About this ebook
One of The Atlantic’s Great American Novels of the Past 100 Years
Under the influence of a charismatic classics professor, a group of clever, eccentric misfits at a New England college discover a way of thought and life a world away from their banal contemporaries. But their search for the transcendent leads them down a dangerous path, beyond human constructs of morality.
“A remarkably powerful novel [and] a ferociously well-paced entertainment . . . Forceful, cerebral, and impeccably controlled.” —The New York Times
Donna Tartt
Donna Tartt is a novelist, essayist and critic. Her first novel, The Secret History, has been published in twenty-three countries.
Related to The Secret History
Related ebooks
Rebecca Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Have Always Lived in the Castle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Tree Grows in Brooklyn Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5East of Eden Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Haunting of Hill House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Animal Farm Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Suspense For You
Pretty Girls: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5None of This Is True: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fairy Tale Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Martian: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Then She Was Gone: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Flicker in the Dark: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Institute: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I'm Thinking of Ending Things: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Housemaid Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shift: Book Two of the Silo Series Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Everyone in My Family Has Killed Someone: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Misery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Thing He Told Me: A Reese Witherspoon Book Club Pick Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Yellowface: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Used to Live Here: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Paris Apartment: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Recursion: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only One Left: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Home Is Where the Bodies Are Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5First Lie Wins: Reese's Book Club: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dark Matter: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Flight: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5One of Us Is Dead Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Billy Summers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Outsider: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sharp Objects: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Finders Keepers: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mr. Mercedes: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Stand Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Hunting Party: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for The Secret History
6,423 ratings274 reviews
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Aug 9, 2025
I am aware that I'm in an incredibly small minority, nonetheless, "The Secret History" did not work for me. I will agree the work is well written. For me however, that was not enough. Likely due to my "advanced" age, I found it difficult to relate to any of the characters or their struggles. The characters seemed to be a collection of self-absorbed, spoiled, and pretentious kids. The story itself
is interesting but takes far too long in the telling. I think it could have shed 200 pages with no loss of merit. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Dec 8, 2024
The Secret History by Donna Tartt is a masterpiece of academic mystery thrillers, offering a slow-paced yet gripping narrative that culminates in a remarkable climax. Unlike conventional thrillers, this novel challenges readers by presenting events without spoon-feeding the intentions of its complex characters. Tartt’s storytelling invites readers to delve deeply into the intricate layers of the plot and make sense of the nuanced happenings.
The first half of the book is meticulously dedicated to character exploration, which is crucial for understanding the story’s depth. Among them, Henry stands out as the most dynamic and enigmatic character. As the narrative unfolds, the shocking developments in the characters' arcs keep readers engaged and intrigued.
Tartt masterfully saves the final twist for the climax, delivering a revelation that provides an entirely new perspective on the story. This singular twist is impactful enough to leave a lasting impression on the reader.
The Secret History deserves all the praise it has received and more. Its blend of rich character development, a thought-provoking plot, and a breathtaking conclusion makes it a must-read for fans of literary fiction and thrillers. Without a doubt, this book earns a glowing 5-star rating. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Aug 2, 2024
for a book with such unlikeable characters, and given that you're told what happens halfway through right at the beginning, i was invested in this so much. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Nov 11, 2024
Loved this backward mystery. You start out knowing who did it--you read to find out why. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Jun 26, 2024
The Secret History is a murder non-mystery; in the novel's opening paragraph its first-person narrator, Richard Papen, confesses his role in the murder of another student of Hampden, a small liberal arts college in Vermont. The only facts left to discover after his admission are what led to the murder and what happened in its wake that leaves Richard—as he puts it—with no other stories to tell.
At Hampden, Richard is befriended by the only other students studying classics with Julian Morrow, a reclusive professor of some renown in the literary world. Henry Winter is the group's ringleader; it is his "modest plan" that results in the murder of the troublesome Edmund "Bunny" Corcoran by Henry and his three cohorts, the maternal twins Charles and Camilla Macaulay and the affable Francis Abernathy.
The novel is broken into two parts: the fatal consequences of Bunny's accidental discovery of a crime all his friends except Richard participated in, and the aftermath of Bunny's murder as the five remaining friends pretend it has no impact on their psyches. Impaired by drugs, alcohol, lust and incest, the group eventually collapses under the weight of its paranoia-induced mistrust of each other.
Some aspects of the story are hard to believe. The depth of Richard's knowledge of the habits and mannerisms of his friends is more in line with a lifelong acquaintance than an association of little more than a semester. The continual drunkenness exhibited by the group is shocking; its lack of impact on their studies is equally unconvincing. And Bunny's family is particularly cartoonish.
Despite these flaws, The Secret History is an engaging story of the detrimental effects of manipulation and deception among well-educated young people isolated in a remote college town with too much free time and money. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Mar 31, 2024
Donna Tartt really knows how to evoke a mood and create a story that sticks with you. While the central characters of The Secret History aren't exactly what you'd call likable, they all feel so very real that I suspect I'll be thinking about them for quite sometime and that's a mark of good writing. Some reviews seemed to indicate that the book ran long, but this isn't so much a book about plot, although that is an important part of it. What it is is a book about mood and character and it helps to have the space to sit with those things in order to reach the pay offs. - Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5
Jan 27, 2024
I thought this was going to be great, but it turned out to be rather ordinary and I am wondering what all the fuss - some years ago now - was about. The plot ends about halfway through the book, and the second half really adds nothing to our understanding of the characters while it treads water (as one other reviewer put it well). Tartt's writing ranges from pedestrian to showing off (it's mostly pedestrian). And the characters remain distant, unlovable, and opaque, while the narrator is an unremarkable everyman without much insight into the events of the novel or (as the author's mouthpiece) the human condition. It's too dull to be a good crime novel, and too banal to be literature. Pulp-able fiction? - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Jan 23, 2024
More interesting in the first two-thirds, then drags unnecessarily afterward.
I picked this book up because it seems to appear on all the "dark academia" lists and videos. Consequently, I think I shan't be reading much DA in future.
[Audiobook note: Tartt did herself no favors by reading this herself. The book would have been much better served by a professional voice actor.] - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Dec 30, 2023
I listened to the book in audiobook format and at 6 hours I was wondering what could possibly happen to these characters that would take 16 more hours. The author would move from one vignette to the next wringing out every last detail. It made for some distinct atmospheric effects, such as the hazy langour of the lake house, and the claustrophobic tension of waiting for the snow to melt and reveal what lay beneath. Those effects were the highlight of the book. However, it also felt stuck at times. For example there were repeated scenes of drunken arguing, many trips to make phone calls that were never answered, many times the narrator wakes up to find he has slept the day away. There were alarm clocks in the 90s, but he certainly did not know how to use one.
Other reviewers absolutely loved this book, but I kept checking to see how much more was left. There's no denying this is solid writing and I wanted to see how it turned out, but it was not an enjoyable read. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Nov 11, 2023
The Secret History is a surprising book. It tells of the secrets of a small college in Vermont, where a small clique of odd students spend their time reading the classics under the tutelage of their mysterious professor.
And doing drugs and drinking. Significant amounts of each.
Bad things happen, as they will do under these circumstances, and most of the rest of the book is taken up with how these young people deal with the bad things.
This doesn’t sound, on the first glance, very exciting, but Tartt is so good at teasing out little disasters and stories that I found myself unable to put the book down. She manages to create a creeping sense of people falling apart, of basically good people losing their way, of evil begetting evil. Richard, the main character, seems at first the most lost, but he ends up being the most stable one of the group, perhaps because things happen TO him rather than him eagerly participating in them.
It’s a high residue book- the characters will stay with me for quite a while, I think. I’d like to reread it, trying to figure out how Tartt wields her magic, but it’s too hard to do. The story is grim and sad and a bit despair-inducing, like a Greek tragedy.
Still, highly recommended. Worth the time spent .
I may have to wait a bit before reading anything more by this author, though… - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Nov 6, 2023
The book opens with five students from a small private college in Vermont walking away from the body of a sixth, making sure they have cleared the evidence from the scene. Told from the point-of-view of Richard Papen (a transfer student from an unsupportive and less-than-wealthy family in California), this mystery is not a "whodunit" or even "howdunit" but a "whydunit". The story spools out through a haze of drugs, alcohol, sex and a Classics course in Greek as we witness the mental states of the students deteriorate under the strain of paranoia, guilt, jealousy, insecurity and self-absorption. It all adds up to a psychosis-inducing cocktail and a compelling tale as riveting as it is awful. Despite the interior dialogues of Richard and the insertion of relatively esoteric ideas (e.g., untranslated words and phrases in Greek and Latin, Ancient Greek concepts of the self, etc...), this isn't really a deep dive into the psyche of the individual or group-- so there is little emotional leverage to fully engage the reader. But I have to admit that this may be because I went in thinking that this would be a lit-fic book and started looking for meaning where perhaps none existed: There must be a reason why "Bunny" was the only one with a nickname (all others are addressed by full first names), right? These students represent archetypes, yes? What does Julian, their teacher represent? But trying to extract meaning out the story is as pointless as it is counter-productive to just enjoying the story for what it is: a remarkable debut novel from a young author (They were under thirty-years old when the book was published) and an entertaining, page-turning thriller with some surprising plot twists. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Nov 24, 2023
I was introduced to Donna Tartt when The Goldfinch was published. That book continues to be one of my all-time favorites. Ever since, people have been recommending I read The Secret History. I finally followed the advice and put The Secret History on hold with my local library. Approximately six months later, my hold finally came in for the audiobook on the Libby app.
