100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 232 views 7 pages Advanced Chemistry Problem Set
The number of moles of n, must equal the number moles of the unknown. Compare the pressure predicted by a)the ideal-gas equation and b)the van der Waals equation for 1.00 mol of n-octane confined to 20. Dm3 at 200degC. In the previous problem, we were using higher pressures and higher temperatures.
AI-enhanced title and description
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save PS1_08-Solution For Later ‘Chem 444B
Homework Set #1 - Solutions
DUE: Friday, January 30, 2009
1) (MeQ&S 16-3)
P= phg
Ee ragee Lme- I2in | 2.54em) cm
P=(100 So 9 fi SOT
P=1.01x10° 8.
om 5
k atm
P=1.01%10° “8_ =1.01%10° Pax
ms? Tp1x10"Pa
P=1.00atm
2) (McQ&S 16-11)
In the ideal-gas equation, all the variables except n are constant. Therefore, the
number of moles of N, must equal the number of moles of the unknown.
0.3625g N, x M2! Na ~ 9,01295mol N,
28g N,
For the unknown.
-_0.917Sgunknown _ 4 2
0.01295mol unknown mol
‘The only homonuclear diatomic with this molar mass is Cl,
3) (MeQ&S 16-16)
i =0.09416
P 10,6201 mo
dm
dm? bar
0.083145 400K)
( ‘mol K iG )
'=353bar
0.094162
mol
Problem Set #1 olede
P
dm? bar
(roo (400K) 9.301920" bar
Seer
0.094162 0.090494" (9 994160".
mol mol
P= ar 1059 bar
P = 8013 bar
dm? bar
0.083145 400K"
( mol K eae)
P=
ooni62™ —on623™
mol =——— mol
183.0240" bat
moPK2
(400x)2 (0 oosi6 lo oss +0. oem |
P=1058 bar—619 bar
P £439 bar
a)
err. a
TET V+ B)+B(7-A)
loa Serie} ossi4s 2” =i je)
o.osai6& 0.056329
= dnt bar
9.6938
mol’
i _,
Py
(c.oste)(005416+0.0s630) “Ys o0sey ome o0sen2)
P=879 bar ~595 bar
P= 284 bar
Problem Set #1 oeHL
aoe
4) Compare the pressure predicted by a)the ideal-gas equation and b)the van
der Waals equation for 1.00 mol of -octane confined to 20.0 dm’ at 200 °C.
Use a = 37.81 dm® bar mol and b = 0.2368 dm’ mot. Why does the van der
‘Waals equation give a reasonable answer for this problem but not for the
previous problem?
a)
dm? es
(imot)| 0.083145 (473K)
pare fobs Se)
v 0a
P=1.97 bar
b)
RT
v-5 Vv
dm’ bar Satan
0.083145 (473K) 3781
P= K = mol*
ane in? es ry
20.04.9368 i
nol So (200%)
P=1.99 bar—0.095 bar
P=1.90 bar
The van der Waals equation works well for this problem because we're using very
low pressures. In the previous problem, we were using higher pressures and
higher densities, which as shown in Figure 16.5 causes large deviations in the
pressure predicted by the van der Waals equation.
5) Calculate the van der Waals constants a and b for (C:Hz):S using T. = 557.0
Kand P.=39.6 bar
From Eq, 16.17, we know a and b in terms of the critical values:
dm? bar se gx)
2 3145 SPA 557.0,
2(Rr 27(o08 145 Tg 87 |
AP, (64 (39.6 bar)
af22,3 bar
mol
dm’ bar
Rr, _ 0.083145 Tg x5570K
8(39.6 bar)
Problem Set #16) (McQ&s 16-30)
Begin with the Redlich-Kwong equation given in Eq. 16.7:
‘and substitute this into the equation for Z
—B
TV (7 +B)
ee
RT? (7 +B)
‘Now substitute for A and B using Eq. 16.18
0.42748R°7?
R
0.086640RT,
Pp
0.42748R°T>
v
(0.086640R7
P.
7
i Lame {
Te~0259 1217, 40.2500) 4.
cert an Ae 702922)1? (McQ&S 16-37)
Eq. 16.23 expresses Z as a polynomial in P. If we ignore any terms of O(P*) or
higher then Z will be linear in P, and we can solve for Bae by graphing (Z-1) versus P
and finding the slope.
y= 0.0015x+ 4£-06
4.2006-03 _ . .
1.0006-08
8.0006-04
Wi 6000604
‘4.0006-04
2.0006-04
0.000600
000 010 020 030 040 060 060 070 080
P (bar)
‘The slope of this line, and therefore the value of Bzp, is 0.0015 bar
8) (MeQ&S 16-39)
Eq, 16.29 gives the Lennard-Jones potential: u(r) = (2) 2) |
‘The minimum value of r occurs at r,,, =r’ =2°a (see Example 16-9)
Substitute this equation for into the Lennard-Jones potential:
}{e] E36]
Problem Set #19) (MeQ&S 16-41)
Use the values of € and o from Table 16.7 to plot Eq. 16.29 for Hz and O2
2 tk (K) ‘o (pm)
He 37 293
o 118 358
‘ule (K)
(pm) H Os
150 448423.40 —16035666.46
175 6855507 _2501010.90
200 © 13001.68 «49518869
225 © 2797.79 116606.27
250 610.48, 31025.99
275 100.22 '8885.24
300 “16.97 2573.20
325, -36.80 663.17
350 133.41 78.50
375 "26.01 86.82
400 “19.33 “117.91
425 nat8 "108.38
450 “10.42 “89.33,
475 “7.70 “70.68
500 “575 “55.03,
525, 14.34 42.68
550 °331 “33.17
575 255 25.89
600 “1.98 20.34
625 21155 “16.08
650 123 “12.81
Lennard-Jones potentials
‘800.00
600.00 | @
400.00 -
oH
2-02
ek (K)
on * oOo? ee 1
oogesssssees! rn
F (om)
You may have chosen to change the units of € to J by multiplying by ke or to
kJ/mol by multiplying by ky and then converting J->ki/mol. In either case, the graph
should look the same as the one shown here, with different values along the y-axis.
Problem Set #110) (MeQ&S 16-55)
Begin with the Redlich-Kwong equation
shown on pages 672-673
fen in Eq, 16.7 and follow the logic
Rr.
rv (+B)
Put each fraction in the form ck, with
a(S
v
#l B
Group the terms based on their power of V:
yar Jovem
r Ty a
Muliply by 7 to wrt it in tems of :
7 fe
goteabte gts)
RT? : -
Compare to Eq. 16.22 to solve for Byy (7) and Byy(T) :
A
By (1) =B-—
RT?
by (T) = Bt AB.
RT?
Problem Set #1