Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inefficiency in parallel pg_restore with many tables
Date: 2023-09-20 02:30:33
Message-ID: 20230920023033.GA2954035@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 02:22:32PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> For now, I've committed 0001 and 0002. I intend to commit the others soon.

I've committed the rest of the patches.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kuwamura Masaki 2023-09-20 02:46:45 Re: pg_rewind with cascade standby doesn't work well
Previous Message Peter Smith 2023-09-20 01:42:12 Re: Move global variables of pgoutput to plugin private scope.