JKR CBR method:
1. Initial Annual Commercial Traffic for One Lane:
Vo ADT
Pc
( DD LD ) 365
100
Vo 48500
15
(0.55 0.80) 365
100
Vo 1168365
2. Total Number of Commercial Vehicles for One Lane:
Vc
Vo [(1 r ) x 1]
r
Vc 1022319 (13 .29 )
Vc 15 .53 10 6
3. Volume of Daily Traffic after 10 Years (one direction):
Vx V1 (1 r ) x xDdxLd
Vx 48500 (1 0.065 )10 0.55 0.80
(more than 2 lane)
Vx 36416 veh/day/lane
4. Equivalent Factor
e 2 (PC% < 15%, trunk)
5. Total Equivalent Standard Axles
ESA Vc e
ESA 15 .53 x 10 6 2
ESA 31 .06 10 6
From table 3.1
6. Maximum One Way Hourly Capacity
c I RT
I 2000 (for multilane)
from Table 3.2
R 1.00 (carriageway width = 3.75 3 = 11.25m > 7.5m)
T
T
100
(100 Pc )
(assume it is flat terrain) Table 3.4
100
(100 15 )
T 0.870
c I RT
c 2000 1.00 0.870
c 1740 veh/day/lane
7. One Lane Traffic Capacity per day
C 10 x c
C 10 1740
C 17400 veh/day/lane
8. Check
Vx C
36416 17400
Hence, capacity has not yet been reached after 10 years.
9. From Figure 2: Thickness Design Monograph,
The chart shows that for an ESA of 13.7 x 106, subgrade CBR = 128 Mpa / 10 = 12.8
the required TA is 28.1 cm.
10. Design of Layer Thickness
TA a1 D1 a 2 D2 a3 D3
Layer Material
Coefficient
Minimum Thickness
a1
Asphalt Concrete
1.00
9 cm
a2
Mechanically Stabilized
0.32
10 cm
0.23
10 cm
Crushed Aggregate
a3
Sand
11. First Trial
D1 = 9.0 cm
D2 = 10.0 cm
D3 = 10.0 cm
TA = (1.00) (9) + (0.32) (10) + (0.23) (10) = 14.5 cm < 28.10 cm
Second Trial
D1 = 12 cm
D2 = 15.0 cm
D3 = 20.0 cm
TA = (1.00) (12) + (0.32) (15) + (0.23) (20) = 21.4 cm < 28.10 cm
Third Trial
D1 = 15.0 cm
D2 = 20.0 cm
D3 = 20.0 cm
TA = (1.00) (15) + (0.32) (20) + (0.23) (20) = 26.00 cm < 28.10cm
Forth Trial
D1 = 20.0 cm
D2 = 20.0 cm
D3 = 20.0 cm
TA = (1.00) (20) + (0.32) (20) + (0.23) (20) = 31.0 cm > 28.10 cm
Fifth Trial
D1 = 15.0 cm
D2 = 24.0 cm
D3 = 26.0 cm
TA = (1.00) (15) + (0.32) (24) + (0.23) (26) = 28.66 cm > 28.10 cm
The layer thicknesses are satisfactory.
Minimum thickness requirements of the pavement structure:
Standard Thickness
Wearing
course
5 cm
10 cm
Base
(bituminous) :
29 cm
Subbase
(granular)
30 cm
Binder course
Cross section:
Dwc = 5 cm
Asphalt layer
Dbc = 10 cm
Base layer
D2 = 24 cm
Subbase layer
D3 = 26 cm
D1 = 15 cm
Subgrade layer
Compare The Material Cost
Crusher run base
= RM25.00 x 2.43 = RM 60.75 per compacted m3
Sand Subbase
= RM26.00 x 2.30 = RM 59.80 per compacted m3
Stone Mastic Asphalt = RM330.00 x 2.30 = RM759 per compacted m3
For the Fifth Trial,
Material
Depth
Cost (RM per
3
Total cost (RM
(m)
compacted m
per compacted m3
Stone Mastic Asphalt
0.15
759
113.85
Crusherrun Base
0.24
60.75
14.58
Sand Sub base
0.26
59.80
15.58
144.01
The total cost for the project
Material
Calculation
Cost (RM)
Crusher-run
Base
Sand Sub Base
RM 60.75 x 15,000 m x 3.75 m x 0.24m x 4lane
3280500.00
RM59.80 x 15,000m x 3.75m x 0.26m x 4lane
3498300.00
Stone Mastic
Asphalt
The total cost
for the project
RM 759.00 x 15,000m x 3.75m x 0.15m x 4lane
25616250.00
RM3280500.00+ RM3498300.00
+ RM25616250.00
32395050.00
Total Cost = RM 32395050.00 + (RM 15.00 x 15,000 x 3.75) = RM 33238800.00