GRE Analytical Writing Practice Test FREE- Analytical Writing Section Test-1

GRE practice test is a crucial component of your preparation. The verbal, quantitative, and analytical writing portions of the GRE syllabus include a wide range of subjects. You can improve your comprehension of the various question types by consistently completing online GRE mock tests. A variety of GRE practice materials are available on the official ETS website. Enrolling in online courses or using other resources allows you to take GRE mock exams efficiently. Regularly taking GRE practice tests will enable you to evaluate your performance.

The professionals at GeeksforGeeks have provided GRE Practice Test for GRE Analytical Writing Practice questions. To help you efficiently prepare for the GRE, our team of knowledgeable educators and test-prep experts has carefully created these Free GRE Practice Questions. Our GRE Practice Tests are priceless, whether you’re just starting your GRE preparation process or want to hone your abilities before exam day. Let’s begin learning all the skills you’ll need to ace the GRE!

Issue Task

1. Claim: Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.

Write an essay in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Answer:

While the pursuit of scientific knowledge is crucial for societal advancement, unrestricted research and development can lead to ethical dilemmas and unforeseen negative consequences. Governments should implement guidelines to ensure that research adheres to ethical standards and public safety, such as in cases involving genetic engineering or artificial intelligence. However, overly stringent restrictions may stifle innovation and progress. A balanced approach, which encourages scientific exploration while safeguarding ethical considerations and public welfare, is essential.

2. Claim: Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the subjects they teach.

Write an essay in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Answer:

Requiring faculty to work outside academia in their fields can enhance their teaching by providing real-world insights and practical applications of theoretical concepts. This exposure can bridge the gap between academia and industry, making education more relevant and engaging for students. However, mandating such experiences may be impractical for some disciplines and could burden faculty with additional responsibilities. Instead, institutions should encourage and facilitate opportunities for industry collaboration and practical experience on a voluntary basis.

3. Claim: The primary goal of education should be to foster a love of learning rather than to prepare students for specific careers.

Write an essay in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Answer:

Fostering a love of learning cultivates curiosity, critical thinking, and a lifelong pursuit of knowledge, which are fundamental for personal and intellectual growth. However, education systems also have a responsibility to prepare students for the job market, providing them with the skills and knowledge necessary for specific careers. Balancing these goals can create a well-rounded educational experience, ensuring students are both passionate about learning and equipped for professional success.

4. Claim: Technology has made it easier for people to be alone, but it has also made it more difficult for people to be lonely.

Write an essay in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Answer:

Technology enables people to be alone physically while staying connected virtually, reducing feelings of loneliness through social media, online communities, and communication platforms. However, the quality of these virtual interactions may not always match face-to-face connections, potentially leading to superficial relationships and a sense of isolation. While technology provides tools to alleviate loneliness, fostering meaningful relationships remains crucial for emotional well-being.

5. Claim: In any situation, the best way to persuade other people is to rely on evidence and logic, rather than on emotion or other rhetorical devices.

Write an essay in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Answer:

Evidence and logic are fundamental for building a convincing argument, as they provide a solid foundation based on facts and rationality. However, appealing to emotions and using rhetorical devices can enhance persuasion by making arguments more relatable and impactful. Effective persuasion often combines logical evidence with emotional appeal to resonate with diverse audiences. Thus, a balanced approach is generally the most effective.

Argument Task

1. Argument: The following is a recommendation from the board of directors of Monarch Books.

"Monarch Books should open a café in its store to attract more customers and improve profitability. Monarch Books’ competitor, Regal Books, recently opened a café and reported a 20% increase in store traffic."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

Answer:

To evaluate this argument, we need evidence on whether the 20% increase in traffic at Regal Books is directly attributable to the café or other factors such as marketing efforts or seasonal trends. Additionally, data on customer preferences and demographics at Monarch Books compared to Regal Books would be relevant. If evidence shows that the café was the primary driver of increased traffic at Regal Books and similar customer preferences exist at Monarch Books, the argument is strengthened. Conversely, if other factors contributed to the increase or customer preferences differ, the argument is weakened.

2. Argument: The following is from a memo from the business manager of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States.

"For the past year, Yum Cheese has seen a significant increase in sales. The success can be attributed to the introduction of a new marketing campaign highlighting the health benefits of cheese. Given this success, we recommend expanding the campaign nationwide to increase sales in all locations."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

Answer:

Evidence needed includes detailed sales data showing a correlation between the marketing campaign and increased sales, as well as customer feedback on the campaign's effectiveness. Additionally, market research on regional preferences and health trends would help determine if the campaign's success can be replicated nationwide. If evidence supports a strong correlation and similar preferences exist in other regions, the argument is strengthened. If sales increases were due to other factors or preferences vary significantly, the argument is weakened.

3. Argument: The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals.

"We need to reduce our healthcare costs. Our neighboring country, which has a similar population size and demographic profile, has successfully reduced their healthcare costs by implementing a nationalized healthcare system. Therefore, we should adopt a nationalized healthcare system to achieve similar cost reductions."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

Answer:

Evidence needed includes a detailed comparison of the healthcare systems, cost structures, and economic conditions between the two countries. Additionally, analysis of potential challenges and benefits of implementing a nationalized system in our country is necessary. If evidence shows that similar conditions and successful implementation are feasible, the argument is strengthened. If differences in healthcare infrastructure, economic stability, or political factors exist, the argument is weakened.

4. Argument: The following is from a letter to the editor of a local newspaper.

"Recently, the local government implemented a program to plant more trees in urban areas to improve air quality. However, despite the program, air quality has not improved significantly. Therefore, the program should be discontinued."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

Answer:

Evidence needed includes data on the number of trees planted, the time frame of the program, and other factors affecting air quality, such as industrial emissions or traffic levels. Additionally, scientific research on the impact of tree planting on air quality would be relevant. If evidence shows that the program's scale or duration was insufficient to impact air quality or other factors played a larger role, the argument is weakened. If evidence suggests the program was adequately implemented but failed to deliver results, the argument is strengthened.

5. Argument: The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a manufacturing company.

"Our company should relocate its manufacturing plant to the town of Hamilton. Hamilton has lower property taxes and a large labor pool. These factors will significantly reduce our operating costs."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

Answer:

Evidence needed includes a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of relocation, considering not only property taxes and labor availability but also transportation costs, potential disruption to operations, and quality of the labor pool. Additionally, information on Hamilton's infrastructure and regulatory environment would be relevant. If evidence shows significant cost savings and a smooth transition are feasible, the argument is strengthened. If potential downsides outweigh the benefits or relocation involves hidden costs, the argument is weakened.