Barriers To Communication and Causes of Communication Failure
Barriers To Communication and Causes of Communication Failure
Failure
Barriers to communication can occur if the recipient has failed to convey the meaning or / and the
importance of the message.
Red tape – message gets passed on to many different people before finally
reaching the recipient making the process too long and the message changing.
Also, actions can be delayed as a result of a late arrival of the message.
The principal barriers to effective communication are: noise, poor feedback, selection of
inappropriate media, a wrong mental attitude, insufficient or lack of attention to work
selection, delay in message transmittal, physical separation of the sender and receiver,
and lack of empathy or a good relationship between the sender and receiver.
Let's examine each of these barriers and possible steps to overcome them. As we
conduct this examination, we should remember that any two or more of these barriers
may occur in combination.
Samuel Hoffenstein in his poem, "The Wind in the Trees," illustrates quite beautifully the
distraction that noise may cause. He says:
When the wind is in the tree,
It makes a noise just like the sea,
As if there were not noise enough
To bother one, without that stuff.
Noise is any random or persistent disturbance that obscures, reduces, or confuses the
clarity or quality of the message being transmitted. In other words, it is any interference
that takes place between the sender and the receiver. This is why we generally identify
any communication problem that can't be fully explained as "noise." The biggest single
cause of noise in the communication process may be the assumption that the act of
communicating is a simple process - that it doesn't require much thought or practice and
all effective managers were born with this skill. This is not true. Effective communication
comes with study and practice. The effectiveness of the communication process is
dependent upon the capabilities of the senders and receivers.
To overcome the noise barrier to effective communication, one must discover its source.
This may not be easy. Noise appears in a variety of ways. During a conversation, have
you ever been distracted by the pictures on the wall, the view from the window, a report
lying open on a desk, or a conversation taking place in an adjacent room? Many people
have been so distracted.
In the perusal of a written communication, have you ever been confused by irrelevant
material or the illogical approach taken by the author? Again, many people have.
Once the source, or sources, of the noise has been identified, steps can be taken to
overcome it. The noise barrier can't always be overcome but, fortunately, just the
awareness of its existence by either the sender or the receiver of a message can help to
improve the communication flow.
Feedback is reaction, Without it, the sender of the message cannot know whether the
recipient has received the entire message or grasped its intent.
The need for feedback should be clearly understood. Feedback is the return of a portion
of the message to the sender with new information. It regulates both the transmission
and reception. The whole process is straightforward: the sender transmits the message
via the most suitable communication media; the receiver gets the message, decodes it,
and provides feedback.
In oral, face-to-face communication, the process doesn't happen quite this way. All of
these actions occur almost simultaneously. For example, the sender is acting as a
receiver while transmitting the message; the receiver is acting as a sender while
receiving the message. When the message is transmitted and effectively received,
feedback serves as a regulating device. The sender continually adjusts his transmission
in response to the feedback. Feedback also alerts the sender to any disruptive noise that
may impede reception of the message.
Feedback not only regulates the communication process, but reinforces and stimulates it.
In fact, it actually serves as the hallmark of dialogue, because it forces communication
and makes it dual. Dual expression, when combined with mutual feedback, becomes a
dialogue.
In any given situation the medium, or media, for communication must be selected. One
medium may work better than another. However, in many cases a combination of media
may be used for the communication process to function effectively.
Henry H. Albers says that no one communication medium can adequately serve the
diverse functional and personal problems of organization dynamics. He believes that "a
repetition of ideas in different terms is useful in solving some communication problems."
The question then emerges, What combination of media would be most effective? Any
project to develop the one best combination of media would prove rather fruitless. There
are many combinations that can provide satisfactory results.
Generally, managers make more frequent use of oral, rather than written,
communication. However, the media one selects for communication in a particular
situation should correlate with the feedback requirements. A communication failure or
partial failure could occur if the media you select for transmittal of a message is
inappropriate and necessary feedback is not received. Most simple messages can be
transmitted orally - either in a face-to-face discussion, formal briefing, or meeting of the
staff. More complex messages should be written in a directive, instruction, memorandum,
or report. Very complex messages should be transmitted in both oral and written form.
Repetition and review of an oral communication in written form can be a facilitating
device.
The arrogance of the sender may impair the communication process. If the
sender believes he knows everything there is to know about the subject being
transmitted, he expects acceptance of his ideas or directions. If the receiver disagrees
with the sender and so states, the sender will not be attuned to the feedback or will find
it a challenge to his stated position. Real communication does not take place.
The sender may assume the receiver will respond to his message in a logical
and rational manner. The receiver's priorities, problems, or assumptions may differ
from the sender's. The receiver's logic may even override that of the sender. In any of
these instances, the sender might judge the receiver to be incompetent or even an
obstructionist. Communication will fail.
The sender may assume he is completely logical and rational - that his position
is right and must prevail. This assumption may be false and no communication takes
place.
The words we use should be selected carefully. Dr. Rudolph Flesch, a specialist in words
and communication, suggests a way to break through the word barrier:
Unfortunately, almost every commonly used word has more than one meaning. Also
words have regional meanings or derive new meanings as a result of the development of
new industries or fields. The meaning conveyed by the sender's words depends upon the
experience and attitude of the receiver. Therefore, one way to penetrate the word barrier
is for the sender to strive to speak or write in terms of the receiver's experience and
attitude. The better able he is to do this, the more successful the communication will be.
Dr. S. E. Hayakawa, a U.S. Senator from California, expressed it very well when he said,
"The meanings of words are not in the words; they are in us."
Both time and space (the physical separation between the sender and the receiver) may
serve as barriers to effective communication.
You, as a manager, may often feel pressed by time constraints. You may feel there aren't
enough hours to accomplish all tasks. One executive puts it this way, "If I can’t get the
work done in a 24-hour day, I have to work evenings." Caught in the network of your
own problems, you may even assume that your subordinates know what you want them
to do, and they will proceed to do it. Actually, this may not be the case. Because of your
failure to communicate, you may not receive the end product you were expecting.
This same problem may occur when you geographically separate departments or
functions of an organization. Quick eye-to-eye communication becomes difficult. The
telephone may not provide the answer. The line may be busy when the call is placed, or
the person being called may be out of the office.
Memoranda sometime provide the answer to the space barrier. However, this might turn
out to be a one-way communication of directions or information. If the recipient of a
memorandum doesn’t understand the message, or if he mistakenly thinks he
understands, the communication process fails.
Lack of empathy can create a barrier between the sender and receiver. Empathy, as
defined in the Dictionary, is "understanding so intimate that the feelings, thoughts, and
motives of one are readily comprehended by another." You can transmit a better
message if you can put yourself in the receiver's place and analyze the message from his
viewpoint. The same holds true for the receiver. He must be able to empathize with you.
That is, the sender, as well as the receiver, must try to project himself into the other's
personality if he want's to increase his potential for effective communication.
The ability to empathize with someone else may not be easy. If you are to see things
from another's viewpoint, you have to put aside your own prejudices and preconceptions.
The receiver may be of a different race, creed, educational background, from a different
section of the country, or have a different specialty or rank within the organization.
Under these circumstances, the task of empathizing with the other member of the
communication link is difficult. The task is further complicated if you believe that
understanding another's viewpoint may pose a threat to your own.
To better communicate, we must try to see ourselves through the eyes of others in the
communication link. By developing some empathy with the people to whom we will be
directing messages, we might recognize the need to modify our messages from time to
time before sending them.
Douglas McGregor, one of the leading authorities on management practices, has said: "It
is a fairly safe generalization that difficulties in communication within an organization are
more often than not, mere symptoms of underlying difficulties in relationships between
parties involved. When communication is ineffective, one needs to look first at the nature
of these relationships rather than at ways of improving communication".
The relationship between the people involved in any communication process may form a
greater barrier to the effectiveness of the communication between them than any other
barrier discussed here. If the relationship between the people participating in the
communication is good, the communication has a greater chance for success. This is true
whether the communication takes place in oral or written form.
The quality of the relationship between the sender and receiver determines to a great
extent the ability of the person transmitting the message to penetrate the
communication barrier.
Final Observations
We have examined the principal barriers to effective communication. We have seen all
around us the problems resulting from the inability of people in today's working
environment to penetrate these barriers. What are you going to do about it? Can you let
the barriers to effective communication in your organization continue to block the path to
effective management? If you and the persons with whom you communicate do your part
to reduce these barriers, some of them may be eliminated. As a result, management of
your organization will be enhanced. Why not take such action today?
