活动介绍

/home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:40:10: fatal error: asm/apic.h: No such file or directory 40 | #include <asm/apic.h> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ compilation terminated.

时间: 2025-09-15 20:35:51 AIGC 浏览: 14
<think> 我们遇到了一个编译错误:`fatal error: asm/apic.h: No such file or directory`。这个错误发生在编译`pcie_udrv.c`文件时,特别是在我们尝试包含`<asm/apic.h>`头文件的时候。这个头文件是Linux内核中与APIC(高级可编程中断控制器)相关的,通常位于内核源码的`arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h`路径下。出现这个错误的原因可能是: 1. 内核源码路径没有正确配置,导致编译器找不到头文件。 2. 当前内核版本不支持或没有提供这个头文件(可能在较旧或非x86架构的内核中)。 3. 编译环境的内核头文件没有安装完整。 ### 解决方案 #### 1. 确认内核头文件路径 首先,确保你的编译环境已经安装了与当前运行内核版本匹配的内核头文件。在基于Debian的系统上,可以使用: ```bash sudo apt install linux-headers-$(uname -r) ``` 在基于RHEL的系统上: ```bash sudo yum install kernel-devel-$(uname -r) ``` #### 2. 检查头文件是否存在 确认`asm/apic.h`文件确实存在于系统中。使用以下命令查找: ```bash find /usr/src -name apic.h ``` 通常情况下,它应该位于类似`/usr/src/linux-headers-$(uname -r)/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h`的路径。 #### 3. 调整Makefile中的包含路径 在编译内核模块的Makefile中,需要指定内核头文件的路径。确保你的Makefile中包含类似以下的设置: ```makefile KERNELDIR ?= /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build ``` 然后在编译标志中添加: ```makefile EXTRA_CFLAGS += -I$(KERNELDIR)/arch/x86/include ``` #### 4. 使用条件编译(如果必要) 如果问题是由于不同内核版本的差异导致的,可以考虑使用条件编译来包含不同的头文件。例如: ```c #include <linux/version.h> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(4,2,0) #include <asm/apic.h> #else #include <asm/processor.h> #endif ``` #### 5. 替代方案:避免直接使用`<asm/apic.h>` 如果上述方法都不能解决问题,或者你不需要直接使用该头文件中的定义,可以考虑替换代码中依赖`<asm/apic.h>`的部分。例如,获取APIC ID的函数可以通过其他方式实现: 在之前的解决方案中,我们使用了: ```c phys_apicid = per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu); ``` 这个函数实际上定义在`<asm/smp.h>`中(而不是`<asm/apic.h>`)。你可以尝试包含`<asm/smp.h>`代替: ```c #include <asm/smp.h> ``` ### 修改后的代码示例 假设我们在`udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity`函数中需要获取APIC ID,我们可以这样修改头文件包含: ```c // 替换原有的#include <asm/apic.h> #include <asm/smp.h> // 提供per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu) // 同时确保包含其他必要的头文件 #include <linux/irq.h> #include <linux/pci.h> #include <linux/cpumask.h> #include <asm/processor.h> ``` ### 验证方法 重新编译模块,观察错误是否消失。如果仍然出现头文件缺失,请按照上述步骤检查头文件路径和安装情况。 ### 相关问题 1. 如何确认当前系统安装的内核头文件版本? 2. 在内核模块开发中,如何处理不同内核版本之间的头文件差异? 3. 当内核头文件缺失时,有哪些常用的调试方法? 4. 如何为自定义内核编译模块并指定内核源码路径? 5. 在非x86架构(如ARM)上编译PCIe驱动需要注意什么? </think> ### 解决编译错误 `fatal error: asm/apic.h: No such file or directory` #### 问题分析 这个编译错误表明您的内核构建环境缺少特定于架构的头文件。`asm/apic.h` 是 x86 架构特有的头文件,位于 Linux 内核源码树的 `arch/x86/include/asm` 目录中。常见原因包括: 1. **内核头文件未正确安装** 2. **非 x86 架构编译**(如 ARM 平台) 3. **内核配置未启用 APIC 支持** 4. **编译路径配置错误** #### 逐步解决方案 ##### 1. 验证内核架构支持 运行命令确认当前架构: ```bash uname -m ``` - 若输出 `x86_64` 或 `i686`,继续下一步 - 若输出 `aarch64` 或 `armv7l`,说明是 ARM 架构,需采用替代方法(见步骤 4) ##### 2. 安装内核头文件(x86 架构) ```bash # Debian/Ubuntu sudo apt install linux-headers-$(uname -r) # RHEL/CentOS sudo yum install kernel-devel-$(uname -r) ``` 验证安装路径: ```bash ls /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h ``` ##### 3. 修改代码兼容性(推荐) 在 `pcie_udrv.c` 中替换: ```c // #include <asm/apic.h> // 注释掉有问题的包含 static int udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data, ...) { // 替代原始APIC ID获取方式 unsigned int apicid = cpumask_first(mask); #if defined(CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC) unsigned int phys_apicid = apic->cpu_present_to_apicid(apicid); #else unsigned int phys_apicid = apicid; // ARM等架构直接使用逻辑ID #endif ... } ``` ##### 4. ARM 架构替代方案 对于 ARM/ARM64 平台: ```c #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h> // ARM架构中断控制器 static int udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(...) { struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_data->irq); int ret = irq_set_affinity(irq_data->irq, mask); if (ret == 0) { // ARM使用GIC中断控制器 gic_set_affinity(d, mask); } return ret; } ``` ##### 5. Makefile 配置检查 确保 Makefile 包含内核构建路径: ```makefile KERNEL_SRC ?= /lib/modules/$(shell uname -r)/build EXTRA_CFLAGS += -I$(KERNEL_SRC)/arch/x86/include # x86专用 ``` ##### 6. 内核配置验证 检查内核 APIC 支持: ```bash grep CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC /boot/config-$(uname -r) # 应输出:CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y ``` #### 验证步骤 1. 清理构建缓存: ```bash make clean ``` 2. 重新编译: ```bash make -j$(nproc) ``` 3. 检查模块加载: ```bash insmod pcie_udrv.ko && dmesg | grep pcie ``` #### 关键注意事项 1. **跨平台兼容性** 使用内核标准 API: ```c irq_set_affinity_hint(irq_data->irq, mask); ``` [^1] 2. **内核版本适配** - ≥ 5.11 内核:使用 `irq_set_affinity_and_hint()` - ≤ 4.2 内核:使用 `__irq_set_affinity()` 3. **日志调试** 添加调试信息: ```c pr_info("Setting affinity: IRQ=%d, CPU=%d\n", irq_data->irq, cpumask_first(mask)); ``` #### 替代头文件方案 若仍需 APIC 功能但缺少头文件: ```c #ifdef CONFIG_X86 #include <asm/apic.h> #else #define apic_id_mask (0xFF << 24) // ARM架构模拟定义 #endif ```
阅读全文

