Where do consumers draw the line? Factors informing perceptions and justifications of deviant consumer behaviour
Dootson, Paula, Johnston, Kim, Beatson, Amanda, & Lings, Ian (2016) Where do consumers draw the line? Factors informing perceptions and justifications of deviant consumer behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(7 - 8), pp. 750-776.
![]() |
Published Version
(PDF 2MB)
Dootson et al 2016.pdf. Administrators only | Request a copy from author |
|
|
Accepted Version (PDF 141kB) |
Description
Deviant consumer behaviour in the marketplace is an ongoing problem causing harm to the organisation, employees, and other consumers. To address this problem, this study explores consumer perceptions of right and wrong using the novel concept of a deviance threshold – the mental line in the sand dictating right and wrong. Using consumer-based interviews with a card-sort activity, findings supported and extended dimensions proposed to explain why some behaviours are perceived as more serious or unethical than others. Moreover, why specific neutralisation techniques are used and how they affect categorisations of behaviours within an individual’s deviance threshold is explained. This study offers alternative strategies tailored to challenging consumer justifications to curb deviance. Implications support abandoning the universal approach to deterrence.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads:
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
ID Code: | 91385 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item Type: | Contribution to Journal (Journal Article) | ||||||||
Refereed: | Yes | ||||||||
ORCID iD: |
|
||||||||
Measurements or Duration: | 27 pages | ||||||||
Keywords: | consumer behaviour, deterrence, deviance threshold, deviant behaviour, marketing, moral, neutralisation, qualitative, risk | ||||||||
DOI: | 10.1080/0267257X.2015.1131734 | ||||||||
ISSN: | 1472-1376 | ||||||||
Pure ID: | 33023454 | ||||||||
Divisions: | Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > QUT Business School Current > Schools > School of Advertising, Marketing & Public Relations |
||||||||
Copyright Owner: | Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters | ||||||||
Copyright Statement: | This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the document is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] | ||||||||
Deposited On: | 21 Jan 2016 22:56 | ||||||||
Last Modified: | 14 Feb 2025 23:09 |
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page