The following communication barriers in organizations and ways to overcome them will be
the main topic of this article.
1. Information Overload. Too much information is as bad as too little because it reduces the
audiences ability to concentrate effectively on the most important messages. People facing
information overload sometimes try to cope by ignoring some of the messages, by delaying
responses to messages they deem unimportant, by answering only parts of some messages, by
responding inaccurately to certain messages, by taking less time with each message, or by
reacting only superficially to all messages.
To overcome information overload, realize that some information is not necessary, and make
necessary information easily available. Give information meaning rather than just passing it
on, and set priorities for dealing with the information flow. Some information isn't necessary.
To overcome the barriers of complex messages, keep them clear and easy to understand. Use
strong organization, guide readers by telling them what to expect, use concrete and specific
language, and stick to the point. Be sure to ask for feedback so that you can clarify and
improve your message.
3. Message Competition. Communicators are often faced with messages that compete for
attention. If you're talking on the phone while scanning a report, both messages are apt to get
short shrift. Even your own messages may have to compete with a variety of interruptions:
The phone rings every five minutes, people intrude, meetings are called, and crises arise. In
short, your messages rarely have the benefit on the receivers undivided attention.
To overcome competition barriers, avoid making demands on a receiver who doesn't have the
time to pay careful attention to your message. Make written messages visually appealing and
easy to understand, and try to deliver them when your receiver has time to read them. Oral
messages are most effective when you can speak directly to your receiver (rather than to
intermediaries or answering machines). Also, be sure to set aside enough time for important
messages that you receive. Business messages rarely have the benefit of the audiences full and
undivided attention.
4. Differing Status. Employees of low status may be overly cautious when sending messages
to managers and may talk only about subjects they think the manager is interested in.
Similarly, higher-status people may distort messages by refusing to discuss anything that
would tend to undermine their authority in the organization. Moreover, belonging to a
particular department or being responsible for a particular task can narrow your point of view
so that it differs from the attitudes, values, and expectations of people who belong to other
departments or who are responsible for other tasks.
To overcome status barriers, keep managers and colleagues well informed. Encourage lower-
status employees to keep you informed by being fair-minded and respectful of their opinions.
When you have information that you're afraid you boss might not like, be brave and convey it
anyway. Status barriers can be overcome by a willingness to give and receive bad news.
5. Lack of Trust, Building trust is a difficult problem. Other organization members don't know
whether you'll respond in a supportive or responsible way, so trusting can be risky. Without
trust, however, free and open communication is effectively blocked, threatening the
organization's stability. Just being clear in your communication is not enough.
To overcome trust barriers, be visible and accessible. Don't insulate yourself behind assistants
or secretaries. Share key information with colleagues and employees, communicate honestly,
and include employees in decision making. For communication to be successful,
organizations must create an atmosphere of fairness and trust.
To overcome media barriers, choose the richest media for no routine, complex message. Use
rich media to extend and to humanize your presence throughout the organization, to
communicate caring and personal interest to employees, and to gain employee commitment to
organizational goals. Use leaner media to communicate simple, routine messages. You can
send information such as statistics, facts, figures and conclusions through a note, memo or
written report
To overcome climate barriers, spend more time listening than issuing orders.
To overcome ethics barriers, make sure your messages include all the information that ought
to be there. Make sure that information is adequate and relevant to the situation. And make
sure your message is completely truthful, not deceptive in any way.
10. Inefficient Communication. Producing worthless messages wastes time and resources, and
it contributes to the information overload already mentioned.
Reduce the number of messages by thinking twice before sending one. Then speed up the
process, first, by preparing messages correctly the first time around and, second, by
standardizing format and material when appropriate. Be clear about the writing assignments
you accept as well as the ones you assign.
11. Physical distractions. Communication barriers are often physical: bad connections, poor
acoustics, illegible copy. Although noise or this sort seems trivial, it can completely block an
otherwise effective message. Your receiver might also be distracted by an uncomfortable
chair, poor lighting, or some other irritating condition. In some cases, the barrier may be
related to the receiver's health. Hearing or visual impairment or even a headache can interfere
with reception of a message. These annoyances don't generally block communication entirely,
but they may reduce the receiver's concentration.
To overcome physical distractions, try to prepare well written documents which are clear,
concise, and comprehensive. When preparing oral presentations try to find a setting which
permits audience to see and hear the speaker clearly.