Exploring How LLMs Think: A Tiny Model vs a Giant Model I recently experimented with two language models — a small 0.6B LLM (Qwen3) and a 20B LLM (GPT-OSS) — using LangChain discovered something fascinating about how AI “thinks.” Even a tiny 0.6B model can summarize short texts almost as accurately as a 20B model. But when I: enabled reasoning, increased context length, changed the task, or used tools …the outputs started to diverge. This showed me something important: Each change reveals which part of a model’s intelligence is activated. and when i asked chatgpt can you rate the model without telling which one is big or small its rates like this : Model 2 → 9.5/10 (best overall — clear, precise, natural, and detailed) Model 1 → 9/10 (very strong, just slightly less natural and detailed) Even small experiments like this — when structured properly with LangChain — teach deep insights into LLM behavior. It’s amazing how much you can learn by observing output differences and structuring prompts systematically. I’m excited to continue exploring AI reasoning, context handling, and task-specific behavior with structured pipelines. #MachineLearning #AI #LLM #NLP #DeepLearning #LangChain #LearningByDoing #Python

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories