WCHS Advisory Committee Report
WCHS Advisory Committee Report
October 9,2007
I am responding to your request of September 27, 2007, for a copy of the Churchill Workgroup
Report that was made public to the media. I am responding on behalf of the superintendent of
schools who, as official custodian of records for the school system, is responsible for replies
under the Maryland Public Infonnation Act, Maryland State Government Article §§10-611, et
seq.
Sinc::;~;~>_.
-p~/~ .•
Brian K. Edwards
Chief of Staff
BKE:mmg
Rockville, Maryland
y
MEMORANDUM
Today I received the final report of the Whiston Churchill High School Advisory Committee and
I am attaching it for your review. As you will recall, I convened the Advisory Committee to
address concerns raised within the Churchill community in January 2007. The committee
chaired by Dr. Joan Benz, principal of Winston Churchill High, and Ms. Lori-Christina Webb,
executive assistant to the deputy superintendent, designed and implemented a variety of inquiry
tools and engaged over 100 people in some aspect of the process. The report fmds that, "there
was great variance in the various stakeholder groups' perceptions of and experiences with
Churchill. It is clear from the information gathered that members of the Churchill school
community experience the same community very differently." There are a number of
recommendations provided in the report; however, the committee identified five priority
recommendations.
I commend the work group for this thoughtful and comprehensive exploration of difficult issues.
This is a good beginning of a long journey to build communities across lines of difference. Staff
at Churchill, with the support of the Office of School Perfornlance, has begun to develop a plan
to implement these recommendations. My office will continue to closely monitor their progress
and keep you updated.
Dr. Benz and Ms. Webb will review the findings of this report at a parent meeting tomorrow
evening at Churchill High School at 7:30 p.m. in the auditorium. You are most welcome to
attend. In addition, Dr. Benz and members of the advisory committee briefed members of the
media this afternoon to update them on their findings.
FKL:lcw
Attachment
Copy to:
Executive Staff
Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Schools
Rockville, Maryland
CONFIDENTIAL
MEMORANDUM
Winston Churchill High School (Chmchill), located in Potomac, has a student population that is
65.3 percent white, 21.9 percent Asian American, 5.6 percent Latino, and 7.2 percent African
American. Three percent of the student population qualifies for the Free and Reduced-price
Meals System. Dr. Joan Benz is the principal of Churchill and has been for the past ten years.
Chmchill is a 2007 Maryland Blue Ribbon School winner and was ranked as one of the top 100
high schools in the 2007 Newsweek challenge index. The school is consistently cited as one of
the best in the nation. Dming the 2006-2007 school year there was a fight involving ten
students. The events subsequent to this fight revealed underlying tensions and resentments. This
seemingly isolated event espoused existing fissmes within the community. Once these existing
fissmes came to light, it \vas clear that the school community needed to grapple with unpleasant
differences, old grievances, and both real and perceived slights.
Background
On January 3, 2007, a fight broke out at Churchill between ten students. Chmchill administrators
determined that since the fight was serious in nature and widely witnessed by the student body,
an explanatory letter needed to be sent to the community. The following day, January 4, 2007, a
letter was sent to the Chmchill community giving details about a fight that had taken place on
canlpus, the events that lead up to the fight, and the race of the participants in the fight. The
letter sent to the community contained the statement "[e]very incident revolving around this two
month ordeal has been Black on Black violence." The letter went on to state that "[a]t the very
time yesterday'S assaults were taking place, I learned that the SAT mean scores for our African
American students had risen an amazing 203 points with an increase of 33 percent in their
participation rate". After receiving the letter describing the fight, and using the term "Black on
Black violence" in juxtaposition to the news regarding the SAT scores, a group of African
American parents met to compose a letter expressing their concern with the use of the tenn, as
well as general concerns about conditions for African American students at Churchill.
Dr. Frieda K. Lacey 2 September 24, 2007
Dr. Benz sent a follow-up letter to the community clarifying the intent of her letter and issuirig an
apology to those who were offended by the wording. In addition, in response to the concerns
raised in the letter from African American parents, a meeting was held on
January 9, 2007. Parents raised a number of issues at this meeting, including long-standing
concerns about negative stereotyping of the predominately African American Scotland
community. Additional concerns were raised about the role of the police in characterizing the
fighting incident as possibly being gang related.
Recommendations
The work group gathered information from the Churchill School Leadership Team, the Churchill
Student Support Team, Churchill students, Churchill parents, the Churchill Black Student
Alliance, the Churchill Student Government, the Churchill NAACP Parents Council, Churchill
Supp0l1ing services staff, Churchill teaching staff, and at the Scotland Commullity Center. I
Infonnation was gathered through the use of focus groups and interviews. In addition to this
data, the work group reviewed and analyzed survey data from parents, staff, and students as well
as input from the 1\\'0 Study Circles held with the Churchill cOlmnunity. A total of 83 people
participated in one of these inquiry groups and 35 people participated in the Study Circles.
1 Findings from the focus groups are considered directional, not defmitive. Although the focus group findings
cannot be generalized to "all students" or "all staff," the results provide in-depth insight into experiences,
perceptions, or attitudes of the participants. The systematic infonnation provided by the focus groups identified
COlmnon themes across various stakeholders in the Churchill community and was used to infom1 the Advisory
Committee's recommendations.
Dr. Frieda K. Lacey 3 September 24, 2007
Based on this analysis, the work group made the following recommendations. The first five
bolded recommendations represented the priorities of the committee.
I Recommendations contrnued:
• Use Courageous Conversations for all students as a study guideJbasis for addressing
issues of equality.
• Increase Churchill students, staff, and parents participation rates on the MCPS Survey
of School Environment.
• Provide positive support of, and outreach to, the Churchill community (students, staff,
and parents).
• Commit to address issues and realize the courageous conversations.
• Identify the offices that will be responsible for supporting Churchill's implementation
of the recommendations.
• Provide an analysis of the processes that were used to address the Advisory
Committee's charge.
• Provide a summary of data collected from focus groups, interviews, and surveys to the
Churchill Leadership Team.
• Establish a buddy system of knowledgeable parents to serve as parent partners.
• Introduce and implement the Restorative Justice Program.
• Develop and use a communication plan to disseminate the Advisory Committee
recommendations to students, staff, parents, and the community
• Share and implement best practices with and anlong school staff for the purpose of
improving relationships vvith students.
• Train staff on special education processes and techniques that promote, support, and
include students with 504 plans and Individualize Education Programs.
• Establish an ongoing and continuous dialogue with cafeteria workers to gather more
information on concerns expressed in student focus group meetings.
• Encourage student interaction through "mix-ern-up" at lunch one time per month.
• Sponsor overnight or weekend group activities where students can get to know students
of other groups.
• Assign mentors to low achieving students.
• Organize student advocacy group that meets with the principal.
• Provide all scholarship information that is available to all students. II
• Establish after-school homework progranls for students who are struggling anclJor want
to get ahead--provide transportation and snacks.
• Train students to serve as Study Circles facilitators.
• Establish student mentoring practices for feeder schools.
• Conduct 1: 1 interviews to obtain feedback.
• Identify programs and strategies that will assist the Churchill staff with the successful
implementation of recommendations.
In addition to these recommendations, tvvo Study Circles were conducted. The Study Circles
developed additional action steps for consideration (Attachment).
Dr. Frieda K. Lacey 5 September 24, 2007
Findings
The work group found that there was great variance in the various stakeholder groups'
Iperceptions of and experiences with Churchill. It is clear from the information gathered
Ithat members of the Churchill school community experience the same community very I
differently.
For some of the groups with whom the committee spoke, Churchill represents a welcoming
enviromnent, a culture of high expectations, and a high performing school. For other groups
Churchill is the opposite of welcoming. They believe that the expectations for them are not high
and their perfOlTIlanCe predetemlined. In addition to these opposing views, there are perceptions
that fall along a continuum of comfort with Churchill. These differences highlight areas for the
school community to focus on in order to create a "consensus reality," where membership in a
specific subgroup is not predictive of perceptions of and attitudes about Churchill.
The work group developed the following four basic areas of inquiry:
The first focus area probed perceptions of Churchill as a welcoming place. For some stakeholder
groups, such as the students who participated in the focus group at the Scotland Community
Center, there is a sense that they are not welcome at Churchill. The students expressed the belief
that they were not wanted and were treated differently than other students. These beliefs were in
stark contrast to comments received from members of the School Leadership Team. This teanl
considers Churchill an extremely welcoming and caring place. The general consensus of that
group was "[w]e're all welcoming the kids-we embrace them." This view was shared by the
Student Support Team, the Churchill parents' focus group, and the Churchill NAACP Parent
Council focus group. It was noted that "many of our students come from private schools and tell
us they feel very welcome at Churchill." The Churchill NAACP Parent Council focus group
added a caveat. Participants said that they feel welcome at school, except by front office staff.
Issues sUlTounding the front office were raised by other groups, including the SGA student focus
group. In contrast to concems about the front office, both the focus group at the Scotland
Community Center and the SGA focus group expressed the view that the counseling staff
represents a welcoming part of Churchill. The Churchill NAACP Parent Council focus group
members raised a concern about the difference between putting out general invitations versus
reaching out. This group articulated concern that "those feeling most isolated don't come."
These differing perceptions were minored in the 2005-2006 Survey of School Environment.
Dr. Frieda K. Lacey 6 September 24, 2007
The sharpest difference of opinion regarding race, ethnicity, and stereotyping revolves around
the question of the impact of socio-economics. For some of the focus groups, significant socio
economic disparities between students at Churchill were as much, if not more, of a relevant
variable as race. These groups spoke about stereotyping based on perceived socio-economic
status. SGA students in particular are concerned about the behavior of teachers with regard to
economic stereotyping. They say some teachers make offending comments to students based on
their perceived socio-economic background. According to the SGA student focus group, some
teachers made comments based on their perception that all Churchill students are wealthy.