The Secret History is an incredible story. I didn’t know much about the plot when I started reading, which I think best suited my experience. My personal challenge while reading The Secret History is that I kept comparing it to how much I loved The Goldfinch, and The Secret History didn’t quite rise to that level for me. I repeatedly reminded myself to manage my expectations and stop comparing one to the other. When I was able to do that, I became immersed in the story.
The story is told from the perspective of Richard Papen, a young man who leaves his home in California to attend Hampden College in Vermont. New to the area with no friends or acquaintances, Richard enrolls in the Ancient Greek program and is academically counseled by professor Julian Morrow. There are only five other students in his Greek studies class. Richard successfully makes a good impression on his peers and is cautiously brought into their close knit fold. Richard never truly seems to fit in with this group as they come from money and don’t really need an education for a future career. Richard comes from a differently world entirely.
The Secret History opens with Richard telling his story from a much later time in his life. He immediately reveals that one member of his peer group is dead. Richard then shares the development of their relationships and how one of his friends met his fate. The story continues to grow darker and more dysfunctional by the minute. It’s a very tragic novel that is exceptionally written.
As I previously mentioned, I borrowed the audiobook from my local library with the Libby app. Surprisingly, Donna Tartt narrates the audiobook and she does an excellent job. It was an additional pleasure to hear the book exactly as the author wrote the story.
I have photos and additional information that I'm unable to include here. It can all be found on my blog, in the link below.
A Book And A Dog - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Nov 7, 2023
I recently heard the NYT book review talk about it this classic Donna Tart psychological thriller about an elite college where an unusual band of students conspire with and against each other regarding acts of murder and cover up. I though The Goldfinch was an excellent read so looked into this, her first novel. It was certainly an engaging plot and I found the narration of Richard Papen to be similar to Nick in the Great Gatsby. He wanted to be a part of the group but yet could stand back and coolly assess their strengths and weaknesses. Certainly Tart used her background of attending Bennington college as the setting for this description of the life of the privileged classics students who fall under the spell of a professor and who felt superior to others. It was news to me to hear how her peer group of writers graduated together:
Vanity Fair:"The twin forces of youth and genius, at least, were palpable in the air upon the arrival of the class of 1986, when three particular undergrads named Bret Easton Ellis, Donna Tartt,and Jonathan Lethem hit the campus, primed to flirt and flounder and follow their callings through their ensuing years at the decade’s most decadent college (which all three would later mythologize in their respective literary careers).
I also didn’t realize how current the idea of “dark academia “ is with hundreds of TicTok videos quoting from this novel.
Though I certainly found the writing smart and full of literary references, I can't say that I enjoyed it much, ghastly things done by unlikeable people and ultimately suffering for it.
Lines:
She raised up on tiptoe and gave me a cool, soft kiss that tasted of Popsicles. Oh you, I thought, my heart beating fast and shallow.
In my own humorless state I failed to see anything except what I construed as certain tragic similarities between Gatsby and myself.
The swish of the oars and the hypnotic thrum of dragonflies blended with his academic monotone. Camilla, flushed and sleepy, trailed her hand in the water. Yellow birch leaves blew from the trees and drifted down to rest on the surface.
A sudden wind rustled through the birches; a gust of yellow leaves came storming down. I took a sip of my drink. If I had grown up in that house I couldn't have loved it more, couldn't have been more familiar with the creak of the swing, or the pattern of the clematis vines on the trellis, or the velvety swell of land as it faded to gray on the horizon, and the strip of highway visible—just barely—in the hills, beyond the trees. The very colors of the place had seeped into my blood: just as Hampden, in subsequent years, would always present itself immediately in my imagination in a confused whirl of white and green and red, so the country house first appeared as a glorious blur of watercolors, of ivory and lapis blue, chestnut and burnt orange and gold, separating only gradually into the boundaries of remembered objects: the house, the sky, the maple trees. But even that day, there on the porch, with Charles beside me and the smell of wood smoke in the air, it had the quality of a memory; there it was, before my eyes, and yet too beautiful to believe.
I sat on the bed during the twilight while the walls went slowly from gray to gold to black, listening to a soprano’s voice climb dizzily up and down somewhere at the other end of the hall until at last the light was completely gone, and the faraway soprano spiraled on and on in the darkness like some angel of death… I was happy in those first days as really I’d never been before, roaming like a sleepwalker, stunned and drunk with beauty. A group of red-cheeked girls playing soccer, ponytails flying… the heavy sweet smell of apples rotting on the ground and the steady thrumming of wasps around them. Commons clock tower: ivied brick, white spire, spellbound in the hazy distance. The shock of first seeing a birch tree at night, rising up in the dark as cool and slim as a ghost. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Aug 21, 2023
I just don’t know what to think. I felt compelled to finish this novel to find out how the guilt they all lived with played out. But I didn’t enjoy the overwhelming use of dreams, and characters living in a constant state of drunkenness. Richard seems to be asleep for most of the novel. Everyone is taking pills and talking Greek and acting odd and I’m not really liking anyone, Henry, Francis, twins Charles and Camilla, Bunny and Richard.
The murder/ mystery element in the novel is hazy also as in a dream sequence .
Themes of morality, education, friendship,university life, alcohol and drug abuse .
I just didn’t really like “ The Secret History”. - Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5
Jul 13, 2023
I took notice of this book after catching something on the Dark Academia social media aesthetic and thought maybe this sounded right up my alley. I was not angry I read/listened to this book, but I was not exactly pleased that it took so long to get through either. The book is overwritten, it is just too long for what it is: “a reverse detective story”. Really it seemed more of a corruption and downfall character arc sort of story although the characters were a bunch of unlikeable asses who seemed to suddenly violate the taboo of murder rather suddenly and without any buildup, but I digress.
I listened to the audiobook and a definite advantage to this was that the author reads it, and she reads it very well even distinguishing some of the voices with some characterizing voice work and flair. That part I overwhelmingly enjoyed. However, two of the chapters are over 4 hours long and one is very close to 5 hours! The print book is over 500 pages even though it only has 8 chapters and an epilogue. An editor needed to ruthlessly chop this sucker down and the author needed to compress the remaining text and divide the longer chapters up into more digestible bits.
I think the length problem is why I just did not retain much of the actual text save for the scene where Richard has lunch and cocktails with Bunny. In fact, this is my favorite part of the book. I was doing yard work in the searing direct sunlight of summer for that bit and now associate it with shoveling dry red-brown, yellow leaves, and old woodchip ground cover.
The main overarching flaw with this work is its excessive length the loose plot simply does not demand it. In fact, superfluous details and dangling plot threads tend to bury it save for the points of the main crime and the resulting secondary incident. The precipitating incident is more thoroughly buried in the text than the latter consequential event, however. As the story proceeds both become a little lost in the details with only call-backs to the latter to buoy the point of that incident.
The characters were a bunch of spoiled pretentious rich kids and thoroughly awful people and the book was too long (my central gripe if you couldn't tell). Although I did kind of appreciate Bunny’s character, he stuck out the most in this long book. Can I recommend The Secret History? Well, I thought it was just “meh” so not really. It was overlong and not economically or well-constructed for what it was. However, if you still think you might want to check this out, possibly for its link to the Dark Academia social media trend, go with the audiobook.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Jul 9, 2023
I can't put this book down! - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Jul 22, 2023
This is a kind of strange book. I picked it up because I read that it’s the foundation of the ‘dark academia’ strain of books. Sadly, it did not have any supernatural aspects to it, but it was very, very dark.
Richard Papen is our narrator. He is from California, in an area where there are no cultural enrichments available (in Richard’s opinion). His father expects him to go into his boring-as-can- be business, and so will fund him going to a local college to get a business degree. Richard has different ideas; his forte is languages, particularly dead languages. He wants to go to an eastern college, where ivy climbs the walls and the classics are studied. He applies to Hampden College, and, surprisingly, gets a scholarship- which doesn’t go very far to pay the bills other than tuition.
Shortly after arriving, he sees a group of students who are different from the rest. They are dressed expensively and somewhat eccentrically, they don’t go to the popular places on campus, they are always together, frequently with the professor of Greek. They pique his interest; he feels he is meant to be a part of their group, although they seem unapproachable and decidedly better than any others on campus. He applies for entry in the Greek classes; the charismatic older professor turns him down. On a second try, he is accepted into the lofty company of the 5 who are the only students in the Greek classes.
The group members are upper class, well-funded, intellectual, and snobby. Twins Camille and Charles, fey Francis, tightly wound Henry, and Bunny, who is always short of money and forever getting the other four to pay his way. (I swear this character would be played by Vince Vaughn if this were made into a movie) Richard almost immediately invents a life for himself, wherein he, too, is also from wealth and culture. He finds as job on campus, which gives him enough money to survive during term- barely- and not at all during winter break. His fake biography and facility with ancient Greek get him past the rarefied group’s cursory inspection and he finds himself included in their get- togethers and antics.
At the start of the novel we are given the information that they have committed murder. This is not a spoiler; this is where Richard pretty much starts with his narration. It turns out the murder was an accident, but they go to lengths to hide it. When one of their number, Bunny, discovers this, he threatens to go to the police and the group decides to commit premeditated murder-and insist that Richard (who had nothing to do with the first death, and was not even part of the group at the time) take part in it. Therein ensues the core of the book, the disintegration of the Greek students, both personally and as a group. It’s painful to watch. Very painful.
