FIRE FIGHTING SYSTEMS IN POWER STATIONS
Why, Where and How in a Power Station
Basics of Combustion Process
Fire Tetrahedron
Oxygen Fuel Heat of Ignition Chain Reaction to Sustain Fire
Sources Of Ignition
Electricity
Smoking
Incendiarism (strike, sabotage) Cutting & Welding Friction
Classification of Occupancies by TAC
Light Hazard
Ordinary Hazard
High Hazard
Electric Generating Station
Major Fires in Fire Stations
Obra Thermal Power Station
Koradi Thermal Power Station
HVDC Transmission System of Rihand Dadri
Line.
Resources of Designer
CODES- National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA), Tariff Advisory Committee (TAC), Beuro Of Indian Standards (BIS). Insurance Agency Feed Back From Operating Stn. Latest Development in the Field.
Inert Gas System Addressable Detection System Multisensor Detectors
10
Fire Risk Areas
Fuel Oil Storage & Handling System.
Coal Storage And Handling System
Cable Galleries Steam Generator /WHRB Transformers
11
Fire Risk Areas- contd.
Lub Oil System
Generators
Control Room & CER Air Pre-heaters Gas Turbines Gas Pressure Reducing Station
12
Type Of Detectors
Heat Detectors
Smoke Detectors
Flame Detectors
13
Heat Detectors +/ Heat Detectors
Advantages
Simplest Least Expensive Reliable Lowest False Alarm Rate Slowest to Respond
Disadvantages
14
Heat Detectors in Power Station
Typical Heat Detectors are:
Quartzoid Bulb Detector Spot Type Heat Detector Linear Heat Sensing Cables Infrared Heat Detector
15
LHSC & Infra-red detectors
LHSC Heat sensing cable comprises of
two conductors encased in heat sensitive material Infra-red Detects moving fires
Responds to Infra-Red Band of Electromagnetic radiation - Provided on conveyors coming from coal stockyard - going to coal bunkers.
16
Use Of Heat Detectors
Used For Detection Of Fires In
Transformers Coal Handling Plant Fuel Oil Storage And Handling Plants Boiler Burner Fronts Lub Oil Storage Facilities Battery Rooms
17
Smoke Detectors +/-_
Smoke Detectors
Advantages
Fast Detection
Disadvantages
More Costly Require More Maintenance Higher False Alarm Rate
18
Other Details of Smoke Detectors
Types Are Ionisation Photoelectric Multisensor Used In Control Rooms Control Equipment Rooms Office Areas MCC/Switch Gears Rooms Cable Galleries
19
Smoke Detectors
Ionisation type Smoke Detector is more
snsitive as compared to Photoelectric type Detector.
20
Smoke Detectors
Ionisation
type Detector
It is Responsive to both Visible and Invisible products of Combustion with very early response to Fires in the Incipient Stage It can Detect Smoke Particles in the 0.01 to 10 Microne range .
21
Ionization Detectors
Detector consists of ionizing chamber with
radio-active source Smoke/Fire changes current in the ionization chamber Used for general office application To avoid the use of radioactive element, these detectors have now been replaced with MultiSensor type detectors.
22
Smoke Detectors
Optical/
Photoelectric
It is responsive to visible smoke It can detect smoke particles in the range of 0.5 to 10 microne It is useful where an ionisation sensor is too sensitive
23
Photo-electric detector
Sensing element is an optical chamber
On fire/smoke, the light scattered in the
optical chamber varies Smolder fires (Suitable for PVC fire)
24
History of smoke detection
Early version of smoke detector 1896
Involved two birds in a cage When overcome by fumes, would fall into a funnel at the bottom of their cage. The weight of their bodies would activate a circuit and register an alarm. Two birds were used so that in the event one died of natural cause; the detector would not be triggered. This was the earliest form of false alarm protection
25
The cross-zoning principle was designed to avoid pouring expensive extinguishing chemicals into the room in a false fire scenario.
26
Addressable Analog Detection System-1
Microprocessor based
Smart & intelligent
Any kind of Detector or Alarm may be
incorporated Detectors are monitored every 3 seconds including their status, sensitivity etc.
28
Addressable Analog Detection System-2
Based on above programmed action can be
taken by panel e.g.
Transmit Alarm Closing Doors Suppression System Printing records
Can Analyse & Adjust Sensitivity of Detector
29
Components of Fire Alarm System
Detection
Protection Annunciation
Central Fire Control Panel
30
Fire Protection
Agents
Should be most effective Safest Least damaging to particular operation or equipment
Pre-Planned Equipment in Place
31
Classification of Fires
Class-A
ORDINARY COMBUSTIBLES e.G. Wood, Paper, Cloth& Plastics Requires Cooling & Quenching
Flammable liquid e.g. Gasoline, Oil, Paints Etc. Requires Blanketing,Smothering Or Chemical Inhibition.
32
Class-B
Classification of fires-contd.
Class - C
Electrical fires Requires non conducting extinguishing agent with cooling, smothering or chemical inhibition characteristics
33
Classification of Fires-contd
Class - D
Combustible Metal Fires e.g. Mg., Al, Na, K ETC. Requires special Dry Powder which Blankets the Fire and Exclude the Oxygen.
34
Common Extinguishing Agents
Water
Oldest Most Common Abundant In-expensive Readily Available Excellent Fire Extinguishing Properties
35
Common Extinguishing Agents-contd.
Easily Transported or Moved. Has Sufficient Surface Tension to allow it to applied as a
Consolidated Stream Discrete Water Droplets Fog or Spray
36
Automatic Sprinklers & Electrical Fires
Characteristics of water spray pattern
Little danger of the transmission of hazardous current Unlikely that personnel will be in the water discharge area when sprinkler activates.
37
Design aspects
Hydrant works as the back bone
Spray/sprinkler system provided for automatic
protection of transformers, coal handling plant, cable galleries, fuel oil and transfer areas. Foam protection system for fuel oil tanks, Total flooding inert gas system for electronic areas.
38
JP- JOCKEY PUMP
HP- HYDRANT PUMP.
TO HYDRANT SYSTEM
SP- SPRAY PUMP MD- MOTOR DRIVEN. DD- DIESEL ENGINE DRIVEN
TO SPRAY SYSTEM
JP
HPMD
HPMD
HPDD
SPMD
SPDD
FIRE WATER STORAGE TANKS
39
MVW SPRAY SYSTEM
Provided to protect
Cable galleries/cable vault of
Main plant ESP/ VFD building CHP control room Switchyard control room Cable galleries provided in any other area
46
MVW SPRAY SYSTEM-Contd.
Coal conveyors Transfer points and crusher houses Fuel oil tanks (NAPHTHA/NGL/HSD) Fuel oil pump house eqpts. Steam turbine bearing housing
47
HVW SPRAY SYSTEM
Turbine oil tanks,coolers and purifiers
Turbine lube oil pipes
Boiler burner fronts All transformers in transformer yard and
transformers of 10MVA and above in other areas in the plant. Oil canals
48
General comments
Hydrant system is kept pressurised using Hydro
pneumatic tank, air compressors and jockey pumps. Hydro-pneumatic tank works as a surge tank. Air compressor helps in maintaining adequate pressure in the system. Jockey pump helps in meeting minor losses. Above system would work, if hydrant system is not used for any other purpose. It is observed that at site hydrant system is used for cleaning and floor washing.
49
Such a practice is very dangerous May result in inadequate pressure at place of fire in emergency situation. To overcome this problem Independent service water system with pumps and piping network is being provided. Jockey pump of higher capacity is being provided. ( earlier it was 20 to 30 Cum./Hr. now it is about 75 Cum./hr.)
50
FIRE PROTECTION OF CONTROL ROOMS AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT ROOMS
52
BACKGROUND
-Devastating fire at OBRA TPS IN OCTOBER 1983 -C.E.A. Circulated the measures to be adopted in fire fighting system in power stations. -Recommendations-use Halon-1301 in control room areas by total flooding system.
53
BASIC REQUIREMENT
These are electronic areas Agent requirements
High efficiency
Non-toxic Non-damaging to equipment Non-conductor of electricity
54
INTRODUCTION IN NTPC
HALON 1301- Meet all the above
Used as a total flooding agent
OBRA FIRE IN 1983
Cause for introduction of agent in NTPC
55
-HALON-1301, an excellent fire extinguishing agent,
- For total flooding application - Safe for use in manned areas - Harmless to equipment. -Accordingly, HALON-1301 gas was introduced in NTPC For protection of CONTROL EQUIPMENT ROOM (C.E.R.) and UNIT CONTRL ROOM (U.C.R.) in 1984. Subsequently all NTPC Projects at that time were provided with HALON-1301.
