0% found this document useful (0 votes)
161 views4 pages

Pawan Kumar Jain V The Pradeshiya Ind and Inv Corp of UP LTD and Ors-2004 6 SCC 758

1. The appellant was the director of a company that had taken a loan from the first respondent corporation. The appellant stood as guarantor for the loan. Recovery proceedings were initiated against the appellant under the Uttar Pradesh Public Money Recovery of Dues Act 1972. 2. The appellant challenged the recovery notice arguing that as the first respondent was now specified as a financial institution under the Debt Recovery Act 1993, recovery could only be done under that Act and not under the Uttar Pradesh Act. 3. The Supreme Court held that since the action was initiated prior to the notification specifying the first respondent as a financial institution, the action was not barred and did not need to be transferred to a tribunal.

Uploaded by

sankhlabharat
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
161 views4 pages

Pawan Kumar Jain V The Pradeshiya Ind and Inv Corp of UP LTD and Ors-2004 6 SCC 758

1. The appellant was the director of a company that had taken a loan from the first respondent corporation. The appellant stood as guarantor for the loan. Recovery proceedings were initiated against the appellant under the Uttar Pradesh Public Money Recovery of Dues Act 1972. 2. The appellant challenged the recovery notice arguing that as the first respondent was now specified as a financial institution under the Debt Recovery Act 1993, recovery could only be done under that Act and not under the Uttar Pradesh Act. 3. The Supreme Court held that since the action was initiated prior to the notification specifying the first respondent as a financial institution, the action was not barred and did not need to be transferred to a tribunal.

Uploaded by

sankhlabharat
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Equivalent Citation: 2004(3)AWC2720(SC), IV(2004)BC141, (2007)3CompLJ533(SC), 2004(6)SCALE560, (2004)6SCC758, 2004(2)UJ1369(SC), (2004)3UPLBEC2366

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal Nos. 3636-3637 of 1998 Decided On: 11.08.2004 Appellants: Pawan Kumar Jain Vs. espondent: The Pradeshi a Indus!ria" and In#es!men! C$r%$ra!i$n $& U.P. '!d. and Ors. H$n()"e Jud*es+ S.N. Variava and Arijit Pasayat! "". C$unse"s+ #o$ Appellant%&etitione$%&laintiff: V.A. Mohta! '$. Adv.! Rakesh K. Khanna! Neeraj Sharma! Shashank Shekhar and Surya Kant! Advs #o$ espondents%Defendant: Aarohi Bhalla and Sujata Kurdukar! Advs. fo$ t(e espondent No. 1 and Shobha Dixit! '$. Adv.! Rajeev Kumar Dubey and Kamlendra Mishra! Advs. fo$ t(e espondent Nos. 2 and 3 Su),e-!+ Ci#i" A-!s.Ru"es.Orders+ ecove$) of De*ts D+e to ,an-s and #inancial .nstit+tions Act! 1993 - 'ections 2 and 31/ 0tta$ &$ades( &+*lic 1one)s 2 ecove$) of D+es3 Act! 1972 - 'ections 3! 3213 and 4/ 'tate #inancial Co$po$ation Act! 1941 - 'ection 29 Cases Re&erred+ 0ni5+e ,+t)le 6+*e .nd+st$ies 2&3 7td. v. 0.&. #inancial Co$po$ation and O$s.! MAN !S"!#$#%!$&&$ Pri$r His!$r + #$o8 t(e "+d98ent and O$de$ dated 1.9.97 and 6.11.97 of t(e Alla(a*ad :i9( Co+$t in C.1.;.&. No. 28391 and C.1. Application No. 69441 of 1997 Ci!in* Re&eren-e+ 0ni5+e ,+t)le 6+*e .nd+st$ies 2&3 7td. v. 0.&. #inancial Co$po$ation and O$s. MAN !S"!#$#%!$&&$ 1entioned Case N$!e+ Ci#i" / Re-$#er $& De)!s Due !$ 0an1s and Finan-ia" Ins!i!u!i$ns A-!2 3445 / Se-!i$ns 6 and 53 / U!!ar Pradesh Pu)"i- M$ne s 7Re-$#er $& Dues8 A-!2 3496 / Se-!i$ns 52 5738 and : / Res%$nden! 3 ad#an-ed m$nies !$ res%$nden! : -$m%an ; A%%e""an! dire-!$r $& Res%$nden! : -$m%an s!$$d *uaran!$r in res%e-! $& "$an ; Issue $& re-$#er n$!i-e a*ains! a%%e""an! ; Cha""en*ed ) wri! %e!i!i$n ; Dismissed ) Hi*h C$ur! ; C$n!en!i$n $& a%%e""an! !ha! a &inan-ia" ins!i!u!i$n wi!hin meanin* !erm in De)! re-$#er A-! -$u"d n$! )e %r$-eeded under U.P. A-! ; A%%ea" !$ Su%reme C$ur! ; As a-!i$n )ein* ini!ia!ed %ri$r !$ n$!i&i-a!i$n issued ) Cen!ra" <$#ernmen! s%e-i& in* Res%$nden! 3 C$r%$ra!i$n as a &inan-ia" ins!i!u!i$n under Se-!i$n 67h82 a-!i$n he"d n$! )arred and n$! "ia)"e !$ )e !rans&erred !$ !ri)una" / A-!i$n a*ains! *uaran!$r -$u"d n$! )e !a1en un!i" %r$%er! $& %rin-i%"e de)!$r is &irs! s$"d $&&

; As a%%e""an! ha#in* n$! s$"d %r$%er! $& %rin-i%"e de)!$r2 a-!i$n a*ains! a%%e""an! he"d unsus!aina)"e ; Re-$#er n$!i-e a*ains! a%%e""an! se! aside

JUD<MENT S.N. Varia#a2 J. 1. 6(ese Appeals a$e a9ainst t(e O$de$ of t(e Alla(a*ad :i9( Co+$t dated 01.09.1997 *) <(ic( Appellant=s ;$it &etition (as *een dis8issed and t(e O$de$ dated 06.11.1997 *) <(ic( t(e evie< &etition (as *een dis8issed. 2. ,$iefl) stated t(e facts a$e as follo<s. 6(e 1st espondent (ad advanced 8onies to t(e 4t( espondent. 6(e Appellant stood 9+a$anto$ in $espect of t(e said loan as at t(at ti8e (e <as a Di$ecto$ of t(e 4 t( espondent-Co8pan). ,) t(e ;$it &etition! t(e Appellant c(allen9ed t(e ecove$) Notice iss+ed a9ainst (i8 +nde$ t(e 0tta$ &$ades( &+*lic 1one)s 2 ecove$) of D+es3 Act! 1972. 6(e :i9( Co+$t (as dis8issed t(e ;$it &etition and t(e evie< &etition. 3. 1$. 1o(ta s+*8itted t(at t(e Cent$al >ove$n8ent (as iss+ed a Notification specif)in9 1st espondentCo$po$ation as a #inancial .nstit+tion <it(in t(e 8eanin9 of t(e te$8 as defined in 'ection $'h( of t(e ecove$) of De*ts D+e to ,an-s and #inancial .nstit+tions Act! 1993 2(e$einafte$ $efe$$ed to as t(e ?De*t ecove$) Act?3. :e s+*8itted t(at s+c( an .nstit+tion can onl) p$oceed in t(e 8anne$ laid do<n in t(e De*t ecove$) Act. :e s+*8itted t(at it is not open to 9ive a 9o-*) to t(e p$ovision of t(e De*t ecove$) Act and +se t(e 8ac(ine$) +nde$ t(e 0.&. &+*lic 1one)s 2 ecove$) of D+es3 Act! 1972 2(e$einafte$ called t(e ?0.&. Act?3. #o$ t(is $eason t(e Notice is *ad and $e5+i$es to *e 5+as(ed. .n s+ppo$t of (is s+*8ission! (e $elied +pon t(e case in Unique Butyle Tube Industries (P) Ltd. v. U. P. Financial Corporation and Ors. MAN !S"!#$#%!$&&$ : @2002A'0&&4'C 666 . .n t(is case! it (as *een (eld t(at a #inancial .nstit+tion <it(in t(e 8eanin9 of t(at te$8 in t(e De*t ecove$) Act cannot p$oceed +nde$ t(e 0. &. Act. 4. 6(is a+t(o$it) <o+ld (ave *een *indin9 +pon +s. :o<eve$! in $epl) 1$. ,(alla pointed o+t t(at in $espect of t(e 1st espondent- .nstit+tion t(e Notification *) t(e Cent$al >ove$n8ent (as onl) *een iss+ed on 24.01.2004! <(e$eas t(e ecove$) Ce$tificate is of a 8+c( ea$lie$ date. :e s+*8itted t(at! t(e$efo$e! in t(is case t(e p$oceedin9s +nde$ t(e 0. &. Act a$e not *a$$ed. :e pointed o+t t(at +nde$ 'ection )# of t(e De*t ecove$) Act! it is onl) s+it o$ p$oceedin9 pendin9 *efo$e an) Co+$t! <(ic( stand t$ansfe$$ed to t(e 6$i*+nal esta*lis(ed +nde$ t(at Act. .n o+$ vie<! 1$. ,(alla is $i9(t. As t(e action <as initiated p$io$ to t(e Notification *ein9 iss+ed *) t(e Cent$al >ove$n8ent! t(e action <o+ld not *e *a$$ed and <o+ld not stand t$ansfe$$ed to t(e 6$i*+nal. 4. 1$. 1o(ta t(en $elied +pon 'ections 3 and 4 of t(e 0. &. Act! <(ic( $ead as follo<s:=5. Re-$#er $& -er!ain dues as arrears $& "and re#enue.--213 ;(e$e an) pe$son is pa$t)-2a3 to an) a9$ee8ent $elatin9 to a loan! advance o$ 9$ant 9iven to (i8 o$ $elatin9 to c$edit in $espect of! o$ $elatin9 to (i$e- p+$c(ase of 9oods sold to (i8 *) t(e 'tate >ove$n8ent o$ t(e Co$po$ation! *) <a) of financial assistance/ o$ 2*3 to an) a9$ee8ent $elatin9 to a loan! advance o$ 9$ant 9iven to (i8 o$ $elatin9 to c$edit in $espect of! o$ $elatin9 to (i$e- p+$c(ase of 9oods sold to (i8! *) a *an-in9 co8pan) o$ a >ove$n8ent co8pan)! as t(e case 8a) *e! +nde$ a 'tate-sponso$ed sc(e8e/ o$ 2c3 to an) a9$ee8ent $elatin9 to a 9+a$antee 9iven *) t(e 'tate >ove$n8ent o$ t(e Co$po$ation in $espect of a loan $aised *) an ind+st$ial conce$n/ o$

2d3 to an) a9$ee8ent p$ovidin9 t(at an) 8one) pa)a*le t(e$e+nde$ to t(e 'tate >ove$n8ent s(all *e $ecove$a*le as a$$ea$s of land $even+e/ and s+c( pe$son2i3 8a-es an) defa+lt in $epa)8ent of t(e loan o$ advance o$ an) instal8ent t(e$eof/ o$ 2ii3 (avin9 *eco8e lia*le +nde$ t(e conditions of t(e 9$ant to $ef+nd t(e 9$ant o$ an) po$tion t(e$eof! 8a-es an) defa+lt in t(e $ef+nd of s+c( 9$ant o$ po$tion o$ an) instal8ent t(e$eof/ o$ 2iii3 ot(e$<ise fails to co8pl) <it( t(e te$8s of t(e a9$ee8ent!-- t(en! in t(e case of 'tate >ove$n8ent! s+c( office$ as 8a) *e a+t(o$iBed in t(at *e(alf *) t(e 'tate >ove$n8ent *) notification in t(e official >aBette! and in t(e case of t(e Co$po$ation o$ a >ove$n8ent co8pan) t(e 1ana9in9 Di$ecto$ t(e$eof! and in t(e case of a *an-in9 co8pan)! t(e local a9ent t(e$eof! *) <(ateve$ na8e called! 8a) send a ce$tificate to t(e Collecto$! 8entionin9 t(e s+8 d+e f$o8 s+c( pe$son and $e5+estin9 t(at s+c( s+8 to9et(e$ <it( costs of t(e p$oceedin9s *e $ecove$ed as if it <e$e an a$$ea$ of land $even+e. 223 6(e Collecto$ on $eceivin9 t(e ce$tificate s(all p$oceed to $ecove$ t(e a8o+nt stated t(e$ein as an a$$ea$ of land $even+e. 233 No s+it fo$ t(e $ecove$) of an) s+8 d+e as afo$esaid s(all lie in t(e civil co+$t a9ainst an) pe$son $efe$$ed to in s+*-section 213. 4. Sa#in*s. -- 213 Not(in9 in section 3! s(all 2a3 affect an) inte$est of t(e 'tate >ove$n8ent! t(e Co$po$ation! a >ove$n8ent co8pan) o$ an) *an-in9 co8pan)! in an) p$ope$t) c$eated *) an) 8o$t9a9e! c(a$9e! pled9e o$ ot(e$ enc+8*$ance/ o$ 2*3 *a$ a s+it o$ affect an) ot(e$ $i9(t o$ $e8ed) a9ainst an) pe$son ot(e$ t(an a pe$son $efe$$ed to in t(at section! in $espect of a cont$act of inde8nit) o$ 9+a$antee ente$ed into a $elation to an a9$ee8ent $efe$$ed to in t(at section o$ in $espect of an) inte$est $efe$$ed to in cla+se 2a3. 223 ;(e$e t(e p$ope$t) of an) pe$son $efe$$ed to in 'ection 3 is s+*Cect to an) 8o$t9a9e! c(a$9e! pled9e o$ ot(e$ enc+8*$ance in favo+$ of t(e 'tate >ove$n8ent! t(e Co$po$ation! a >ove$n8ent co8pan) o$ *an-in9 co8pan)! t(en -2a3 in eve$) case of a pled9e of 9oods! p$oceedin9s s(all fi$st *e ta-en fo$ sale of t(e t(in9 pled9ed! and if t(e p$oceeds of s+c( sale a$e less t(an t(e s+8 d+e! t(en p$oceedin9s s(all *e ta-en fo$ $ecove$) of t(e *alance as if it <e$e an a$$ea$ of land $even+e : &$ovided t(at <(e$e t(e 'tate >ove$n8ent is of opinion t(at it is necessa$) so to do fo$ safe9+a$din9 t(e $ecove$) of t(e s+8 d+e to it o$ to t(e Co$po$ation! >ove$n8ent co8pan) o$ *an-in9 co8pan)! as t(e case 8a) *e! it 8a) fo$ $easons to *e $eco$ded! di$ect p$oceedin9s to *e ta-en fo$ $ecove$) of t(e s+8 d+e! as if it <e$e an a$$ea$ of land $even+e *efo$e o$ at t(e sa8e ti8e as p$oceedin9s a$e ta-en fo$ sale of t(e t(in9 pled9ed/ 2*3 in eve$) case of a 8o$t9a9e! c(a$9e o$ ot(e$ enc+8*$ance on i88ova*le p$ope$t)! s+c( p$ope$t) o$! as t(e case 8a) *e! t(e inte$est of t(e defa+lte$ t(e$ein! s(all fi$st *e sold in p$oceedin9s fo$ $ecove$) of t(e s+8 d+e f$o8 t(at pe$son as if it <e$e an a$$ea$ of land $even+e! and an) ot(e$ p$oceedin9 8a) *e ta-en t(e$eafte$ onl) if t(e Collecto$ ce$tifies t(at t(e$e is no p$ospect of $ealiBation of t(e enti$e s+8 d+e t($o+9( t(e fi$st 8entioned p$ocess <it(in a $easona*le ti8e.? 6. :e s+*8itted t(at *) vi$t+e of t(ese p$ovisions! t(e 1 st espondent cannot p$oceed a9ainst t(e Appellant%9+a$anto$ +ntil t(e 1st espondent (as fi$st sold t(e p$ope$t) of t(e p$incipal-de*to$ <(ic( (ad *een 8o$t9a9ed in t(ei$ favo+$. :e points o+t t(at on 22nd "+l)! 1996 action +nde$ 'ection $* of t(e 'tate #inancial Co$po$ation Act! 1941 (ad *een initiated and p()sical possession ta-en. :e points o+t t(at t(e$eafte$ on 12.02.1996 a One 6i8e 'ettle8ent <as a$$ived at *) t(e 1st espondent <it( t(e 4t( espondent. :e points
3

