Metayage

Prior art includes information related to an invention that is in the public domain before the date of filing a patent application. This has an impact on the novelty and inventiveness of the invention, and hence impacts the chances of being successful in securing a patent grant. If you are a startup founder, participate in this poll by India Electronics and Semiconductor Association , and stay posted to get the results of the poll.

https://lnkd.in/gSaaXZcQ

Why Tech Startups Should Borrow Pharma’s Patent Strategy (India–US)- Tech founders build amazing things, but many forget to protect their ideas as strongly as pharma companies protect their drugs. Pharma has spent decades figuring out how to handle patents in two tough places—the US and India—and there’s a lot tech startups can learn from that. *Start Early and Use the Right Tools File provisional patents early, then use the PCT route to keep your options open for global filing for up to 30 months. Instead of filing just one patent, break your idea into multiple parts—core tech, improvements, applications—just like pharma does. *Match Your IP to Your Startup’s Growth Before raising major funding, make sure your core ideas are protected. As you grow, convert provisionals into full applications. Investors take IP seriously—strong patents can boost your valuation. *Don’t Skip Freedom-to-Operate Checks Pharma doesn't launch without checking if they might be infringing someone else’s patent. Tech startups should do the same, especially in the US. *Patents Can Earn Money Too Beyond protection, patents can lead to licensing deals, partnerships, and even higher acquisition offers. Most Pharma companies have mastered the India–US patent game. Tech founders can use the same approach to stay ahead, protect their work, and build long-term value. https://www.metayage.com/ [Pharma companies, Tech companies, Tech Founder, Pharma company founder, Intellectual Property, Patent]

We couldn’t agree more with Srinath Ravichandran, CEO of AgniKul Cosmos Private Limited, who recently shared valuable insights on the importance of safeguarding intellectual property (IP). As he rightly pointed out, startups often get caught up in the pace of building and scaling their ventures, leaving little time for IP-related work. However, investing time and effort in building and protecting IP not only secures innovation but also strengthens long-term competitiveness. AgniKul Cosmos, based out of Chennai, is pioneering space technology through the development of customisable small satellite launch vehicles, including the Agnibaan rocket — a remarkable example of indigenous innovation and cutting-edge engineering. We are proud of visionary companies like AgniKul Cosmos that are redefining India’s space landscape while valuing the power of intellectual property. [Intellectual Property, Innovation, Startup India, AgniKul Cosmos, IPProtection, SpaceTech]

Why top IP firms charge more—and why clients gladly pay it- It comes down to something larger firms often overlook: deep specialization in high-stakes work. We spoke with a client last week who was closing a major acquisition deal. They needed comprehensive IP due diligence across multiple jurisdictions. Their question wasn't about price. It was about whether we had handled similar deals before. Here's what we've noticed about specialized IP partnerships: They command premium rates in M&A transactions because they understand the nuances that generalist firms miss. A missed patent family or unclear ownership chain can derail a billion-dollar deal. They excel in regulatory compliance work where technical precision matters more than firm size. One properly crafted patent strategy saves clients far more than legal fees cost. They build trust through repeated success in specific domains. Clients return because expertise compounds over time. The big firms have scale and brand recognition. That's valuable. But specialized partnerships have something different. They have depth in areas where mistakes are expensive and expertise is rare. Your positioning determines your pricing power. When you solve high-value problems that few others can handle well, rate discussions shift entirely. Clients stop comparing hourly fees and start evaluating the cost of getting it wrong. The opportunity exists for IP partnerships willing to own their specialization rather than compete on breadth. What's your take? Does specialization create more value than scale in complex IP matters? https://www.metayage.com/ [IP firms, Intellectual Property firm, IP attorney, IP agent, Top IP firms, IP Due diligence]

Who gets the patent—your client or their algorithm? This question is causing serious headaches in patent offices worldwide. AI systems are now generating novel inventions. They're designing new drugs. They're creating innovative materials. They're solving complex engineering problems. And patent law has no clear answer for who invented what. Traditional patent law assumes a human inventor. It requires a natural person to be named. It's built on centuries of human creativity being the source of innovation. AI flips this on its head. When an algorithm generates a patentable invention with minimal human input, the legal framework starts to crack. Courts are grappling with inventorship questions. Patent offices are rejecting applications listing AI as inventors. Companies are scrambling to document human involvement. The uncertainty goes deeper than just naming inventors. How do you prove inventive step when AI can generate thousands of solutions in seconds? How do you establish prior art when AI models are trained on massive datasets? How do you define the scope of claims for inventions humans might struggle to fully explain? These aren't theoretical problems anymore. They're happening right now in patent prosecution. They're affecting valuation decisions. They're creating gaps in IP protection strategies. The legal profession needs to catch up fast. Patent attorneys must understand how AI generates inventions. They need strategies for documenting human contributions. They need frameworks for explaining AI involvement to examiners. The companies that figure this out early will have a massive advantage. Are you preparing for this shift in your patent strategy? https://www.metayage.com/ [Patent laws, New age intellectual property, AI Invention, AI Inventor, USPTO, IPO, WIPO]

India's IP reforms are opening new doors—are you ready? The country is quietly reshaping its patent landscape. Recent amendments signal something interesting. India is moving closer to international IP standards while keeping its unique economic priorities intact. This matters for anyone managing a global patent portfolio. Prosecution strategies that worked five years ago might need a refresh. The gap between US prosecution and Indian prosecution is narrowing. We're seeing harmonization in action. Patent examiners in India are aligning more closely with practices familiar to those filing in the US and Europe. The examination process is becoming more predictable. The timelines are getting clearer. For global companies, this creates opportunities. Filing strategies can become more streamlined. Prosecution arguments that succeed in one jurisdiction may translate better across borders. Budget allocation gets easier when systems speak the same language. But here's the key insight. This isn't about India simply copying Western standards. The reforms balance global integration with local needs. Understanding that balance is where the real strategic advantage lies. Companies that track these developments now will be positioned ahead of competitors. They'll optimize their filing decisions. They'll craft prosecution strategies that work across multiple jurisdictions. They'll save time and resources. The patent landscape is becoming more integrated. Those who adapt their strategies accordingly will see the benefits in their portfolios. Are you monitoring how these changes affect your international filings? [IPO, Indian Patent Office, USPTO, patent law, patents, WIPO, inventor, startups, Indian patent]

Could a simple certificate boost inventor loyalty and ROI? India might have cracked the code with something most patent systems overlook entirely. When you file a patent in India, inventors can receive a Certificate of Inventorship. This is a formal government document that officially recognizes their contribution. Most jurisdictions list inventors on patent documents. India goes further by issuing a dedicated certificate. It sounds small. The impact can be significant. Universities and research institutions struggle with inventor motivation constantly. Researchers pour years into developing innovations. They often feel disconnected from the commercialization process. Patents get filed under institutional ownership. Inventors become names on a document. The Certificate of Inventorship changes this dynamic. It provides tangible recognition that inventors can frame and display. It validates their creative contribution in a way that matters. Academia thrives on recognition and credibility. This certificate delivers both. Research-intensive organizations are taking notice. Some are strategically choosing to file in India partly for this benefit. The morale boost translates into continued innovation. Inventors feel valued. They stay engaged with the patent process. They contribute more willingly to future projects. The return extends beyond the individual patent. It builds a culture where innovation is celebrated and recognized formally. For organizations managing global patent portfolios, this creates an interesting strategic consideration. Where you file matters for protection and enforcement. It might also matter for the people driving your innovation pipeline. Are you leveraging recognition as part of your IP strategy? https://www.metayage.com/ [inventor, inventor recognition, Indian Patent office, Certificate of Inventorship, Innovation by researchers, Invention by faculty, Invention by student, Invention by an individual, patents]

For US and Indian startups that are in the process of raising capital - Here is a power packed session for you. I'm looking forward to sharing the platform with Pradeep Yuvaraj and Rajnish Pal at this Zoom session by Sarthy Venture Investment Partners representing Metayage see below for the registration links and a FREE PASS this Friday night 9 pm IST and 8:30 AM PST. Thank you Girish Batra for this opportunity.