Some of groups talked about the intersection of race and socio-economics. For example, the
School Student Support Team focus group said, "If you look into the cafeteria in the morning the
students eating a free breakfast are 99 percent African American. I have heard kids out in the
hall making fun of someone in the cafeteria eating breakfast." The BSA student focus group
pointed out that black students are assun1ed to be economically needy by the school, even when
this is not correct, as illustrated in the following comment. "They give you fi-ee stuff all the time.
I can pay for this, but they give it to me free because I am black."
Although the BSA student focus group discussed socio-economics as a factor in stereotyping,
they also expressed the belief that students are stereotyped based on race or ethnicity. One
comment was "[w]hen they talk to you they talk different to black people than they do to white
people. Students think you are ghetto and they think you should know who 50 cents momma is."
Both the Churchill NAACP parents focus group and the focus group at the Scotland Community
Center expressed the view that there is stereotyping based on race. PaIiicularly poignant '\Jere
some of the examples offered from the students in the focus group at the ScotlaI1d Community
Center. A student provided the following example: "In my Spanish class [two from this focus
group are in the san1e class] the teacher asks each of us if we have our homework. Everybody
says yes, but she makes me and my friend [the only two minority students in the class] come up
to the front of the class and show her our homework."
There is general agreement that there are extremely high academic expectations at Churchill.
There is disagreement, hmvever, about whether there are high expectations for all students. The
two staff-based focus groups disagreed about whether there were high expectations for all
students. The School Leadership Team stated that expectations were high for all students while
the School Student SupPOli Team expressed the view that since students at Churchill are
generally high achieving, toleraI1ce for any kind of difference is low. BSA students say there are
high expectations from both teachers and parents. "Yes, this is a very high academic school.
Yesterday we had the assembly because we won the blue ribbon [National Blue Ribbon School].
So teachers definitely look to students to see how well their grades are and expect them to do
well." Comments regarding the high academic expectations at Churchill included the following:
Dr. Frieda K. Lacey 7 September 24, 2007
• "They have high expectations for everyone here and think everyone should achieve on a
high level."
• "My friends at college said that Churchill classes really helped to prepare them and gave
them good student habits."
However, there are negative assumptions or perceptions based on race as sampled ill the
following:
• "They don't think that all black people are stupid or dumb, but I think if you're black,
you have to prove that you're smart."
• "Sometimes when we are reading a book and we read something that contains the n-word
everybody turns and looks at you and I go 'damn, I'm stuck.'"
• "If you don't get something right away in this particular school, they just dumb you out;
you automatically get put in a resource class."
• "I was in an AP class and as soon as my grade started going from a low B to a high C,
they kicked me out [of that class]."
• "One teacher told me that I would grow up and work at McDonalds and told my friend
that she would end up having five babies because she was Hispanic."
These differences also are reflected in student responses to the 2005-2006 Survey of School
Environment.
The focus groups had few suggestions on how to improve Churchill. However, there were some
cornmon themes. Parent and staff focus groups identified after-school academic support as an
area for improvement. Parents also identified the need for staff training on diversity or cultural
issues.
Conclusion
The work of the advisory group can only be the beginning of the ongoing dialogue that must take
place within the Churchill community. The priority recommendations identified by the work
group focus on putting into place training, structures, and processes that would, over time,
Dr. Frieda K. Lacey 8 September 24, 2007
transfoIDl the community by hopefully improving attitudes. There are some fairly quick changes
such as improving the climate in the front office. In addition, incorporating parents who
participated in the Study Circles into the parent/school decision-making process and structure
would capitalize on the work these parents have already done and would provide school
leadership with a rich diverse resource. These changes would set a tone about the climate
expectations in the school. Other recommendations will need to be implemented over time;
however, it is imperative that the conversation that has begun in the Churchill community needs
to continue. One way to continue this conversation within the greater ChurchillcOlmnunity is to
hold additional Study Circles throughout the school year. Communication is critical for the
community to 'buy-in' to the process and establish a healthy dialogue. It is essential that a letter
be sent out to the Churchill community at the beginning of the school year that outlines what has
been done since February 2007 and the plans for the upcoming year in regard to improving the
Churchill climate.
1. Increase staff awareness (through round table discussions) of the types of statements and
behaviors that can be deemed negative and the impact those statements and behaviors
may have on students, staff, and parents.
2. Develop and employ a structure to engage staff and the parent community in an ongoing
discussion of race.
3. Establish and execute an ongoing dialogue with the main office staff about staffs,
students' , and parents' perception of creating a welcoming office environment.
4. The Churchill School Improvement Team will re-examine, research, and revise the
school plan, giving careful consideration to the data collected from the focus groups, staff
interviews, and surveys of school enviroIDllent.
By using the recommendations developed by the work group, Churchill leadership in parinership
with students, par"ents, and the community can begin the process of dismantling the barriers
which prevent all members of the community from viewing Churchill High School as a safe arld
welcoming place for all.
LCW:la
Attachment
2
Attachment