相关推荐

/home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c: In function 'udrv_pcie_compose_msi_msg': /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:131:9: error: unused variable 'apic_id' [-Werror=unused-variable] 131 | u32 apic_id = cpu_physical_id(smp_processor_id()); | ^~~~~~~ /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c: At top level: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:141:12: error: static declaration of 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity' follows non-static declaration 141 | static int udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:34: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.h:150:5: note: previous declaration of 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity' with type 'int(struct irq_data *, const struct cpumask *, bool)' {aka 'int(struct irq_data *, const struct cpumask *, _Bool)'} 150 | int udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c: In function 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity': /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:143:62: error: 'data' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean '_data'? 143 | struct udrv_pcie_host *pcie = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); | ^~~~ | _data /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:143:62: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:154:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] 154 | } | ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

/home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c: In function 'pcie_optimize_numa_affinity': /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c:546:35: error: 'struct udrv_pcie_host' has no member named 'pdev'; did you mean 'dev'? 546 | int node = dev_to_node(&host->pdev->dev); | ^~~~ | dev /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c: At top level: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c:553:13: error: static declaration of 'udrv_pcie_init_affinity' follows non-static declaration 553 | static void udrv_pcie_init_affinity(struct udrv_pcie_host *host) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c:10: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.h:28:6: note: previous declaration of 'udrv_pcie_init_affinity' with type 'void(struct udrv_pcie_host *)' 28 | void udrv_pcie_init_affinity(struct udrv_pcie_host *host); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c: In function 'udrv_pcie_init_affinity': /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c:556:60: error: 'struct udrv_pcie_host_msi_info' has no member named 'virq'; did you mean 'irq'? 556 | struct irq_data *irq_data = irq_get_irq_data(host->msi.virq); | ^~~~ | irq /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c: At top level: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c:553:13: error: 'udrv_pcie_init_affinity' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] 553 | static void udrv_pcie_init_affinity(struct udrv_pcie_host *host) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[3]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/scripts/Makefile.build:286: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:124:12: error: static declaration of 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity' follows non-static declaration 124 | static int udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:34: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.h:150:12: note: previous declaration of 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity' with type 'int(struct irq_data *, const struct cpumask *, bool)' {aka 'int(struct irq_data *, const struct cpumask *, _Bool)'} 150 | extern int udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c: In function 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity': /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:132:5: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement] 132 | u64 new_addr = pcie->msi.msi_addr; | ^~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[3]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/scripts/Makefile.build:286: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/Makefile:1848: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie] Error 2 make[1]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/Makefile:194: __sub-make] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/g60098972/master/open_source/output' build ko! aarch64-openeuler-linux-strip: '*.ko': No such file make: *** [Makefile:43: ko] Error 1修改后仍然报错,请继续分析

/home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:141:12: error: static declaration of 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity' follows non-static declaration 141 | static int udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:34: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.h:150:5: note: previous declaration of 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity' with type 'int(struct irq_data *, const struct cpumask *, bool)' {aka 'int(struct irq_data *, const struct cpumask *, _Bool)'} 150 | int udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c: In function 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity': /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:157:16: error: 'data' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean '_data'? 157 | msg.data = data->hwirq; | ^~~~ | _data /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:157:16: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:169:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type] 169 | } | ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[3]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/scripts/Makefile.build:286: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[2]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/Makefile:1848: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie] Error 2 make[1]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/Makefile:194: __sub-make] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/g60098972/master/open_source/output' build ko! aarch64-openeuler-linux-strip: '*.ko': No such file make: *** [Makefile:43: ko] Error 1

/home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c: In function 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity': /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:123:62: error: 'data' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean '_data'? 123 | struct udrv_pcie_host *pcie = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); | ^~~~ | _data /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:123:62: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in make[3]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/scripts/Makefile.build:286: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c: In function 'pcie_optimize_numa_affinity': /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c:549:12: error: returning 'const struct cpumask *' from a function with return type 'int' makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion] 549 | return cpumask_of_node(node); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c: In function 'udrv_pcie_init_affinity': /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c:555:34: error: invalid initializer 555 | cpumask_var_t optimal_mask = pcie_optimize_numa_affinity(host); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c:556:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity'; did you mean 'udrv_pcie_init_affinity'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 556 | udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(host->msi.irq_domain->irq_data, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | udrv_pcie_init_affinity /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c:556:52: error: 'struct irq_domain' has no member named 'irq_data' 556 | udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(host->msi.irq_domain->irq_data, | ^~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[3]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/scripts/Makefile.build:286: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/Makefile:1848: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie] Error 2 make[1]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/Makefile:194: __sub-make] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/g60098972/master/open_source/output' build ko! aarch64-openeuler-linux-strip: '*.ko': No such file make: *** [Makefile:43: ko] Error 1

/home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c: In function 'udrv_pcie_init_affinity': /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c:560:52: error: 'struct irq_domain' has no member named 'irq_data' 560 | udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(host->msi.irq_domain->irq_data, | ^~ /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.c:559:22: error: unused variable 'irq_data' [-Werror=unused-variable] 559 | struct irq_data *irq_data = irq_domain_get_irq_data(host->msi.irq_domain, host->msi.irq); | ^~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors make[3]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/scripts/Makefile.build:286: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_dfx_sbuf_api.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:124:12: error: static declaration of 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity' follows non-static declaration 124 | static int udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:34: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.h:150:12: note: previous declaration of 'udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity' with type 'int(struct irq_data *, const struct cpumask *, bool)' {aka 'int(struct irq_data *, const struct cpumask *, _Bool)'} 150 | extern int udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data, const struct cpumask *mask, bool force); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ make[3]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/scripts/Makefile.build:286: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/Makefile:1848: /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie] Error 2 make[1]: *** [/home/g60098972/master/open_source/linux5.10/Makefile:194: __sub-make] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/g60098972/master/open_source/output' build ko! aarch64-openeuler-linux-strip: '*.ko': No such file make: *** [Makefile:43: ko] Error 1这是修改后的报错,请帮我继续分析

/home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:123:55: error: 'data' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean '_data'? 123 | struct pci_dev *pdev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); | ^~~~ | _data /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:123:55: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:124:29: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_desc_get_msi_desc'; did you mean 'irq_data_get_msi_desc'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 124 | struct msi_desc *desc = irq_desc_get_msi_desc(data->irq_desc); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | irq_data_get_msi_desc /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:133:5: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement] 133 | union { | ^~~~~ /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:141:28: error: 'cpu_apicid' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'cpu_init'? 141 | msi_msg.address_lo |= (cpu_apicid[cpu] << 12); // 设置新APIC ID | ^~~~~~~~~~ | cpu_init /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:152:5: error: 'pci_dev' undeclared (first use in this function) 152 | pci_dev->msix_entries[data->hwirq].affinity = *mask; | ^~~~~~~ /home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/pcie_udrv.c:123:21: error: unused variable 'pdev' [-Werror=unused-variable] 123 | struct pci_dev *pdev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); 我按照你的修改之后,编译报错

#include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include "internals.h" /* * Access rules: * * procfs protects read/write of /proc/irq/N/ files against a * concurrent free of the interrupt descriptor. remove_proc_entry() * immediately prevents new read/writes to happen and waits for * already running read/write functions to complete. * * We remove the proc entries first and then delete the interrupt * descriptor from the radix tree and free it. So it is guaranteed * that irq_to_desc(N) is valid as long as the read/writes are * permitted by procfs. * * The read from /proc/interrupts is a different problem because there * is no protection. So the lookup and the access to irqdesc * information must be protected by sparse_irq_lock. */ static struct proc_dir_entry *root_irq_dir; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP enum { AFFINITY, AFFINITY_LIST, EFFECTIVE, EFFECTIVE_LIST, }; static int show_irq_affinity(int type, struct seq_file *m) { struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc((long)m->private); const struct cpumask *mask; switch (type) { case AFFINITY: case AFFINITY_LIST: mask = desc->irq_common_data.affinity; #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ if (irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(&desc->irq_data)) mask = desc->pending_mask; #endif break; case EFFECTIVE: case EFFECTIVE_LIST: #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK mask = irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(&desc->irq_data); break; #endif default: return -EINVAL; } switch (type) { case AFFINITY_LIST: case EFFECTIVE_LIST: seq_printf(m, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(mask)); break; case AFFINITY: case EFFECTIVE: seq_printf(m, "%*pb\n", cpumask_pr_args(mask)); break; } return 0; } static int irq_affinity_hint_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc((long)m->private); unsigned long flags; cpumask_var_t mask; if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL)) return -ENOMEM; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags); if (desc->affinity_hint) cpumask_copy(mask, desc->affinity_hint); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); seq_printf(m, "%*pb\n", cpumask_pr_args(mask)); free_cpumask_var(mask); return 0; } int no_irq_affinity; static int irq_affinity_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { return show_irq_affinity(AFFINITY, m); } static int irq_affinity_list_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { return show_irq_affinity(AFFINITY_LIST, m); } #ifndef CONFIG_AUTO_IRQ_AFFINITY static inline int irq_select_affinity_usr(unsigned int irq) { /* * If the interrupt is started up already then this fails. The * interrupt is assigned to an online CPU already. There is no * point to move it around randomly. Tell user space that the * selected mask is bogus. * * If not then any change to the affinity is pointless because the * startup code invokes irq_setup_affinity() which will select * a online CPU anyway. */ return -EINVAL; } #else /* ALPHA magic affinity auto selector. Keep it for historical reasons. */ static inline int irq_select_affinity_usr(unsigned int irq) { return irq_select_affinity(irq); } #endif static ssize_t write_irq_affinity(int type, struct file *file, const char __user *buffer, size_t count, loff_t *pos) { unsigned int irq = (int)(long)PDE_DATA(file_inode(file)); cpumask_var_t new_value; int err; if (!irq_can_set_affinity_usr(irq) || no_irq_affinity) { struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); // 获取中断描述符 // 添加详细打印 printk(KERN_ERR "IRQ %d affinity set failed:\n", irq); printk(KERN_ERR " desc=%px\n", desc); if (desc) { printk(KERN_ERR " status=0x%lx\n", desc->status_use_accessors); printk(KERN_ERR " chip=%s\n", desc->irq_data.chip ? desc->irq_data.chip->name : "NULL"); printk(KERN_ERR " set_affinity=%px\n", desc->irq_data.chip ? desc->irq_data.chip->irq_set_affinity : NULL); } } printk("%d can't set affinity_usr\n", irq); return -EIO; if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&new_value, GFP_KERNEL)) return -ENOMEM; if (type) err = cpumask_parselist_user(buffer, count, new_value); else err = cpumask_parse_user(buffer, count, new_value); if (err) goto free_cpumask; /* * Do not allow disabling IRQs completely - it's a too easy * way to make the system unusable accidentally :-) At least * one online CPU still has to be targeted. */ if (!cpumask_intersects(new_value, cpu_online_mask)) { /* * Special case for empty set - allow the architecture code * to set default SMP affinity. */ err = irq_select_affinity_usr(irq) ? -EINVAL : count; } else { err = irq_set_affinity(irq, new_value); if (!err) err = count; } free_cpumask: free_cpumask_var(new_value); return err; } static ssize_t irq_affinity_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer, size_t count, loff_t *pos) { return write_irq_affinity(0, file, buffer, count, pos); } static ssize_t irq_affinity_list_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer, size_t count, loff_t *pos) { return write_irq_affinity(1, file, buffer, count, pos); } static int irq_affinity_proc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) { return single_open(file, irq_affinity_proc_show, PDE_DATA(inode)); } static int irq_affinity_list_proc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) { return single_open(file, irq_affinity_list_proc_show, PDE_DATA(inode)); } static const struct proc_ops irq_affinity_proc_ops = { .proc_open = irq_affinity_proc_open, .proc_read = seq_read, .proc_lseek = seq_lseek, .proc_release = single_release, .proc_write = irq_affinity_proc_write, }; static const struct proc_ops irq_affinity_list_proc_ops = { .proc_open = irq_affinity_list_proc_open, .proc_read = seq_read, .proc_lseek = seq_lseek, .proc_release = single_release, .proc_write = irq_affinity_list_proc_write, }; #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK static int irq_effective_aff_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { return show_irq_affinity(EFFECTIVE, m); } static int irq_effective_aff_list_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { return show_irq_affinity(EFFECTIVE_LIST, m); } #endif static int default_affinity_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { seq_printf(m, "%*pb\n", cpumask_pr_args(irq_default_affinity)); return 0; } static ssize_t default_affinity_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer, size_t count, loff_t *ppos) { cpumask_var_t new_value; int err; if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&new_value, GFP_KERNEL)) return -ENOMEM; err = cpumask_parse_user(buffer, count, new_value); if (err) goto out; /* * Do not allow disabling IRQs completely - it's a too easy * way to make the system unusable accidentally :-) At least * one online CPU still has to be targeted. */ if (!cpumask_intersects(new_value, cpu_online_mask)) { err = -EINVAL; goto out; } cpumask_copy(irq_default_affinity, new_value); err = count; out: free_cpumask_var(new_value); return err; } static int default_affinity_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) { return single_open(file, default_affinity_show, PDE_DATA(inode)); } static const struct proc_ops default_affinity_proc_ops = { .proc_open = default_affinity_open, .proc_read = seq_read, .proc_lseek = seq_lseek, .proc_release = single_release, .proc_write = default_affinity_write, }; static int irq_node_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc((long) m->private); seq_printf(m, "%d\n", irq_desc_get_node(desc)); return 0; } #endif static int irq_spurious_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) { struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc((long) m->private); seq_printf(m, "count %u\n" "unhandled %u\n" "last_unhandled %u ms\n", desc->irq_count, desc->irqs_unhandled, jiffies_to_msecs(desc->last_unhandled)); return 0; } #define MAX_NAMELEN 128 static int name_unique(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *new_action) { struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); struct irqaction *action; unsigned long flags; int ret = 1; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags); for_each_action_of_desc(desc, action) { if ((action != new_action) && action->name && !strcmp(new_action->name, action->name)) { ret = 0; break; } } raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); return ret; } void register_handler_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *action) { char name [MAX_NAMELEN]; struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); if (!desc->dir || action->dir || !action->name || !name_unique(irq, action)) return; snprintf(name, MAX_NAMELEN, "%s", action->name); /* create /proc/irq/1234/handler/ */ action->dir = proc_mkdir(name, desc->dir); } #undef MAX_NAMELEN #define MAX_NAMELEN 10 void register_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) { static DEFINE_MUTEX(register_lock); void __maybe_unused *irqp = (void *)(unsigned long) irq; char name [MAX_NAMELEN]; if (!root_irq_dir || (desc->irq_data.chip == &no_irq_chip)) return; /* * irq directories are registered only when a handler is * added, not when the descriptor is created, so multiple * tasks might try to register at the same time. */ mutex_lock(®ister_lock); if (desc->dir) goto out_unlock; sprintf(name, "%d", irq); /* create /proc/irq/1234 */ desc->dir = proc_mkdir(name, root_irq_dir); if (!desc->dir) goto out_unlock; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP /* create /proc/irq/<irq>/smp_affinity */ proc_create_data("smp_affinity", 0644, desc->dir, &irq_affinity_proc_ops, irqp); /* create /proc/irq/<irq>/affinity_hint */ proc_create_single_data("affinity_hint", 0444, desc->dir, irq_affinity_hint_proc_show, irqp); /* create /proc/irq/<irq>/smp_affinity_list */ proc_create_data("smp_affinity_list", 0644, desc->dir, &irq_affinity_list_proc_ops, irqp); proc_create_single_data("node", 0444, desc->dir, irq_node_proc_show, irqp); # ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK proc_create_single_data("effective_affinity", 0444, desc->dir, irq_effective_aff_proc_show, irqp); proc_create_single_data("effective_affinity_list", 0444, desc->dir, irq_effective_aff_list_proc_show, irqp); # endif #endif proc_create_single_data("spurious", 0444, desc->dir, irq_spurious_proc_show, (void *)(long)irq); out_unlock: mutex_unlock(®ister_lock); } void unregister_irq_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) { char name [MAX_NAMELEN]; if (!root_irq_dir || !desc->dir) return; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP remove_proc_entry("smp_affinity", desc->dir); remove_proc_entry("affinity_hint", desc->dir); remove_proc_entry("smp_affinity_list", desc->dir); remove_proc_entry("node", desc->dir); # ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_EFFECTIVE_AFF_MASK remove_proc_entry("effective_affinity", desc->dir); remove_proc_entry("effective_affinity_list", desc->dir); # endif #endif remove_proc_entry("spurious", desc->dir); sprintf(name, "%u", irq); remove_proc_entry(name, root_irq_dir); } #undef MAX_NAMELEN void unregister_handler_proc(unsigned int irq, struct irqaction *action) { proc_remove(action->dir); } static void register_default_affinity_proc(void) { #ifdef CONFIG_SMP proc_create("irq/default_smp_affinity", 0644, NULL, &default_affinity_proc_ops); #endif } void init_irq_proc(void) { unsigned int irq; struct irq_desc *desc; /* create /proc/irq */ root_irq_dir = proc_mkdir("irq", NULL); if (!root_irq_dir) return; register_default_affinity_proc(); /* * Create entries for all existing IRQs. */ for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) register_irq_proc(irq, desc); } #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW int __weak arch_show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, int prec) { return 0; } #ifndef ACTUAL_NR_IRQS # define ACTUAL_NR_IRQS nr_irqs #endif int show_interrupts(struct seq_file *p, void *v) { static int prec; unsigned long flags, any_count = 0; int i = *(loff_t *) v, j; struct irqaction *action; struct irq_desc *desc; if (i > ACTUAL_NR_IRQS) return 0; if (i == ACTUAL_NR_IRQS) return arch_show_interrupts(p, prec); /* print header and calculate the width of the first column */ if (i == 0) { for (prec = 3, j = 1000; prec < 10 && j <= nr_irqs; ++prec) j *= 10; seq_printf(p, "%*s", prec + 8, ""); for_each_online_cpu(j) seq_printf(p, "CPU%-8d", j); seq_putc(p, '\n'); } rcu_read_lock(); desc = irq_to_desc(i); if (!desc || irq_settings_is_hidden(desc)) goto outsparse; if (desc->kstat_irqs) for_each_online_cpu(j) any_count |= *per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, j); if ((!desc->action || irq_desc_is_chained(desc)) && !any_count) goto outsparse; seq_printf(p, "%*d: ", prec, i); for_each_online_cpu(j) seq_printf(p, "%10u ", desc->kstat_irqs ? *per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, j) : 0); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags); if (desc->irq_data.chip) { if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_print_chip) desc->irq_data.chip->irq_print_chip(&desc->irq_data, p); else if (desc->irq_data.chip->name) seq_printf(p, " %8s", desc->irq_data.chip->name); else seq_printf(p, " %8s", "-"); } else { seq_printf(p, " %8s", "None"); } if (desc->irq_data.domain) seq_printf(p, " %*d", prec, (int) desc->irq_data.hwirq); else seq_printf(p, " %*s", prec, ""); #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW_LEVEL seq_printf(p, " %-8s", irqd_is_level_type(&desc->irq_data) ? "Level" : "Edge"); #endif if (desc->name) seq_printf(p, "-%-8s", desc->name); action = desc->action; if (action) { seq_printf(p, " %s", action->name); while ((action = action->next) != NULL) seq_printf(p, ", %s", action->name); } seq_putc(p, '\n'); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); outsparse: rcu_read_unlock(); return 0; } #endif 我补充proc.c的代码,请结合全部信息一起,重新分析在复位进入内核时不调用设置中断亲和性的代码,而是在通过echo 3 > /proc/irq/109/smp_affinity_list指令时再调用设置中断亲和性的函数。包括要注意“我们修改了udrv_pcie_msi_set_affinity函数,在函数中使用了cpu_logical_map,但是这个符号在内核模块中未导出,导致编译模块时出现未定义错误。 错误信息:ERROR: modpost: "cpu_logical_map" [/home/g60098972/master/build/build_sdk/ko_compile/pcie/hi309a_pcie.ko] undefined!”

大家在看

recommend-type

Cisco Enterprise Print System-开源

一组使大量打印机的管理和支持变得更加容易的工具。
recommend-type

考虑弹流润滑的斜齿轮传动多目标遗传算法优化—源代码

本人可以分享自己写的一些优化源代码 基于遗传算法的机械工程优化系列: 1.基于改进遗传算法的孔加工路径最短通路优化 2.基于遗传算法孔加工最短回路优化 3.考虑弹流润滑的斜齿轮传动多目标优化设计 4.考虑弹流润滑的直齿圆锥齿轮传动多目标优化 5.考虑重合度的直齿圆柱齿轮传动多目标优化 6.考虑重合度的斜齿轮传动多目标优化设计 7.基于改进遗传算法的压缩弹簧优化设计 8.基于改进遗传算法的拉伸弹簧优化设计 9.基于改进遗传算法的数控加工铣削参数优化 10.基于改进遗传算法的数控加工车削参数优化 11.基于改进遗传算法的数控加工钻削参数优化 12.基于改进遗传算法的V带传动多目标优化设计 还有更多优化算法等待大家,如有需要请发邮件到[email protected]
recommend-type

FT2232HL开发板相关资料.7z

完整的DIY USB-JTAG包,包括原理图,说明手册,数据手册,以及驱动。
recommend-type

LMX2571原理图pcb工程

TI芯片LMX2571的原理图PCB,还有中文数据手册,需要的朋友自行下载,仿照ti官网。
recommend-type

MAX30100心率血氧中文参考手册

MAX30100心率血氧传感器中文翻译。Max30100是一款集成的脉搏血氧和心率检测传感器。它使用了两个LED灯,一个用来优化光学的光电探测器,和低噪声模拟信号处理器,用来检测脉搏的血氧和心率信号。 Max30100的运行电压在1.8V到3.3V之间,并且可以通过软件来控制,待机电流极小,可以忽略不计,这样可以使电源在如何时候都能保持连接状态。

最新推荐

recommend-type

哈尔滨探秘微信小程序:从技术解析到完整复现(附核心代码)

哈尔滨探秘微信小程序:从技术解析到完整复现(附核心代码)
recommend-type

旧型饼形图转为js图五

Webji-23.html
recommend-type

毕设&课设:一个基于 AI 的智能菜谱推荐系统,帮助你解决-今天吃什么-的困扰.zip

经导师指导并认可通过的大作业设计项目源码,适用人群:计算机,电子信息工程、数学等专业的大学生课程设计、期末大作业或毕业设计,作为“参考资料”使用。
recommend-type

mobile-0.6.0-alpha.jar

mobile-0.6.0-alpha.jar
recommend-type

K-means聚类算法可视化Python代码 包含肘部法则和轮廓系数分析

# K-means聚类算法可视化Python代码 K-means聚类算法实现,包含肘部法则和轮廓系数分析功能。提供丰富的可视化和分析工具,适用于数据科学学习和实际项目应用。 ## 快速开始 ### 环境要求 ```bash pip install numpy matplotlib seaborn scikit-learn pandas ``` ### 完整演示 运行主程序查看完整功能演示: ```bash python main.py ```
recommend-type

CireNeikual-LD32:探索开源作曲新境界

从给定文件信息中,我们可以提取出以下知识点: 1. Ludum Dare: Ludum Dare是一种全球性的游戏开发活动,鼓励开发者在限定时间内(通常是48小时或72小时)创造出一个游戏。这个活动的特点是挑战参与者在非常短的时间内完成一个游戏项目的构思、设计、编程和发布。Ludum Dare强调的是创意和执行能力,而不是游戏的复杂度或制作质量。 2. 作曲作品:在这次Ludum Dare活动中,参与者提交的是一首音乐作品。音乐在游戏开发中扮演着非常重要的角色,它可以增强游戏的氛围、情感以及玩家的沉浸感。作曲者可能使用了数字音乐工作站(DAW)、音频编辑软件或乐器模拟软件来创作这首音乐。 3. 开源:开源(Open Source)指的是软件源代码对所有人都是可获取的,任何人都可以查看、修改和分发该代码。开源软件通常是自由软件,这意味着用户可以自由地使用、复制、研究、修改和改进软件。开源项目往往由一个社区来共同维护和推进,这样的协作模式使得软件可以快速适应不断变化的需求和标准。 4. CireNeikual-LD32:从标题中可以推测,这可能是作曲者在Ludum Dare 32期间创作的音乐作品名称。这可能是一个电子音乐项目,因为音乐标题中的“CireNeikual”听起来像是合成器、电子乐器或虚拟乐器的名称。这类音乐通常包含合成声音、节拍和旋律,它可能与电子游戏的氛围紧密相关。 5. 文件名称列表:从提供的信息来看,压缩包子文件中只包含了“LD32”的文件名,这可能意味着该压缩包仅包含一个作品,即上文提到的CireNeikual-LD32音乐作品。这个文件很可能是以MP3、WAV或其他音频格式存储的音乐文件。 6. 知识点的综合应用:Ludum Dare作为一个游戏开发快速挑战活动,其理念与开源运动的精神不谋而合,都是基于共享、合作和共同进步的价值观。参与者在短短的48小时内不仅要快速制作游戏内容,还要在技术、艺术和音乐方面做出迅速的决策。开放源代码的做法有利于其他开发者学习和改进,这也有助于推动整个游戏开发社区的技术和创意发展。音乐作品的加入为游戏增添了艺术层次,使得整个项目更加完整和吸引人。此外,像CireNeikual-LD32这样的作品可能也会推动音乐创作者之间的交流和合作,通过开源共享其作品,他们能够获得反馈,并且与其他创作者共同探讨音乐制作的新技术和新想法。
recommend-type

多租户资源配置秘籍:CDS 7.1.62命名空间隔离与配额管理的6种实施方式

# 摘要 多租户环境下的资源管理是云原生平台面临的核心挑战之一,尤其在基于Kubernetes的CDS架构中,命名空间隔离与资源配额控制成为保障租户间安全与效率的关
recommend-type

里面的递归合并

你提到“里面的递归合并”,我理解你是指对嵌套结构(如树形结构)的递归处理与合并,特别是在处理监控设备树时,既要递归构建带 `checked` 状态的结构,又要递归提取选中的名称。 我们可以将这两个递归操作合并为一个过程,以减少递归次数,提高性能,特别是在数据量大的情况下。这样可以避免对同一棵树进行多次遍历。 --- ### ✅ 合并递归处理:一次遍历完成结构转换和收集选中项 我们可以在递归构建结构的同时,收集 `checked` 为 `true` 的节点名称,从而减少一次完整的递归遍历。 --- ### ✅ 合并后的优化代码如下: ```javascript videoList(
recommend-type

Clementine.js FCC:专为Free Code Camp设计的项目样板

### 标题知识点解析 #### clementinejs-fcc:专门用于 Free Code Camp 课程的 Clementine.js 样板版本 标题中提到的“clementinejs-fcc”指的是一个专门为Free Code Camp(FCC)课程设计的Clementine.js样板版本。这个版本是为学习者准备的,用以帮助他们完成FCC中的项目。在讨论Clementine.js样板时,需要强调以下几点: 1. **Clementine.js项目定位:** Clementine.js 是一个轻量级的全栈JavaScript开发样板。这意味着它提供了一个基础的框架或模板,初学者和有经验的开发者可以在其基础上快速开始新的项目,而不必从零开始配置整个开发环境。 2. **技术栈:** Clementine.js样板利用了Node.js、Express(一个高性能的Node.js框架)、MongoDB(一个文档型数据库),这三个技术通常被合称为MEAN(MongoDB, Express, AngularJS, Node.js)堆栈。此处虽然提到了Express和Node.js,但AngularJS并未在标题中显示,可能是因为标题提到的版本并没有使用AngularJS。 3. **GitHub认证集成:** 样板包含了GitHub认证,这是非常实用的功能,因为它允许用户使用他们的GitHub账户来登录应用程序,从而简化了用户认证过程。 4. **Free Code Camp(FCC):** Free Code Camp是一个提供免费编码课程的非营利组织,旨在教授学生在真实的项目中使用Web开发技术。FCC项目包括一系列从基础到高级的编程挑战,参与者通过完成这些挑战来学习和提高编程技能。 ### 描述知识点解析 #### 此项目不再积极维护 描述中提到项目已不再积极维护,这意味着项目的主要开发工作已经停止,不再添加新功能或进行重大更新。尽管如此,该项目的存档版本仍然可以供学习者或需要稳定版本的用户使用。 #### Clementine.js FCC 样板概述 - **样板透明性和简单性:** 描述中提到样板在透明度和简单性方面做得很好,这表示项目的设计意图让用户能够轻松理解和使用样板中包含的各个组件。 - **版本说明:** - **基础版本:** 最简单的版本,适用于那些对样板体积和功能侵入性有特定要求的用户。 - **增强版本:** 使用AngularJS作为前端框架的稍微复杂的版本,这表明该版本提供了更多的功能和结构,可能更适合需要前端框架的项目。 - **FCC版本:** 标准样板的修订版,专门为FCC课程的学生设计。由于FCC是一个教育项目,所以这个版本可能包括额外的教学材料、注释或指导,以便学生更好地理解和完成课程中的项目。 ### 标签知识点解析 #### JavaScript 标签中提到“JavaScript”,它是Clementine.js样板的基础。JavaScript是一种高级的、解释型的编程语言,广泛用于前端开发。在Clementine.js样板中,JavaScript不仅用于客户端的交互,还用于Node.js环境中的服务器端编程。由于项目是为FCC课程准备的,因此特别强调了JavaScript的学习和应用,包括其在客户端和服务器端的使用。 ### 压缩包子文件的文件名称列表知识点解析 #### clementinejs-fcc-master 列表中提到的“clementinejs-fcc-master”是项目文件的名称。在这个上下文中,“master”可能表示这是项目的主分支或主版本。在Git版本控制系统中,“master”通常用作默认分支的名字,代表项目的当前最佳版本。这一点对于理解如何下载、安装和使用Clementine.js样板版本是非常重要的。 ### 综合应用知识点 综上所述,Clementine.js样板为全栈JavaScript开发提供了一个轻量级的起点,使用了流行的MEAN堆栈技术,并且针对Free Code Camp课程进行了定制。这个样板的FCC版本适用于学生完成课程项目,因为它的设计和功能都特别考虑到了教学目的。尽管项目已不再积极维护,但用户仍然可以使用存档版本。对于正在学习全栈JavaScript开发的个人,特别是正在参与Free Code Camp课程的学习者,这个样板仍是一个有价值的资源。
recommend-type

CDS 7.1.62云原生整合之道:Kubernetes Operator部署模式的5大优势解析

# 摘要 随着云原生技术的快速发展,Kubernetes Operator在复杂中间件管理中展现出强大优势。本文以CDS 7.1.62为实践平台,系统阐述Operator与云原生体系融合的演进背景,深入解析其基于控制器模式、自定义资源(CRD)和状态协调循环的核心机制,并对比Helm与StatefulSet在部署复杂应用时的局限性。通过实际部署