Scribd
Upload
83 views9 pages

Fatigue Cracking and Fractography

1) The document discusses fatigue cracking and fractography. It examines fatigue initiation and crack growth at stress concentrators on material surfaces. 2) Various images show fatigue striations that reveal crack growth patterns and the correlation between fracture surfaces and underlying material microstructures. 3) Diagrams and data plots examine relationships between factors like stress range, plastic strain, crack length, and material properties on fatigue life. 4) The progression from initial crack nucleation governed by plasticity to long crack growth governed by linear elastic fracture mechanics is described.

Uploaded by

dxsszsz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
83 views9 pages

Fatigue Cracking and Fractography

1) The document discusses fatigue cracking and fractography. It examines fatigue initiation and crack growth at stress concentrators on material surfaces. 2) Various images show fatigue striations that reveal crack growth patterns and the correlation between fracture surfaces and underlying material microstructures. 3) Diagrams and data plots examine relationships between factors like stress range, plastic strain, crack length, and material properties on fatigue life. 4) The progression from initial crack nucleation governed by plasticity to long crack growth governed by linear elastic fracture mechanics is described.

Uploaded by

dxsszsz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Fatigue Cracking and Fractography

(Above) This macroscopic view of a fractured shaft shows a


series of radiating ridges on the fracture surface, which can be
traced along the direction in which they converge to identify the
area of the fracture origin. In that area, note the darker region,
which represents the initial fatigue and slow crack growth prior
to final failure in one or a few load cycles. Surface crack initiation
was at the bottom of a spline on the shaft, the same kind of initiation at or within a stress concentrator which is often observed.

(Far left, below) Fatigue initiation occured at the bar surface


and occupied only the small,
shiny area before overload failure of most of the cross-section.
(Near left) Almost
the opposite: crack
initiation at the arrowed point on the
bar surface, followed
by crack growth
across nearly all the
section before overload in the small
crescent at lower
right. Careful examination is necessary in
such examination of
fractures.

(a) Typical replica appearance of regualr striations. (b) Striations viewed in SEM. (c) Random loading
produced irregular striations, varying with load amplitude, still one striation per cycle. (d) So-called
ductile striations, with large, regular size and spacing. (e) Brittle striations, where successive crack
front locations are still marked but not by the same process as in figures (a) through (d).
From Hertzberg, Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials (4th ed.), Wiley, 1996,
page 607

(Left) Technique of plateau etch of


fracture surface (top) to reveal underlying
microstructure of primary alpha grains in
the recrystallization anneal or RA structure of Ti-6 Al-4 V.
Four photos courtesy J.C. Chesnutt

(Right) Three-dimensional representation of


uniformity of microstructure in upset-forged
Ti-6 Al-4 V, in the solution treated and overaged or STOA structure, with primary alpha
grains in a matrix of alpha + beta phase.
(Below) Plateau etching to show correlation
of fracture and microstructure features.

(Top) The sequence proposed by Laird for fully plastic generation of


one striation per load cycle. From C. Laird, ASTM STP 415.

(Bottom) The forward or monotonic


plastic zone, formed by
the maximum stress in
a fatigue loading cycle,
has the familiar dimensions known from
LEFM. Within it, however, is a fatigue zone,
in which stress is fully
reversed, and which is
exactly one-fourth the
size of the monotonic
zone. Also shown is
the process zone at
the crack tip, where
fracture processes are
underway.

(Above) The original Paris & Erdogan data on 2024 aluminum which led to the
proposal of the Paris Law, with m value about 4.

(Right) Collections of data


by Rolfe and Barsom on
steels of ferrite + pearlite
microstructure, upper
graph, and quenched and
tempered martensitic
steels of higher strength,
lower graph. Note in all
three figures on this page
that the later convention
of crack growth rate as the
ordinate of such plots had
not yet been accepted.
From S.T. Rolfe and J.M.
Barsom, Fracture and Fatigue Control in Structures,
Prentice-Hall, 1977, pages
237, 239.

(Top) Illustration of how increases in fracture toughness, to


extend the range of Stage III in
the FCP diagram, produce far
smaller gains in life, compared
to reductions in FCP rate.
From Thompson.

(Bottom) Collection of data


on steels, titanium alloys, and
aluminum alloys, showing how
normalization with such factors
as modulus E permits gathering data onto a single plot.
From Tanaka.

Data on steels, R.O. Ritchie, Fracture 1977

(Top) Illustration of LCF at


high strains per cycle, and
HCF at essentially zero plastic strain per cycle, as end
points on a diagram of strain
range vs. life.
(From T. Courtney, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, p.
577

(Below) Ratio of opening K to maximum K in the fatigue cycle, as a function of K. If crack


closure dominates the observation of crack growth threshold, then as this ratio approaches
one, crack growth should stop, as seen here. From Minakawa & McEvily.

At right is shown a schematic


representation of how crack nucleation and early growth at a
stress concentrator may behave
much like a low-cycle fatigue
test, with a large plastic zone
dut to the relatively large radius
of the corner; but as the crack
grows away from the concentrator, its plastic zone shrinks to
the size associated with LEFM
fatigue crack propagation.

(Below) Often called a Kitagawa diagram for the researcher who gathered extensive data on
the behavior, this graph shows in its right-hand part, the usual relation between crack length
(to the one-half power) times stress, while the left-hand part shows simply the endurance limit:
when cracks are too small for LEFM behavior, stress-controlled or long-life fatigue dominates,
but if crack are large enough, stress intensity-controlled propagation to failure occurs.

You might also like