Systematic Approach to Training for Nuclear Facility Personnel: Processes, Methodology and Practices
By IAEA
()
About this ebook
Other titles in Systematic Approach to Training for Nuclear Facility Personnel Series (30)
Design Principles and Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repositories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCosting Methods and Funding Schemes for Radioactive Waste Disposal Programmes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary Review on the Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Nuclear Power Plant Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImpact of Fuel Density on Performance and Economy of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of National Infrastructure for the Uranium Production Cycle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDecommissioning at a Multifacility Site Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear Reactor Technology Assessment for Near Term Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Nuclear Power Plant Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStatus and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunication and Stakeholder Involvement in Radioactive Waste Disposal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethodologies for Assessing Pipe Failure Rates in Advanced Water Cooled Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Ionization Chamber Smoke Detectors: Approaches and Practical Experiences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExperience in the Management of Radioactive Waste After Nuclear Accidents: A Basis for Preplanning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Depleted Uranium Used as Shielding in Disused Radiation Devices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Radioactive Lightning Conductors and Their Associated Radioactive Sources Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTraining and Human Resource Considerations for Nuclear Facility Decommissioning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsData Analysis and Collection for Costing of Research Reactor Decommissioning: Final Report of the DACCORD Collaborative Project Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSystematic Approach to Training for Nuclear Facility Personnel: Processes, Methodology and Practices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear–Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Factors Engineering Aspects of Instrumentation and Control System Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Human Resources in the Field of Nuclear Energy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVendor and User Requirements and Responsibilities in Nuclear Cogeneration Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Status of Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Life Cycle Risk Management for New Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPost-irradiation Examination Techniques for Research Reactor Fuels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplication of Wireless Technologies in Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation and Control Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Read more from Iaea
Climate Change and Nuclear Power 2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Non-Invasive Cardiovascular Imaging: A Guide for the Practitioner Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuidance On Setting Up a Comprehensive Cancer Centre Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational Expert Group on Nuclear Liability (INLEX): A Collective View on the First Two Decades Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComprehensive Audits of Radiotherapy Practices: A Tool for Quality Improvement Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Assessment of Climate, Land, Energy and Water Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDosimetry for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdapting the Energy Sector to Climate Change Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Systematic Approach to Training for Nuclear Facility Personnel
Titles in the series (62)
Design Principles and Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repositories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCosting Methods and Funding Schemes for Radioactive Waste Disposal Programmes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary Review on the Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Nuclear Power Plant Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImpact of Fuel Density on Performance and Economy of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of National Infrastructure for the Uranium Production Cycle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDecommissioning at a Multifacility Site Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear Reactor Technology Assessment for Near Term Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Nuclear Power Plant Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStatus and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunication and Stakeholder Involvement in Radioactive Waste Disposal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethodologies for Assessing Pipe Failure Rates in Advanced Water Cooled Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Ionization Chamber Smoke Detectors: Approaches and Practical Experiences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExperience in the Management of Radioactive Waste After Nuclear Accidents: A Basis for Preplanning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Depleted Uranium Used as Shielding in Disused Radiation Devices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Radioactive Lightning Conductors and Their Associated Radioactive Sources Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTraining and Human Resource Considerations for Nuclear Facility Decommissioning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsData Analysis and Collection for Costing of Research Reactor Decommissioning: Final Report of the DACCORD Collaborative Project Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSystematic Approach to Training for Nuclear Facility Personnel: Processes, Methodology and Practices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear–Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Factors Engineering Aspects of Instrumentation and Control System Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Human Resources in the Field of Nuclear Energy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVendor and User Requirements and Responsibilities in Nuclear Cogeneration Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Status of Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Life Cycle Risk Management for New Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPost-irradiation Examination Techniques for Research Reactor Fuels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplication of Wireless Technologies in Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation and Control Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Guide to Knowledge Management Strategies and Approaches in Nuclear Energy Organizations and Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSocial psychology A Complete Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunity Leadership Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWarehouse Safety Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe M.A.D. Safety Book for Leaders (Make a Difference) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSafe and I Know It: Safety through Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIncident Command System A Complete Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRedefining Work Health and Safety Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStay Safe This Summer: Health and Safety for Young Workers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSafety First! Really?: Safety through Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDevelopment plan Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAligned Leadership: Building Relationships, Overcoming Resistance, and Achieving Success Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInversion and the Perspective-Based Safety Culture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAssessment That Works: How Do You Know How Much They Know? a Guide to Asking the Right Questions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHealth, Safety & Environment Key Performance Indicators Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBolting Training to Productivity Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Occupational Health and Safety Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeading With Authenticity In Times Of Transition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCode audit Standard Requirements Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVision Realized!: How top executives bridge vision to achievement through project management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProduct Portfolio and Program Management Third Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnit 2 Compensation Theories and Strategies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOperational Risk & Control (ORC) Best Practice Framework Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsISO 21500 Guidance on project management - A Pocket Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNine Steps to Success: An ISO27001:2013 Implementation Overview Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Holistic Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow Leaders Think Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRules For Leadership: Improving Unit Performance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bottom Line: A Management Primer For First Line Law Enforcement Supervisors Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Premises liability Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Power Resources For You
The Homeowner's DIY Guide to Electrical Wiring Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5DIY Lithium Battery Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Journeyman Electrician Exam Prep Mastery 2025-2026 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSolar Power Demystified: The Beginners Guide To Solar Power, Energy Independence And Lower Bills Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Photovoltaic Design and Installation For Dummies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How Do Electric Motors Work? Physics Books for Kids | Children's Physics Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElectronics All-in-One For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Idaho Falls: The Untold Story of America's First Nuclear Accident Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Way Home: Tales from a life without technology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Design of Rotating Electrical Machines Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Ultimate Solar Power Design Guide Less Theory More Practice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Energy: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Off Grid Solar: A handbook for Photovoltaics with Lead-Acid or Lithium-Ion batteries Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Power Electronics: Lecture Notes of Power Electronics Course Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDistribution of Electrical Power: Lecture Notes of Distribution of Electric Power Course Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRenewable Energy Sources - Wind, Solar and Hydro Energy Edition : Environment Books for Kids | Children's Environment Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShorting the Grid: The Hidden Fragility of Our Electric Grid Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElectric Power Transmission: Lecture Notes of Electric Power Transmission Course Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Air Cooled Heat Exchanger Handbook: Fundamentals, Calculations, Design and Q&A Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSolar Electricity Basics: Powering Your Home or Office with Solar Energy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Solar Power Your Home For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reactive Power Compensation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOFF-GRID PROJECTS: Essential Guide to Enhance DIY Skills for Self-Reliance Preppers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFire on the Horizon: The Untold Story of the Gulf Oil Disaster Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRenewable Energy for Agriculture: Insights from Southeast Asia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Systematic Approach to Training for Nuclear Facility Personnel
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Systematic Approach to Training for Nuclear Facility Personnel - IAEA
SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO TRAINING
FOR NUCLEAR FACILITY PERSONNEL:
PROCESSES, METHODOLOGY AND PRACTICES
IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES No. NG-T-2.8
SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO TRAINING
FOR NUCLEAR FACILITY PERSONNEL:
PROCESSES, METHODOLOGY AND PRACTICES
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY
VIENNA, 2021
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
All IAEA scientific and technical publications are protected by the terms of the Universal Copyright Convention as adopted in 1952 (Berne) and as revised in 1972 (Paris). The copyright has since been extended by the World Intellectual Property Organization (Geneva) to include electronic and virtual intellectual property. Permission to use whole or parts of texts contained in IAEA publications in printed or electronic form must be obtained and is usually subject to royalty agreements. Proposals for non-commercial reproductions and translations are welcomed and considered on a case-by-case basis. Enquiries should be addressed to the IAEA Publishing Section at:
Marketing and Sales Unit, Publishing Section
International Atomic Energy Agency
Vienna International Centre
PO Box 100
1400 Vienna, Austria
fax: +43 1 26007 22529
tel.: +43 1 2600 22417
email: [email protected]
www.iaea.org/publications
© IAEA, 2021
Printed by the IAEA in Austria
April 2021
STI/PUB/1909
IAEA Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Names: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Title: Systematic approach to training for nuclear facility personnel : processes, methodology and practices / International Atomic Energy Agency.
