You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As with CP936, iterating over the PUA table and looking for matches in
it was a significant bottleneck for GB18030 decoding (though not as
severe a bottleneck as for CP936, since more is involved in GB18030
decoding than CP936 decoding).
Here are some benchmark results after optimizing out that bottleneck:
GB18030, medium - to UTF-16BE - faster by 60.71% (0.0007 vs 0.0017)
GB18030, medium - to UTF-8 - faster by 59.88% (0.0007 vs 0.0017)
GB18030, long - to UTF-8 - faster by 44.91% (0.0669 vs 0.1214)
GB18030, long - to UTF-16BE - faster by 43.05% (0.0672 vs 0.1181)
GB18030, short - to UTF-8 - faster by 27.22% (0.0003 vs 0.0004)
GB18030, short - to UTF-16BE - faster by 26.98% (0.0003 vs 0.0004)
(The 'short' test strings had 0-5 codepoints each, 'medium' ~100
codepoints, and 'long' ~10,000 codepoints. For each benchmark, the
test harness cycled through all the test strings 40,000 times.)
0 commit comments