Clarify the "workflow integrations" section #319
Conversation
…t management (except for CircleCI), and expand the discussion of ticket-management features. Add appropriate links.
WalkthroughThe documentation update enhances the introduction page by providing a more comprehensive explanation of CodeRabbit's integration capabilities. It expands on the types of systems CodeRabbit integrates with, specifically detailing support for issue-management platforms and ticket creation during code reviews. The list of supported platforms now explicitly mentions Jira, Linear, GitHub, and GitLab, while CircleCI is removed. Additional references to relevant documentation sections are also included. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments. If you are seeing this consistently it is likely a permissions issue. Please check "Moderation" -> "Code review limits" under your organization settings.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🛑 Comments failed to post (2)
docs/overview/introduction.md (2)
66-66: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the cross-reference link target exists
Please ensure that the “Supported Git Platforms” page exists at
/platforms/and contains the expected header/content. Otherwise, this link will 404.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify presence of 'Supported Git Platforms' documentation fd -e md platforms.md . rg -n '^# Supported Git Platforms' .Length of output: 94
Ensure the “Supported Git Platforms” page has the expected header
The target file
docs/platforms/platforms.mdexists, but it’s missing the top-level heading# Supported Git Platforms. Without this exact header, the link at/platforms/may confuse readers or not surface correctly in navigation.Required fix:
- In
docs/platforms/platforms.md, add or update the first line to:# Supported Git Platforms🤖 Prompt for AI Agents (early access)
In docs/platforms/platforms.md at line 1, add or update the top-level heading to exactly "# Supported Git Platforms" to ensure the link in docs/overview/introduction.md line 66 points to a page with the expected header and avoids navigation or 404 issues.
68-75: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Improve clarity and structure of ticket-management integrations
This section introduces ticket-management integrations but is currently merged into the existing list without a dedicated heading, and the bullet labels (e.g., “GitHub”) may be ambiguous. Consider:
- Adding a subheading like
### Ticket Management Integrationsfor improved scannability.- Renaming
GitHub/GitLabtoGitHub Issues/GitLab Issuesto distinguish from Git platform support.- Ensuring the guides at
/guides/issue-creationand/guides/issue-chatexist (and adding trailing slashes for consistency).@@ ## Seamless workflow integration - For more information, see [Supported Git Platforms](/platforms/). - In addition, you can integrate CodeRabbit with issue-management platforms. This lets you ask CodeRabbit to create tickets during code reviews, or chat with CodeRabbit about your code from within issue comments. Compatible platforms include the following: - - GitHub - - GitLab - - Jira - - Linear - For more information, see [Issue Creation](/guides/issue-creation) and [Issue Chat](/guides/issue-chat). + For more information, see [Supported Git Platforms](/platforms/). + ### Ticket Management Integrations + In addition, CodeRabbit supports integrations with ticket-management platforms, enabling ticket creation and in-issue chat during code reviews. Compatible platforms include: + - GitHub Issues + - GitLab Issues + - Jira + - Linear + For detailed setup, see [Issue Creation](/guides/issue-creation/) and [Issue Chat](/guides/issue-chat/).