This is a very long book, but Tartt’s prose carried me along effortlessly, even in the painful sections. And that’s a good thing, because the characters are… thinly portrayed. There are no souls behind the window dressing of their elitism. There isn’t really a lot of plot- there are a few events, and a lot about how the characters react to them. In the end, the secret society of elite intellectuals is nothing more than teenagers trying on guises and finding out that there are real world consequences to their actions. Did I enjoy the book? Yes, I did. Despite its weak spots, I couldn’t put the gigantic thing down. I just had to see what those kids did next- and the ending did have quite a surprise. - Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5
Jan 22, 2024
Social chronicle, portrait of youth, frustration, it is slow, (2014) (Translated from Spanish) - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Apr 3, 2023
I have heard about this book for what feels like ages: highly literate friends of mine shocked and stunned when I told them I hadn't read it; many who plant Proust and Woolf regularly on their top ten lists would also place this book on their top ten list of both contemporary and all-time favorite novels; etcetera. I feel like I've owned a copy of this book forever, and it was a wonderfully compelling read—almost addictive in its prose, its characterizations, its unrivaled setting of mood. Tartt is a master of ambience, and The Secret History is less what one reviewer below calls it—something along the lines of a first-time novelist writing a long book to pack everything she wants in, to show her talent off, and so on—and much more a long, tedious, and claustrophobic study in the ominous. It can be downright uncomfortable to read this novel because of Tartt's expert use of mood and her control of the narrative through the first-person narration and her juggling of temporalities throughout.
Structurally, this is a very sound and very wise book; I actually thought that one of the long chapters toward end (about three-quarters of the way through the book) was an oversight on Tartt's part, but, on thinking it over a bit more with this idea of the mood she's trying to set and alter slightly as the novel progresses, this actually works wonderfully. (I'm not saying which chapter because the location and events would be a major plot spoiler.) This is less a novel about plot—we learn what happens, for the most part, on page one—than it is a novel about the psychological depths of others as viewed by one very biased narrator. For that alone, it's well worth reading as a study in psychological realism and depth; coupled with the strange, ominous, and often creepy mood Tartt continues throughout, it's a compelling and masterful read.
It's hard to believe this is a first novel, and I can well believe the immense pressure Tartt felt in writing her second which I look forward to reading soon. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Mar 21, 2023
Extraordinary first novel from a young writer. Exceptional in observational detail, background knowledge, pace, dialogue, mood, and yet full of flaws, too. Biggest criticisms: There is little depth to these characters (understandable for college students maybe, but the adults are constructed this way, too) and some situations, conceits are just too overwhelming to accept. While not a classic, I had no trouble seeing why this novel arrived with fanfare and made Tartt a literary darling. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Feb 18, 2023
uhh these characters Suck but man was that a ride - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Feb 9, 2023
A fascinating and immersive novel, with particular resonance for me as I happen to have spent a year at Bennington College, the model for Hampen College. Tartt's description of rich kids' lives in Vermont is evocative and brought back a lot of memories, and her portrayal of the fascinating classics department professor Julian intrigued me (I also studied classics). The realism of their Greek studies and the environment was balanced by the fantasy of the way they talk and their secret activities, which I think were intentionally at a remove from our experience as moderns -- the question posed is, what if some kids really did decide to live like ancients in the modern world?
I was less satisfied was the "inverted detective story" plot, which seemed to arrive with too much urgency, infecting the narrator's and my own experience before we had barely got settled into our new life as classics students. But, still a fascinating read whose author I will continue to follow. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Oct 29, 2022
Just stunning. Couldn't stop, had to read it all in one sitting, absolutely drunk, delirious, insane. Hate reading books this good. - Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Oct 23, 2022
Five stars because this book was so excellently written. Dark and atmospheric, so layered. I have so much admiration for this author's work.
The characters are extremely hard to like, just a bunch of young assholes.
This book takes place in some town in Vermont, in a liberal arts college, that is one of the strangest colleges I've ever heard of. They don't work very hard, they only go to school for 3 months in the fall and three months in the spring, and they party so much, and everybody smokes so much you can't believe it.
The protagonist and his group of cohorts are so very young and think they are so very mature. They're very unlikable. They actually are studying ancient Greek; I don't know what they think they're going to do with that. Two out of the group are rich kids, so that's why they don't really care that they're taking a course of study that won't get them a job.
The narrator is Richard, from a lower middle class background in California. The other poor kid is nicknamed Bunny; he's not really poor it's just that his parents won't give him a penny. He shamelessly mooches off everybody else, especially Henry.
They are fascinated with this idea of having a bacchanalia: and to them that means losing their minds and going into a depraved state where every carnal desire is satisfied and alcohol plays a huge part in it; essentially they become wild animals. They actually achieved this, and in that state they commit a terrible crime.
When one of their group that wasn't there finds out that they did this, then they commit another crime to cover it up.
as there were a lot of references I didn't understand, I looked them up on google, and came across this blogger, whose observations were helpful to me, and I copied and pasted part of what she had to say about the book:
Michelle podsiedlik
"The Secret History is very much like The Magus and The Brothers Karamazov: two of my all-time favorites that I hesitate to recommend too heartily to others. The plots are meandering and unsatisfying; many of the characters are aggressively unlikeable; the authors have little sense of humor about their subjects (Fowles, especially). But the writing itself hits a sweet spot for me. It’s like a quiet art film. Tartt’s compositions are so beautiful that each moment is enjoyed, even if the overall structure is lacking. This kind of enjoyment is very subjective. I can’t call The Secret History a great book but I had a great time reading it."
Their advisor, and their teacher, is an old man named Julian, who is independently wealthy, and does pretty much what he wants in the college, because he refuses his salary except for a dollar a semester. He's the one that puts the idea of the bachanalia into their minds. Richard starts the class late in the term, and on the first day, Julian has this to say:
"...the discussion that day was about loss of self, about Plato's four divine madnesses, about madness of all sorts; he began by talking about what he called the burden of the self, and why people want to lose the self in the first place.
'Why does that obstinate little voice in our heads torment us so?' He said, looking around the table. 'Could it be because it reminds us that we are alive, of our mortality, of our individual souls - which, after all, we are too afraid to surrender but yet make us feel more miserable than any other thing? But isn't it also pain that often makes us most aware of self? It is a terrible thing to learn as a child that one is a being separate from all the world, and that no one and no thing hurts along with one's burned tongues and skinned knees, that one's aches and pains are all one's own. Even more terrible, as we grow older, to learn that no person, no matter how beloved, can ever truly understand us. Our own selves make us most unhappy, and that's why we're so anxious to lose them, don't you think?... ' "
Richard the narrator is a loathsome character, but even more loathsome is the character of Bunny, whose real name is Edmond. After the bacchanalia, and Bunny figures out what has happened, Henry takes Bunny to Rome over the 3-month break of Christmas, in a way to bribe him out of telling on them. He spends probably $80,000 on this trip.
Richard had to find a place to stay, because the college closes up over the extended holiday. He has no money and no job, so he finds a room at the top of a warehouse, where the owner obstensively makes musical instruments, and he's supposed to help him by making pegs for instruments, and sanding mandolins. There's a hole in the ceiling, and no heating, so he lays on the floor and catches pneumonia eventually. By chance, Henry discovers him, having come back early from Rome. He takes Richard to the hospital, and when Richard is released, brings him back to his house to recuperate.
"on the Saturday before school was to begin, I was lying on Henry's bed reading a book. Henry had been gone since before I woke up. suddenly I heard a loud banging at the front door. Thinking Henry had forgotten his key, I went to let him in.
It was Bunny. He was wearing sunglasses and -- in contrast to the shapeless, Tweedy rags he generally wore -- a sharp and very new Italian suit. He had also gained about 10 or 20 lb. He seemed surprised to see me."
Henry tells Richard about the bacchanalia: " " 'it was heart shaking. Glorious. Torches, dizziness, singing. Wolves howling around us and bull bellowing in the dark. The river ran white. It was like a film in fast motion, the moon waxing and waning, clouds rushing across the sky. Vines grew from the ground so fast they twined up the trees like snakes; seasons passing in the wink of an eye, entire years for all I know... I mean we think of phenomenal change as being the very essence of time when it's not at all. Time is something which defies spring and winter, birth and decay, the good and the bad, indifferently.'
. . . What exactly did you do?' I said.
'Well, really, I think we needn't go into that now,' He said smoothly. 'there was a certain carnal element to the proceedings but the phenomenon was basically spiritual in nature.'
'You saw Dionysus, I suppose?' I had not meant this at all seriously, and I was startled when he nodded as casually as if I'd asked him if he'd done his homework.
'You saw him corporeally? Goat skin? Thyrsus?' "
I mentioned how much they smoke in this book. Most of them are chain-smoking, all the time; I don't even know how they breathe, because they're doing it inside of houses.
Later on in the book, Francis calls up Richard in the middle of the night and tells him he's dying. He convinces Richard to come over to tend to him:
" 'The way you smoke,' I said, 'no wonder you're short of breath.'
'that has nothing to do with it,' he said irritably, tamping the cigarette on the back of his wrist. 'That's just what these stupid Vermonters tell you. Stop smoking, cut out booze and coffee. I've been smoking half my life. You think I don't know how it affects me? You don't get these nasty cramping pains in your chest from cigarettes, nor from having a few drinks, either. Besides, I have all these other symptoms. Heart palpitations. Ringing in the ears.' "
I forgot to mention that they also drink, almost constantly. And not just beer; they're drinking every kind of hard liquor. They do every kind of drugs too, all kinds of pills, and snort coke, do crank.
When the shit hits the fan, Julian, their beloved teacher, is not there for them, but runs away, as fast and as far as he can:
" . . . I could say that the secret of Julian's charm was that he latched on to young people who wanted to feel better than everybody else; that he had a strange gift for twisting feelings of inferiority into superiority and arrogance. I could also say that he did this not through altruistic motives but selfish ones, in order to fulfill some egotistic impulse of his own. And I could elaborate on this at some length and with, I believe, a fair degree of accuracy. But still that would not explain the fundamental magic of his personality or why - even in the light of subsequent events - I still have an overwhelming wish to see him the way that I first saw him: as the wise old man who appeared to me out of nowhere on a desolate strip of road, with a bewitching offer to make all my dreams come true." - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Nov 2, 2022
This is one of those books that manages to be a lot of things. Set in a second rate college that attracts odd-ball well-off students who can't (or don't want to) go to a college with a better name, it follows the students who are taking an ancient Greek Studies for a major. They are all odd, even compared to their fellow college students. Its a story about a murder - the day of the murder, than the events before and after. Narrated by an outsider, a scholarship student from California.
The thing is, there are no good people in this book. They all have their faults, but Donna Tart is a master at writing motivations - reading about this tight-knit group imploding is compelling. While the ending wasn't really a surprise, how it came to that point was.
One thing - the story is set in the late 80's in prestigious college. Was there really this much drinking, drugs, and general debauchery on campus? Was there an attempt to even try to hide it? - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Jul 3, 2022
It's rare that I can enjoy a book where I don't really like most of the characters, but this well-written book managed it. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Sep 7, 2022
I don’t know, I expected more from this book, everyone praises it. It feels like it left me hanging. The characters, I expected more from them, honestly; the story was more of the same. A pretty predictable ending. I spent the whole book waiting for an unexpected twist, something to surprise me, but no. (Translated from Spanish) - Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5
Mar 15, 2022
I read this because my teen book club wanted to read it for our monthly book. I did not like The Goldfinch, so I did not go into this with high hopes and I was not disappointed. Richard, Henry, twins Camilla and Charles, Francis, and Bunny were pretentious and annoying. All except Richard come from a lot of money and Hampden College resembled any number of small, private New England Colleges. Richard was a kind of sympathetic character but he so wants to fit in with the exclusive group and Julian, their charismatic Classics professor who selects a small group to teach useful skills like ancient Greek and Latin. The group take his lessons a bit too far one night and events go forth from there. - Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Feb 9, 2022
This is a hard book to rate.
All of the characters are one-dimensional, and the rating should be low.
The author's interest in showing off their collection of aesthetic knick-knacks gets old before one is able to even settle into the book, so the rating should be low.
The pointlessness of everything feels like a lazy commentary, and thus, the rating should be low.
Yet I read this book with gusto. At least the first 2/3 or so of the book. Kind of like when smoking a cigar. The first 2/3 are great, but finishing out that final third, when things start to get bitter, and heavy, and your interest is gone...it took a lot of willpower to sit down and finish the book.
I'm not sure it was worth finishing.
Yet, for all the annoyances, the author managed several times to give me a sense that a great book was shaping up in my hands. Maybe that great book is the author's next book. - Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Jan 21, 2022
An excellent story of the collapse of five classics students.
Book preview
The Secret History - Donna Tartt
PROLOGUE
The snow in the mountains was melting and Bunny had been dead for several weeks before we came to understand the gravity of our situation. He’d been dead for ten days before they found him, you know. It was one of the biggest manhunts in Vermont history—state troopers, the FBI, even an army helicopter; the college closed, the dye factory in Hampden shut down, people coming from New Hampshire, upstate New York, as far away as Boston.
It is difficult to believe that Henry’s modest plan could have worked so well despite these unforeseen events. We hadn’t intended to hide the body where it couldn’t be found. In fact, we hadn’t hidden it at all but had simply left it where it fell in hopes that some luckless passer-by would stumble over it before anyone even noticed he was missing. This was a tale that told itself simply and well: the loose rocks, the body at the bottom of the ravine with a clean break in the neck, and the muddy skidmarks of dug-in heels pointing the way down; a hiking accident, no more, no less, and it might have been left at that, at quiet tears and a small funeral, had it not been for the snow that fell that night; it covered him without a trace, and ten days later, when the thaw finally came, the state troopers and the FBI and the searchers from the town all saw that they had been walking back and forth over his body until the snow above it was packed down like ice.
—
It is difficult to believe that such an uproar took place over an act for which I was partially responsible, even more difficult to believe I could have walked through it—the cameras, the uniforms, the black crowds sprinkled over Mount Cataract like ants in a sugar bowl—without incurring a blink of suspicion. But walking through it all was one thing; walking away, unfortunately, has proved to be quite another, and though once I thought I had left that ravine forever on an April afternoon long ago, now I am not so sure. Now the searchers have departed, and life has grown quiet around me, I have come to realize that while for years I might have imagined myself to be somewhere else, in reality I have been there all the time: up at the top by the muddy wheel-ruts in the new grass, where the sky is dark over the shivering apple blossoms and the first chill of the snow that will fall that night is already in the air.
What are you doing up here? said Bunny, surprised, when he found the four of us waiting for him.
Why, looking for new ferns, said Henry.
And after we stood whispering in the underbrush—one last look at the body and a last look round, no dropped keys, lost glasses, everybody got everything?—and then started single file through the woods, I took one glance back through the saplings that leapt to close the path behind me. Though I remember the walk back and the first lonely flakes of snow that came drifting through the pines, remember piling gratefully into the car and starting down the road like a family on vacation, with Henry driving clench-jawed through the potholes and the rest of us leaning over the seats and talking like children, though I remember only too well the long terrible night that lay ahead and the long terrible days and nights that followed, I have only to glance over my shoulder for all those years to drop away and I see it behind me again, the ravine, rising all green and black through the saplings, a picture that will never leave me.
I suppose at one time in my life I might have had any number of stories, but now there is no other. This is the only story I will ever be able to tell.
BOOK I
CHAPTER
1
Does such a thing as the fatal flaw,
that showy dark crack running down the middle of a life, exist outside literature? I used to think it didn’t. Now I think it does. And I think that mine is this: a morbid longing for the picturesque at all costs.
A moi. L’histoire d’une de mes folies.
My name is Richard Papen. I am twenty-eight years old and I had never seen New England or Hampden College until I was nineteen. I am a Californian by birth and also, I have recently discovered, by nature. The last is something I admit only now, after the fact. Not that it matters.
I grew up in Plano, a small silicon village in the north. No sisters, no brothers. My father ran a gas station and my mother stayed at home until I got older and times got tighter and she went to work, answering phones in the office of one of the big chip factories outside San Jose.
Plano. The word conjures up drive-ins, tract homes, waves of heat rising from the blacktop. My years there created for me an expendable past, disposable as a plastic cup. Which I suppose was a very great gift, in a way. On leaving home I was able to fabricate a new and far more satisfying history, full of striking, simplistic environmental influences; a colorful past, easily accessible to strangers.
The dazzle of this fictive childhood—full of swimming pools and orange groves and dissolute, charming show-biz parents—has all but eclipsed the drab original. In fact, when I think about my real childhood I am unable to recall much about it at all except a sad jumble of objects: the sneakers I wore year-round; coloring books and comics from the supermarket; little of interest, less of beauty. I was quiet, tall for my age, prone to freckles. I didn’t have many friends but whether this was due to choice or circumstance I do not now know. I did well in school, it seems, but not exceptionally well; I liked to read—Tom Swift, the Tolkien books—but also to watch television, which I did plenty of, lying on the carpet of our empty living room in the long dull afternoons after school.
I honestly can’t remember much else about those years except a certain mood that permeated most of them, a melancholy feeling that I associate with watching The Wonderful World of Disney
on Sunday nights. Sunday was a sad day—early to bed, school the next morning, I was constantly worried my homework was wrong—but as I watched the fireworks go off in the night sky, over the floodlit castles of Disneyland, I was consumed by a more general sense of dread, of imprisonment within the dreary round of school and home: circumstances which, to me at least, presented sound empirical argument for gloom. My father was mean, and our house ugly, and my mother didn’t pay much attention to me; my clothes were cheap and my haircut too short and no one at school seemed to like me that much; and since all this had been true for as long as I could remember, I felt things would doubtless continue in this depressing vein as far as I could foresee. In short: I felt my existence was tainted, in some subtle but essential way.
I suppose it’s not odd, then, that I have trouble reconciling my life to those of my friends, or at least to their lives as I perceive them to be. Charles and Camilla are orphans (how I longed to be an orphan when I was a child!) reared by grandmothers and great-aunts in a house in Virginia: a childhood I like to think about, with horses and rivers and sweet-gum trees. And Francis. His mother, when she had him, was only seventeen—a thin-blooded, capricious girl with red hair and a rich daddy, who ran off with the drummer for Vance Vane and his Musical Swains. She was home in three weeks, and the marriage was annulled in six; and, as Francis is fond of saying, the grandparents brought them up like brother and sister, him and his mother, brought them up in such a magnanimous style that even the gossips were impressed—English nannies and private schools, summers in Switzerland, winters in France. Consider even bluff old Bunny, if you would. Not a childhood of reefer coats and dancing lessons, any more than mine was. But an American childhood. Son of a Clemson football star turned banker. Four brothers, no sisters, in a big noisy house in the suburbs, with sailboats and tennis rackets and golden retrievers; summers on Cape Cod, boarding schools near Boston and tailgate picnics during football season; an upbringing vitally present in Bunny in every respect, from the way he shook your hand to the way he told a joke.
I do not now nor did I ever have anything in common with any of them, nothing except a knowledge of Greek and the year of my life I spent in their company. And if love is a thing held in common, I suppose we had that in common, too, though I realize that might sound odd in light of the story I am about to tell.
How to begin.
After high school I went to a small college in my home town (my parents were opposed, as it had been made very plain that I was expected to help my father run his business, one of the many reasons I was in such an agony to escape) and, during my two years there, I studied ancient Greek. This was due to no love for the language but because I was majoring in pre-med (money, you see, was the only way to improve my fortunes, doctors make a lot of money, quod erat demonstrandum) and my counselor had suggested I take a language to fulfill the humanities requirement; and, since the Greek classes happened to meet in the afternoon, I took Greek so I could sleep late on Mondays. It was an entirely random decision which, as you will see, turned out to be quite fateful.
I did well at Greek, excelled in it, and I even won an award from the Classics department my last year. It was my favorite class because it was the only one held in a regular classroom—no jars of cow hearts, no smell of formaldehyde, no cages full of screaming monkeys. Initially I had thought with hard work I could overcome a fundamental squeamishness and distaste for my subject, that perhaps with even harder work I could simulate something like a talent for it. But this was not the case. As the months went by I remained uninterested, if not downright sickened, by my study of biology; my grades were poor; I was held in contempt by teacher and classmate alike. In what seemed even to me a doomed and Pyrrhic gesture, I switched to English literature without telling my parents. I felt that I was cutting my own throat by this, that I would certainly be very sorry, being still convinced that it was better to fail in a lucrative field than to thrive in one that my father (who knew nothing of either finance or academia) had assured me was most unprofitable; one which would inevitably result in my hanging around the house for the rest of my life asking him for money; money which, he assured me forcefully, he had no intention of giving me.
So I studied literature and liked it better. But I didn’t like home any better. I don’t think I can explain the despair my surroundings inspired in me. Though I now suspect, given the circumstances and my disposition, I would’ve been unhappy anywhere, in Biarritz or Caracas or the Isle of Capri, I was then convinced that my unhappiness was indigenous to that place. Perhaps a part of it was. While to a certain extent Milton is right—the mind is its own place and in itself can make a Heaven of Hell and so forth—it is nonetheless clear that Plano was modeled less on Paradise than that other, more dolorous city. In high school I developed a habit of wandering through shopping malls after school, swaying through the bright, chill mezzanines until I was so dazed with consumer goods and product codes, with promenades and escalators, with mirrors and Muzak and noise and light, that a fuse would blow in my brain and all at once everything would become unintelligible: color without form, a babble of detached molecules. Then I would walk like a zombie to the parking lot and drive to the baseball field, where I wouldn’t even get out of the car, just sit with my hands on the steering wheel and stare at the Cyclone fence and the yellowed winter grass until the sun went down and it was too dark for me to see.
Though I had a confused idea that my dissatisfaction was bohemian, vaguely Marxist in origin (when I was a teenager I made a fatuous show of socialism, mainly to irritate my father), I couldn’t really begin to understand it; and I would have been angry if someone had suggested that it was due to a strong Puritan streak in my nature, which was in fact the case. Not long ago I found this passage in an old notebook, written when I was eighteen or so: "There is to me about this place a smell of rot, the smell of rot that ripe fruit makes. Nowhere, ever, have the hideous mechanics of birth and copulation and death—those monstrous upheavals of life that the Greeks call miasma, defilement—been so brutal or been painted up to look so pretty; have so many people put so much faith in lies and mutability and death death death."
This, I think, is pretty rough stuff. From the sound of it, had I stayed in California I might have ended up in a cult or at the very least practicing some weird dietary restriction. I remember reading about Pythagoras around this time, and finding some of his ideas curiously appealing—wearing white garments, for instance, or abstaining from foods which have a soul.
But instead I wound up on the East Coast.
I lit on Hampden by a trick of fate. One night, during a long Thanksgiving holiday of rainy weather, canned cranberries, ball games droning from the television, I went to my room after a fight with my parents (I cannot remember this particular fight, only that we always fought, about money and school) and was tearing through my closet trying to find my coat when out it flew: a brochure from Hampden College, Hampden, Vermont.
It was two years old, this brochure. In high school a lot of colleges had sent me things because I did well on my SATs, though unfortunately not well enough to warrant much in the way of scholarships, and this one I had kept in my Geometry book throughout my senior year.
I don’t know why it was in my closet. I suppose I’d saved it because it was so pretty. Senior year, I had spent dozens of hours studying the photographs as though if I stared at them long enough and longingly enough I would, by some sort of osmosis, be transported into their clear, pure silence. Even now I remember those pictures, like pictures in a storybook one loved as a child. Radiant meadows, mountains vaporous in the trembling distance; leaves ankle-deep on a gusty autumn road; bonfires and fog in the valleys; cellos, dark windowpanes, snow.
Hampden College, Hampden, Vermont. Established 1895. (This alone was a fact to cause wonder; nothing I knew of in Plano had been established much before 1962.) Student body, five hundred. Coed. Progressive. Specializing in the liberal arts. Highly selective. Hampden, in providing a well-rounded course of study in the Humanities, seeks not only to give students a rigorous background in the chosen field but insight into all the disciplines of Western art, civilization, and thought. In doing so, we hope to provide the individual not only with facts, but with the raw materials of wisdom.
Hampden College, Hampden, Vermont. Even the name had an austere Anglican cadence, to my ear at least, which yearned hopelessly for England and was dead to the sweet dark rhythms of the little mission towns. For a long time I looked at a picture of the building they called Commons. It was suffused with a weak, academic light—different from Plano, different from anything I had ever known—a light that made me think of long hours in dusty libraries, and old books, and silence.
My mother knocked on the door, said my name. I didn’t answer. I tore out the information form in the back of the brochure and started to fill it in. Name: John Richard Papen. Address: 4487 Mimosa Court; Plano, California. Would you like to receive information on Financial Aid? Yes. And I mailed it the following morning.
The months subsequent were an endless dreary battle of paperwork, full of stalemates, fought in trenches. My father refused to complete the financial aid papers; finally, in desperation, I stole the tax returns from the glove compartment of his Toyota and did them myself. More waiting. Then a note from the Dean of Admissions. An interview was required, and when could I fly to Vermont? I could not afford to fly to Vermont, and I wrote and told him so. Another wait, another letter. The college would reimburse me for my travel expenses if their scholarship offer was accepted. Meanwhile the financial aid packet had come in. My family’s contribution was more than my father said he could afford and he would not pay it. This sort of guerrilla warfare dragged on for eight months. Even today I do not fully understand the chain of events that brought me to Hampden. Sympathetic professors wrote letters; exceptions of various sorts were made in my case. And less than a year after I’d sat down on the gold shag carpet of my little room in Plano and impulsively filled out the questionnaire, I was getting off the bus in Hampden with two suitcases and fifty dollars in my pocket.
I had never been east of Santa Fe, never north of Portland, and—when I stepped off the bus after a long anxious night that had begun somewhere in Illinois—it was six o’clock in the morning, and the sun was rising over mountains, and birches, and impossibly green meadows; and to me, dazed with night and no sleep and three days on the highway, it was like a country from a dream.
The dormitories weren’t even dorms—or at any rate not like the dorms I knew, with cinderblock walls and depressing, yellowish light—but white clapboard houses with green shutters, set back from the Commons in groves of maple and ash. All the same it never occurred to me that my particular room, wherever it might be, would be anything but ugly and disappointing and it was with something of a shock that I saw it for the first time—a white room with big north-facing windows, monkish and bare, with scarred oak floors and a ceiling slanted like a garret’s. On my first night there, I sat on the bed during the twilight while the walls went slowly from gray to gold to black, listening to a soprano’s voice climb dizzily up and down somewhere at the other end of the hall until at last the light was completely gone, and the faraway soprano spiraled on and on in the darkness like some angel of death, and I can’t remember the air ever seeming as high and cold and rarefied as it was that night, or ever feeling farther away from the low-slung lines of dusty Plano.
Those first days before classes started I spent alone in my whitewashed room, in the bright meadows of Hampden. And I was happy in those first days as really I’d never been before, roaming like a sleepwalker, stunned and drunk with beauty. A group of red-cheeked girls playing soccer, ponytails flying, their shouts and laughter carrying faintly over the velvety, twilit field. Trees creaking with apples, fallen apples red on the grass beneath, the heavy sweet smell of apples rotting on the ground and the steady thrumming of wasps around them. Commons clock tower: ivied brick, white spire, spellbound in the hazy distance. The shock of first seeing a birch tree at night, rising up in the dark as cool and slim as a ghost. And the nights, bigger than imagining: black and gusty and enormous, disordered and wild with stars.
I was planning to sign up for Greek again, as it was the only language at which I was at all proficient. But when I told this to the academic counselor to whom I had been assigned—a French teacher named Georges Laforgue, with olive skin and a pinched, long-nostriled nose like a turtle’s—he only smiled, and pressed the tips of his fingers together. I am afraid there may be a problem,
he said, in accented English.
Why?
There is only one teacher of ancient Greek here and he is very particular about his students.
I’ve studied Greek for two years.
That probably will not make any difference. Besides, if you are going to major in English literature you will need a modern language. There is still space left in my Elementary French class and some room in German and Italian. The Spanish
—he consulted his list—the Spanish classes are for the most part filled but if you like I will have a word with Mr. Delgado.
Maybe you could speak to the Greek teacher instead.
"I don’t know if it would do any good. He accepts only a limited number of students. A very limited number. Besides, in my opinion, he conducts the selection on a personal rather than academic basis."
His voice bore a hint of sarcasm; also a suggestion that, if it was all the same to me, he would prefer not to continue this particular conversation.
I don’t know what you mean,
I said.
Actually, I thought I did know. Laforgue’s answer surprised me. It’s nothing like that,
he said. Of course he is a distinguished scholar. He happens to be quite charming as well. But he has what I think are some very odd ideas about teaching. He and his students have virtually no contact with the rest of the division. I don’t know why they continue to list his courses in the general catalogue—it’s misleading, every year there is confusion about it—because, practically speaking, the classes are closed. I am told that to study with him one must have read the right things, hold similar views. It has happened repeatedly that he has turned away students such as yourself who have done prior work in classics. With me
—he lifted an eyebrow—if the student wants to learn what I teach and is qualified, I allow him in my classes. Very democratic, no? It is the best way.
Does that sort of thing happen often here?
Of course. There are difficult teachers at every school. And plenty
—to my surprise, he lowered his voice—"and plenty here who are far more difficult than him. Though I must ask that you do not quote me on that."
I won’t,
I said, a bit startled by this sudden confidential manner.
Really, it is quite essential that you don’t.
He was leaning forward, whispering, his tiny mouth scarcely moving as he spoke. "I must insist. Perhaps you are not aware of this but I have several formidable enemies in the Literature Division. Even, though you may scarcely believe it, here in my own department. Besides, he continued in a more normal tone,
he is a special case. He has taught here for many years and even refuses payment for his work."
Why?
He is a wealthy man. He donates his salary to the college, though he accepts, I think, one dollar a year for tax purposes.
Oh,
I said. Even though I had been at Hampden only a few days, I was already accustomed to the official accounts of financial hardship, of limited endowment, of corners cut.
Now me,
said Laforgue, I like to teach well enough, but I have a wife and a daughter in school in France—the money comes in handy, yes?
Maybe I’ll talk to him anyway.
Laforgue shrugged. You can try. But I advise you not to make an appointment, or probably he will not see you. His name is Julian Morrow.
I had not been particularly bent on taking Greek, but what Laforgue said intrigued me. I went downstairs and walked into the first office I saw. A thin, sour-looking woman with tired blond hair was sitting at the desk in the front room, eating a sandwich.
It’s my lunch hour,
she said. Come back at two.
I’m sorry. I’m just looking for a teacher’s office.
Well, I’m the registrar, not the switchboard. But I might know. Who is it?
Julian Morrow.
Oh, him,
she said, surprised. What do you want with him? He’s upstairs, I think, in the Lyceum.
What room?
Only teacher up there. Likes his peace and quiet. You’ll find him.
Actually, finding the Lyceum wasn’t easy at all. It was a small building on the edge of campus, old and covered with ivy in such a manner as to be almost indistinguishable from its landscape. Downstairs were lecture halls and classrooms, all of them empty, with clean blackboards and freshly waxed floors. I wandered around helplessly until finally I noticed the staircase—small and badly lit—in the far corner of the building.
Once at the top I found myself in a long, deserted hallway. Enjoying the noise of my shoes on the linoleum, I walked along briskly, looking at the closed doors for numbers or names until I came to one that had a brass card holder and, within it, an engraved card that read Julian Morrow. I stood there for a moment and then I knocked, three short raps.
A minute or so passed, and another, and then the white door opened just a crack. A face looked out at me. It was a small, wise face, as alert and poised as a question; and though certain features of it were suggestive of youth—the elfin upsweep of the eyebrows, the deft lines of nose and jaw and mouth—it was by no means a young face, and the hair was snow white.
I stood there for a moment as he blinked at me.
How may I help you?
The voice was reasonable and kind, in the way that pleasant adults sometimes have with children.
I—well, my name is Richard Papen—
He put his head to the side and blinked again, bright-eyed, amiable as a sparrow.
—and I want to take your class in ancient Greek.
His face fell. Oh. I’m sorry.
His tone of voice, incredibly enough, seemed to suggest that he really was sorry, sorrier than I was. I can’t think of anything I’d like better, but I’m afraid there isn’t any room. My class is already filled.
Something about this apparently sincere regret gave me courage. Surely there must be some way,
I said. One extra student—
I’m terribly sorry, Mr. Papen,
he said, almost as if he were consoling me on the death of a beloved friend, trying to make me understand that he was powerless to help me in any substantial way. But I have limited myself to five students and I cannot even think of adding another.
Five students is not very many.
He shook his head quickly, eyes shut, as if entreaty were more than he could bear.
Really, I’d love to have you, but I mustn’t even consider it,
he said. I’m terribly sorry. Will you excuse me now? I have a student with me.
—
More than a week went by. I started my classes and got a job with a professor of psychology named Dr. Roland. (I was to assist him in some vague research,
the nature of which I never discovered; he was an old, dazed, disordered-looking fellow, a behavioralist, who spent most of his time loitering in the teachers’ lounge.) And I made some friends, most of them freshmen who lived in my house. Friends is perhaps an inaccurate word to use. We ate our meals together, saw each other coming and going, but mainly were thrown together by the fact that none of us knew anybody—a situation which, at the time, did not seem necessarily unpleasant. Among the few people I had met who’d been at Hampden awhile, I asked what the story was with Julian Morrow.
Nearly everyone had heard of him, and I was given all sorts of contradictory but fascinating information: that he was a brilliant man; that he was a fraud; that he had no college degree; that he had been a great intellectual in the forties, and a friend to Ezra Pound and T. S. Eliot; that his family money had come from a partnership in a white-shoe banking firm or, conversely, from the purchase of foreclosed property during the Depression; that he had dodged the draft in some war (though chronologically this was difficult to compute); that he had ties with the Vatican; a deposed royal family in the Middle East; Franco’s Spain. The degree of truth in any of this was, of course, unknowable but the more I heard about him, the more interested I became, and I began to watch for him and his little group of pupils around campus. Four boys and a girl, they were nothing so unusual at a distance. At close range, though, they were an arresting party—at least to me, who had never seen anything like them, and to whom they suggested a variety of picturesque and fictive qualities.
Two of the boys wore glasses, curiously enough the same kind: tiny, old-fashioned, with round steel rims. The larger of the two—and he was quite large, well over six feet—was dark-haired, with a square jaw and coarse, pale skin. He might have been handsome had his features been less set, or his eyes, behind the glasses, less expressionless and blank. He wore dark English suits and carried an umbrella (a bizarre sight in Hampden) and he walked stiffly through the throngs of hippies and beatniks and preppies and punks with the self-conscious formality of an old ballerina, surprising in one so large as he. Henry Winter,
said my friends when I pointed him out, at a distance, making a wide circle to avoid a group of bongo players on the lawn.
The smaller of the two—but not by much—was a sloppy blond boy, rosy-cheeked and gum-chewing, with a relentlessly cheery demeanor and his fists thrust deep in the pockets of his knee-sprung trousers. He wore the same jacket every day, a shapeless brown tweed that was frayed at the elbows and short in the sleeves, and his sandy hair was parted on the left, so a long forelock fell over one bespectacled eye. Bunny Corcoran was his name, Bunny being somehow short for Edmund. His voice was loud and honking, and carried in the dining halls.
The third boy was the most exotic of the set. Angular and elegant, he was precariously thin, with nervous hands and a shrewd albino face and a short, fiery mop of the reddest hair I had ever seen. I thought (erroneously) that he dressed like Alfred Douglas, or the Comte de Montesquiou: beautiful starchy shirts with French cuffs; magnificent neckties; a black greatcoat that billowed behind him as he walked and made him look like a cross between a student prince and Jack the Ripper. Once, to my delight, I even saw him wearing pince-nez. (Later, I discovered that they weren’t real pince-nez, but only had glass in them, and that his eyes were a good deal sharper than my own.) Francis Abernathy was his name. Further inquiries elicited suspicion from male acquaintances, who wondered at my interest in such a person.
And then there were a pair, boy and girl. I saw them together a great deal, and at first I thought they were boyfriend and girlfriend, until one day I saw them up close and realized they had to be siblings. Later I learned they were twins. They looked very much alike, with heavy dark-blond hair and epicene faces as clear, as cheerful and grave, as a couple of Flemish angels. And perhaps most unusual in the context of Hampden—where pseudo-intellects and teenage decadents abounded, and where black clothing was de rigueur—they liked to wear pale clothes, particularly white. In this swarm of cigarettes and dark sophistication they appeared here and there like figures from an allegory, or long-dead celebrants from some forgotten garden party. It was easy to find out who they were, as they shared the distinction of being the only twins on campus. Their names were Charles and Camilla Macaulay.
All of them, to me, seemed highly unapproachable. But I watched them with interest whenever I happened to see them: Francis, stooping to talk to a cat on a doorstep; Henry dashing past at the wheel of a little white car, with Julian in the passenger’s seat; Bunny leaning out of an upstairs window to yell something at the twins on the lawn below. Slowly, more information came my way. Francis Abernathy was from Boston and, from most accounts, quite wealthy. Henry, too, was said to be wealthy; what’s more, he was a linguistic genius. He spoke a number of languages, ancient and modern, and had published a translation of Anacreon, with commentary, when he was only eighteen. (I found this out from Georges Laforgue, who was otherwise sour and reticent on the topic; later I discovered that Henry, during his freshman year, had embarrassed Laforgue badly in front of the entire literature faculty during the question-and-answer period of his annual lecture on Racine.) The twins had an apartment off campus, and were from somewhere down south. And Bunny Corcoran had a habit of playing John Philip Sousa march tunes in his room, at full volume, late at night.
Not to imply that I was overly preoccupied with any of this. I was settling in at school by this time; classes had begun and I was busy with my work. My interest in Julian Morrow and his Greek pupils, though still keen, was starting to wane when a curious coincidence happened.
It happened the Wednesday morning of my second week, when I was in the library making some Xeroxes for Dr. Roland before my eleven o’clock class. After about thirty minutes, spots of light swimming in front of my eyes, I went back to the front desk to give the Xerox key to the librarian and as I turned to leave I saw them, Bunny and the twins, sitting at a table that was spread with papers and pens and bottles of ink. The bottles of ink I remember particularly, because I was very charmed by them, and by the long black straight pens, which looked incredibly archaic and troublesome. Charles was wearing a white tennis sweater, and Camilla a sun dress with a sailor collar, and a straw hat. Bunny’s tweed jacket was slung across the back of his chair, exposing several large rips and stains in the lining. He was leaning his elbows on the table, hair in eyes, his rumpled shirtsleeves held up with striped garters. Their heads were close together and they were talking quietly.
