0% found this document useful (0 votes)
92 views4 pages

Math Enthusiasts: Lah Numbers Study

This document presents a recurrence relation for associated Lah numbers Lk(m,n) that is obtained from their generating function. It is shown that Lk(m,n) is a strong logarithmic concave function of n for fixed k and m, meaning it satisfies the inequality [Lk(m,n)]2 > Lk(m,n + 1)Lk(m,n - 1). This property is proved using the recurrence relation and Newton's inequality for polynomials with real roots.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
92 views4 pages

Math Enthusiasts: Lah Numbers Study

This document presents a recurrence relation for associated Lah numbers Lk(m,n) that is obtained from their generating function. It is shown that Lk(m,n) is a strong logarithmic concave function of n for fixed k and m, meaning it satisfies the inequality [Lk(m,n)]2 > Lk(m,n + 1)Lk(m,n - 1). This property is proved using the recurrence relation and Newton's inequality for polynomials with real roots.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

CONCAVITY PROPERTY AND A RECURRENCE RELATION FOR ASSOCIATED LAH NUMBERS

J . C. AHUJA and E . A . ENNEKING

Portland

State

University,
ABSTRACT

Portland,

OR 97207

A recurrence relation is obtained for the associated Lah numbers,

Lk(m,n),
via their generating function. Using this result, it is shown that is a strong logarithmic concave function of n for fixed k and 7 7 7 . 1. The Lah numbers L (m,n) are given by the relation INTRODUCTION Lk(m,n)

(see Riordan [4, p. 44]) with arguments m and n

(1)

L(m,n)

= (-l)B(m!/!)(*" J),
is the same as that of

where L(m,n) = 0 for n > m. Since the sign of L(m,n) (-l)n, we may write (1) in absolute value as (2) \L(m,n)\ = (mi/n!)^"^.

We define the associated Lah numbers Lk(m9n) (3) . Lk(m,n) =

for integral k > 0 as

^/n^ti-ir-r^*^-1)

where Lk(m9n) = 0 for n > m. Using the binomial coefficient identity (12.13) in Feller [2, p. 64], it can. be easily seen that

(4)

Ll(m,n)

= \L(m9n) | .

The use of the associated Lah numbers L^im^n) has recently arisen in a paper by the author [1], where the n-fold convolution of independent random variables having the decapitated negative binomial distribution is derived in terms of the numbers L^(jn9n) . In this paper, we first provide a recurrence relation for the numbers L^irn^n). This result is then utilized to show that Lk(m,n) is a strong logarithmic concave (SLC) function of n for fixed k and ? ? 7 , that is, Lk(m,n) satisfies the inequality

(5)

[Lk(m,n)]2

> Lk(m,n + l)Lk(m9n

- 1)

for k = 1, 2, ...,??7=3,4 S ..., and n = 2, 3, ...,7?7-l. 2. RECURRENCE RELATION FOR Lk(m9n) Lk(m,n)

The author [1] has provided a generating function for the numbers in the form

(6)

[(1 - eyk

- 1]" =

n\Lk(m,n)dm/ml. 158

April 1979

CONCAVITY PROPERTY AND A RECURRENCE RELATION FOR ASSOCIATED LAH NUMBERS

159

Differentiating both sides of (6) with respect to 0, then multiplying both sides by (1 - 9), gives (7) nkld - Q)'k - l] n_1 (l - e)'k = (1 - Q)ZnlLk(m9n)Qm-1/(m - 1)!

which, using (6), becomes (8) nkZnlLk(m9n)Qm/m\ + nkZ(n - l)\Lk(m9n 1)1. l)Qm/ml

= (1 - Q)ln\Lk(m9n)Qm-l/(m

Now, equating the coefficient of 0 m in (8), we obtain the recurrence formula for Lk(m,n) as (9)
L

k(m

^-^

(n^

^)Lk(m,n)

+ kLk(m9n

- 1).

