微服务架构是一种将单一应用程序开发为一套小的服务的方法

微服务架构是一种将单一应用程序开发为一套小的服务的方法，每个服务运行在其独立的进程中，并通常拥有自己的技术栈，包括数据库和消息队列系统。这种架构风格与传统的单体应用相比，具有以下优势：

1. 灵活性与可扩展性：微服务架构允许各个组件独立部署、扩展和维护。当某个服务需要更多的资源时，可以单独扩展该服务，而不影响其他服务。

2. 技术多样性：在微服务架构中，不同的服务可以使用不同的编程语言和技术栈实现。这为开发团队提供了更大的灵活性，可以根据服务的特定需求选择最合适的技术。

3. 持续交付与部署：微服务架构支持持续集成和持续部署（CI/CD），使得新功能和服务可以快速迭代和部署。每个服务都可以独立发布，减少了整体系统的复杂性。

4. 容错性：由于每个服务都是独立运行的，一个服务的失败不会影响到整个系统。这提高了系统的可用性和容错能力。

5. 组织与团队协作：微服务架构促进了小型、跨职能团队的形成，每个团队负责一个或多个服务的开发和维护。这种结构有助于提高团队的自主性和效率。

6. 敏捷响应市场变化：微服务架构使得企业能够更快地适应市场变化和技术演进，因为可以迅速调整或替换特定的服务。

《The Biggest Loser Next Contestant》是一个关于减肥和健康生活方式的电视节目，它通过竞赛的形式帮助参与者实现体重减轻和身体改善的目标。这个节目通常包括一系列的体能训练、营养指导以及心理辅导，旨在帮助参赛者在规定的时间内达到最大的减重效果。

节目中的参赛者来自各行各业，他们因为超重或肥胖而面临健康问题。通过参与节目，他们不仅有机会赢得奖金，更重要的是能够获得专业的指导和支持，学习如何建立健康的生活习惯，这对他们的长期健康至关重要。

节目通常会设置一些挑战和任务，比如团队比赛、个人挑战等，这些活动旨在激励参赛者不断努力，同时也增加了节目的观赏性。此外，节目还会邀请医生、营养师和健身教练等专业人士为参赛者提供科学的建议和指导。

If the tech community were to host their own version of the popular TV show The Biggest Loser (or maybe Celebrity Fit Club) you would see enterprise Java front and center—bloated, overweight, tired, and drained.

The future of enterprise Java is becoming clear. The morbidly obese legacy platforms are in decline, with leaner solutions increasingly used in production as well as in development. Legacy technologies such as EJB are becoming less and less relevant.The lukewarm takeup of Java EE 5 leaves it looking increasingly like the last gasp of traditional J2EE bloatware. Meanwhile, the Java EE 6 specification is finally set to allow for greater modularity, in a radical change which will have important implications for developers and is likely to rejuvenate competition among implementations. As the standards and the products based upon them have gathered pound after pound of cellulite, SOA, Web 2.0 and other infrastructural changes continually impose new requirements that were not foreseen when J2EE was conceived a decade ago, as a chubby but cute baby.

So much for the past. What does the future hold?

I think the big picture is one of an exciting period of change. Analysts at Gartner Group agree, writing in the report Trends in Platform Middleware that

The popular Java Platform, Enterprise Edition (Java EE) and .NET platform middleware technologies are increasingly inadequate to cover needs for extensive scalability and performance, event-based programming styles, advanced service-oriented architecture (SOA) and dynamic application developments.

Here are my predictions:

We will once more see real competition in the application server space, rather than a continued monopoly of a decreasing number of large vendors. Through version 5, Java EE did not serve the needs of the developers and their organizations so much as the needs of vendors who were protected from competition by the many cumbersome and irrelevant legacy APIs that needed to be implemented by any new entrant. With Java EE 6 needing to embrace modularity to remain relevant, renewed competition is likely.
Tomorrow’s application server will have a dramatically smaller footprint than the Jabba the Hut of today. The patients must lose hundreds of pounds or perish. Consider another analyst comment:


    Consider the trend (over the past year or two) by Web CMS vendors toward embedding, bundling, or otherwise targeting Tomcat as a runtime framework instead of, say, JBoss. If all you need is a servlet engine and web server, why bring along EJB runtimes, a JMX framework, JAAS/JACC, and all the other scaffolding that comes with a full-blown J2EE appserver? 