I suddenly wanted to know what they were saying. I went to the bookshelf behind their table—the long way, as if I wasn’t sure what I was looking for—all the way down until I was so close I could’ve reached out and touched Bunny’s arm. My back to them, I picked a book at random—a ridiculous sociological text, as it happened—and pretended to study the index. Secondary Analysis. Secondary Deviance. Secondary Groups. Secondary Schools.
I don’t know about that,
Camilla was saying. "If the Greeks are sailing to Carthage, it should be accusative. Remember? Place whither? That’s the rule."
Can’t be.
This was Bunny. His voice was nasal, garrulous, W. C. Fields with a bad case of Long Island lockjaw. It’s not place whither, it’s place to. I put my money on the ablative case.
There was a confused rattling of papers.
Wait,
said Charles. His voice was a lot like his sister’s—hoarse, slightly southern. "Look at this. They’re not just sailing to Carthage, they’re sailing to attack it."
You’re crazy.
No, they are. Look at the next sentence. We need a dative.
Are you sure?
More rustling of papers.
"Absolutely. Epi tō karchidona."
I don’t see how,
said Bunny. He sounded like Thurston Howell on Gilligan’s Island.
Ablative’s the ticket. The hard ones are always ablative.
A slight pause. Bunny,
said Charles, you’re mixed up. The ablative is in Latin.
"Well, of course, I know that, said Bunny irritably, after a confused pause which seemed to indicate the contrary,
but you know what I mean. Aorist, ablative, all the same thing, really…"
Look, Charles,
said Camilla. This dative won’t work.
Yes it will. They’re sailing to attack, aren’t they?
"Yes, but the Greeks sailed over the sea to Carthage."
"But I put that epi in front of it."
"Well, we can attack and still use epi, but we have to use an accusative because of the first rules."
Segregation. Self. Self-concept. I looked down at the index and racked my brains for the case they were looking for. The Greeks sailed over the sea to Carthage. To Carthage. Place whither. Place whence. Carthage.
Suddenly something occurred to me. I closed the book and put it on the shelf and turned around. Excuse me?
I said.
Immediately they stopped talking, startled, and turned to stare at me.
I’m sorry, but would the locative case do?
Nobody said anything for a long moment.
Locative?
said Charles.
"Just add zde to karchido, I said.
I think it’s zde. If you use that, you won’t need a preposition, except the epi if they’re going to war. It implies ‘Carthage-ward,’ so you won’t have to worry about a case, either."
Charles looked at his paper, then at me. Locative?
he said. That’s pretty obscure.
Are you sure it exists for Carthage?
said Camilla.
I hadn’t thought of this. Maybe not,
I said. I know it does for Athens.
Charles reached over and hauled the lexicon towards him over the table and began to leaf through it.
Oh, hell, don’t bother,
said Bunny stridently. If you don’t have to decline it and it doesn’t need a preposition it sounds good to me.
He reared back in his chair and looked up at me. I’d like to shake your hand, stranger.
I offered it to him; he clasped and shook it firmly, almost knocking an ink bottle over with his elbow as he did so. Glad to meet you, yes, yes,
he said, reaching up with the other hand to brush the hair from his eyes.
I was confused by this sudden glare of attention; it was as if the characters in a favorite painting, absorbed in their own concerns, had looked up out of the canvas and spoken to me. Only the day before Francis, in a swish of black cashmere and cigarette smoke, had brushed past me in a corridor. For a moment, as his arm touched mine, he was a creature of flesh and blood, but the next he was a hallucination again, a figment of the imagination stalking down the hallway as heedless of me as ghosts, in their shadowy rounds, are said to be heedless of the living.
Charles, still fumbling with the lexicon, rose and offered his hand. My name is Charles Macaulay.
Richard Papen.
Oh, you’re the one,
said Camilla suddenly.
What?
You. You came by to ask about the Greek class.
This is my sister,
said Charles, and this is—Bun, did you tell him your name already?
No, no, don’t think so. You’ve made me a happy man, sir. We had ten more like this to do and five minutes to do them in. Edmund Corcoran’s the name,
said Bunny, grasping my hand again.
How long have you studied Greek?
said Camilla.
Two years.
You’re rather good at it.
Pity you aren’t in our class,
said Bunny.
A strained silence.
Well,
said Charles uncomfortably, Julian is funny about things like that.
Go see him again, why don’t you,
Bunny said. Take him some flowers and tell him you love Plato and he’ll be eating out of your hand.
Another silence, this one more disagreeable than the first. Camilla smiled, not exactly at me—a sweet, unfocused smile, quite impersonal, as if I were a waiter or a clerk in a store. Beside her Charles, who was still standing, smiled too and raised a polite eyebrow—a gesture which might have been nervous, might have meant anything, really, but which I took to mean Is that all?
I mumbled something and was about to turn away when Bunny—who was staring in the opposite direction—shot out an arm and grabbed me by the wrist. Wait,
he said.
Startled, I looked up. Henry had just come in the door—dark suit, umbrella, and all.
When he got to the table he pretended not to see me. Hello,
he said to them. Are you finished?
Bunny tossed his head at me. Look here, Henry, we’ve got someone to meet you,
he said.
Henry glanced up. His expression did not change. He shut his eyes and then reopened them, as if he found it extraordinary that someone such as myself should stand in his path of vision.
Yes, yes,
said Bunny. This man’s name is Richard—Richard what?
Papen.
Yes, yes. Richard Papen. Studies Greek.
Henry brought his head up to look at me. Not here, surely,
he said.
No,
I said, meeting his gaze, but his stare was so rude I was forced to cut my eyes away.
Oh, Henry, look at this, would you,
said Charles hastily, rustling through the papers again. We were going to use a dative or an accusative here but he suggested locative?
Henry leaned over his shoulder and inspected the page. Hmm, archaic locative,
he said. Very Homeric. Of course, it would be grammatically correct but perhaps a bit off contextually.
He brought his head back up to scrutinize me. The light was at an angle that glinted off his tiny spectacles, and I couldn’t see his eyes behind them. Very interesting. You’re a Homeric scholar?
I might have said yes, but I had the feeling he would be glad to catch me in a mistake, and that he would be able to do it easily. I like Homer,
I said weakly.
He regarded me with chill distaste. I love Homer,
he said. Of course we’re studying things rather more modern, Plato and the tragedians and so forth.
I was trying to think of some response when he looked away in disinterest.
We should go,
he said.
Charles shuffled his papers together, stood up again; Camilla stood beside him and this time she offered me her hand, too. Side by side, they were very much alike, in similarity less of lineament than of manner and bearing, a correspondence of gesture which bounced and echoed between them so that a blink seemed to reverberate, moments later, in a twitch of the other’s eyelid. Their eyes were the same color of gray, intelligent and calm. She, I thought, was very beautiful, in an unsettling, almost medieval way which would not be apparent to the casual observer.
Bunny pushed his chair back and slapped me between the shoulder blades. Well, sir,
he said, we must get together sometime and talk about Greek, yes?
Goodbye,
Henry said, with a nod.
Goodbye,
I said. They strolled off and I stood where I was and watched them go, walking out of the library in a wide phalanx, side by side.
—
When I went by Dr. Roland’s office a few minutes later to drop off the Xeroxes, I asked him if he could give me an advance on my work-study check.
He leaned back in his chair and trained his watery, red-rimmed eyes on me. Well, you know,
he said, for the past ten years, I’ve made it my practice not to do that. Let me tell you why that is.
I know, sir,
I said hastily. Dr. Roland’s discourses on his practices
could sometimes take half an hour or more. I understand. Only it’s kind of an emergency.
He leaned forward again and cleared his throat. And what,
he said, might that be?
His hands, folded on the desk before him, were gnarled with veins and had a bluish, pearly sheen around the knuckles. I stared at them. I needed ten or twenty dollars, needed it badly, but I had come in without first deciding what to say. I don’t know,
I said. Something has come up.
He furrowed his eyebrows impressively. Dr. Roland’s senile manner was said to be a facade; to me it seemed quite genuine but sometimes, when you were off your guard, he would display an unexpected flash of lucidity, which—though it frequently did not relate to the topic at hand—was evidence that rational processes rumbled somewhere in the muddied depths of his consciousness.
It’s my car,
I said, suddenly inspired. I didn’t have a car. I need to get it fixed.
I had not expected him to inquire further but instead he perked up noticeably. What’s the trouble?
Something with the transmission.
Is it dual-pathed? Air-cooled?
Air-cooled,
I said, shifting to the other foot. I did not care for this conversational turn. I don’t know a thing about cars and am hard-pressed to change a tire.
What’ve you got, one of those little V-6 numbers?
Yes.
I’m not surprised. All the kids seem to crave them.
I had no idea how to respond to this.
He pulled out his desk drawer and began to pick things up and bring them close to his eyes and put them back in again. Once a transmission goes,
he said, in my experience the car is gone. Especially on a V-6. You might as well take that vehicle to the junk heap. Now, myself, I’ve got a ’98 Regency Brougham, ten years old. With me, it’s regular checkups, new filter every fifteen hundred miles, and new oil every three thousand. Runs like a dream. Watch out for these garages in town,
he said sharply.
Pardon?
