Church’s Thesis for Turing Machine Last Updated : 12 Jul, 2025 Comments Improve Suggest changes 20 Likes Like Report The Church-Turing Thesis is an important idea in the study of computability i.e. the ability to solve problems using a set of rules or procedures. It is an abstract model of a computing device, proposed by Alan Turing and Alonzo Church. It helps define algorithms and computing processes. The basic idea of the thesis is:Any effective calculation or computation that can be done by a human (following specific steps) can also be done by a Turing machine.A Turing machine is a simple mathematical model that represents a basic form of a computer. This machine helps explain the logic behind modern computers.Turing MachineTo define these algorithms clearly, Alonzo Church developed a method called "M" for manipulating strings using logic and mathematics. This method must meet the following criteria:Finite instructions: The method must have a limited number of steps.Finite output: The method should produce a result after a certain number of steps.Real-life feasibility: The method should be physically possible.Simple to understand: It should not require complex understanding.Based on these conditions, Church proposed the Church-Turing Thesis, which states:"Every computation that can be done in the real world can be effectively performed by a Turing machine."This idea was first formulated by Church in 1930 and is known as the Church-Turing Thesis. Although it cannot be proven, the hypothesis assumes that all computable functions can be represented by partial recursive functions.In simpler terms:Assumption 1: Every function must be computable.Assumption 2: If a function F is computable and you perform basic operations on it to get a new function G, then G is also computable.Importance of the Church-Turing ThesisDefines computability: The Church-Turing Thesis provides a clear definition of what is considered "computable" in computer science.Standard for algorithms: It defines "algorithmically computable" as anything that can be computed by a Turing machine.Basis for computability: It helps in understanding which problems can be solved using computers.Foundation of computer science: The thesis is fundamental to the study of computability and sets the foundation for modern computer science.Relationship Between Turing Machines and Lambda CalculusEquivalent PowerThough they look very different, Turing Machines and Lambda Calculus are equivalent in terms of computational power. This means:Anything you can compute with a Turing Machine can be computed using Lambda Calculus.Anything you can compute with Lambda Calculus can be simulated by a Turing Machine.This equivalence was crucial to supporting Church’s Thesis because it showed two very different formal systems capture the same notion of “computable function.”Different PerspectivesTuring Machines focus on a mechanical step-by-step process involving states and symbols on a tape.Lambda Calculus focuses on symbolic manipulation of functions and substitution.Both models provide a formal way to define algorithms but from different angles: one machine-based, the other function-based. Create Quiz Comment D deepanshu_rustagi Follow 20 Improve D deepanshu_rustagi Follow 20 Improve Article Tags : GATE CS Theory of Computation Explore Automata _ IntroductionIntroduction to Theory of Computation5 min readChomsky Hierarchy in Theory of Computation2 min readApplications of various Automata4 min readRegular Expression and Finite AutomataIntroduction of Finite Automata3 min readArden's Theorem in Theory of Computation6 min readSolving Automata Using Arden's Theorem6 min readL-graphs and what they represent in TOC4 min readHypothesis (language regularity) and algorithm (L-graph to NFA) in TOC7 min readRegular Expressions, Regular Grammar and Regular Languages7 min readHow to identify if a language is regular or not8 min readDesigning Finite Automata from Regular Expression (Set 1)4 min readStar Height of Regular Expression and Regular Language3 min readGenerating regular expression from Finite Automata3 min readCode Implementation of Deterministic Finite Automata (Set 1)8 min readProgram for Deterministic Finite Automata7 min readDFA for Strings not ending with "THE"12 min readDFA of a string with at least two 0âs and at least two 1âs3 min readDFA for accepting the language L = { anbm | n+m =even }14 min readDFA machines accepting odd number of 0âs or/and even number of 1âs3 min readDFA of a string in which 2nd symbol from RHS is 'a'10 min readUnion Process in DFA4 min readConcatenation Process in DFA3 min readDFA in LEX code which accepts even number of zeros and even number of ones6 min readConversion from NFA to DFA5 min readMinimization of DFA7 min readReversing Deterministic Finite Automata4 min readComplementation process in DFA2 min readKleene's Theorem in TOC | Part-13 min readMealy and Moore Machines in TOC3 min readDifference Between Mealy Machine and Moore Machine4 min readCFGRelationship between grammar and language in Theory of Computation4 min readSimplifying Context Free Grammars6 min readClosure Properties of Context Free Languages11 min readUnion and Intersection of Regular languages with CFL3 min readConverting Context Free Grammar to Chomsky Normal Form5 min readConverting Context Free Grammar to Greibach Normal Form6 min readPumping Lemma in Theory of Computation4 min readCheck if the language is Context Free or Not4 min readAmbiguity in Context free Grammar and Languages3 min readOperator grammar and precedence parser in TOC6 min readContext-sensitive Grammar (CSG) and Language (CSL)2 min readPDA (Pushdown Automata)Introduction of Pushdown Automata5 min readPushdown Automata Acceptance by Final State4 min readConstruct Pushdown Automata for given languages4 min readConstruct Pushdown Automata for all length palindrome6 min readDetailed Study of PushDown Automata3 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {anbm cn | m,n>=1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {an bn cm | m,n>=1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {anbn | n>=1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {amb2m| m>=1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {am bn cp dq | m+n=p+q ; m,n,p,q>=1}2 min readConstruct Pushdown automata for L = {0n1m2m3n | m,n ⥠0}3 min readConstruct Pushdown automata for L = {0n1m2n+m | m, n ⥠0}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {ambncm+n | m,n ⥠1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {amb(m+n)cn| m,n ⥠1}3 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {a2mb3m|m>=1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {amb2m+1 | m ⥠1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {aibjckdl | i==k or j==l,i>=1,j>=1}3 min readConstruct Pushdown automata for L = {a2mc4ndnbm | m,n ⥠0}3 min readNPDA for L = {0i1j2k | i==j or j==k ; i , j , k >= 1}2 min readNPDA for accepting the language L = {anb2n| n>=1} U {anbn| n>=1}2 min readNPDA for the language L ={wÐ{a,b}* | w contains equal no. of a's and b's}3 min readTuring MachineTuring Machine in TOC7 min readTuring Machine for addition3 min readTuring machine for subtraction | Set 12 min readTuring machine for multiplication2 min readTuring machine for copying data2 min readConstruct a Turing Machine for language L = {0n1n2n | nâ¥1}3 min readConstruct a Turing Machine for language L = {wwr | w ∈ {0, 1}}5 min readConstruct a Turing Machine for language L = {ww | w ∈ {0,1}}7 min readConstruct Turing machine for L = {an bm a(n+m) | n,mâ¥1}3 min readConstruct a Turing machine for L = {aibjck | i*j = k; i, j, k ⥠1}2 min readTuring machine for 1's and 2âs complement3 min readRecursive and Recursive Enumerable Languages in TOC6 min readTuring Machine for subtraction | Set 22 min readHalting Problem in Theory of Computation4 min readTuring Machine as Comparator3 min readDecidabilityDecidable and Undecidable Problems in Theory of Computation6 min readUndecidability and Reducibility in TOC5 min readComputable and non-computable problems in TOC6 min readTOC Interview preparationLast Minute Notes - Theory of Computation13 min readTOC Quiz and PYQ's in TOCTheory of Computation - GATE CSE Previous Year Questions2 min read Like