Scribd
Upload
265 views1 page

White Light Corp V City of Manila Digest

The document summarizes a Supreme Court case that ruled an ordinance passed by the City of Manila prohibiting short time admissions in hotels and motels was null and void. The ordinance was challenged by hotel operators as infringing on individual liberty. While cities have powers to regulate establishments, the court found the ordinance violated due process protections against arbitrary regulations and invaded private rights by making broad assumptions about guests. Not all hotel guests staying for short periods were there for obscene purposes. The ordinance overreached in restricting individual rights beyond what is required to protect public interests.

Uploaded by

April Dream Mendoza Pugon
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
265 views1 page

White Light Corp V City of Manila Digest

The document summarizes a Supreme Court case that ruled an ordinance passed by the City of Manila prohibiting short time admissions in hotels and motels was null and void. The ordinance was challenged by hotel operators as infringing on individual liberty. While cities have powers to regulate establishments, the court found the ordinance violated due process protections against arbitrary regulations and invaded private rights by making broad assumptions about guests. Not all hotel guests staying for short periods were there for obscene purposes. The ordinance overreached in restricting individual rights beyond what is required to protect public interests.

Uploaded by

April Dream Mendoza Pugon
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

April Dream M. Pugon JD 1 1. WHITE LIGHT CORPORATION, TITANIUM CORPORATION and STA.

MESA TOURIST & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Petitioners, vs. CITY OF MANILA, represented by DE CASTRO, MAYOR ALFREDO S. LIM, Respondent. G.R. No. 122846 Facts: On 3 Dec 1992, then Mayor Lim signed into law Ordinance 7774 entitled An Ordinance prohibiting short time admission in hotels, motels, lodging houses, pension houses and similar establishments in the City of Manila. White Light Corp is an operator of mini hotels and motels who sought to have the Ordinance be nullified as the said Ordinance infringes on the private rights of their patrons. The RTC ruled in favor of WLC. It ruled that the Ordinance strikes at the personal liberty of the individual guaranteed by the Constitution. The City maintains that the ordinance is valid as it is a valid exercise of police power. Under the Local Government Code, the City is empowered to regulate the establishment, operation and maintenance of cafes, restaurants, beerhouses, hotels, motels, inns, pension houses, lodging houses and other similar establishments, including tourist guides and transports. The CA ruled in favor of the City. ISSUE: Whether or not Ordinance 7774 is valid. HELD: The Supreme Court ruled that the said ordinance is null and void as it indeed infringes upon individual liberty. It also violates the due process clause which serves as a guaranty for protection against arbitrary regulation or seizure. The said ordinance invades private rights. Note that not all who goes into motels and hotels for wash up rate are really there for obscene purposes only. Some are tourists who needed rest or to wash up or to freshen up. Hence, the infidelity sought to be avoided by the said ordinance is more or less subjected only to a limited group of people. The SC reiterates that individual rights may be adversely affected only to the extent that may fairly be required by the legitimate demands of public interest or public welfare. January 20, 2009

You might also like