The recurrence relation (9) is used to obtain Table I for the associated Lah numbers Lk(m,n) for n = 1(1)5 and m = 1(1)5. It may be remarked that, for k = 1, Table I reduces to the one for the absolute Lah numbers given in Riordan [4, p. 44]. 3. CONCAVITY OF Lk(m,n)

The proof of the SLC property of the numbers Lk(m9n) is based on the following result of Newton's inequality given in Hardy, Littlewood, and Polya [3, p. 52]: If the polynomial

P(oc) = J2
=1

nxn

has only real roots, then (10) 4 > n+ln-1 To establish the SLC property, we need the follow-

for n = 2, 3, . . . , m - 1. ing: Lmma: If


p

m(%) = X ^
n-l

Lk(m,n)xn are real, distinct, and nonpositive for all m = 1,

then the m roots of Pm (x) 2, ... . PfiOO^'(11)


m

It can be easily seen that Pm (x) , using (9), may be expressed as Pm(x) = Y,
n= l m

Lk(m,n)xn

= J2
n= l

link

+ m - l)Lk(m

- l , n ) + kLk(m

- l,n

l)]xn

= (kx + m - l)Pm_l(x)

kx[dPm_l(x)ldx}9

160

CONCAVITY PROPERTY AND A RECURRENCE RELATION FOR ASSOCIATED LAH NUMBERS


LT)

[April

A^
I ^

rH

A?

<r

J-

Ad

A^ O
rH

+
Ad

+ 1)
en
' A^ Ad Ad
/N

S~\

rH

Ad

A^

+
A^
rH rH

+
A:
/s

en

/^-s

/-"S

CM

rH

rH

<N

(N

A!

+ % ^ Ad
Ad en

Ad
V '

CM

C M

Ad

+ ^ ^ Ad
A^

rH Ad

+
Ad en

cn

+ +

A?

Ad
/N

/"-\ CM
,H
/N

/S

CM

CM

+ A:
/"N

+ A?
v
/*S

rH

* ^
H

rH

'

Ad
v_^
N

rH

+ A:
Ad Ad

+ A^
Ad .

+ Ad
^w'

Ad ' Ad

Ad

H CM

en

<t

un

1979]

CONCAVITY PROPERTY AND A RECURRENCE RELATION FOR ASSOCIATED LAH NUMBERS

161

By induction, we find that Px(x) and P3(x) = kx[k2x2 + 3k(k + l)x + (k + l)(fc + 2 ] , = kx, P2(x) = kx(kx + k + 1),

so that the statement is true for m = 1, 2, and 3. For m > 3, assume that POT_iC^c) n a s m-1 real, distinct, and nonpositive roots. If we define (12) then, since Pm(O) = 0, Tm(x) Pm (x) (13) has exactly the same finite roots as Pm (x), gives Tm(x) = kx(k
+ l)/k

Tm(x)

exxm/kPm(x),

and the identity (11) for

dTm_l(x)/dx.

By hypothesis, Pm-i(x), and hence ^-^(ar), has m-1 real, distinct, and nonpositive roots. Tm_1(x) also has a root at ->, and, by Rolle T s theorem, between any two roots of Tm_1(x) , dTm_1(x)/dx will have a root. This places m-1 distinct roots of Tm_l(x) on the negative real axis; x - 0 is obviously another one, making m altogether. This proves the result by induction. Thus the above lemma, together with the inequality (10), provides us the following: Tkdonm: For w > _ 3, k = 19 2, ..., and n = 2, 3, . . . , T T ? - 1, the associated Lah numbers Lk(m9n) satisfy the inequality (5). It may be remarked that, as a consequence of the above result and relation (4), we have the following: CotioULaJiy: For m >_3, and n = 2, 3, ..., 7 7 7 - 1 , the Lah numbers L(m9n) isfy the inequality (14) [L(m,n)]2 > L(m,n + l)L(m9n - 1). sat-

REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. J. C. Ahuja, "Distribution of the Sum of Independent Decapitated Negative Binomial Variables," Ann. Math. Statist. 42 (1971):383-384. W. Feller, An Intorduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications (New York: Wiley, 1968). G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood, & G. Ploya, Inequalities (Cambridge: The University Press, 1952). J. Riordan, An Introduction to Combinatorial Analysis (New York: Wiley, 1958). #####

You might also like