Agile Method of Testing
Agile Method of Testing
While the given application under test is still evolving depending upon the customer
needs, the mindset of the end user and the current market condition, it is highly
impractical to go for the usual standard SDLC Models like Water Fall, V&V Model etc.
Such models are most suitable for the Applications that are stable and non-volatile.
The concept of “Time-To-Market” is the key word in today’s IT Business that compels
the Software vendors to come up with new strategies to save the time, resources,
cut down the cost involved and at the same time, deliver a reliable product that
meets the user requirements. In this case, a reasonably good amount of end-to-end
testing is carried out and the product could be acceptable with known issues/defects
at the end of an intermediate release. These defects are harmless for the Application
usability.
To adopt such a process in a systematic way, we have a new concept called Agile
Methodology. This methodology continuously strives to overcome the issues of
dynamically changing requirements while still trying to maintain a well-defined
process.
defects at the early stage so that the developer can fix them in the next round on
priority basis and continue with further development. This iteration continues until
the end of the code implementation. Once the testing cycle starts, the Test team can
now focus more on major test items such as Integration, Usability Testing and
System Testing etc.
The Testing team knows the complexity involved and it is accepted by the customer
that the software development and/or the enhancements and hence the testing is a
continuous process. Testing of the application at a black box level would suffice in
order to identify the issues and raise the defects by the Testing team. The application
continues to evolve until it reaches the stage of final acceptance. Hence the scope of
testing would continue to evolve as per the Customer needs.
Every intermediate release of the product would be divided into two short cycles,
usually of the duration of 40 days each. Each cycle would be executed in the
following stages. The roles and responsibilities of every individual and the team are
clearly defined for each stage.
•Design Specifications: The Testing team’s efforts would focus on performing any tool
or process improvements and reviewing, understanding, and contributing to the
nascent specifications.
•Implementation: While the Engineering/Development team is implementing the
code, Testers would develop complete Testing Plan and Test Sets (set of test cases)
for each of the features included in the cycle. Engineering features must be included;
they would likely require some level of collaboration with the engineering feature
developer. All Test Sets should be ready to execute by the end of implementation
period of the respective cycle. After Test Set preparation, calculate the time
estimation and prioritization for the Test Set execution based on the complexity and
expected execution time for each test suite.
•While the test execution time estimation is notoriously difficult, this number should
provide the Customer with a starting point for benchmarking.
•Testing/QA: Test Set execution, raising defects and follow up with the Engineering
Team. End-to-end validation of the defects. Focus simultaneously on improving the
quality of test cases. Watching out for and adding new cases as testing proceeds.
Testing the software end-to-end to discover regressions and subtle systemic issues.
Learning to focus more on using the time available to uncover the largest number of
and most important bugs. Any deviation from the estimated time should be
communicated across well in advance, so that the schedule can be worked upon
depending upon the priority of the pending tasks. If there are certain issues or test
cases blocking due to unknown errors, they would be differed until the beginning of
next Testing/QA Cycle.
•Before acceptance: Follow up on ad-hoc requests/ changes in requirements on a
regular basis, besides trying to complete the defined tasks.
Agile method of testing 4
This type of testing is what usually the Agile Testers incorporate. Context Driven
testing is the one where the test scenarios are not known before hand. It mostly
comes from the context in which the application is being executed. In our case, it is
constructing the UDMs based on a given use case from the targeted end user and
test it for the scenarios that are explained by his system configuration. It also
includes constructing the UDMs based on any trouble-shooting discussion arising out
of defects pointed out during the Customer acceptance and testing.
Rapid Testing is a process of defining our own strategies to test the Software, not
necessarily following any specific Process or a Model. It focuses mainly on identifying
the defects as quickly as possible rather than focusing on the end user requirements.
Heuristic approach is used in such cases. The tester uses his common sense and
previous work experience to test the application at various levels in order to figure
out where the application stands.
References: http://www.testing.com/agile