE–IPF: addressing the noisy and borderline examples problem in imbalanced classification by a re-sampling method with filtering, Inf. Sci. 291 (2015), 184–203.

    Google Scholar 

  30. G. Douzas, F. Bacao, F. Last, Improving imbalanced learning through a heuristic oversampling method based on k-means and SMOTE, Inf. Sci. 465 (2018), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. Douzas, F. Bacao, Geometric SMOTE a geometrically enhanced drop-in replacement for SMOTE, Inf. Sci. 501 (2019), 118–135.

    Google Scholar 

  32. X.W. Liang, et al., LR-SMOTE — an improved unbalanced data set oversampling based on K-means and SVM, Knowl. Based Syst. 196 (2020), 105845.

    Google Scholar 

  33. G.E. Batista, R.C. Prati, M.C. Monard, A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data, ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 6 (2004), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  34. V. López, et al., An insight into classification with imbalanced data: empirical results and current trends on using data intrinsic characteristics, Inf. Sci. 250 (2013), 113–141.

    Google Scholar 

  35. G. Haixiang, et al., Learning from class-imbalanced data: review of methods and applications, Expert Syst. Appl. 73 (2017), 220–239.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Y. Freund, R.E. Schapire, Experiments with a new boosting algorithm, in International Conference on Machine Learning, Citeseer, Bari, Italy. 1996, p. 148–156.

  37. J.H. Friedman, Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine, Ann. Stat. 29 (2001), 1189–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. Lin, et al., Accurate prediction of potential druggable proteins based on genetic algorithm and Bagging-SVM ensemble classifier, Artif. Intell. Med. 98 (2019), 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  39. M. Hao, Y. Wang, S.H. Bryant, An efficient algorithm coupled with synthetic minority over-sampling technique to classify imbalanced PubChem BioAssay data, Anal. Chim. Acta. 806 (2014), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  40. V. Bolón-Canedo, A. Alonso-Betanzos, Ensembles for feature selection: a review and future trends, Inf. Fusion. 52 (2019), 1–12.

  41. D. Fuqua, T. Razzaghi, A cost-sensitive convolution neural network learning for control chart pattern recognition, Expert Syst. Appl. 150 (2020), 113275.

    Google Scholar 

  42. H. Li, et al., Cost-sensitive sequential three-way decision modeling using a deep neural network, Int. J. Approx. Reason. 85 (2017), 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ö.F. Arar, K. Ayan, Software defect prediction using cost-sensitive neural network, Appl. Soft Comput. 33 (2015), 263–277.

    Google Scholar 

  44. J. Park, I.W. Sandberg, Universal approximation using radialbasis-function networks, Neural Comput. 3 (1991), 246–257.

    Google Scholar 

  45. J.H. Holland, Genetic algorithms, Sci. Am. 267 (1992), 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  46. V. López, et al., Cost-sensitive linguistic fuzzy rule based classification systems under the MapReduce framework for imbalanced big data, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 258 (2015), 5–38.

    Google Scholar 

  47. C.L. Castro, A.P. Braga, Novel cost-sensitive approach to improve the multilayer perceptron performance on imbalanced data, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 24 (2013), 888–899.

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Hall, et al., The WEKA data mining software: an update, SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11 (2009), 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  49. D. Veganzones, E. Severin, An investigation of bankruptcy prediction in imbalanced datasets, Decis. Support Syst. 112 (2018), 111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Y. Feng, et al., Multi-strategy monarch butterfly optimization algorithm for discounted {0–1} knapsack problem, Neural Comput. Appl. 30 (2017), 3019–3036.

    Google Scholar 

  51. G.G. Wang, S. Deb, L.D.S. Coelho, Earthworm optimisation algorithm: a bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for global optimisation problems, Int. J. Bio-Inspired Comput. 12 (2015), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  52. G.G. Wang, et al., A new metaheuristic optimisation algorithm motivated by elephant herding behaviour, Int. J. Bio Inspired Comput. 8 (2017), 394–409.

    Google Scholar 

  53. G.G. Wang, Moth search algorithm: a bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization problems, Memet. Comput. 10 (2016), 151–164.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China

    Jia-Chao Wu, Jiang Shen & Fu-Sheng Liu

  2. Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China

    Man Xu

Authors
  1. Jia-Chao Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiang Shen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Man Xu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fu-Sheng Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Man Xu.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, JC., Shen, J., Xu, M. et al. An Evolutionary Self-organizing Cost-Sensitive Radial Basis Function Neural Network to Deal with Imbalanced Data in Medical Diagnosis. Int J Comput Intell Syst 13, 1608–1618 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.201012.005

Download citation

  • Received: 27 July 2020

  • Accepted: 28 September 2020

  • Published: 19 October 2020

  • Issue Date: January 2020

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.d.201012.005

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Key words

  • Imbalanced data
  • Medical diagnosis
  • Radial basis function neural network
  • Cost-sensitive
  • Genetic algorithm
  • Particle swarm optimization
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature