Scribd
Upload
31 views2 pages

RGNFSRF

This document is a report from a three-member assessment committee evaluating a JRF candidate for upgrade to SRF status after two years. The committee members are an outside subject expert, the candidate's supervisor, and the head of the department. They assessed the candidate's progress through a presentation and interview. Based on the candidate's outstanding/very good/satisfactory performance and published work, the committee recommends [he/she] be upgraded/not upgraded to SRF status. The committee members and administrators sign off on the report.

Uploaded by

pujaadi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
31 views2 pages

RGNFSRF

This document is a report from a three-member assessment committee evaluating a JRF candidate for upgrade to SRF status after two years. The committee members are an outside subject expert, the candidate's supervisor, and the head of the department. They assessed the candidate's progress through a presentation and interview. Based on the candidate's outstanding/very good/satisfactory performance and published work, the committee recommends [he/she] be upgraded/not upgraded to SRF status. The committee members and administrators sign off on the report.

Uploaded by

pujaadi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ANNEXURE VII

THREE MEMBERS ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE REPORT FOR UPGRADATION FROM


JRF TO SRF UNDER THE SCHEME OF JRF IN SCIENCE ,HUMANITIES & SOCIAL
SCIENCES
Assessment
for
Upgradation
of
Mr./Mrs.______________________________________________________________
JRF working at the Department of _______________________________________ of
University/Institution/College _________________________________ on completion of two years on
date ___________________________
CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMITTEE
(Name and designation)
1. [ 1 Outside Subject Expert- other than same Univ./Instt./College]
2. [ Supervisor of Research Scholar]
3. [ Head of the Department]
Date of joining:
Ph.D. registration No.:
Date of meeting:
Time:
VENUE OF ASSESSMENT/INTERVIEW:
ASSESSMENT OF THE COMMITTEE
The Committee assessed the progress of the candidate through their presentation followed by interview
and recommended as follows.
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Strike out whichever is not applicable)
In view of the outstanding/ very good/satisfactory performance of the JRF,
and also the fact that he/she
has published work to his/her credit, the committee
recommends that Mr./Mrs./Ms.________ ___________________________ may be
upgraded or not upgraded from JRF to SRF.

Signature
Name
Date
Name of the Supervisor

Signature
Name
Date
Outside Subject Expert

Signature
Name
Date
Head of Deptt.
(Seal)

Signature
Name
Date
Registrar/Director/Principal
(Seal of Univ./Institution/College)

Signature
Name
Date
Head of Deptt.
(Seal)

Signature
Name
Date
Registrar/Director/Princip
al
(Seal of
Univ./Institution/College)

You might also like