2013-14 - Revised Framework For Assessment
2013-14 - Revised Framework For Assessment
Impact on Citizens
1.
Key Dimension
of Impact
Economic:
Direct &
Indirect
Indicators
Direct cost to user: travel costs,
travel time, elapsed time for
service delivery, cost of repeated
visits
2. Governance:
Corruption,
Accountability,
Transparency,
Participation
Questions
Number of trips made for the service
Average travel cost of making each
trip
Average travel time for each trip
Average waiting time in each trip
Estimate of wage loss if any
Payment of bribe to Government
functionaries/agents: Yes/No
Total amount paid in bribes to
Government functionaries/agents
Amount of payments made to agents
to facilitate the service
Any errors in the documents which
required correction: Yes/No
Number of trips required for
correction to be done
Travel cost for the trips
Waiting time in offices for getting
correction done
Estimate of wage loss, if any, in getting
correction done
Total processing fee paid for the task
Total license fee, stamp duty, taxes
paid
Number of documents to be submitted
Cost of preparation of documents in
terms of hours/days
Effort in preparing documents:
Measure on a scale
Measured on a scale
Yes/No
Key Dimension
of Impact
Indicators
Quality and quantity of information
shared by agencies
Questions
Are the rules and procedures clearly
stated without ambiguity and
mistakes: Measure on a scale
Transparency of data: Measure on a
scale
Transparency of decisions: Measure
on a scale
Awareness level and source of
information
3.
Quality of
Service:
Decency,
Fairness,
Convenience,
etc.
Measured on a scale
Key Dimension
of Impact
Indicators
Extent of protection of privacy
Questions
Any instance of privacy being violated:
Yes/No
Perception of protection of privacy
and confidentiality of data: measure
on a scale
1.
Key Dimensions
Economic: Direct
& Indirect
Indicator
Increased revenue collection:
enhanced payee base and
improved compliance
Productivity gains
Question
Total collections over at least 4 years
(2 years prior to application and 2
years after the application)
Payee base over at least 4 years (2
years prior to application and 2 years
after the application)
Perception on compliance: Measure
on a scale (To be supplemented with
qualitative inputs)
Total collection over at least 4 years (2
years prior to application and 2 years
after the application)
Total cost over 3 years after
implementation
Total number of employees over 3
years after implementation
Number of frauds reported in
previous 2 years
Fraud prevention measured on a scale
Ability to control cost measured on a
scale
Number of transactions processed per
month
Average number of transactions per
employee
% reduction in cycle time of key
processes
Governance:
Corruption,
Accountability,
Transparency,
Participation
Transparency of rules,
procedures, data and decision
making
Key Dimensions
Indicator
Question
employees
3.
Performance on
Key Noneconomic
Objectives
Strengthening feedback
mechanisms
Degree of employee
involvement in project design,
development & implementation
With reference to the key
organization goals in section I
Ability to define and comply
with a citizens charter
Enhanced basket of services
Improved performance
monitoring and decision
support (account for no. of
services)
Improvements in complaint
handling and problem
resolution
4.
5.
Key Dimensions
Process
Improvements
Quality of
implementation
Indicator
Reduction in cycle times of key
processes
Question
Degree of improvement measured on
a scale from perception of managers
(To be supplemented with qualitative
inputs)
Reduction in throughput time
Measured on a scale from a sample of
employees
Measured on a scale from a sample of
employees
Measured on a scale from perception
of managers
Lapses in security recorded in last 2
years
Measured on a scale from perception
of managers
Understanding of ones work
measured on a scale from a sample of
employees
Comfort level with the new system
measured on a scale from a sample of
employees
Stakeholder Consultation
Employee Satisfaction
Adherence to SLAs
Service (Citizen
Perspective)
eGovernance
Key
dimension
Indicators
Awareness
Access
mechanism
Efforts made
Mechanisms
Actual
Complete
Online
Third party
-Different level
-Mobile
-Internet
-Facilitation Centre
Key
dimension
Indicators
-Authorized agencies
Time
Interaction
Government offices
Ease of access
Total time
Waiting time
Turnaround time
Adherence to SLA
Number of visits
Number of channel partners
interacted with
Number of types of channel
partners interacted with
Quality of interaction
Grievance handling
Infrastructure
Information
Complete
-Ease of interaction
-Politeness
-Satisfaction
-Dignity
-How was queue being
managed
-Pro-activeness
-Help desks & call centers
-Availability
-Satisfaction
-Process
-Seating
-Parking
-Accessibility
-Drinking water etc
-Instruction
-Information
-Across channels
Relevant
Consistency across channels
Simple
Language support
Accuracy/updation of
information
Status update/verification
Flexibility of modification
Costs (to the
user)
Delivery of
service
User charges
Agent
Bribe
Opportunity cost?
Cost of access
Integrated
Complete
End to end
-Travel
-Technology
-Preparing documents
-Search cost
Key
dimension
Indicators
Overall perception
Corruption
Trust
Transparency
Privacy
Accountability
Responsiveness
Security
SLA
Use of
connections/
relations
Citizen charters
Technology
Infrastructure
Resources
Benefits
Project
governance
Process before
and after
Existence
Adherence
Awareness
Visibility
Language
Availability
Adherence to standards
Scalability
Versioning
Change management
Inter-operability
Security
Financial
Human
Revenue
Indirect
Leadership
Continuity
Monitoring
Service model
Capacity utilization
Service lead time
Human resource utilization
Cycle time
Record management
Audit trail
-Governance
-Disaster recovery
-Incident handling
-Capacity building
Training
Knowledge
management
-Change management
Pro-activeness
-Employee morale
-Computer awareness
-PPP
-In-house
-Any other