Skip to content

Fix two typos in lint description #11638

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

samueltardieu
Copy link
Contributor

Fix #11636

changelog: none

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 7, 2023

r? @Manishearth

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 7, 2023
@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2023

📌 Commit bffba76 has been approved by Manishearth

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2023

⌛ Testing commit bffba76 with merge 33f49f3...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 7, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: Manishearth
Pushing 33f49f3 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 33f49f3 into rust-lang:master Oct 7, 2023
@samueltardieu samueltardieu deleted the into-iter branch November 29, 2023 22:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

into_iter_without_iter explanation typo: (&val).iter() vs (&val).into_iter()
5 participants