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify presence of issue-creation and issue-chat guides rg -n '^# Issue Creation' -g 'docs/**/*.md' rg -n '^# Issue Chat' -g 'docs/**/*.md'Length of output: 129
Let’s verify whether the “issue-creation” guide file actually exists and contains the expected heading.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # List any guides matching “issue-creation” find docs/guides -type f -iname "*issue-creation*.md" # If found, check for the “# Issue Creation” header rg -n '^# Issue Creation' -g 'docs/guides/*issue-creation*.md'Length of output: 150
To confirm the heading in
docs/guides/issue-creation.md, let’s inspect its first lines:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash head -n 20 docs/guides/issue-creation.mdLength of output: 814
Enhance ticket‐management integrations section for clarity
This change will make ticket workflows more discoverable and distinguish platform support from issue creation:
• Insert a dedicated subheading under “Seamless workflow integration”
• Rename each item to “GitHub Issues”/“GitLab Issues” for clarity
• Add trailing slashes to guide links for consistency
• Ensure the Issue Creation guide has a top‐level# Issue CreationheaderLocations to update:
docs/overview/introduction.md (around line 68):
@@ ## Seamless workflow integration - For more information, see [Supported Git Platforms](/platforms/). - In addition, you can integrate CodeRabbit with issue-management platforms. This lets you ask CodeRabbit to create tickets during code reviews, or chat with CodeRabbit about your code from within issue comments. Compatible platforms include the following: - - GitHub - - GitLab - - Jira - - Linear - For more information, see [Issue Creation](/guides/issue-creation) and [Issue Chat](/guides/issue-chat). + For more information, see [Supported Git Platforms](/platforms/). + ### Ticket Management Integrations + CodeRabbit also integrates with ticket platforms—create tickets or chat about your code in-place. Compatible platforms: + - GitHub Issues + - GitLab Issues + - Jira + - Linear + For detailed setup, see [Issue Creation](/guides/issue-creation/) and [Issue Chat](/guides/issue-chat/).docs/guides/issue-creation.md (after frontmatter):
# Issue Creation🤖 Prompt for AI Agents (early access)
In docs/overview/introduction.md around lines 68 to 75, add a subheading "### Ticket Management Integrations" above the list to improve section clarity. Rename the bullet points from "GitHub" and "GitLab" to "GitHub Issues" and "GitLab Issues" to clearly indicate issue tracking features. Also, update the guide links to include trailing slashes, changing "/guides/issue-creation" and "/guides/issue-chat" to "/guides/issue-creation/" and "/guides/issue-chat/" for consistency. In docs/guides/issue-creation.md, ensure the file starts with a top-level heading "# Issue Creation" immediately after any frontmatter to match the referenced guide title.
…laforms. (On the bot's advice.)
Deploying coderabbit-docs with
|
| Latest commit: |
b693607
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://3e6cb2a3.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://issues.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/overview/introduction.md (2)
68-70: Consistent hyphenation for “issue management”
The header and introductory sentence hyphenate “issue-management,” whereas the Git section does not hyphenate “Git platform.” To keep styling parallel, remove the hyphen:- ### Issue-management integration + ### Issue management integration - You can integrate CodeRabbit with issue-management platforms. + You can integrate CodeRabbit with issue management platforms.
76-76: Consider naming consistency across list items
Currently the list mixes “Issues”-suffixed entries with bare product names (“Jira,” “Linear”). For parallelism, you might optionally append “Issues” to those as well:- - Linear + - Linear Issues
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/overview/introduction.md(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/overview/introduction.md (3)
57-57: Renamed section header is clear and focused
Changing “Seamless workflow integration” to “Git platform integration” accurately scopes the content to Git-based systems. The title is concise and matches the link target below.
72-73: Good: Explicitly list GitHub Issues and GitLab Issues
Calling out “GitHub Issues” and “GitLab Issues” by name makes it crystal-clear which issue systems are supported.
66-66:✅ Verification successful
Verify the
/platforms/link target exists
Make sure that the “Supported Git Platforms” page is present at/platforms/so this link doesn’t 404.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for a Markdown file or index page named 'platforms' under docs/ fd 'platforms' -t f docsLength of output: 52
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # List all Markdown files in the docs/platforms directory to check for an index page fd -e md docs/platformsLength of output: 387
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Correctly list Markdown files in the docs/platforms directory fd . -e md docs/platformsLength of output: 229
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Show the YAML front matter of docs/platforms/platforms.md to verify if a custom slug/permalink is set sed -n '1,50p' docs/platforms/platforms.mdLength of output: 1478
Link target verified:
/platforms/page exists
- The file
docs/platforms/platforms.mdis present with the expected “Supported Git Platforms” content and no custom slug is set, so the default route/platforms/will resolve correctly.No changes required.
Expand this section with a summary of ticket-management integrations (and dropping mention of CircleCI, which isn't one). Add some cross-reference links to more docs about integrations.
Fixes #309.
Staged: https://issues.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev/#platform-integration-options