He’d found his checkbook at last. Well, you ought to go to the Bursar but I guess this’ll be all right,
he said, opening it and beginning to write laboriously. Some of these places in Hampden, they find out you’re from the college, they’ll charge you double. Redeemed Repair is generally the best—they’re a bunch of born-agains down there but they’ll still shake you down pretty good if you don’t keep an eye on them.
He tore out the check and handed it to me. I glanced at it and my heart skipped a beat. Two hundred dollars. He’d signed it and everything.
Don’t you let them charge you a penny more,
he said.
No sir,
I said, barely able to conceal my joy. What would I do with all this money? Maybe he would even forget he had given it to me.
He pulled down his glasses and looked at me over the tops of them. That’s Redeemed Repair,
he said. They’re out on Highway 6. The sign is shaped like a cross.
Thank you,
I said.
I walked down the hall with spirits soaring, and two hundred dollars in my pocket, and the first thing I did was to go downstairs to the pay phone and call a cab to take me into Hampden town. If there’s one thing I’m good at, it’s lying on my feet. It’s sort of a gift I have.
—
And what did I do in Hampden town? Frankly, I was too staggered by my good fortune to do much of anything. It was a glorious day; I was sick of being poor, so, before I thought better of it, I went into an expensive men’s shop on the square and bought a couple of shirts. Then I went down to the Salvation Army and poked around in bins for a while and found a Harris tweed overcoat and a pair of brown wingtips that fit me, also some cufflinks and a funny old tie that had pictures of men hunting deer on it. When I came out of the store I was happy to find that I still had nearly a hundred dollars. Should I go to the bookstore? To the movies? Buy a bottle of Scotch? In the end, I was so swarmed by the flock of possibilities that drifted up murmuring and smiling to crowd about me on the bright autumn sidewalk that—like a farm boy flustered by a bevy of prostitutes—I brushed right through them, to the pay phone on the corner, to call a cab to take me to school.
Once in my room, I spread the clothes on my bed. The cufflinks were beaten up and had someone else’s initials on them, but they looked like real gold, glinting in the drowsy autumn sun which poured through the window and soaked in yellow pools on the oak floor—voluptuous, rich, intoxicating.
—
I had a feeling of déjà vu when, the next afternoon, Julian answered the door exactly as he had the first time, by opening it only a crack and looking through it warily, as if there were something wonderful in his office that needed guarding, something that he was careful not everyone should see. It was a feeling I would come to know well in the next months. Even now, years later and far away, sometimes in dreams I find myself standing before that white door, waiting for him to appear like the gatekeeper in a fairy story: ageless, watchful, sly as a child.
When he saw it was me, he opened the door slightly wider than he had the first time. Mr. Pepin again, isn’t it?
he said.
I didn’t bother to correct him. I’m afraid so.
He looked at me for a moment. You have a wonderful name, you know,
he said. There were kings of France named Pepin.
Are you busy now?
I am never too busy for an heir to the French throne if that is in fact what you are,
he said pleasantly.
I’m afraid not.
He laughed and quoted a little Greek epigram about honesty being a dangerous virtue, and, to my surprise, opened the door and ushered me in.
It was a beautiful room, not an office at all, and much bigger than it looked from outside—airy and white, with a high ceiling and a breeze fluttering in the starched curtains. In the corner, near a low bookshelf, was a big round table littered with teapots and Greek books, and there were flowers everywhere, roses and carnations and anemones, on his desk, on the table, in the windowsills. The roses were especially fragrant; their smell hung rich and heavy in the air, mingled with the smell of bergamot, and black China tea, and a faint inky scent of camphor. Breathing deep, I felt intoxicated. Everywhere I looked was something beautiful—Oriental rugs, porcelains, tiny paintings like jewels—a dazzle of fractured color that struck me as if I had stepped into one of those little Byzantine churches that are so plain on the outside; inside, the most paradisal painted eggshell of gilt and tesserae.
He sat in an armchair by the window and motioned for me to sit, too. I suppose you’ve come about the Greek class,
he said.
Yes.
His eyes were kind, frank, more gray than blue. It’s rather late in the term,
he said.
I’d like to study it again. It seems a shame to drop it after two years.
He arched his eyebrows—deep, mischievous—and looked at his folded hands for a moment. I’m told you’re from California.
Yes, I am,
I said, rather startled. Who had told him that?
I don’t know many people from the West,
he said. I don’t know if I would like it there.
He paused, looking pensive and vaguely troubled. And what do you do in California?
I gave him the spiel. Orange groves, failed movie stars, lamplit cocktail hours by the swimming pool, cigarettes, ennui. He listened, his eyes fixed on mine, apparently entranced by these fraudulent recollections. Never had my efforts met with such attentiveness, such keen solicitude. He seemed so utterly enthralled that I was tempted to embroider a little more than perhaps was prudent.
"How thrilling, he said warmly when I, half-euphoric, was finally played out.
How very romantic."
Well, we’re all quite used to it out there, you see,
I said, trying not to fidget, flushed with the brilliance of my success.
And what does a person with such a romantic temperament seek in the study of the classics?
He asked this as if, having had the good fortune to catch such a rare bird as myself, he was anxious to extract my opinion while I was still captive in his office.
If by romantic you mean solitary and introspective,
I said, I think romantics are frequently the best classicists.
He laughed. The great romantics are often failed classicists. But that’s beside the point, isn’t it? What do you think of Hampden? Are you happy here?
I provided an exegesis, not as brief as it might have been, of why at the moment I found the college satisfactory for my purposes.
Young people often find the country a bore,
said Julian. Which is not to say that it isn’t good for them. Have you traveled much? Tell me what it was that attracted you to this place. I should think a young man such as yourself would be at a loss outside the city, but perhaps you feel tired of city life, is that so?
So skillfully and engagingly that I was quite disarmed, he led me deftly from topic to topic, and I am sure that in this talk, which seemed only a few minutes but was really much longer, he managed to extract everything about me he wanted to know. I did not suspect that his rapt interest might spring from anything less than the very richest enjoyment of my own company, and though I found myself talking with relish on a bewildering variety of topics—some of them quite personal, and with more frankness than was customary—I was convinced that I was acting of my own volition. I wish I could remember more of what was said that day—actually, I do remember much of what I said, most of it too fatuous for me to recall with pleasure. The only point at which he differed (aside from an incredulous eyebrow raised at my mention of Picasso; when I came to know him better I realized that he must have thought this an almost personal affront) was on the topic of psychology, which was, after all, heavy on my mind, working for Dr. Roland and everything. But do you really think,
he said, concerned, that one can call psychology a science?
Certainly. What else is it?
But even Plato knew that class and conditioning and so forth have an inalterable effect on the individual. It seems to me that psychology is only another word for what the ancients called fate.
"Psychology is a terrible word."
He agreed vigorously. Yes, it is terrible, isn’t it?
he said, but with an expression that indicated that he thought it rather tasteless of me even to use it. Perhaps in certain ways it is a helpful construct in talking about a certain kind of mind. The country people who live around me are fascinating because their lives are so closely bound to fate that they really are predestined. But
—he laughed—I’m afraid my students are never very interesting to me because I always know exactly what they’re going to do.
I was charmed by his conversation, and despite its illusion of being rather modern and digressive (to me, the hallmark of the modern mind is that it loves to wander from its subject) I now see that he was leading me by circumlocution to the same points again and again. For if the modern mind is whimsical and discursive, the classical mind is narrow, unhesitating, relentless. It is not a quality of intelligence that one encounters frequently these days. But though I can digress with the best of them, I am nothing in my soul if not obsessive.
We talked a while longer, and presently fell silent. After a moment Julian said courteously, If you’d like, I’d be happy to take you as a pupil, Mr. Papen.
I, looking out the window and having half-forgotten why I was there, turned to gape at him and couldn’t think of a thing to say.
However, before you accept, there are a few conditions to which you must agree.
What?
I said, suddenly alert.
Will you go to the Registrar’s office tomorrow and put in a request to change counselors?
He reached for a pen in a cup on his desk; amazingly, it was full of Montblanc fountain pens, Meisterstücks, at least a dozen of them. Quickly he wrote out a note and handed it to me. Don’t lose it,
he said, because the Registrar never assigns me counselees unless I request them.
The note was written in a masculine, rather nineteenth-century hand, with Greek e’s. The ink was still wet. But I have a counselor,
I said.
It is my policy never to accept a pupil unless I am his counselor as well. Other members of the literature faculty disagree with my teaching methods and you will run into problems if someone else gains the power to veto my decisions. You should pick up some drop-add forms as well. I think you are going to have to drop all the classes you are currently taking, except the French, which would be as well for you to keep. You appear to be deficient in the area of modern languages.
I was astonished. "I can’t drop all my classes."
Why not?
Registration is over.
That doesn’t matter at all,
said Julian serenely. The classes that I want you to pick up will be with me. You will probably be taking three or four classes with me per term for the rest of your time here.
I looked at him. No wonder he had only five students. But how can I do that?
I said.
He laughed. I’m afraid you haven’t been at Hampden very long. The administration doesn’t like it much, but there’s nothing they can do. Occasionally they try to raise problems with distribution requirements but that’s never caused any real trouble. We study art, history, philosophy, all sorts of things. If I find you are deficient in a given area, I may decide to give you a tutorial, perhaps refer you to another teacher. As French is not my first language, I think it wise if you continue to study that with Mr. Laforgue. Next year I’ll start you on Latin. It’s a difficult language, but knowing Greek will make it easier for you. The most satisfying of languages, Latin. You will find it a delight to learn.
I listened, a bit affronted by his tone. To do what he asked was tantamount to my transferring entirely out of Hampden College into his own little academy of ancient Greek, student body five, six including me. All my classes with you?
I said.
Not quite all of them,
he said seriously, and then laughed when he saw the look on my face. "I believe that
