MR Binge Drinking Report
MR Binge Drinking Report
Aaron Bernard, Noah Rooney, Britney Sheehan, Tyler Gossage, Kyle Davis, Mallory Hurley
Table of Contents
Executive Summary..2 Background of Binge Drinking.....3-7 Problem Statement....8 State of Purpose....9 References...10 Research Objective.........11 Research Method....12 Analysis and Discussion........13-22 Conclusion for Research Conclusion.23 Recommendation for Solutions.24-25 Appendix.. 26-33
Executive Summary
Vandelay Industries has conducted a research to study the reason behind the recent growth in binge drinking on college campus. The main objective of this study is to figure out the reasons and causes of binge drinking, so that it can be prevented. To do this, Vandelay Industries used students of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee as a sample to help understand the entire student population at UWM. The students were requested to complete short "Lifestyle" surveys. These surveys contained questions asking about personal drinking habits, drinking habits of peers, and reasons for drinking. This would generate the data that Vandelay Industries needs to provide analysis for the research questions. Analysis of the survey data disclosed that a vast majority of UW-Milwaukee students (91%) consume alcohol, with an average of 5.5 drinks per night. The primary reasons that students drink is 'because their friends are drinking', followed closely by 'because drinking is the best way to have a good time.' Respondents also reported to, on average, drink "occasionally" and "often" because of peer pressure. Vandelay Industries recommends that college campuses promote fun and diverse activities during typical drinking times and try to spread awareness of the dangers of overconsumption of alcohol. Bringing in celebrities and motivational speakers during these times has been a successful tactic for colleges in the past. Utilizing social media to spread word of these events is also recommended, as well as handing out flyers and promotional gifts. Doing all of this will create a student following and give them the opportunity to have social experiences that are safe from the dangers of alcohol consumption.
that more affluent, educated, and prone to colder weather. While some states are more likely to binge drink than others, at the end of the day this is still a major issue that America needs to tackle. Without immediate action to address this problem the unfortunate consequences of binge drinking will continue unabated. Excessive drinking has been linked to many health problems that range from unintentional injuries to malicious intentional harm. These consequences can not only harm the body, but also affect relationships among peers. Some unintentional injuries that can occur due to excessive amounts of alcohol include automobile accidents, falls, and burns. These unintentional injuries can range from minor scratches to deadly accidents. Alcohol poisoning is another unintentional consequence of binge drinking and is a major problem among young adults today. Alcohol poisoning is a medical emergency that results from high alcohol levels in the bloodstream passing through the nervous system and can create problems such as low blood pressure, coma, or even death. Alcohol poisoning is prevalent among young adults ranging from the ages of 18-24, which is the age group for most college graduates. The more common consequences of excessive drinking occur within the consumers body. Diseases such as high blood pressure, stroke, and other cardiovascular problems can be linked to excessive amounts of alcohol consumption. Neurological damage along with liver disease has also been a common consequence of binge drinking. The prevalence of binge drinking among males is twice as much as it is among the female population, thus leading to many cases of domestic violence, unintentional pregnancies, and most commonly: sexually transmitted disease. Nearly 35% of all reports of violence is a result of alcohol abuse and is the leading factor for child mistreatment and negligence cases.
There are many possible causes to binge drinking on college campuses which can vary from student to student. One main attraction in binge drinking is the thought that it is socially acceptable on campus. Weekends in college generally begin Thursday evening and run through Saturday night. By going out on these nights, students say they feel as if they fit in with their peers and explain that they feel more confident and social when meeting people while drinking. Alcohol is a key part of many social gatherings outside of the classroom that allows for many students to open up and meet new people during the night. Being the key part of such events also creates peer pressure among students to drink. Students are put in a situation with people they may not know and tend to use alcohol as a backbone for their night. After a long week of exams and homework, students enjoy loosening up on the weekend. Many students reward themselves with alcohol once they complete their stressful weeks. Students use alcohol as their escape allowing the use of binge drinking as their reasoning to act, do, and behave as they please. Another cause for binge drinking could be a students desire for new experiences that is available once they move into a college setting. In a college town, many students find that getting alcohol around campus may be more accessible. This is definitely apparent to first-year students that have more accessibility than they had in high school. Students may also find that liquor stores around college campuses tend to be more lenient and students may find it as an easy source to obtaining alcohol. Also, since many students live on their own, the lack of parental guidance and enforcement of house rules may encourage students to buy alcohol that they may be deterred from if they were living with their guardians. Binge drinking could possibly occur due to genetic inherence. History of alcohol abuse could factor into why some students feel the need to binge drink. Also, a younger sibling could have watched or heard stories of their older siblings college experience and wanted to follow in