o+t t(at t(e$eafte$ t(e p$ope$t) <as (anded *ac- to t(e 1st espondent is not entitled to p$oceed a9ainst t(e Appellant.

espondent. :e s+*8its t(at! t(e$efo$e! t(e 1st

7. 1$. ,(alla ad8its t(e a*ove 8entioned facts. :e! (o<eve$! s+*8its t(at t(e co8pan) co88itted defa+lts and! t(e$efo$e! t(e One 6i8e 'ettle8ent failed. :e s+*8itted t(at ea$lie$ atte8pts to sell t(e p$ope$ties of t(e 4t( espondent Co8pan) )ielded no $es+lt as no offe$s <e$e $eceived. :e s+*8itted t(at action +nde$ 'ection $* (as a9ain *een initiated a9ainst t(e 4t( espondent Co8pan). :e s+*8itted t(at as t(e 4t( espondent Co8pan) (as co88itted defa+lts and it (as not *een possi*le to $ecove$) *) sale of p$ope$t)! action (as *een ta-en a9ainst t(e 9+a$anto$ fo$ $ecove$) of t(e a8o+nt. 8. .n o+$ vie<! t(e a*ove set o+t p$ovisions of t(e 0. &. Act a$e ve$) clea$. Action a9ainst t(e 9+a$anto$ cannot *e ta-en +ntil t(e p$ope$t) of t(e p$incipal-de*to$ is fi$st sold off. As t(e Appellant (as not sold t(e p$ope$t) of t(e p$incipal-de*to$! t(e action a9ainst t(e Appellant cannot *e s+stained. ;e! t(e$efo$e! set aside t(e ecove$) Notice. 9. ;e! (o<eve$! cla$if) t(at it <ill *e open to t(e 1st espondent to p$oceed a9ainst t(e Appellant *efo$e t(e De*t ecove$) 6$i*+nal in acco$dance <it( p$inciples laid do<n in 0ni5+e ,+t)le 6+*e=s case 2s+p$a3. 10. 6(e Appeals stand disposed of acco$din9l). 6(e$e <ill *e no o$de$ as to costs.

You might also like