Description: Vienna : International Atomic Energy Agency, 2021. | Series: IAEA nuclear energy series, ISSN 1995–7807 ; no. NG-T-2.8 | Includes bibliographical references.
Identifiers: IAEAL 21-01370 | ISBN 978–92–0–113320–5 (paperback : alk. paper) | ISBN 978–92–0–113420–2 (pdf) | ISBN 978–92–0–113520–9 (epub) | ISBN 978–92–0–113620–6 (mobipocket)
Subjects: LCSH: Nuclear power plants — Employees — Training of. | Nuclear power plant operators — Training of. | Personnel. | Training. | Nuclear facilities — Employees.
Classification: UDC 621.311.25:005.963.1 | STI/PUB/1909
FOREWORD
The IAEA’s statutory role is to seek to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world
. Among other functions, the IAEA is authorized to foster the exchange of scientific and technical information on peaceful uses of atomic energy
. One way this is achieved is through a range of technical publications including the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series.
The IAEA Nuclear Energy Series comprises publications designed to further the use of nuclear technologies in support of sustainable development, to advance nuclear science and technology, catalyse innovation and build capacity to support the existing and expanded use of nuclear power and nuclear science applications. The publications include information covering all policy, technological and management aspects of the definition and implementation of activities involving the peaceful use of nuclear technology.
The IAEA safety standards establish fundamental principles, requirements and recommendations to ensure nuclear safety and serve as a global reference for protecting people and the environment from harmful effects of ionizing radiation.
When IAEA Nuclear Energy Series publications address safety, it is ensured that the IAEA safety standards are referred to as the current boundary conditions for the application of nuclear technology.
Safe, reliable and efficient performance of nuclear facilities cannot be achieved solely through high quality equipment and documentation. Sufficient numbers of adequately trained, qualified and motivated personnel, able to fulfil their responsibilities and perform their tasks to the required standards, are critical in achieving excellence and preventing unacceptable risks to the personnel, public, facility and environment. Therefore, attaining and maintaining the competence and qualification of the personnel is central to ensuring the safety, reliability and efficiency of such facilities, whether operating or newly built. This includes management, operations, maintenance, engineering and technical support, and training personnel, as well as contractor personnel. Adequate training on performance under abnormal and emergency conditions is crucial for ensuring competence.
This publication compiles experience gained worldwide using the systematic approach to training (SAT) in nuclear facility personnel training. The approach has proved its effectiveness in nuclear and other safety critical industries over decades and is recognized as the best international practice in nuclear training. Using SAT, competence requirements can be established for certain jobs in a nuclear facility to ensure that incumbents have attained all the required competencies. The evaluation of training effectiveness is an inherent feature of SAT and helps to demonstrate that personnel performance has improved and training is of value for the organization.
The SAT process not only improves personnel performance, but also often identifies needed improvements in nuclear facility processes, procedures, equipment and organization. Analysis of job requirements identifies the knowledge, skills and attitudes needed in all areas, not only the technical areas. Management competencies, interpersonal skills and human performance related competencies are also identified and effectively addressed in training programmes based on SAT.
Nuclear facility operators around the world, including those with the best performance records, advocate SAT, and regulatory authorities in many Member States mandate or strongly recommend the use of SAT for nuclear facilities such as nuclear power plants.
This publication includes good practices, offers recommendations from the experts in the field on the entire set of activities within the SAT process and provides examples of the application of SAT. It builds on the information provided in Technical Reports Series No. 380. A key feature of this publication is a demonstration of how SAT serves as one of the important processes in a nuclear facility management system and how it integrates with other processes.
Appreciation is expressed to all Member States for their valuable contributions and to all participants listed at the end of this publication. The IAEA officer responsible for this publication was L. Halt of the Division of Nuclear Power.
EDITORIAL NOTE
This publication has been edited by the editorial staff of the IAEA to the extent considered necessary for the reader’s assistance. It does not address questions of responsibility, legal or otherwise, for acts or omissions on the part of any person.
Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information contained in this publication, neither the IAEA nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from its use.
Guidance provided here, describing good practices, represents expert opinion but does not constitute recommendations made on the basis of a consensus of Member States.
The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries.
The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA.
The IAEA has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third party Internet web sites referred to in this book and does not guarantee that any content on such web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
The authoritative version of this publication is the hard copy issued at the same time and available as pdf on www.iaea.org/publications. To create this version for e-readers, certain changes have been made, including a the movement of some figures and tables.
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
1.2. Objective
1.3. Scope
1.4. Structure
1.5. Users
2. NUCLEAR FACILITY TRAINING AS PART OF AN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
2.1. Formalization of the training process
2.2. Interfaces of the training process
2.3. Role of government and regulatory bodies
3. THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN NUCLEAR INDUSTRY, EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND TRAINING SYSTEMS
3.1. Forms of cooperation
3.2. Benefits of cooperation
3.3. Role of government in the relationship between education and industry
4. ROLES OF MANAGERS AND LEADERS IN TRAINING
4.1. Levels of management and leadership
5. TRAINING POLICY
5.1. Goals, scope and purpose of the training policy
5.2. Training procedures
5.3. Selection and recruitment
5.4. Relationship between training and knowledge management
6. TRAINING CONSULTATION FORUMS AND COMMITTEES
6.1. Levels of training forums and committees
7. SAT PHASES AND PROCESS
7.1. Integration of SAT based training and nuclear facility performance improvement
7.2. Initial and continuing training programmes
7.3. Incorporating operating experience
7.4. Benefits of using SAT
7.5. Essential elements of SAT
7.6. Challenges of SAT — applying a graded approach
8. SAT IN DEPTH — ANALYSIS PHASE
8.1. Overview of the analysis phase
8.2. Purpose of the analysis phase
8.3. Essentials of the analysis phase
8.4. Inputs to the analysis phase
8.5. Performance analysis
8.6. Training needs analysis
8.7. Overview of job and task analysis and job competency analysis
8.8. Job and task analysis and job competency analysis
8.9. Supplementary analysis methods and techniques
8.10. Analysing complex tasks and higher order cognitive competencies
8.11. Interpersonal, management and human performance competencies
8.12. Selecting the analysis method
8.13. Outputs
8.14. Lessons learned from the analysis phase
9. SAT IN DEPTH — DESIGN PHASE
9.1. Overview of the design phase process and activities
9.2. Purpose of the design phase
9.3. Essentials of the design phase
9.4. Inputs to the design phase
9.5. Training objectives
9.6. Design of initial training programmes
9.7. Design of continuing training programmes
9.8. Just in time training
9.9. Selecting the training settings and approach
9.10. Developing questions and constructing tests
9.11. Training programme and training course descriptions
9.12. Estimating resource requirements
9.13. Training courses that apply to more than one job
9.14. Outputs
9.15. Lessons learned in the design phase
10. SAT IN DEPTH — DEVELOPMENT PHASE
10.1. Overview of the development phase process and activities
10.2. Purpose of the development phase
10.3. Essentials of the development phase
10.4. Inputs to the development phase
10.5. Development of training materials
10.6. Defining lesson content and training methods
10.7. Developing lesson plans
10.8. Defining and developing training tools and aids
10.9. Infrastructure for training material development
10.10. Material for classroom training
10.11. Material for simulator training
10.12. Material for on the job training
10.13. Material for workshop, laboratory and mock-up training
10.14. Material for e-learning
10.15. Material for self-study
10.16. Review, validation, piloting and approval of training material
10.17. Outputs
10.18. Lessons learned/good practices
11. SAT IN DEPTH — IMPLEMENTATION PHASE
11.1. Overview of the implementation phase
11.2. Purpose of the implementation phase
11.3. Essentials of the implementation phase
11.4. Inputs to the implementation phase
11.5. Activities performed during the implementation phase
11.6. Implementing various types of training
11.7. Output from the implementation phase
11.8. Exemption from training
11.9. Administering tests
11.10. Feedback to trainees
11.11. Performance not meeting required standards
11.12. In-training programme evaluation
11.13. Training records and reports
11.14. Lessons learned/good practices
12. SAT IN DEPTH — EVALUATION PHASE
12.1. Overview of the evaluation phase
12.2. Purpose of the evaluation phase
12.3. Essentials of the evaluation phase
12.4. Inputs to the evaluation phase
12.5. Stakeholders, ownership and responsibilities for evaluating the effectiveness of facility and personnel
12.6. Evaluation of training effectiveness
12.7. Training course evaluation
12.8. Ownership and responsibilities for evaluating the effectiveness of nuclear facility personnel training
12.9. Data from the observation of job performance
12.10. Input from job incumbents
12.11. Plant facility operating experience feedback and performance indicators
12.12. Inputs from internal reviews, inspections and audits
12.13. External evaluations of training
12.14. Formal evaluation of a completed training programme
12.15. Measuring the return on training investment
12.16. Outputs from the evaluation phase
12.17. Lessons learned from the evaluation phase
13. SAT APPLICATIONS
13.1. Overview of the training model
13.2. Management and leadership training
13.3. Operations personnel training
13.4. Maintenance personnel training
13.5. Engineering and technical support personnel training
13.6. Training on radiation protection and radiological control
13.7. Chemistry personnel training
13.8. Instructor development
13.9. Emergency preparedness training
13.10. Site access and general employee training
14. CONTRACTOR TRAINING
14.1. Process to assure contractor personnel competence
14.2. Practices regarding contractor personnel competence
15. SUMMARY
REFERENCES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Annex I: BASIC INSTRUCTOR TRAINING PROGRAMME DESCRIPTI ON EXAMPLE
Annex II: BASIC TRAINING POLI CY EXAMPLE
Annex III: SAT IMPLEMENTATI ON EXAMPLE
Annex IV: TASK TO TRAINING MATR IX EXAMPLE
Annex V: DIFFICULTY, IMPORTANCE AND FREQUENCY RATING PROCE SS EXAMPLE
GLOSSARY
ABBREVIATIONS
CONTRIBUTORS TO DRAFTING AND REVIEW
STRUCTURE OF THE IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
Training is an important tool to achieve and maintain the required competence of various categories of personnel in all nuclear facilities. High quality and effective training and qualification of personnel are necessary to achieve high safety and efficiency standards in nuclear facility performance. Training and qualification combined are a key feature of the integrated management systems of nuclear facilities. As the use of a systematic approach to training (SAT) has progressed in several nuclear applications, the approach has demonstrated its usefulness. Since Technical Reports Series No. 380 [1] was published in 1996, the nuclear industry has accumulated an enormous amount of valuable experience in the field of personnel training. The SAT process has become more formalized and lessons learned concerning its application in a wide spectrum of nuclear facilities have accumulated. There arose a greater need for the formalized and standardized training process to be applicable to an increasingly wide range of nuclear facility jobs.
For these reasons, Member States recommended through the Technical Working Group on Managing Human Resources (TWG–MHR) that the IAEA produce a publication that would incorporate recent experience and guidance in nuclear training based on a systematic approach and expand the scope to include other nuclear facilities in addition to nuclear power plants (NPPs). This report has been developed to meet that request, and it builds on Technical Reports Series No. 380 [1], which has played an important role since its publication, guiding managers and training staff in introducing the basic principles of SAT.
This publication supports IAEA Nuclear Energy Series No. NG-G-2.1, published in 2009 [2]. NG-G-2.1 includes an overview on the use of SAT for ensuring competence of personnel, which is detailed in this publication.
1.2. Objective
The purpose of this publication is to update the SAT process with lessons learned and good practices that have been demonstrated to enhance facility performance. It provides a basis for establishing and sustaining the quality and reliability of training and qualification for all main categories of nuclear facility personnel.
1.3. Scope
This publication is applicable to nuclear facilities such as NPPs, nuclear fuel cycle and radioactive waste management facilities, and research reactors. It is applicable to the entire life cycle of the facilities, including planning, construction and commissioning, operation and decommissioning. The processes and methodology presented in this report can be used to identify job specific training requirements for any nuclear facility job or function and then to meet these requirements through the SAT process. While SAT is recognized in the nuclear field as an important approach and methodology to achieve high quality, reliable and effective training, this report has been developed focusing on safety considerations and the practical examples are provided mostly from this standpoint; however, SAT methodology can be used in other areas (e.g. in nuclear security) too. Guidance provided here, describing good practices, represents expert opinion but does not constitute recommendations made on the basis of a consensus of Member States.
1.4. Structure
This publication presents the SAT process at different levels and discusses the importance of nuclear training as part of an integrated management system in Section 2. Section 3 discusses the relationships between the nuclear industry, educational institutions and training systems, and the benefits, roles and forms of cooperation. Section 4 primarily describes managers’ and leaders’ responsibilities in training. Section 5 describes the importance of training policies. Section 6 describes how to achieve effective SAT based training using consultation forums and committees. Section 7 describes the five interrelated SAT phases and processes, their essential elements, and challenges in applying a graded approach. Sections 8 through 12 describe the five phases: analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation. Section 13 presents different SAT applications. Section 14 describes the processes which ensure contractor personnel competence.
1.5. Users
This publication is primarily intended for users from the following organizations:
— Nuclear facility operating organizations in all phases of the life cycle wishing to establish effective, high quality training programmes or to improve their training systems;
— Regulatory organizations responsible for setting requirements and performing independent regulatory reviews of nuclear facility personnel training;
— Facilities using sources of ionizing radiation;
— Organizations involved with the transport of radioactive material;
— Entities involved in the nuclear industry sector (suppliers or contractors to nuclear facilities such as NPP vendors, training organizations, technical support organizations, developers and suppliers of training materials and tools such as those for simulator training, and educational institutions such as technical schools and universities);
— International organizations that provide assistance to countries and nuclear facilities in enhancing safety, increasing efficiency and improving performance.
The main personnel from these organizations who would benefit from the use of this publication are:
—Management and supervisors responsible for the competence and qualification of their facility personnel;
— Training and human resource managers and specialists;
— Regulatory personnel.
The necessary involvement of various levels of management is discussed in detail. Therefore, this publication will be especially useful not only for training specialists but for corporate and nuclear facility managers — from the highest executive level to first level supervisors. Regulatory authorities will find in this report many updates regarding nuclear training practices that may be effectively used in national nuclear regulatory systems. Educational institutions and those in academia will find suggestions in this report for proactive cooperation and partnership with the industry for training. Facility vendors and providers of training services and training tools will learn more about the training considerations from the international community of end users to develop them as ‘knowledgeable customers’ in the training field.
2. NUCLEAR FACILITY TRAINING AS PART OF AN INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
According to IAEA safety standards [3], a management system has to be used to provide a single framework for the arrangements and processes necessary to address all the goals of nuclear industry organizations, including safety, health, environmental, security, quality and economic elements, and other considerations such as social responsibility. The training and qualification of personnel in a nuclear facility needs to be viewed as one of the important supporting processes within the organization’s overall management system and has to be fully integrated into this system. Ensuring the needed competence of personnel is an important objective of managing human resources at a nuclear facility and can be defined within the overall framework of the management system.
The organization needs to ensure that all personnel have the competencies needed to perform their assigned tasks by doing the following [2]:
— Recruiting individuals who have education, experience and qualifications suited to their jobs;
— Retaining individuals with attitudes and values appropriate to work in the nuclear industry;
— Providing initial training and qualification programmes based on job responsibilities that are systematically developed and implemented;
— Authorizing personnel for the unsupervised performance of tasks based upon the standards required for their jobs, supporting the safe and reliable