An Impeditive Administrative Culture? The Legacy of Australia's First Auditor-General on the Australian Audit Office
Wanna, John & Ryan, Christine (2003) An Impeditive Administrative Culture? The Legacy of Australia's First Auditor-General on the Australian Audit Office. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 49(4), pp. 469-480.
|
Accepted Version
(PDF 81kB)
3604.pdf. |
Description
This historical study offers an historical narrative of the Australian Audit Office from its formation in 1901 until the end of the term of Australia's first Auditor-General in 1925. The Audit Office was created to assist the government in discharging and reporting on its accountability for the economical use of resources. The model under which the Office was created was one based on small government where a minimalist role for the Office was envisaged. Accordingly, the initial Audit Act dictated a detailed audit methodology. However, the expansion of Commonwealth activities due to the outbreak of the First World War, the realities of a decentralised Commonwealth administration and the more commercial activities of government created numerous problems for both the Office and government. The Auditor-General was unable, or unwilling, to adapt his audit methodologies to suit the changing circumstances of Australian public administration and the Audit Office increasingly fell into an audit backlog. Relations with the executive periodically became strained over these matters prompting intervention by subsequent governments. This early period is important historically as it provides a window through which to view the development of the public sector audit function and its contribution to an efficient public sector. In addition, the events of this period illustrate the importance of relations between the Audit Office and the government, and the role of the Auditor-General in contributing to an efficient public administration.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads:
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
ID Code: | 3604 |
---|---|
Item Type: | Contribution to Journal (Journal Article) |
Refereed: | Yes |
Measurements or Duration: | 12 pages |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1467-8497.2003.00309.x |
ISSN: | 0004-9522 |
Pure ID: | 34121839 |
Divisions: | Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > QUT Business School |
Copyright Owner: | Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters |
Copyright Statement: | This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] |
Deposited On: | 24 Feb 2006 00:00 |
Last Modified: | 08 Feb 2025 21:31 |
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page