Scribd
Upload
22 views3 pages

USCA1 Opinion on Sanchez Appeals

The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the US District Court's denial of motions to vacate sentence filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 by appellants Edwin and Rafael Sanchez. In a per curiam opinion, the appeals court agreed with the reasons given by the district court in its September 14, 1993 memorandum and order for denying the appellants' motions to vacate their sentences.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
22 views3 pages

USCA1 Opinion on Sanchez Appeals

The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the US District Court's denial of motions to vacate sentence filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 by appellants Edwin and Rafael Sanchez. In a per curiam opinion, the appeals court agreed with the reasons given by the district court in its September 14, 1993 memorandum and order for denying the appellants' motions to vacate their sentences.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

USCA1 Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


____________________
No. 93-2156
EDWIN SANCHEZ,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
No. 93-2157
RAFAEL SANCHEZ,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant, Appellee.
________________
APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
_________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
___________
Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________

Edwin Sanchez on brief pro se.


_____________
Cheryl J. Sturm on brief for appellant Rafael Sanchez.
_______________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Heidi E. Brieg
________________
______________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

____________________
November 29, 1994
____________________

Per Curiam.
__________

The

district court's

motions to

vacate sentence under

appellants

Edwin

reasons stated

and

in the

memorandum and order.

28 U.S.C.

Rafael Sanchez
district court's

is

denial of
2255

affirmed
________

the

filed by
for the

September 14,

1993

-2-

You might also like