Skip to content

ITReadOnlyTxnTest is flaky with multiplexed sessions #3132

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
olavloite opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3150
Closed

ITReadOnlyTxnTest is flaky with multiplexed sessions #3132

olavloite opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #3150
Assignees
Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner API. type: process A process-related concern. May include testing, release, or the like.

Comments

@olavloite
Copy link
Collaborator

Using a min-read-timestamp is not allowed with a multi-use read-only transaction. This is also checked by the ITReadOnlyTxnTest. However, the error that is returned when using multiplexed sessions can be different than the current expectation. The reason is that if the transaction is started before the multiplexed session has been created, the code flow uses a waiter. This waiter will return the error as a SpannerException, while the direct code flow will return an IllegalArgumentException. That causes the following flaky test failure in some cases (note that in a production situation the difference between the two errors are not really relevant, both indicate a programming error that needs to be fixed in code):

[ERROR] Tests run: 11, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 40.88 s <<< FAILURE! -- in com.google.cloud.spanner.it.ITReadOnlyTxnTest
[ERROR] com.google.cloud.spanner.it.ITReadOnlyTxnTest.multiMinReadTimestamp -- Time elapsed: 0.064 s <<< ERROR!
com.google.cloud.spanner.SpannerException: UNKNOWN: Bounded staleness mode MIN_READ_TIMESTAMP is not supported for multi-use read-only transactions. Create a single-use read or read-only transaction instead.
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.SpannerExceptionFactory.newSpannerExceptionPreformatted(SpannerExceptionFactory.java:291)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.SpannerExceptionFactory.newSpannerExceptionPreformatted(SpannerExceptionFactory.java:297)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.SpannerExceptionFactory.newSpannerException(SpannerExceptionFactory.java:61)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.SpannerExceptionFactory.newSpannerException(SpannerExceptionFactory.java:181)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.SpannerExceptionFactory.newSpannerException(SpannerExceptionFactory.java:110)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.SpannerExceptionFactory.asSpannerException(SpannerExceptionFactory.java:100)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.DelayedReadContext.getReadContext(DelayedReadContext.java:47)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.DelayedReadContext.lambda$executeQuery$6(DelayedReadContext.java:117)
	at com.google.common.base.Suppliers$NonSerializableMemoizingSupplier.get(Suppliers.java:186)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.ForwardingResultSet.next(ForwardingResultSet.java:59)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.it.ITReadOnlyTxnTest.multiMinReadTimestamp(ITReadOnlyTxnTest.java:316)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
	at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:54)
	at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
	at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
	at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:49)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.createRequestAndRun(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:120)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.executeLazy(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:105)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:77)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:69)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreProvider.invoke(JUnitCoreProvider.java:146)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Bounded staleness mode MIN_READ_TIMESTAMP is not supported for multi-use read-only transactions. Create a single-use read or read-only transaction instead.
	at com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkArgument(Preconditions.java:220)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.AbstractReadContext$MultiUseReadOnlyTransaction.(AbstractReadContext.java:331)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.AbstractReadContext$MultiUseReadOnlyTransaction$Builder.build(AbstractReadContext.java:305)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.SessionImpl.readOnlyTransaction(SessionImpl.java:374)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.DelayedMultiplexedSessionTransaction.lambda$readOnlyTransaction$5(DelayedMultiplexedSessionTransaction.java:119)
	at com.google.api.core.ApiFutures$ApiFunctionToGuavaFunction.apply(ApiFutures.java:396)
	at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractTransformFuture$TransformFuture.doTransform(AbstractTransformFuture.java:254)
	at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractTransformFuture$TransformFuture.doTransform(AbstractTransformFuture.java:244)
	at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractTransformFuture.run(AbstractTransformFuture.java:125)
	at com.google.common.util.concurrent.DirectExecutor.execute(DirectExecutor.java:31)
	at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractFuture.executeListener(AbstractFuture.java:1298)
	at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractFuture.complete(AbstractFuture.java:1059)
	at com.google.common.util.concurrent.AbstractFuture.set(AbstractFuture.java:784)
	at com.google.api.core.AbstractApiFuture$InternalSettableFuture.set(AbstractApiFuture.java:87)
	at com.google.api.core.AbstractApiFuture.set(AbstractApiFuture.java:70)
	at com.google.api.core.SettableApiFuture.set(SettableApiFuture.java:46)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.MultiplexedSessionDatabaseClient$1.onSessionReady(MultiplexedSessionDatabaseClient.java:215)
	at com.google.cloud.spanner.SessionClient$CreateMultiplexedSessionsRunnable.run(SessionClient.java:310)
	at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
	at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
	at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:750)
@olavloite olavloite added the type: process A process-related concern. May include testing, release, or the like. label May 29, 2024
@olavloite olavloite self-assigned this May 29, 2024
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner API. label May 29, 2024
olavloite added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 10, 2024
Propagate the underlying cause of the ExecutionException as
a RuntimeException directly, if this is already a RuntimeException.
This keeps the behavior of multiplexed sessions and regular
sessions equal, regardless whether the Delayed... route is
taken for multiplexed sessions, or the direct route is used.

Fixes #3132
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the googleapis/java-spanner API. type: process A process-related concern. May include testing, release, or the like.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant