20 Arguments to Confront a Muslim

20 ARGUMENTS TO CONFRONT A MUSLIM

HERVE JAUBERT

HJ

Copyright © 2019 HERVE JAUBERT

All rights reserved

No part of this book may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without express written permission of the publisher.

ASIN: B07SPK6M3L

Contents

Title Page

Copyright

20 ARGUMENTS

HERVE JAUBERT

ISLAM

MUSLIM

THE QURAN

SHARIA

CREEPING SHARIA

MUHAMMAD

ABROGATION

TAQIYYA

A RELIGION OF PEACE

ISLAM IS TOLERANT

ISLAMIST

ALLAHU AKBAR

CONVERSION AND APOSTASY

JIZYAH

TERRORISM

HONOR KILLING

WOMEN

FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION

IS. ISLAMIC STATE

FREEDOM OF SPEECH

MUSIC

DHIMMI

KAFIR

CHRISTIANS

JIHAD

CHILD MARRIAGE

ISLAMOPHOBIA

FRUSTRATIONS

SCIENCE

DOUBLE STANDARDS

DEMOCRACY

THE CONSTITUTION

VIOLENCE

CONCLUSION

20 ARGUMENTS

TO CONFRONT

A MUSLIM

HERVE JAUBERT

ISBN 9781973962083

copyright©2017 Hervé Jaubert

All Rights Reserved

Every week we hear of vicious attacks perpetrated by someone shouting Allahu Akbar and quoting verses from the Qur'an. These terrorist attacks are committed in the name of Islam and expose the true nature of Islam. Not surprisingly, Muslims are today the most disliked people on Earth. Yet, the Government, the media and Muslims themselves, of course, claim that Islamic violence has nothing to do with Islam because it is a religion of peace.

One can feel the desperation of authorities trying to convince us that Islamic terrorism is not Islamic, or that terrorists highjacked Islam, or again that it is workplace violence, or furthermore that terrorists misunderstand the Qur'an. It must not be convincing enough because the media and politicians have added new claims be that terrorists are affected by some sort of mental illness or that gun laws are not strong enough.

This desperation leads to ''Islamopology", the relentless and constant effort to deceit public opinion that Islam is not the motive behind Islamic violence. After an Islamic terrorist attack, the first reaction of authorities is to avoid at all cost a link between Islam and the perpetrator(s). When the Islamic motive becomes inevitable, authorities and the media then try to dissociate the motives from Islam. There are actually more efforts to combat the public negative reactions to Islamic attacks than there are to combat the cause of these Islamic attacks.

Islamopology not only defends Islam but attacks any criticism of Islam. Islamopology seeks to appease Muslims while trying to instill a feeling of guilt towards non-Muslims, that somehow it is our fault if poor Muslims turn violent. Islamopology plays the victim card for Muslims even after some Islamic extremist went on a killing rampage, and blames everything else.

Islamopology has invented words to hide the Islamic origin of the violence in Islam. Words such as: Moderate Islam: to differentiate Muslims from the violent Muslims; Islamophobia: to chastise any criticism of Islam; radical Islam: so that terrorists are not Muslims but radicals;youth instead of second-generation Muslim immigrant; Asian instead of Arab terrorist; freedom fighter or rebel instead of terrorist; militant instead of Islamist; extremist instead of radical Muslim. These words are never used in Islamic countries, only in the West. Don't get fooled, Islam is Islam, there is no variations in Islam. Based on the very teachings of Islam, a so-called moderate is a heretic, and that's why ISIS massacre them.

Islamopologists go even further as to demand gun bans, so people, law-abiding citizens, would no longer be able to defend themselves against armed terrorists.

Islam excuses and even commands violence toward unbelievers, and Islamopology excuses Islam for being violent towards unbelievers.

Non-Muslim westerners who are no experts in Islam and who have not read the Qur'an get misinformed by contradictory messages across the media. Muslims are