5
their footsteps. There are many different agendas behind binge drinking, whether it is social interactions or the accessibility they gain from the college life. To fight the problem of binge drinking on college campuses, there has been many prevention programs designed and implemented to bring awareness to the student population. In October 2011, Shaquille O'Neal and The Century Council partnered to bring the students' voice to life by producing student-created videos. These videos address how serious of an issue campus binge drinking is. Shaq also has messages in the form of short public service announcements (PSA's) with the campaign LessThanUThink (LTUT). LTUT is a student-based anti-binge campaign created by the advertising and public relations students of the University of Alabama. This campaign's primary focus is to reach out to students via humorous messages that relay the negative social effects of overconsumption. The Texas Christian University (TCU) has their own anti-binge campaign called VITALS. It stands for Vomiting, Incoherent, Temperature, Absence of Color, Low Breathing, and Seizures. As opposed to using humor or scare tactics to send a message, VITALS focuses on illustrating that the characteristics in its name are essential to living. The primary goal is educating TCU students about alcohol poisoning symptoms and what to do in a case involving alcohol poisoning. They spread the awareness of the dangers of binge-drinking through mobile phone apps, the website, advertisements, t-shirts, water bottles, and magnets. VITALS also hopes to increase the recognition of its emblem. The Other Hangover is a student-driven campaign created on the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities campus. It targets at-risk drinkers and is designed to fight high-risk campus drinking. The campaigns objectives are to increase awareness of the negative effects of
overconsumption, generate active discussion of the negative effects of overconsumption, and change the attitudes relating to overconsumption. The Other Hangover is funded by The Century Council and had a student-led team that designed the positioning, strategy, and execution elements of the campaign. The main focus of the campaign was to show how one's reputation can be ruined by drinking too much. The flyers and banners do a great job of sending that message. Based on UM-Twin Cities surveys, 81% agree that the messages are more relatable than other 'drink responsibly' ads, 81% agree that the situations portrayed in The Other Hangover ads are more realistic and believable than other ads, 77% said that they like The Other Hangover campaign more than others, and 54.8% of students made conversation about the campaign with their friends. The Other Hangover has also expanded to Augsburg College, Hamline University, and Macalester College.
Problem Statement
This research is being conducted for UW Health authorities. For many years, binge and excessive drinking has been a major issue for everyone from adults to teenagers, but can most directly affect college students. The dangers of drinking include declining academic performance, interpersonal problems such as bouts of violence as well as loss of friends and family, and long term health problems (including liver, cardiovascular, and neurological problems as well as STDs stemming from riskier sexual activity). We believe that these may be a direct result from the ease of access in obtaining alcohol, peer pressure (from media, friends, family, and our current culture), genetic disposition, and lack of enforcement on current underage drinking laws. We hope to use the information gathered from the research to effectively lower the percentage of young adults participating in binge and excessive drinking which in turn can lower the mortality rate of alcohol in general.
Statement of Purpose
Vandelay Industries is dedicated to conducting research on excessive drinking, which remains to be a public issue. The University of Wisconsin Milwaukee health authorities have requested information from Vandelay Industries on the issue of binge drinking at their college campus. The University of Wisconsin Milwaukee is at the forefront of contributing to this national problem. Wisconsin continues to be ranked in the top five states for excessive drinking. The purpose of the research being conducted is to help prevent excessive drinking among college campuses, reduce the number of alcohol related injuries or deaths, and to help focus students on their studies. UWM health authorities hope to reduce the percentage of students who drink excessively along with helping promote good health across the campus using the information that is being provided by Vandelay Industries.
References
Florida, R. (2012, January 19). The Geography of American Binge Drinking - Arts & Lifestyle. The Atlantic Cities. Retrieved February 19, 2012, from http://www.theatlanticcities.com/arts-and-lifestyle/2012/01/geographybinge-drinking/971/
CDC - Text Description of Home Page Chart - Alcohol. (2012, January 9). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/data-table.htm
CDC Vital Signs - Binge Drinking. (2012, January 10). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/BingeDrinking/index.html CDC - Fact Sheets-Alcohol Use And Health - Alcohol. (2012, October 1). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/alcohol-use.htm Wescheler, H., Davenport, A., Dowdall, G., Moeykens, B., & Castillo, S. (1994, December 7). Health and behavioral consequences of binge drinking in... [JAMA. 1994] - PubMed - NCBI. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7966895?dopt=Abstract The century council. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.centurycouncil.org/initiative/unique-partnerships-shaquilleoneal LessThanUThink. (2011). Retrieved from http://ltut.org/ VITALS. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.tcuvitals.com/ The other hangover. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.theotherhangover.com/
10
Research Objectives
We hope to answer the following Research Questions (RQs): RQ1. Research Question 1: Determine the drinking profile of your typical respondent: By drinking profile, we mean: a) How prevalent is drinking of alcoholic beverages? b) How much is typically ingested? c) What is the primary reason why students drink? d) How much is typically spent? RQ2. Research Question 2: With those students who drink alcohol, a) How large a group are students with when they go out drinking, on the average? b) To what extent do students drink because of pressure from friends and acquaintances? c) To what extent do students drink because of easy availability of cheap alcohol? RQ3. For Research Question 3, we will determine: a) How widespread is drinking in the population? b) To what extent does this sample of students reveal the possibility of alcohol abuse in the student population? c) Do males and females drink different amounts? RQ4. For Research Question 4, we are trying to determine: a) In the students perception, what are the most common consequences of excessive drinking among his / her peers? b) Is there evidence of underage drinking? c) This is a qualitative question: Do you suspect social desirability bias with answers to any of these questions? Which one(s)? Explain what you understand by this term, and then answer the question.
11
Research Method
For our method of collecting responses, our group wanted to focus on reaching out to a wide array of UW-Milwaukee students. Since our group is larger, we decided to couple up and take on different sections of the campus. We chose places such as the Library and Union; however, we tried to avoid the dorms due to the fact that the majority of students are only lower classman, usually Freshmen and Sophomores. In the union we tried to reach out to students that were seated so that they would be more willing to take the survey. We figured that if someone was walking around the union they were probably trying to get a class, therefore wouldnt want to stop
to quickly take the survey. We also chose students that we seated alone because we assumed they
would be sitting with someone around their age or they would not feel pressured match responses because their friend was present. In order to create variety within our results, we tried to base our sample selection on students we thought varied from one another. For example, if we asked a student that had an older appearance, we would then try to find a student that seemed as if they were younger. For our responses we wanted to get a good sample of all students, therefore tried to find students of different ages and majors. The majority of the time these tactics we tried to use worked. We discovered that most all of students we asked were willing to take the survey because it was one-page (back and front) and only took a few minutes to complete. When discussing our finding, we found that on average we each asked about 11 people in order to receive our 8 surveys. To each obtain the 8 surveys each, it took roughly 25 minutes which includes finding students, having them fill it out, and thanking them. Overall, we found that we were able to find diversified group of students, who were willing to take the survey with very few complications.
12
Drinking among the UWM student population is very popular. As can be seen in Table 4, approximately 91% of students drink. Only 6 of our 67 respondents answered no to the first question on our survey. While this is to be expected on a college campus, this amount of drinking can be very dangerous and lead to negative consequences. Our graph below shows the drastic difference in drinkers and non-drinkers on the UWM campus.
13
As can be seen in Table 1 in our appendix, our respondents on average drink 5.5 alcoholic beverages in a typical night out. The respondents also stated that they go out drinking 2 nights in a typical week. 5.5 drinks is borderline binge drinking which is becoming a very real problem on our college campuses. Whats even more troubling is the fact that our respondents will be borderline binge drinking an average of 2 nights out of every week. That is 104 days a year of binge drinking. It is safe to say that when almost 30% of the year is spent binge drinking, it increases the likelihood of unwanted consequences to become very real complications.
Our data shows that there are two prevailing reasons why students drink. According to Table 5 in the appendix, the greatest percentages of respondents drink because their friends are drinking. A close second is because respondents see drinking as the best way to have a good time. The data from our graph on the subsequent page (a larger version can be seen as graph 2 in the appendix) shows that over half of our respondents chose either Because my friends are drinking or Its the best way to have
14
a good time which is well over how many respondents chose the remaining 4 options.
As can be seen in Table 1 in the appendix, the average spent on a typical night for our respondents is $19.00 a night. There was an extremely wide array of responses for this question with responses from as low as $0 to as high as $60. Since the average amount of nights our respondents go out in a week is 2 nights, our respondents spend an average $1,976 a year on alcohol. That is almost half of a full semester at UWM.
15
e) How large of a group are students with when they go out drinking, on the average?
Our data in Table 5 show that our respondents are out drinking they are on average with a group of 5 people. This is clearly the safest route as our respondents will always be close to a friend who can help out if our respondents were in trouble. However, with a larger amount of people with while drinking means there is a larger amount of peer pressure to deal with which can be an issue with our respondents as we discover in the next question.
f) To what extent do students drink because of pressure from friends and acquaintances?
According to Table 2, our respondents on average drink between occasionally and often because of pressure from friends and acquaintances. The mean value was 2.43 with a standard deviation of 1.072. This is important to consider when figuring out recommendations as it would not be enough to target the students, but the reinforcing the ability to say no to peer pressure.
16
As can be seen on Table 2 in the appendix, students on average drink often because of easy availability of cheap alcohol. The mean value was 2.7 with a standard deviation of 1.27. We can conclude that the average UWM student drinks more often due to easy availability of cheap alcohol rather than peer pressure.
RQ3. For Research Question 3, we will determine: h) How widespread is drinking in the population? CI= p+-1.96(Square root of p*q/n) 91+-1.96(Square root of 91*9/67) 91+1.96(3.50) = 97.86 91-1.96(3.50) = 84.14 CI = (84.14, 97.86)
My best estimate (according to our data in Table 4) is that on average 91% of UWM students drink alcoholic beverages. In addition, I am 95% confident that the true population falls between these limits 84.14% and 97.86%. This is shocking when compared to the average amount of drinkers in the entire United States of America which is 67%. This is a huge difference in populations.
17
i) To what extent does this sample of students reveal the possibility of alcohol abuse in the student population?
My best estimate (according to our data in Table 7) is that on an average night out, UWM students drink about 5.5 alcoholic beverages. In addition I am 95% confident that the true amount of alcoholic beverages consumed in a night falls between 4.7 and 6.4.
According to our definition of binge drinking (a pattern of drinking that brings a persons blood alcohol concentration (BAC) to 0.08 percent or above which typically happens when men consume 5 or more drinks, and when women consume 4 or more drinks, in about 2 hours), the average range of alcoholic beverages consumed in a night for our sample can be considered alcohol abuse. However, variables to consider when determining if it is truly alcohol abuse include time between drinks, BMI of the individual and whether or not they ate before drinking.
18
Our null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the amount of alcoholic beverages a male consumes compared to the amount of alcoholic beverages a female consumes.
After running an independent samples t-test on Table 8 in our appendix, we find out that there is no major difference in the alcohol consumption between male and female students. Although males consume an average of 6 alcoholic beverages a night and females consume an average of 4.5, the differences are not statistically significant. We determined this because our p value was .076 which is above .05 and thus not statistically significant. Therefore we must accept our null hypothesis.
RQ4. For Research Question 4, we are trying to determine: k) In the students perception, what are the most common consequences of excessive drinking among his / her peers?
According to the table on the subsequent page (Table 10 in the appendix): passing out, getting in trouble with the police, and drunk driving are the biggest consequences UWM students believe are involved with excessive drinking. UWM students agree that passing out is the biggest consequence while drinking. Passing out can be extremely
19
dangerous and a persons BAC can still increase while the person is passed out. Another consequence that UWM students agreed was almost as common as passing out was getting in trouble with the police. This consequence can happen because of many variables, but ultimately ends with the student regretting their actions.
Consequences to Drinking
Have Passed Out Trouble with Police Drunk Driving Nausea, Sweating, Shakiness, Craving Perform Poorly in Class Vandalism Miss Class Have Been in an Accident
Mean
2.91 2.42 2.32 2.32 2.17 2.09 2.06 1.97
Standard Deviation
0.701 0.934 0.97 0.793 0.997 0.904 1.014 0.883
According to table 9 in the appendix, there is overwhelming evidence of underage drinking on the UWM campus according to our sample. When a one-sample t-test hypothesis test was run we discovered that there was almost no difference between our hypothesis of our average age being 20 (below the legal drinking age) and our sample mean of 20.19.
20
Our null hypothesis was that there were NO differences between the average age of our sample and our hypothesis that the average age would be 20. The significance value for our hypothesis test was 0.252 which is not close to being statistically significant and we must accept our null hypothesis.
m) Do you suspect social desirability bias with answers to any of these questions?
Social desirability bias is the idea that a person may respond to interview or survey questions in a way that he or she believes is socially acceptable rather than completely accurate. This bias can be extremely detrimental to the overall validity of information from a survey.
I believe that only a couple questions were subjected to social desirability bias such as Q3 (How much money do you spend on alcohol on a typical night out?), Q5 (What is the TOP reason why you drink alcoholic beverages?), Q7 (To what extent do you drink because of pressure from friends and acquaintances?), Q8 (To what extent do you drink due to easy availability of cheap?), and Q18 (What is your cumulative GPA?). I believe Q3 is subject to social desirability bias because it is based on financial matters and most people may feel uncomfortable if they spend a lot of money on alcohol. Q5 may be subject to social desirability bias because as our group suspected Because my friends are drinking and Its the best way to have a good time would be the most popular answers because they are the most stereotypical reasons for drinking. While the
21
respondent may actually drink to escape stress or relax, these reasons for drinking are more or less frowned upon as reasons for drinking.
I believe Q7 and Q8 have similar reasons for why social desirability bias may have been a factor. I believe the main issue is that answering in the affirmative to both answers make the respondent feel similarly to why they answered Because my friends are drinking or Its the best way to have a good time in Q5: these are not generally acceptable reasons to drink.
Q18 could have been subjected to social desirability bias because GPA is a sensitive subject to students especially in the competitive atmosphere of a university.
22
23
24
The committee can utilize social media to help spread the word about the events being held on campus during these hours. By using Facebook and Twitter posts, they can reach out to students through the growing social media world. Posting videos and different photos can help bring in students by showing how entertaining the events can be. The college website may also be used to promote these activities on the weekends. The internet isnt the only way that students can be reached. On campus, the committee can hand out flyers or promotional gifts to students in order to gain a following. Leaving flyers on seats in large lecture halls is another effective way for the committee to promote themselves. In order for these events to be successful, the committee must first create a following. While ending alcohol consumption on college campuses is near impossible at this point, it is important to spread awareness of the truly negative effects of the irresponsible use of alcohol. One way to spread awareness is to advertise statistics and emotional stories through social media targeted at college students. Through the use of anonymous usernames on social media websites, students could share their story of how irresponsible drinking affected their life. These recommendations are just a couple of many tactics that could be used to help prevent binge drinking on college campuses. We believe that colleges can create a group that promotes anti-drinking activities on campus. By using different sources of media, they will be able to create a following and hopefully help provide students with a fun, safe experience without alcohol or at the very least responsible alcohol consumption.
25
Appendix
Tables:
61
1.9016
.99087
59 62 63
8 5 4
26
My friends and acquaintances do poorly on exams or papers due to drinking. My friends and acquaintances sometimes get into trouble with the police due to drinking. My friends and acquaintances sometimes participate in vandalism or damage property due to drinking. My friends and acquaintances drive while drunk. My friends and acquaintances sometimes pass out after a drinking spree. My friends and acquaintances sometimes experience nausea, sweating, shakiness, or craving as a direc... 65 2 2.32 .793 65 2 2.91 .701 65 2 2.32 .970 64 3 2.09 .904 65 2 2.42 .934 65 2 2.17 .977
* For questions To what extent do you drink because of pressure from friends and
acquaintances and To what extent do you drink due to easy availability of cheap alcohol the following scale was used: Not at all = 1 Occasionally = 2 Often = 3 Very often = 4 Always = 5 *For the remaining questions, the following scale was used: Strongly Disagree = 1 Disagree = 2 Agree = 3 Strongly Agree = 4
27
Table 5
What is the TOP reason why you drink alcoholic beverages? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent I enjoy the taste It relaxes me Because my friends are drinking It's the best way to have a good Valid time To escape stress and other pressures Other Total Missing Total Missing 5 8 19 17 7.5 11.9 28.4 25.4 8.2 13.1 31.1 27.9 8.2 21.3 52.5 80.3
9 3 61 6 67
95.1 100.0
28
Table 6
What is your gender? Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Male Valid Female Total Missing Total missing 38 27 65 2 67 56.7 40.3 97.0 3.0 100.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 58.5 100.0
Table 7
29
Table 8
Group Statistics What is your gender? How many alcoholic beverages do you consume on an average night out? Female 22 4.7045 2.14176 .45662 Male N 36 Mean 6.1389 Std. Deviation 3.89982 Std. Error Mean .64997
Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances F Sig. t df Sig. (2tailed) Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower How many alcoholic beverages do you consume on an average night out? Equal variances not assumed 1.806 55.530 .076 1.43435 .79433 -.15719 3.02589 Equal variances assumed 8.256 .006 1.582 56 .119 1.43435 .90668 -.38195 Upper 3.25066 t-test for Equality of Means
Table 9
30
Table 10
Consequences to Drinking
Have Passed Out Trouble with Police Drunk Driving Nausea, Sweating, Shakiness, Craving Perform Poorly in Class Vandalism Miss Class Have Been in an Accident
Mean
2.91 2.42 2.32 2.32 2.17 2.09 2.06 1.97
Standard Deviation
0.701 0.934 0.97 0.793 0.997 0.904 1.014 0.883
31
Graphs:
Graph 1
32
Graph 2
33