Presented at the COMSOL Conference 2010 India
Use of COMSOL Multi-Physics in Modeling Galvanic Corrosion
Kiran B. Deshpande
Senior Researcher, Material Characterization and Modeling Group India Science Lab, General Motors Global Research and Development GM Technical Centre India Pvt Ltd, Creator Building, International Tech Park Ltd. Whitefield Road, Bangalore - 560 066, INDIA Email: [Link]@[Link]
COMSOL CONFERENCE 2010, BANGALORE October 29 - 30, 2010
Motivation
Why Magnesium in Automobiles?
Light weight increases fuel economy High strength to weight ratio makes it a good engineering material Good castability enables high production rate
Challenges
Poor corrosion resistance
Mg is not very suitable for automotive applications which are exposed to corrosion media
High galvanic corrosion
Mg is very anodic to other metals such as Fe, Al poor durability in dissimilar material
joints and applications
Research Focus
Understanding macro-galvanic and micro-galvanic corrosion
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
India Science Lab
What is galvanic corrosion?
Electrolyte Mild Steel 2H+ H2 Electric field Mg++ Zn Al Mg Anodic
Al
2e-
Mg
3 conditions for galvanic corrosion
Potential difference between dissimilar materials Electrical contact between dissimilar material for electron transport Exposure to conductive medium for ionic transport
Cathodic
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Modeling of Corrosion Phenomena
Micro-galvanic corrosion Macro-galvanic corrosion
AM50 Die Cast Microstructure a Phase
Mild Steel (cathode)
AE44 (Mg alloy)
After 3 days immersion in 1.6 wt% NaCl solution b Phase
Objective: To optimize the processing route to obtain the desirable microstructure for the better corrosion resistance
Objective: To develop a numerical tool to predict galvanic corrosion rate, which can provide design specifications
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Microstructure corrosion correlation
Alloy AM50 AM50 AM50 Casting Process Die Cast Permanent Mold Sand Cast Ecorr (V) -1.48 -1.5 -1.5 b phase content % 18.4 1.08 0.61 icorr (A/m2) 0.081 0.182 0.269
Ecorr - Corrosion Potential
icorr Corrosion current density
AM50 DC
AM50 PM
AM50 SC
Microstructure effect on corrosion b phase fraction b phase Distribution Al content in the a phase India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Reference: Sundarraj et al., Magnesium Technology 2008, TMS 2008.
Modeling approach
Model Schematic n 0
Electrolyte
Assumptions
Well mixed, incompressible and electroneutral electrolyte solution Uniform Al content throughout alpha phase No interfacial resistance due to corrosion product is considered here The dissolution reaction is considered at the anode surface
n 0
2 0
b phase (Cathode) a phase (Anode)
n 0
where is the electric potential
j k n f ( )
Corrosion rate calculation
Corrosion rate in [Link]-1 [Link]-1 Equivalent weight in [Link]-1 Density in kg.m-3 anodic current density in Amp.m-2
The model is capable of explicitly tracking the corroding phase. The model predictions are based on non-linear polarization data.
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Modeling Approach: moving boundary formulation
Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) Method COMSOL Multi-Physics
Initial mesh
Electrolyte
Cathode
Anode
Deformed mesh
India Science Lab
x
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Effect of b phase fraction (area ratio)
Model Schematic
10% b phase
Electrolyte a phase (Anode) 90 b phase (Cathode) a phase (Anode) 20 m 90 m
50% b phase
90% b phase
The maximum of anodic current density (corrosion rate)
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
as b phase fraction
Scanning Vibrating Electrode Technique
Equipment
Electrometer
Schematic
Vin RE
Potentiostat WE CE RE
Scanning probe Test sample Electrolyte
Sample specimen
SVET output Current density calculation
j
b a b
E A
Current density, Amp/m2 Conductivity, S/m Potential difference at the two extremes of amplitude of probe vibration, V Amplitude of probe vibration, m
E
SVET experiments are performed on a galvanic couple where individual components are in direct physical and electrical contact, which eliminates IR drop.
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Model - SVET Comparison
10% b phase
50% b phase
90% b phase
Model and SVET experiments : Corrosion rate as b phase fraction The corrosion rate AM50 dc was the lowest despite the highest b phase fraction This behavior motivates us to investigate the effect of b phase distribution
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Level set formulation
Microstructure of AM50 die cast along the depth
A single boundary is used to specify the anode surface and the cathode surface using the level set function The above formulation can capture the varying ratios of the a phase and the b phase along the depth of the alloy
Acknowledgement: Shashank Tiwari for microstructure
Reference: K. B. Deshpande, Electrochimica Acta (2010), doi:10.1016/[Link].2010.09.044
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Continuous b phase network
Schematic of microstructure Model prediction
Electrolyte
b phase
Dissolved a phase
a phase preferentially dissolves in electrolyte solution until continuous network of b phase is exposed to electrolyte solution after which corrosion is halted.
