How to Handle Error in lm.fit with createFolds Function in R
Last Updated :
01 Jul, 2024
When you are working with linear models and cross-validation in R then you may come across the following error “Error in lm. fit (0 non-na Cases)” This is a common error with creating folds with the caret package, which can sometimes produce inaccurate folds. In this article, you will learn why this error can occur and how to manage this issue in R Programming Language.
Understanding the Error
The "Error in lm. fit (0 non-na Cases)" typically occurs when:
- Improper Handling of NAs: If NAs are not properly handled or imputed before creating the folds, they can cause issues during the model fitting process.
- Data Subsetting Issues: When using functions like creating folds from the caret package for cross-validation, the data might be split in a way that one or more folds contain only missing values (NAs).
- Imbalanced Datasets: If your dataset is heavily imbalanced or contains a lot of missing values, some of the cross-validation folds might end up without any valid observations.
This is normally an error that arises when analyzing discrete data or when using disproportionate stratified sampling on rare occurrence cases.
Causes and Solutions of the Error in lm.fit
Here are the main types of Error in lm.fit occuers in the model and we will discuss different methods to solve this errors.
1. Presence of NA Values
Looking at your current set of your data, there appear to be NA values which would cause an inconvenience in the model fitting.
R
# Load necessary packages
if (!requireNamespace("caret", quietly = TRUE)) {
install.packages("caret")
}
library(caret)
# Create a dataset where 'x' contains only NA values
data <- data.frame(
x = rep(NA, 100), # 'x' column with 100 NA values
y = rnorm(100) # 'y' column with random normal values
)
# Function to fit linear model and handle errors
fit_model <- function(data) {
tryCatch({
lm(y ~ x, data = data)
}, error = function(e) {
message("Error fitting model: ", e$message)
return(NULL) # Return NULL if there's an error
})
}
# Fit linear model (intentionally triggers error)
result <- fit_model(data)
# Check if model fitting was successful
if (!is.null(result)) {
print(summary(result)) # Print summary of the model if successful
}
Output:
Error fitting model: 0 (non-NA) cases
2. Imbalanced Datasets
This error occurs when the dataset is heavily imbalanced or contains a lot of missing values, leading some cross-validation folds to have no valid observations.
R
# Example of an imbalanced dataset
data_imbalanced <- data.frame(
x = c(rep(NA, 8), 9, 10),
y = c(rep(2, 8), NA, 20)
)
# Create 3 folds
folds <- createFolds(data_imbalanced$y, k = 3)
# Perform cross-validation
cv_results <- lapply(folds, function(train_indices) {
train_data <- data_imbalanced[train_indices, ]
model <- lm(y ~ x, data = train_data)
return(summary(model))
})
Output:
Error in lm.fit(x, y, offset = offset, singular.ok = singular.ok, ...) :
0 (non-NA) cases
3. Improper Handling of NAs
This error occurs if NAs are not properly handled or imputed before creating the folds, causing issues during the model fitting process.
R
# Data with missing values not handled
data_with_nas <- data.frame(
x = c(1, 2, NA, 4, 5, NA, 7, 8, 9, 10),
y = c(2, 4, 6, NA, 10, 12, 14, 16, NA, 20)
)
# Create 5 folds
folds <- createFolds(data_with_nas$y, k = 5)
# Perform cross-validation
cv_results <- lapply(folds, function(train_indices) {
train_data <- data_with_nas[train_indices, ]
model <- lm(y ~ x, data = train_data)
return(summary(model))
})
Output:
Error in lm.fit(x, y, offset = offset, singular.ok = singular.ok, ...) :
0 (non-NA) cases
Now we will discuss all the solutions of the caused errors.
Solution 1: Remove or Impute NAs Before Creating Folds
For the first example, removing rows with NAs can solve the issue.
R
# Load necessary libraries
library(caret)
# Example data with NAs
set.seed(123)
data <- data.frame(
x = c(1, 2, 3, NA, 5, 6, 7, 8, NA, 10),
y = c(2, 4, 6, 8, 10, NA, 14, 16, 18, 20)
)
# Remove rows with NAs
clean_data <- na.omit(data)
# Create folds on the clean data
folds <- createFolds(clean_data$y, k = 5)
# Perform cross-validation on clean data
cv_results <- lapply(folds, function(train_indices) {
train_data <- clean_data[train_indices, ]
model <- lm(y ~ x, data = train_data)
return(summary(model))
})
print(cv_results)
Output:
$Fold1
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = train_data)
Residuals:
ALL 1 residuals are 0: no residual degrees of freedom!
Coefficients: (1 not defined because of singularities)
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 16 NA NA NA
x NA NA NA NA
Residual standard error: NaN on 0 degrees of freedom
$Fold2
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = train_data)
Residuals:
ALL 2 residuals are 0: no residual degrees of freedom!
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 0 NA NA NA
x 2 NA NA NA
Residual standard error: NaN on 0 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 1, Adjusted R-squared: NaN
F-statistic: NaN on 1 and 0 DF, p-value: NA
$Fold3
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = train_data)
Residuals:
ALL 2 residuals are 0: no residual degrees of freedom!
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 0 NA NA NA
x 2 NA NA NA
Residual standard error: NaN on 0 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 1, Adjusted R-squared: NaN
F-statistic: NaN on 1 and 0 DF, p-value: NA
$Fold4
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = train_data)
Residuals:
ALL 1 residuals are 0: no residual degrees of freedom!
Coefficients: (1 not defined because of singularities)
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 20 NA NA NA
x NA NA NA NA
Residual standard error: NaN on 0 degrees of freedom
$Fold5
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = train_data)
Residuals:
ALL 1 residuals are 0: no residual degrees of freedom!
Coefficients: (1 not defined because of singularities)
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 10 NA NA NA
x NA NA NA NA
Residual standard error: NaN on 0 degrees of freedom
Solution 2: Check for Valid Cases Within Each Fold
For the second example, ensuring each fold has valid cases can help.
R
# Load necessary libraries
library(caret)
# Example of an imbalanced dataset
data_imbalanced <- data.frame(
x = c(rep(NA, 8), 9, 10),
y = c(rep(2, 8), NA, 20)
)
# Create 3 folds
folds <- createFolds(data_imbalanced$y, k = 3)
# Perform cross-validation
cv_results <- lapply(folds, function(train_indices) {
train_data <- data_imbalanced[train_indices, ]
model <- lm(y ~ x, data = train_data)
return(summary(model))
})
Output:
$Fold1
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = train_data)
Residuals:
ALL 1 residuals are 0: no residual degrees of freedom!
Coefficients: (1 not defined because of singularities)
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 20 NA NA NA
x NA NA NA NA
Residual standard error: NaN on 0 degrees of freedom
Solution 3: Impute Missing Values
For the third example, imputing missing values ensures the model has data to work with.
R
# Load necessary libraries
library(caret)
# Example of an imbalanced dataset
data_imbalanced <- data.frame(
x = c(rep(NA, 8), 9, 10),
y = c(rep(2, 8), NA, 20)
)
# Remove rows with NAs in the target variable before creating folds
clean_data <- na.omit(data_imbalanced)
# Create 3 folds on the clean data
folds <- createFolds(clean_data$y, k = 3)
# Perform cross-validation with a check for non-NA cases
cv_results <- lapply(folds, function(train_indices) {
train_data <- clean_data[train_indices, ]
if (all(is.na(train_data$x)) | all(is.na(train_data$y))) {
return(NULL) # Skip fold if all values are NA
} else {
model <- lm(y ~ x, data = train_data)
return(summary(model))
}
})
print(cv_results)
Output:
$Fold1
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = train_data)
Residuals:
ALL 2 residuals are 0: no residual degrees of freedom!
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 0 NA NA NA
x 2 NA NA NA
Residual standard error: NaN on 0 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 1, Adjusted R-squared: NaN
F-statistic: NaN on 1 and 0 DF, p-value: NA
$Fold2
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = train_data)
Residuals:
3 6
-3 3
Coefficients: (1 not defined because of singularities)
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 9 3 3 0.205
x NA NA NA NA
Residual standard error: 4.243 on 1 degrees of freedom
$Fold3
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = train_data)
Residuals:
ALL 2 residuals are 0: no residual degrees of freedom!
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 10.5 NA NA NA
x 0.0 NA NA NA
Residual standard error: NaN on 0 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: NaN, Adjusted R-squared: NaN
F-statistic: NaN on 1 and 0 DF, p-value: NA
$Fold4
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = train_data)
Residuals:
ALL 2 residuals are 0: no residual degrees of freedom!
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 0 NA NA NA
x 2 NA NA NA
Residual standard error: NaN on 0 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 1, Adjusted R-squared: NaN
F-statistic: NaN on 1 and 0 DF, p-value: NA
$Fold5
Call:
lm(formula = y ~ x, data = train_data)
Residuals:
ALL 2 residuals are 0: no residual degrees of freedom!
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 0 NA NA NA
x 2 NA NA NA
Residual standard error: NaN on 0 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 1, Adjusted R-squared: NaN
F-statistic: NaN on 1 and 0 DF, p-value: NA
By following these complete solutions, you can handle the "Error in lm.fit (0 non-NA cases)" effectively and ensure a smooth model training and evaluation process.
Conclusion
The "Error in lm.fit (0 non-na Cases)" when using createFolds can be frustrating, but it's often a sign of underlying data issues. By understanding the causes and implementing robust solutions, you can ensure your cross-validation process is more reliable and your machine learning models are built on solid foundations. Remember to always inspect your data thoroughly before applying machine learning techniques, and consider the nature of your dataset when choosing cross-validation strategies. With these practices in place, you'll be better equipped to handle and prevent such errors in your R-based machine learning projects.
Similar Reads
How to Handle Invalid Argument Error in R Functions
Handling invalid argument errors in R functions involves implementing proper input validation and providing informative error messages to users. In this guide, we'll explore common practices for handling invalid argument errors, along with examples in R Programming Language. Types of errors for Inva
3 min read
How to Deal with Error in match.fun in R
The match. fun() function is essential for matching and evaluating functions in the context of the R Programming Language. However, when using this feature, users could run into issues. This article examines typical problems with match. fun() and offers workable solutions to manage them. Causes of e
3 min read
How to Deal with Error in eval in R
The eval() function in R allows us to execute expressions dynamically. But there can be errors during this execution. This article discusses common errors in eval() and how to effectively handle them. Common Errors in eval() and Their Solutions1. Undefined VariableAn error occurs when a variable use
3 min read
How to Fix Attempt to Apply Non-function Error in R
The Non-function Error in R Programming Language occurs when you attempt to call a variable that is not a function as if it were one. This error can occur in a variety of scenarios, such as using brackets erroneously with a variable name or attempting to invoke a function that does not exist. In thi
3 min read
How to Handle Error in cbind in R
In R Programming Language the cbind() function is commonly used to combine vectors, matrices, or data frames by column. While cbind() is a powerful tool for data manipulation, errors may occur when using it, leading to unexpected behavior or failed execution. In this article, we'll discuss common er
4 min read
How to Handle Error in data.frame in R
In R programming Language, the data.frame() method plays a crucial role in organizing and handling data in a dynamic setting. But things don't always go as planned, and mistakes do happen. This post acts as a manual for comprehending typical mistakes in the data.frame() method and offers helpful adv
3 min read
How to Fix Error in aggregate.data.frame in R
The aggregate function in R applies the data aggregation on the basis of required factors. Yet, users are bound to find errors while dealing with data frames. In this article, common errors and effective solutions to solve them are elucidated.Common Errors in aggregate.data.frameErrors may arise, pa
2 min read
How to Validate Input to a Function Error in R
In this article, we will examine various methods for how to validate input to the function by using R Programming Language. How to validate input to the function?Validating input to a function in R is crucial for ensuring that your code behaves as expected and can handle various types of input grace
5 min read
How to Fix Error in model.frame.default in R
Errors in the model. frame. default function in R Programming Language can be annoying, but knowing how to fix them is essential for effective modelling and data analysis. However, users may encounter errors while using a model. frame.default, often due to issues related to the structure or content
3 min read
How to Fix: could not find function â%>%â in R
In this article, we are going to see how to fix, could not find function â%>%â in R Programming Language. The pipe operator %>% was introduced to decrease time and to improve the readability and maintainability of code. This error can occur while donât have loaded or installed the R package. M
2 min read