Skip to content

crypto/x509: ParseCRL allows the Invalidity Date of revoked certificates in the CRL to be UTC time #73442

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
onepeople158 opened this issue Apr 19, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
BugReport Issues describing a possible bug in the Go implementation. NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.

Comments

@onepeople158
Copy link

Go version

go version go1.24.2 linux/amd64

Output of go env in your module/workspace:

CRL Issuer: CN=My Root CA,OU=My Root CA,O=My Company,L=San Francisco,ST=California,C=US
This Update Time: 2025-01-01 08:00:00 +0800 CST
Next Update Time: 2025-12-01 08:00:00 +0800 CST
Signature Algorithm: SHA256-RSA
Number of Revoked Certificates: 2

Revoked Entry Details:
============================
Serial Number: 1c80022ef81f2405ee96a612dcb61fe0ac701e5e
Revocation Time: 2025-04-17 18:16:51 +0800 CST
  (No extensions)
----------------------------
Serial Number: 8cb8193ecce671ec00000000582c8a7a
Revocation Time: 2025-03-04 08:00:00 +0800 CST
  Extensions:
    2.5.29.21 (CRL Reason): Superseded
    2.5.29.24 (Invalidity Date): 2024-11-14 14:44:00 +0800 CST
----------------------------

What did you do?

Hello developer, I successfully parsed the revoked certificate information with the Invalidity Date as UTC time ("241114064400Z") in Go. However, according to RFC5280, it states:

The Invalidity Date must be in GeneralizedTime format.

Is this a problem?

What did you see happen?

I successfully parsed the revoked certificate information with the Invalidity Date as UTC time ("241114064400Z") in Go.

What did you expect to see?

Test Case:

Invalidity Date(utc).zip

@JunyangShao
Copy link
Contributor

@rolandshoemaker

@JunyangShao JunyangShao added the NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one. label Apr 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
BugReport Issues describing a possible bug in the Go implementation. NeedsInvestigation Someone must examine and confirm this is a valid issue and not a duplicate of an existing one.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants