The Peircean concept of the index has been used in the description of a broad range of different phenomena, among these deictic expressions such as personal pronouns, sociolinguistic variants, lexically governed case markers, bound...
moreThe Peircean concept of the index has been used in the description of a broad range of different phenomena, among these deictic expressions such as personal pronouns, sociolinguistic variants, lexically governed case markers, bound allomorphs and bound allophones. A common denominator for the various instances of linguistic indexing is the “pointing” relation from an element: the index, to something else that is present in the context: the indicatum. For instance, a bound allomorph is an index pointing to its conditioning context as the indicatum (pl. indicata). Such pointing is a kind of linguistic meaning, different from conceptual/ideational meaning but nevertheless a contribution to the meaningfulness of the utterance.
In my talk, I will present a recently suggested typology of indexical functions (Nielsen 2016: 90-92; Nielsen & Sansiñena 2024: 11-20) that establishes four main types of indexical function:
I. Identifying indexical function (e.g. group-identifying vocabulary)
II. Situational indexical function (most types of deixis)
III. Systemic indexical function (indexing from an element of a system to the system itself)
IV. Structural indexical function (pointing within the linguistic structure, e.g. bound allomorphs)
Serving as a tool for analysing and classifying the full range of indexical phenomena in language, the typology provides a frame of reference for the (other) main topic of my talk: the way in which indexical meaning may cross the boundaries between different types of indexing and between different linguistic domains. With examples from various languages, I will show how an index may serve composite indexical functions, e.g. combining the identifying and the situational type, and I will demonstrate how the indexicality of an element can straddle different linguistic domains, such as internal syntactic structure and extra-linguistic interactional context. The phenomenon of insubordination is a case in point (Nielsen & Sansiñena 2024: 33-35, 42-44). The synchronic domain straddling of indexical relations is tightly bound up with diachronic processes that lead to either an extension of the set of indicata, i.e. the range what may be pointed at by an index, or to a semiotic shift whereby symbolic meaning is replaced with indexical meaning or vice versa.
As my main illustration of domain straddling and diachronic processes affecting indexical meaning, I will present the case of the Danish indirect object (IO) (Nielsen & Heltoft 2023; Nielsen 2024). The valency-bound (i.e. lexically governed) IO is an index of the verb that provides the argument slot and the semantic role of the IO, cf. (1) with the IO-governing verb tilbyde ‘offer’, while the free (i.e. non-valency-bound) IO is an index of a presupposed pragmatic context that establishes a recipient role. This is the reason for the unacceptability of (2a) with the non-IO-governing verb hente ‘fetch’ and without a contextually established recipient, and the acceptability of (2b) where the directive speech act context establishes the speaker as a “reception-wisher”.
(1) Anna tilbød Michael en stol
A. offer.PST M. a chair
‘Anna offered Michael a chair’
(2) a. *Anna hentede Michael en stol
A. fetch.PST M. a chair
(intended: ‘Anna fetched Michael a chair’)
b. hent mig en stol!
fetch.IMP me a chair
‘Fetch me a chair!’
I will outline the diachronic process whereby the free IO in Danish changed from having symbolic meaning and no dependence on speech act context to having indexical meaning, thus making the overall category of IO a domain-straddling index.
References
Nielsen, P. J. (2024). From symbol to index: The semiotic harmonisation of the Danish free indirect object. In P. J. Nielsen & M. S. Sansiñena (eds.), Indexicality: The Role of Indexing in Language Structure and Language Change. Berlin: De Gruyter, 283-328.
Nielsen, P. J. & L. Heltoft (2023). Indexicality across the boundaries of syntax, semantics and pragmatics: The constructional content of the Danish free indirect object. In E. Zehentner, M. Rothlisberger & T. Colleman (eds.), Ditransitives in Germanic Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 150-194.
Nielsen, P. J. & M. S. Sansiñena (2024). Indexes in language and linguistics. In P. J. Nielsen & M. S. Sansiñena (eds.), Indexicality: The Role of Indexing in Language Structure and Language Change. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1-56.