Skip to content

fix(sdk): fixes type issues for ParallelFor. Fixes #9366 #10436

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Feb 8, 2024

Conversation

rickyxie0929
Copy link
Contributor

@rickyxie0929 rickyxie0929 commented Jan 26, 2024

Description of your changes:
Fix the compile errors when using dictionary type in ParallelFor.

Checklist:

Copy link
Member

@connor-mccarthy connor-mccarthy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @rickyxie0929!

Copy link
Member

@connor-mccarthy connor-mccarthy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, Ricky. Just nits. This LGTM.

@rickyxie0929
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@rickyxie0929
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@rickyxie0929
Copy link
Contributor Author

rickyxie0929 commented Feb 7, 2024

/retest

Copy link
Member

@connor-mccarthy connor-mccarthy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @rickyxie0929!

/lgtm
/approve

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot added the lgtm label Feb 7, 2024
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: connor-mccarthy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

google-oss-prow bot commented Feb 8, 2024

@rickyxie0929: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
kubeflow-pipelines-samples-v2 48d16fc link false /test kubeflow-pipelines-samples-v2
kfp-kubernetes-execution-tests b57f758 link false /test kfp-kubernetes-execution-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@connor-mccarthy
Copy link
Member

/retest

@google-oss-prow google-oss-prow bot merged commit fe04a5a into kubeflow:master Feb 8, 2024
roytman pushed a commit to roytman/pipelines that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2024
…eflow#10436)

* fix type issues

* fix type issue

* fix format

* fix failed test

* fix format

* delete comments

* resolve comments

* resolve comments

* resolve format

* resolve import

* move unnecessary file

* resolve compiler_test failures

* resolve comments

* remove unnecessary imports

* fix format sort

* fix nits

* add new compiled yaml file

* solve merge conflicts

* solve conflicts

* format

* sort

* resolve comments

* resolve comments

Signed-off-by: Alexey Roytman <[email protected]>
stijntratsaertit pushed a commit to stijntratsaertit/kfp that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2024
…eflow#10436)

* fix type issues

* fix type issue

* fix format

* fix failed test

* fix format

* delete comments

* resolve comments

* resolve comments

* resolve format

* resolve import

* move unnecessary file

* resolve compiler_test failures

* resolve comments

* remove unnecessary imports

* fix format sort

* fix nits

* add new compiled yaml file

* solve merge conflicts

* solve conflicts

* format

* sort

* resolve comments

* resolve comments
petethegreat pushed a commit to petethegreat/pipelines that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
…eflow#10436)

* fix type issues

* fix type issue

* fix format

* fix failed test

* fix format

* delete comments

* resolve comments

* resolve comments

* resolve format

* resolve import

* move unnecessary file

* resolve compiler_test failures

* resolve comments

* remove unnecessary imports

* fix format sort

* fix nits

* add new compiled yaml file

* solve merge conflicts

* solve conflicts

* format

* sort

* resolve comments

* resolve comments
petethegreat pushed a commit to petethegreat/pipelines that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2024
…eflow#10436)

* fix type issues

* fix type issue

* fix format

* fix failed test

* fix format

* delete comments

* resolve comments

* resolve comments

* resolve format

* resolve import

* move unnecessary file

* resolve compiler_test failures

* resolve comments

* remove unnecessary imports

* fix format sort

* fix nits

* add new compiled yaml file

* solve merge conflicts

* solve conflicts

* format

* sort

* resolve comments

* resolve comments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants