Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Explore 1.5M+ audiobooks & ebooks free for days

    Only $12.99 CAD/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Foreign Policy Analysis: Navigating Global Interactions and Strategic Decision Making
    Foreign Policy Analysis: Navigating Global Interactions and Strategic Decision Making
    Foreign Policy Analysis: Navigating Global Interactions and Strategic Decision Making
    Ebook449 pages5 hoursPolitical Science

    Foreign Policy Analysis: Navigating Global Interactions and Strategic Decision Making

    By Fouad Sabry

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Unlock the Complex World of Foreign Policy Analysis


    Ready to navigate global politics? "Foreign Policy Analysis" is your essential guide to understanding the strategies and decisions shaping international relations. This book is a key resource for anyone looking to comprehend foreign policy within political science.


    Why This Book Matters


    In our interconnected world, foreign policy decisions have vast impacts. Whether you're a professional, student, or enthusiast, grasping these processes empowers you to analyze and appreciate global diplomacy.


    Chapters Overviews


    - 1: Foreign Policy Analysis - Fundamentals and frameworks of foreign policy analysis.
    - 2: Political Science - Relationship between foreign policy and political science.
    - 3: Rational Choice Theory - Application to foreign policy decision-making.
    - 4: Public Choice - Influence on foreign policy decisions.
    - 5: International Relations - Major theories and their relevance.
    - 6: Foreign Policy - Formulation and implementation insights.
    - 7: International Relations Theory - Theories and their application.
    - 8: Policy - Essential policy-making components.
    - 9: Policy Analysis - Techniques and tools.
    - 10: Policy Network Analysis - Networks shaping outcomes.
    - 11: Evaluation - Importance of evaluating effectiveness.
    - 12: Public Policy - Connection to foreign policy-making.
    - 13: Development Communication - Role of communication.
    - 14: Public Administration - Administrative execution.
    - 15: Governance - Structures influencing decisions.
    - 16: Political Psychology - Psychological factors.
    - 17: Essence of Decision - Critical historical decisions.
    - 18: Rationalization (Economics) - Economic rationalizations.
    - 19: Rational Planning Model - Planning models in policy-making.
    - 20: Feminism in International Relations - Influence of feminist theories.
    - 21: International Legal Theories - Legal frameworks governing foreign policy.


    Why You Should Read This Book


    "Foreign Policy Analysis" broadens your perspective and equips you with analytical tools to engage with international relations. This guide is an investment in understanding global affairs.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherOne Billion Knowledgeable
    Release dateAug 7, 2024
    Foreign Policy Analysis: Navigating Global Interactions and Strategic Decision Making

    Other titles in Foreign Policy Analysis Series (30)

    View More
    View More

    Read more from Fouad Sabry

    Related to Foreign Policy Analysis

    Titles in the series (100)

    View More
    View More

    Related ebooks

    Geopolitics For You

    View More
    View More

    Related categories

    Reviews for Foreign Policy Analysis

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Foreign Policy Analysis - Fouad Sabry

      Chapter 1: Foreign policy analysis

      Foreign policy analysis (FPA) is a method within the international relations subfield of political science that focuses on theory, development, and empirical investigation of the processes and results of foreign policy.

      Foreign policy analysis (FPA) examines how a state formulates its foreign policy. FPA requires the study of both international and domestic politics as it investigates the decision-making process. FPA also draws on the study of diplomacy, war, intergovernmental organizations, and economic sanctions, each of which is a tool for a state to execute foreign policy. FPA is often taught under the subject of public policy within political science or political studies, as well as the study of international relations. FPA may also be regarded a subfield of international relations (IR), which seeks to comprehend the decision-making processes behind foreign policy. Richard Snyder, James Rosenau, Alexander George, Graham Allison, and Irving Janis are some of the most distinguished experts in this discipline. In other terms, FPA is a criticism of the prevalent structuralist methods in IR.

      Multiple steps are involved in the formation of foreign policy:

      Evaluation of the international and domestic political context - Foreign policy is formulated and conducted within an international and domestic political context, which a state must comprehend in order to decide the optimal foreign policy choice. For instance, a country can be required to react to an international catastrophe.

      Setting objectives - A state has numerous foreign policy objectives. At any given moment, a state must identify which objective is influenced by the international and domestic political climate. In addition, foreign policy objectives may contradict, requiring the state to choose priorities.

      Determination of policy alternatives - In light of the political climate, a state must next evaluate what policy options are available to achieve the given aim or goals. This will include an evaluation of the state's ability to execute policy alternatives and an evaluation of the outcomes of each policy option.

      Formal decision making action - At some level within a government, a formal foreign policy decision will be made. Typically, decisions about foreign policy are decided by the executive branch of government. Foreign policy choices are often made by the head of state (like a president) or head of government (like a prime minister), cabinet, or ministry.

      Once a foreign policy option has been selected and a formal decision has been made, the policy must subsequently be executed. Foreign policy is often carried out by specialized branches of the state bureaucracy, such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or the State Department. Other departments, like those for commerce, defense, and assistance, may also have a role in enacting foreign policy.

      (as proposed in 1969 by Graham T. Allison. See his book Essence of Decision (1971/99) for a more exhaustive explanation.

      The rational actor model is founded on the principle of rational choice. Inter-state relations (or international relations) serve as the context for analysis. The state is seen as a unified agent capable of making logical choices based on preference ranking and value maximization.

      According to the rational actor model, a state uses a rational decision-making process. This method comprises:

      Objective setting and ranking.

      Consideration of alternatives.

      Evaluation of repercussions.

      Profit maximization.

      In other words, it gives examples for answering the question: given this knowledge, what is the optimal course of action for achieving one's objective? The essential premise of this theory is that governments are cohesive and logical; hence, they would pursue meticulously planned and well-defined foreign policy objectives. In this respect, the rational choice model is largely a realist foreign policy analytical level. The paradigm of the rational actor has been criticized. The approach tends to disregard a variety of political factors, such as those identified by Michael Clarke as political choices, non-political decisions, bureaucratic processes, continuations of earlier policies, and pure chance. Additionally, it disregards feelings, emotional floods, selective attention, and groupthink.

      In this approach, the state is not seen as a unified actor. Instead, it is a collection of competing bureaucracies clamoring for more budgets and more personnel. Individual decision makers attempt to negotiate and compete for influence in order to achieve their individual objectives. Frequently, things are regarded as a zero-sum game in which one bureaucracy's victory or increase in funds is perceived as a loss for another bureaucracy. Here, choices are made by bureaucracies fighting against one another and proposing answers to issues involving the use of their resources in order to elevate their status. In line with its pluralistic meaning, the bureaucratic politics model may also refer to internal state procedures including no institutional players whose informal channels might influence policy outcomes.

      The Organizational Processes paradigm is derived from clusters of government agencies that look out for their own interests and adhere to standard operating procedures. According to this concept, many bureaucracies have distinct standard operating procedures. These processes are created so that day-to-day activities may be conducted. Frequently, an order or judgment must be made in spite of these normal processes. It is often quite challenging for a bureaucracy to operate out of character or opposed to their usual operating protocols.

      Model of inter-branch politics

      Self-aggrandizement paradigm - In this model, a leader serves his or her own interests. (often referred to as cognitive processes and psychological approach)

      Political process model - In this model, the decision-making body is influenced by several non-governmental players, including NGOs and the media.

      Multilevel and Multidimensional approach - In accordance with this model, experts examine certain facets of foreign policy formulation by using several key theories.

      Social constructivist approach - In this perspective, academics emphasize the significance of ideas, speech, and identity in forming FPA.

      Council on International Relations

      Chatham House

      American Enterprise Institute

      Brookings Institution

      Woodrow Wilson International Scholars Center

      Jean-Frédéric Morin and Jonathan Paquin, Foreign Policy Analysis: A Toolkit (Palgrave, 2018).

      ^ a b c d Robert Jackson, Georg Sorensen's Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 5th ed.

      Oxford University Press, 2013.

      Jean A. Garrison, Foreign Policy Analysis in 20/20: A Symposium, International Studies Review 5, no. 2 (March 2003), pp. 155-202.

      Foreign Policy Analysis, Department of Political Science, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Missouri. http://foreignpolicyanalysis.org/

      Graham T. Allison's Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis was published in 1969. American Political Science Review, Volume 63, Number 3 (September 1969), Pages 689-718

      Perspectives on International Relations: Power, Institution, and Ideas, by Henry Nau. 2009, CQ Press. 2nd edition

      ^ M.

      Clarke, ‘The Foreign Policy System: A Framework for Analysis’, in M.

      Clarke and B.

      White (eds) Understanding Foreign Policy: The Foreign Policy Systems Approach (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 1989), pp.

      27-59.

      {End Chapter 1}

      Chapter 2: Political science

      The study of government and politics is known as political science (or PoliSci) (GOVT), Economics, law, sociology, management, history, philosophy, criminology and the sociology of law, geography, anthropology, psychology, communication studies, human resource management (HR as applied to public administration), and environmental studies all have ties to, draw from, and share information with political science; the field also contributes to others like global studies, social work, urban planning, intelligence studies, and intelligence analysis.

      Political science is the study of government and political institutions, as well as the study of political behavior, ideology, and the laws that govern these areas.

      It draws on a wide range of methodologies, including those originally developed in disciplines other than political science but which are now widely used in the field. Positivism, interpretivism, rational choice theory, behaviorism, structuralism, post-structuralism, realism, institutionalism, pluralism, organizational theory, management theory, and the intelligence cycle are just some of the perspectives that have been taken into account. Primary sources, such as historical documents and official records, and secondary sources, such as scholarly journal articles, survey research, statistical analysis, case studies, experimental research, model building, and others more so unique to the field, such as policy analysis, program evaluation, foreign policy analysis, psephology, or political psychology are all used in political science.

      Separating itself from political philosophy and history, modern political science began to take shape in the second half of the 19th century. History, moral philosophy, political economy, political theology, and other disciplines concerned with determining what ought to be and deducing the characteristics and functions of the ideal state can be seen as clear antecedents to modern political science, which was not always distinguished from political philosophy.

      While political scientists share more terminology with sociologists than those who specialize in the study of classical political philosophy because of their focus on modernity and the modern nation state, the latter is primarily defined by a concern for Hellenic and Enlightenment thought (e.g., structure and agency).

      The establishment of political science programs and faculty positions in the late 19th century marked the beginning of the field's acceptance at academic institutions. When someone has a Ph.D. or an MA in politics, they are often referred to as a political scientist..

      In the 1950s and 1960s, the field underwent a behavioral revolution, which placed an emphasis on the scientific, methodical study of both individual and social behavior. Early behavioral political science, as represented by the work of Robert Dahl, Philip Converse, and the collaboration between sociologist Paul Lazarsfeld and public opinion scholar Bernard Berelson, focused on studying political behavior rather than institutions or interpretation of legal texts.

      Deductive, game-theoretic formal modeling techniques saw a boom in the late 1960s and early 1970s as researchers sought to create a more analytical body of knowledge. Research that applied economic theory and methodology to the study of political institutions like the United States Congress and political behavior like voting increased dramatically during this time period. Main proponents of this change were William H. Riker and his fellow faculty and students at the University of Rochester.

      Progress toward systematic theory has been modest and uneven, despite significant research progress in the field based on all the types of scholarship mentioned above.

      Perestroika was a political science movement that emerged in the year 2000 as a backlash against what its proponents saw as the mathematicization of the discipline. Those who participated in the movement pushed for more diversity in political science's research methods and wider public applicability.

      The field of study known as political science examines such topics as how and why power is distributed, the structure and function of governing institutions like national and international governments, as well as public policy and political behavior. Stability, justice, material wealth, peace, and public health are just some of the indicators used to gauge the efficacy of governance and individual policies. Some political scientists seek to advance normative theses (such as by making concrete policy recommendations) through analysis of politics, while others seek to advance positive theses (which attempt to describe how things are, as opposed to how they should be). There is often a close relationship between the study of politics and the study of policies, such as in comparative analyses of how different political institutions lead to different policy outcomes.

      Journalists, lobbyists, politicians, and voters may all benefit from the analytical frameworks that political scientists develop. Chaturvedi claims, Some political scientists work as advisors to elected officials, while others seek elective office themselves. Governments, political parties, and the civil service all employ political scientists. They might be part of some sort of political or non-governmental organization. Those with a background in politics can contribute to businesses in a number of ways. Political scientists are frequently employed by private organizations like think tanks, research institutes, polling organizations, and public relations firms.

      Some political scientists specialize in the study of politics at the national level. They might, for instance, focus solely on American politics.

      Political change and transition theory, Many professionals in political science use the following areas for their work, research, and development of their skills, techniques, education, and experience:

      Focusing on human nature and the ethical goals of political association, political philosophy is interested in the theoretical underpinnings of political communities and institutions.

      Researches the theoretical underpinnings of politics, sociology, and statistics in order to better design and analyze empirical studies.

      Psephology, or quantitative analysis of elections and balloting, is a subfield of Political Analysis.

      The purpose of political forecasting is to anticipate the results of upcoming political events.

      The study of comparative politics seeks to understand the universal principles at work across different political systems.

      The study of international relations focuses on the reasons behind state and non-state interplay on a global scale.

      The field of study known as Security Studies examines issues such as terrorism, national defense, and international stability.

      Academic study dedicated to evaluating and analyzing intelligence data is known as intelligence studies..

      Analysis of foreign policy is a method that incorporates theory, innovation, and empirical research into its focus on the causes and effects of international relations.

      Analyzing policies and testing interventions:

      When it comes to putting into practice the goals of laws and elected officials, policy analysis is a technique used in public administration that allows civil servants, activists, and others to do just that.

      Project, policy, and program evaluation is the practice of using data gathered through research to draw conclusions about those endeavors, The field of public administration is known as organizational theory, which focuses on the inner workings of government agencies.

      The application of ethics in public administration provides a standard for policymaking.

      Budgeting and financing of government operations:

      Allocating limited resources among competing priorities is the goal of public budgeting.

      The field of study known as public finance analyzes how governments affect economies.

      In public administration, human resource management is an internal framework that ensures a fair, ethical, and value-driven approach to hiring public servants. Human resources' core features include programs for caring for and compensating workers as well as other administrative tasks (e.g., human rights, Americans with Disabilities Act). Members of the executive management team who oversee the HR director and other crucial department employees are also included in the public administration system.

      The field of study known as nonprofit management examines the causes and effects of nonprofit organizations and their practices.

      Management's role in emergency management is to establish policies and procedures that help communities prepare for and recover from emergencies.

      Additionally, political methodology and research into the internal politics of a country may be treated as separate subfields by some schools of political science. In the United States, American politics is often viewed as a distinct field from international politics.

      Political philosophy, political behavior (including public opinion, collective action, and identity), and political institutions are just a few of the topical categories into which some academic departments divide research (including legislatures and international organizations). Scholarship in subfields of political science is frequently highlighted at conferences and published in specialized journals. For instance, the American Political Science Association is divided into 42 subgroups that specialize in different areas of political research.

      Global studies

      Law

      Public law

      Administrative law

      Constitutional law

      International law

      Criminal Justice

      Criminology

      Sociology of Law

      Paralegal studies and legal administration as a field of study

      Administration of justice

      Urban planning

      Urban planning education

      Urban studies

      Geography

      Economics

      Communication studies

      Journalism

      Political communications

      Communications

      Social work

      Research on Conflict and Peace

      Intelligence studies

      Data science

      Public health

      Business administration

      Marketing and sales from businesses to government agencies, or B2G.

      Public procurement

      Environmental studies

      Environmental science

      Civil engineering

      Industrial engineering

      Systems engineering

      Human resource management

      Operations research

      The study of politics can be approached from many different ontological perspectives, and researchers in the field use a wide range of methods to do so. Observations in controlled environments are often difficult to reproduce or duplicate in political science, as political science is fundamentally the study of human behavior in all aspects of politics, despite the fact that experimental methods are becoming increasingly common (see experimental political science). As a result, political scientists have traditionally studied political elites, institutions, and individual or group behavior in order to establish norms, generalize findings, and develop theories about politics.

      However, unlike other subjects like non-human organisms in biology, minerals in geoscience, chemical elements in chemistry, stars in astronomy, and particles in physics, human actors in political science can only be partially observed and have the capacity to make conscious choices. Methodological pluralism is a defining feature of modern political science, as it reflects the field's progress in the face of increasing complexity by adopting a wide range of approaches to analyzing politics.

      Field experiments are a common tool in empirical political science, Feminist political theory, historical analysis associated with the Cambridge school, and Straussian approaches are just a few of the many theoretical stances and methods used by political theorists to explain political phenomena.

      When sociological norms or psychological biases are linked to political phenomena, for example, political science may overlap with the traditional focuses of other social sciences. In such cases, political science may adopt their research strategies or forge a new one.

      a discipline which lives on the fault line between the 'two cultures' in the academy, the sciences and the humanities, as one author puts it, may be an apt description for political science and, by extension, the social sciences as a whole. while at others, especially research universities, political science would be taught by the university's public policy school because of its emphasis on a more applied form of public administration at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. The study of politics can be integrated into a curriculum focused on the liberal arts, on professional development/professional school preparation, or on both.

      The Bachelor of Arts degree in political science is widely available at schools across the United States. Larger universities typically offer doctoral and master's degree programs (MA/MAT and PhD/EdD). Universities founded before or heavily influenced by the 1960s tend to use the term government for the field of study known as political science in North America after the 1960s; Pi Sigma Alpha is the preeminent national honor society for political science and government majors at American universities, while Pi Alpha Alpha is the preeminent national honor society for public administration majors.

      Both academic and professional writing exist in the field of political science, with the former including but not limited to:

      Essays, articles, texts, reflection papers, capstone projects, responses to such, and reflections on events and real-world problems are all examples of academic writing.

      Case studies

      Memoranda

      Content writing

      Policy analysis

      Position papers

      Reports

      Intelligence assessments

      Academic works of both color and tone

      Legal briefs

      Grant writing

      Legislation and Regulations

      Social research

      Strategic communications

      Marketing collateral

      Research papers, in which an original research question is investigated, are the most common form of academic writing in the field of generalist political sciences.

      {End Chapter 2}

      Chapter 3: Rational choice theory

      The term rational choice theory refers to a set of guiding principles that may be used to better comprehend the behavior of societal and economic institutions. as well as philosophy.

      The fundamental assumption behind rational choice theory is that the choices that individual actors make will, taken as a whole, give rise to aggregate patterns of social behavior. Additionally, the theory presupposes that people have preferences out of the several accessible options for decision. It is believed that these preferences are both exhaustive and reversible. The ability of a person to express which of the available choices best suits them is necessary for completeness (i.e. individual prefers A over B, B over A or are indifferent to both). Alternately, transitivity refers to the situation in which a person weakly likes choice A over option B and then weakly prefers option B over option C, which ultimately leads to the realization that the individual weakly prefers option A over option C. The rational agent will next carry out their own cost-benefit analysis based on a number of different criteria in order to carry out the action that they have self-determined to be their best option.

      The pursuit of one's goals in the most expedient and economical manner possible, without regard to the significance or value of those pursuits, is an example of one kind of rationality known as instrumental rationality. Duncan Snidal emphasizes that the aims are not limited to egotistical, materialistic, or self-centered concerns. They also contain objectives that are other-regarding and altruistic, in addition to goals that are normative or ideational. To illustrate this point using an illustration from Milton Friedman, a theory is considered to have been successful if it can pass the empirical test by predicting that the behavior of leaves on a tree can be explained by the rationality of the leaves.

      It may be hard to scientifically evaluate or refute the rationality assumption if the individual's goals or preferences are not first expressly dictated. On the other hand, the predictions that a particular interpretation of the theory makes are testable. The most widely used interpretation of rational choice theory, the anticipated utility theory, has been called into question as a consequence of the experimental findings of behavioral economics in recent years. Economists are enhancing their theories of choice by learning from other studies, such as psychology, in order to acquire a more realistic perspective of how humans make decisions. One of these fields is psychology. For instance, in recognition of his contributions to this area of study, the behavioral economist and experimental psychologist Daniel Kahneman was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 2002.

      According to the rational choice theory, there are two possible outcomes that might result from two different decisions about human activity.

      Firstly, Within the scope of all the potential and associated actions, the practicable area will be selected.

      Second, after the selection of the most desired alternative, The selection of the most practical location was made taking into consideration the available financial resources, legal, social, limits, either physical or mental, that the agent is now contending with.

      After that, a choice will be made based on the preference order.: 501 Individuals choose the best action according to their personal preferences and the constraints facing them.

      E.g, There is nothing unreasonable or abnormal about having a preference for fish over beef for the very first time, However, there is something illogical about choosing fish over meat at one moment, and then preferring meat over fish in the next one, without their having been any further adjustments made.

      The fundamental assumption behind rational choice theory is that the choices that individual actors make will, taken as a whole, give rise to aggregate patterns of social behavior. Therefore, every person makes a decision based on the limitations (or option set) they are presented with in addition to their own personal

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1