The application server of tomorrow will not merely implement JCP specifications. With the rise of OSGi on the server side and the emergence of SCA, the JCP is no longer the sole source of specifications relevant to enterprise Java. The ubiquity of open source and the emergence of open source de facto standards introduces another element in the mix. A small number of open source projects are now more relevant to the majority of enterprise Java applications than the majority of the specifications that make up Java EE. This must ultimately begin to affect the characteristics of application servers.
The market will need to address the gap between Tomcat and WebLogic/WebSphere. Currently an important part of the market is neglected. The majority of Java web applications are most at home on Tomcat. A minority actually want some of the more esoteric functionality of a full-blown application server, such as JCA, or specialized capabilities such as distributed transaction management. But a larger minority need some of the operational and management features of those products, but are not interested in the esoteric APIs and the bloat they bring along with them. As more and more end user companies look to phase out legacy application servers in favor of better suited technologies, there will inevitably be a response to market demand, with products that hit the sweet spot and bridge this gap.
The gap between application servers and ESBs will be bridged. This is a logical consequence of the rise of POJO middleware. The same underlying platform should be able to address web and SOA requirements. Spring already provides a consistent component model across different deployment scenarios (something that Gartner have also repeatedly mentioned); a similar consistency of the rest of the platform is overdue, and likely to develop quickly as the dead hand of legacy J2EE ceases to hold back progress.

In my next blog on this topic, I’ll look at some of the technologies likely to play a role in tomorrow’s lean and powerful platform infrastructure.

comments powered by Disqus

企业Java的未来变得越来越清晰，主要得益于以下几个方面的发展：

1. 微服务架构：随着业务需求的复杂化和系统规模的扩大，传统的单体应用逐渐暴露出其局限性。微服务架构通过将大型应用拆分成多个小型、独立的服务，每个服务都可以独立开发、部署和扩展。这种架构模式提高了系统的灵活性、可维护性和可扩展性。

2. 云原生技术：云计算的普及推动了云原生技术的发展。云原生技术包括容器化（如Docker）、编排工具（如Kubernetes）等，它们使得应用程序可以更加高效地在云环境中运行和管理。Java也积极拥抱这些技术，提供了相应的支持和工具。

3. 响应式编程：响应式编程是一种非阻塞式的编程模型，它允许程序在等待I/O操作完成时继续执行其他任务。Java通过引入Project Reactor等响应式库，为开发者提供了编写高性能、可伸缩的并发应用程序的能力。

4. GraalVM和Substrate VM：GraalVM是一个高性能的多语言虚拟机，它支持多种编程语言，包括Java。Substrate VM是GraalVM的一部分，它可以将Java代码提前编译成机器码，从而提高应用程序的启动速度和性能。

5. Java新版本的特性：Java不断推出新版本，每个版本都带来了新的特性和改进。例如，Java 17引入了密封类（Sealed Classes），增强了模块系统的安全性；Java 18则计划提供更多的性能优化和新特性。

6. 社区和生态系统的支持：Java拥有一个庞大且活跃的社区，这意味着有大量的开源项目、库和框架可供使用。这些资源不仅加速了开发过程，还促进了知识共享和技术传播。

7. 安全性和稳定性：Java长期以来以其安全性和稳定性著称，这对于企业级应用来说至关重要。随着技术的不断发展，Java也在持续增强其安全特性，以应对日益复杂的网络安全威胁。

如果技术社区主办自己的流​​行电视节目《最大的失败者》（或也许是Celebrity Fit Club）的发布，您会看到企业Java处于领先地位和中心地位–肿胀，超重，疲惫和疲惫。

企业Java的未来变得越来越清晰。病态肥胖的旧平台正在下降，精益解决方案越来越多地用于生产和开发中。诸如EJB之类的传统技术变得越来越不相关。对Java EE 5的冷淡使用使它看起来越来越像传统J2EE膨胀软件的最后一口气。同时，最终将Java EE 6规范设置为允许更大的模块化，这是一个根本性的变化，它将对开发人员产生重要影响，并可能使实现之间的竞争恢复活力。随着脂肪的标准和基于它们的产品的堆积如潮，SOA，Web 2.0和其他基础设施的变化不断地提出了新的要求，这是十年前胖胖但可爱的婴儿所无法想象的。