Do climate change adaptation practices improve technical efficiency of smallholder farmers? Evidence from Nepal

, , , & (2018) Do climate change adaptation practices improve technical efficiency of smallholder farmers? Evidence from Nepal. Climatic Change, 147(3 - 4), pp. 507-521.

View at publisher

Description

This paper provides one of the first empirical studies that examine the impact of climate change adaptation practices on technical efficiency (TE) among smallholder farmers in Nepal. An adaptation index is used to explore the impact of farmers’ adaptation on TE using the stochastic frontier analysis framework. Data for six districts of Nepal representing all three agro-ecological regions (terai, hill, and mountain) were collected from a focus group discussion, a stakeholder workshop and a household survey. The survey shows that about 91% of the farming households have adopted at least one practice to minimize the adverse impacts of climate change. Empirical results reveal that adaptation is an important factor explaining efficiency differentials among farming households. Those adopting a greater number of adaptation practices on a larger scale are, on average, found to be 13% more technically efficient than those adopting fewer practices on smaller scale. The empirical results also show that average TE is only 0.72, indicating that there are opportunities for farming households in Nepal to further improve productive efficiency, on average by 28%. Other important factors that explain variations in the productive efficiency across farming households include farmer’s education level, irrigation facilities, market access, and social capital such as farmer’s participations in relevant agricultural organizations and clubs. This study provides empirical evidence to policy makers that small scale adjustments made by farmers in response to climate change impacts are effective in improving farmers’ efficiency in agriculture production. This indicates a need for farmers’ involvement in climate change adaptation planning.

Impact and interest:

43 citations in Scopus
36 citations in Web of Science®
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 223769
Item Type: Contribution to Journal (Journal Article)
Refereed: Yes
ORCID iD:
Lee, Boonorcid.org/0000-0002-3594-0575
Hoang, Viet Nguorcid.org/0000-0002-9742-2378
Measurements or Duration: 15 pages
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-018-2168-4
ISSN: 0165-0009
Pure ID: 33348121
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > QUT Business School
Past > Institutes > Institute for Future Environments
Current > Schools > School of Economics & Finance
Copyright Owner: Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters
Copyright Statement: This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected]
Deposited On: 06 Nov 2021 18:06
Last Modified: 08 Feb 2025 17:32