Scribd
Upload
3K views2 pages

IB Economics IA Assessment Rubric

This document appears to be an internal assessment rubric for evaluating a student's portfolio of economic commentaries on articles. It assesses the portfolio across six criteria: diagrams, terminology, application of economic concepts, analysis, evaluation/reasoning, and meeting rubric requirements. Each criterion has descriptors defining levels of achievement from 0 to 3 or 4 points. An overall score is given that takes into account performance on all criteria.

Uploaded by

api-196719233
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3K views2 pages

IB Economics IA Assessment Rubric

This document appears to be an internal assessment rubric for evaluating a student's portfolio of economic commentaries on articles. It assesses the portfolio across six criteria: diagrams, terminology, application of economic concepts, analysis, evaluation/reasoning, and meeting rubric requirements. Each criterion has descriptors defining levels of achievement from 0 to 3 or 4 points. An overall score is given that takes into account performance on all criteria.

Uploaded by

api-196719233
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Criterion C: Application
  • Criterion B: Terminology
  • Criterion A: Diagrams
  • Criterion D: Analysis
  • Criterion F: Rubric Requirements
  • Criterion E: Evaluation

Name:

_________________________________________________________________________________________
Internal Assessment #__________
Unit Covered: _____________________________________________________

Score: _____________________________________

Criterion A: Diagrams

This criterion assesses the extent to which the student is able to construct
and use diagrams.

0
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below

Relevant diagrams are included but not explained, or the explanations are
incorrect

Relevant, accurate and correctly labeled diagrams are included, with a


limited explanation

Relevant, accurate and correctly labeled diagrams are included, with a full
explanation.


Criterion B: Terminology

This criterion assesses the extent to which the student uses appropriate
economic terminology

0
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.

Terminology relevant to the article is included in the commentary

Terminology relevant to the article is used appropriately throughout the


commentary.


Criterion C: Application

This criterion assesses the extent to which the student recognizes,
understands and applies economic information in the context of the article

0
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.

Relevant economic concepts and/or theories are applied to the article.

Relevant economic concepts and/or theories are applied to the article


appropriately throughout the commentary.

Criterion D: Analysis

This criterion assesses the extent to which the student can explain and
develop appropriate economic theories and/or concepts in the context of the article.

0
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.

There is limited economic analysis relating to the article.

There is appropriate economic analysis relating to the article.

There is effective economic analysis relating to the article.


Criterion E: Evaluation

This criterion assesses the extent to which the student synthesizes his or her
analysis in order to make judgments that are supported by reasoned arguments.

0
The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.

1
Judgments are made that are unsupported, or supported, by incorrect
reasoning.

Judgments are made that are supported by limited reasoning.

Judgments are made that are supported by appropriate reasoning.

Judgments are made that are supported by effective and balanced reasoning.


Criterion F: Rubric requirements

This criterion assesses the extent to which the student meets the five rubric
requirements for the complete portfolio.

Each commentary does not exceed 750 words.

Each article is based on a different section of the syllabus.

Each article is taken from a different and appropriate source.

Each article was published no earlier than one year before the writing of the commentary.

The summary portfolio coversheet, three commentary coversheets and the article for each
commentary are included.

The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.

Three rubric requirements are met.

2

Four rubric requirements are met.

All five rubric requirements are met.

You might also like