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
a phase dissolution
b phase
India Science Lab
Dissolved a phase
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Continuous b phase network
Surface b phase fraction evolution
Average anodic current density evolution
Average anodic current density as surface b phase fraction The corrosion activity is however halted after the a phase present on the surface is dissolved into the electrolyte solution. The total charge passed per square meter area = 1.3844105 C/m2 The total mass of material removed per square meter area = 17.22 g/m2
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Discrete b phase
Model prediction Schematic of microstructure Electrolyte
b phase
Dissolved a phase
a phase continuously dissolves in the electrolyte solution as discontinuous b phase network assists corrosion. As discrete b phase is not well supported, b phase eventually spatters off.
References: Ambat, et al., Corrosion Science, 42, 1433-1455 (2000); Song et al., Corrosion Science, 41, 249-273 (1999).
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Discrete b phase
Surface b phase fraction evolution
a b a b
Average anodic current density evolution
Neck formation and neck thinning leading to b phase spattering is captured using the model. The corrosion activity lasts for a lot longer for discrete b phase than in continuous b phase network. The model captures the scenario leading to b phase spattering, but not the actual spattering as the model cannot capture topological changes.
The total charge passed per square meter area = 2.5060 10 C/m2
5
The total mass of material removed per square meter area = 31.17 g/m2
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Modeling of Corrosion Phenomena
Micro-galvanic corrosion Macro-galvanic corrosion
AM50 Die Cast Microstructure a Phase
Mild Steel (cathode)
AE44 (Mg alloy)
After 3 days immersion in 1.6 wt% NaCl solution b Phase
Objective: To optimize the processing route to obtain the desirable microstructure for the better corrosion resistance
Objective: To develop a numerical tool to predict galvanic corrosion rate, which can provide design specifications
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Modeling approach
Model Schematic n 0
Electrolyte
Assumptions
Well mixed, incompressible and electro-neutral electrolyte solution No interfacial resistance due to corrosion product is considered here Anode surface is assumed to be corroding and cathode surface is assumed to be non-corroding
n 0
2 0
Mild Steel (Cathode) Magnesium (Anode)
n 0
where is the electric potential
j k n f ( )
Corrosion rate calculation
Corrosion rate in [Link]-1 [Link]-1
Equivalent weight in [Link]-1
The model is capable of explicitly tracking the corroding phase. The model predictions are based on non-linear polarization data.
Density in kg.m-3 anodic current density in Amp.m-2
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Animation capturing moving Mg surface
Mild Steel
AE44 (Mg alloy)
2 mm
India Science Lab
Photograph after cross-sectional cut of AE44 MS couple after 3 days of immersion
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
SVET and model prediction
AE44 Mild steel couple AE44 AA6063 couple
The corrosion rate predicted using the numerical model is within +9% of that estimated using SVET analysis for AE44 mild steel couple. The corrosion rate predicted using the numerical model is within -29% of that estimated using SVET analysis for AE44 AA6063 couple.
References: K. B. Deshpande, Corrosion Science, 52 (2010) 2819 2826 K. B. Deshpande, Corrosion Science, 52 (2010) 3514 - 3522 Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
India Science Lab
Immersion and model prediction
AE44 Mild steel couple AE44 AA6063 couple
The corrosion rate predicted using the numerical model is within -20% of that estimated from immersion technique for AE44 mild steel couple. The corrosion rate predicted using the numerical model is within -47% of that estimated from immersion technique for AE44 AA6063 couple.
Acknowledgement: Sampath Vanimisetti (Image digitization)
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010
Summary
Corrosion rate (mm/y) Galvanic Couples SVET experiments 197 42
Immersion experiments
243 52
Mixed Potential Theory 231 26
ALE method 210 29
AE44 - MS AE44 AA6063
The corrosion rate predicted using the numerical model is in good agreement with that estimated from the two experimental techniques.
The galvanic corrosion behavior is demonstrated at both macro and micro scale using the numerical model developed using COMSOL Multi-Physics.
India Science Lab
Comsol Conference, Bangalore, October 29 - 30, 2010