56
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
In 1991 due to adverse environmental impact
- further use of HALON was discontinued.
57
HALON PHASE OUT
In view of environmental considerations, its use was reviwed in NTPC in 1991 and it was decided not to specify HALON System for ongoing and future projects.
Accordingly, only portable extingushers were provided for control room and modular CO2 Injection system was to be explored for individual panels in CONTROL EQUIPMENT ROOM (C.E.R.)
58
CO2 Injection system was not found suitable because of objection raised by panel manufacturers. Hence this system has not been provided in any NTPC Projects for U.C.R. AND C.E.R.
59
The issue of fire protection system in control rooms and control equipment rooms was once again reviewed in NTPC in 1999
65
CLEAN AGENTS NOW AVAILABLE
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) USA has published a code NFPA-2001. This code covers clean agent fire extinguishing system as an alternative to HALON.
70
NFPA-2001
NFPA-2001,1996 MADE AVAILABLE FOR
CLEAN AGENT SYSTEMS
CLEAN AGENTS
HALOCARBONS
INERT GASES
71
COMPARISON OF CLEAN AGENTS
HALOCARBONS
Physical charact-eristics
INERT GAS
Physical charact-eristics
CHEMICAL
SPEED OF EXTING-
INERT GAS
UISHING
SPEED OF EXTING-
Fast since total agent discharge is in 10 sec.
UISHING
Relatively slower since total gas discharge time is about 60 sec.
72
COMPARISON OF CLEAN AGENTS
HALOCARBONS Design concen-tration to extinguish fire 7% INERT GAS Concentration required to extinguish fire 34%
73
COMPARISON OF CLEAN AGENTS
HALOCARBONS CYLINDER STORAGE
INERT GAS CYLINDER STORAGE
4 TIMES MORE THAN HALON
10 TIMES MORE THAN HALON
CYLINDER
CYLINDER
PRESSURE
PRESSURE
25 TO 40 BAR
150 TO 300 BAR
74
COMPARISON OF CLEAN AGENTS
HALOCARBONS GAS DISCHARGE PRESSURE
INERT GAS GAS DISCHARGE PRESSURE
5 BAR
NOT SIGNIFICANT
25 BAR
VENTING DESIGN
SPECIAL CARE IS TO BE
TAKEN IN ENCLOSURE DESIGN WITH RESPECT TO VENTING
75
COMPARISON OF CLEAN AGENTS
HALOCARBONS Location of cylinder: should not be more than 20m away from the risk INERT GAS Can be loacted 150m away from the risk
76
COMPARISON OF CLEAN AGENTS
HALOCARBONS No. of cylinder banks each bank can serve only one fire risk INERT GAS One bank can serve a number of fire risks using directional valve Refill cost cheap
Refill cost very high
77
COMPARISON OF CLEAN AGENTS
HALOCARBONS Undergoes thermal and chemical decomposition while extinguishing fire INERT GAS Not subject to any decomposition.
78
Halocarbon is a chemical agent. Hence, possibility of its use being banned or restricted in future can not be ruled out.
83
INERT GASES
Normal level of oxygen -21% in atmosphere To extinguish fire oxygen concentration should be less
than 15%
Oxygen concentration less than 12% is not safe for
human occupancy.
Inert gas reduces oxygen concentration ( to less than
15% but more than 12% and extinguish fire.
84
HALOCARBONS-1
FM-200 - GREATLAKE CHEMICALS, USA NAF-SIII- NORTH AMERICAN FIRE GUARDIAN , CANADA, ITALY FE-13 - Du PONT CEA-410
88
INERT GASES-1
INERGEN(N2-52%, ARGON -40%, CO2-8%)
ARGONITE (N2-50%, ARGON -50%)
ARGOTEC ( ARGON -100%) NITROGEN (N2-100%)
91
INERT GASES-1
These are mixture of freely available gases in
atmosphere System design is proprietary Refilling is cheaper Requires more cylinders Directional valves can be used.
92
INERT GASES-3
INERGEN - AVAILABLE FROM TYCO USA,
ANSUL USA, WORMOLD AUSTRALIA. ARGONITE - GINGE-KERR, DENMARK. ARGOTEC - MINIMAX, GERMANY NITROGEN - NOHMI BOSAI, JAPAN
94
MONTREAL PROTOCOL
For India - eliminate HALON Consumption
completely by developing safer alternatives by 2010.
97
THANK YOU
100
101
102
103