Reading A EKG
Reading A EKG
1. Rate – if regular, then count the number of large squares between R waves; 1 square = 300 bpm, 2 = 150 bpm, 3 = 100
bpm, 4 = 75 bpm, 5 = 60 bpm, 6 = 50 bpm. Each small box = 0.04 s, each large box = 5 small boxes = 0.20 s.
2. Rhythm – is it regular? (use calipers/ruler to make sure all R-R intervals are the same); are there P waves, and are
they in front of every QRS? (in sinus rhythm, P waves will be upright in lead II); are P waves all identical?
3. Intervals
PR interval: normally 0.12 to 0.20 seconds (will not exceed a large box)
QRS interval: normally 0.04 to 0.10 seconds (no larger than half a large box)
QT interval: should be less than half the R-R interval (if HR < 100)
4. Axis deviation – net QRS deflection should be positive in both leads I and aVF
Right axis deviation: QRS negative in I, positive in aVF
Left axis deviation: QRS positive in I, negative in aVF
5. Hypertrophy
Left ventricular hypertrophy: sum of deepest S in V1 or V2 and tallest R in V5 or V6 > 35 mm (patients > 35 yo); R in
aVL > 12 mm indicative of “strain”.
Left atrial enlargement: P waves are notched (M-shaped) in I, II, or aVL or a deep terminal negative component to P in
V1
Right atrial enlargement: tall, peaked P waves (> 2.5 mm) in II, III, aVF
Right ventricular hypertrophy: right atrial enlargement, right axis deviation, incomplete RBBB, low voltage tall R wave
in V1, persistent precordial S waves, right ventricular strain are all suggestive.
6. Infarction
Q waves: small, normal Q waves can be seen in lateral leads (I, aVL, V4 to V6), while moderate-large sized Q waves
may be normal in leads III, aVF, aVL, and V1. To localize the infarction, look for groupings of Q waves in the following
leads…
Inferior II, III, aVF
Anteroseptal V1 to V3
Anterior V3 and V4
Anterolateral V4 and V6, I, aVL
Posterior V1 and V2
Other pearls
What is wrong?
What caused it?
What’s being done about it?
The answer to the first question, “What is wrong?” is obtained by simple inspection of the values on the pH, PaCO2, and HCO3-.
If all three values are normal, the answer to “What is wrong?” is “Nothing,” and the other two questions can be ignored.
If either pH, PaCO2, or HCO3- are abnormal, check the pH. If it’s below 7.4, the answer to “What is wrong?” is “Acidosis.” If
above 7.4, “Alkalosis.”
If the pH is within the normal range, but the PaCO2 or HCO3- (or both) are abnormal, an acid-base derangement exists, but the
body has fully compensated for it. For example, with a pH of 7.35 (normal) and a decreased bicarbonate of 18, an acidosis exists.
The second question is “What caused it?” The answer is “Metabolic” if bicarbonate has caused the observed change in pH from
7.4. If carbon dioxide caused it, the answer is “Respiratory.” If both are guilty, the answer is “Mixed metabolic and respiratory.”
First look at the bicarbonate. Is it guilty?
Increased bicarbonate raises the pH. Low bicarbonate lowers the pH. If you see a pH above 7.4 and the bicarbonate is elevated
above normal, it means bicarbonate is guilty of raising the pH. So a metabolic alkalosis exists.
If the bicarbonate is above 7.4 and the bicarbonate is decreased or normal, bicarbonate is not guilty.
Similarly, if the pH is below 7.4 and the bicarbonate is below normal, it means lack of bicarbonate is responsible for lowering the
pH. Therefore a metabolic acidosis exists.
Look at the CO2. Is it guilty?
Carbon dioxide is acidic. A high CO2 will lower the pH, while a low CO2 will raise it. If the pH is above 7.4 and the PaCO2 is
lower than normal, lack of CO2 is responsible. A respiratory alkalosis exists.
If, however, the CO2 is normal or elevated while the pH is above 7.4, then CO2 can’t be contributing to the disturbance.
If both PaCO2 and HCO3- are shifted in a direction that would contribute to the pH abnormality, both are guilty. A mixed
metabolic and respiratory abnormality exists.
The final question is “What’s the body doing about it?” We’re checking for compensatory changes — changes the body has made
to compensate for the abnormality. This is an inherantly inaccurate question, as I’ll discuss later. Consider your answer a “best guess.”
Assume the body has only two mechanisms to affect pH: respiratory and metabolic. Respiratory is CO2 and metabolic is HCO3-.
After you’ve identified the guilty party (CO2 or HCO3-), look at the other value. If that other value is abnormal, but in a direction
that would move the pH back towards normal, then compensation is present.
If you’ve found that both HCO3- and CO2 are guilty, then obviously compensation isn’t present. As an example, assume blood
gases that show pH=7.33, HCO3=16.5, and PaCO2=32. The problem is acidosis (any abnormality plus pH >> 7.4). The guilty party is
metabolic (HCO3- is low, shifted in a direction that causes acidosis). Respiratory compensation is present (CO2 is abnormal in a
direction that would raise the pH back towards normal.
Compensation by respiratory means is very fast, occuring within seconds or minutes. This compensation occurs via the body’s
control of respiratory rate through the brain respiratory center. Thus respiratory compensation for metabolic abnormalities is seen
almost immediately.
Metabolic compensation, on the other hand, is slow. It occurs through elimination of acid or alkali by the kidney. Hours go by
before significant compensation is seen. Metabolic compensation will occur for chronic respiratory disturbance, but also, metabolic
correction through the kidney will be seen for metabolic disturbances.
Is this accurate? No. Identifying the source of acidosis and presence of compensation assumes that the same process has been
going on all along. If body’s state changes from one source of abnormality to another, or if two completely separate pathological
processes are present, your “guess” will be wrong.
For example, Phil Smith has a heart attack and goes into V-fib. He develops both respiratory and metabolic acidosis. Then he gets
defibrillated and wakes up. As he realizes that he has to give up his favorite cholesterol-rich foods, he hyperventilates. Now blood
gases are drawn.
Looking at these gases, you diagnose “fully compensated (chronic) respiratory alkalosis.” Not true. Phil has an acute respiratory
alkosis superimposed upon a “slightly less acute” metabolic acidosis. Remember that bicarbonate abnormalities cannot change
quickly.
Computer interpretation (such as that used in Mad Scientist Software's Blood Gases program) look for "zones" of blood gas values
where clinical disturbances tend to fall. This gives a 95% level of certainty about mixed disorders and compensation. At the bedside
however, you're on your own.
Whenever you diagnose a respiratory cause for an acid-base abnormality, with metabolic compensation, consider whether the
abnormal bicarbonate could be a “leftover” or separate metabolic abnormality of the opposite type.
For example, in aspirin poisoning, both metabolic acidosis and respiratory alkalosis occur as a result of the aspirin. Depending on
whether the pH happens to be above or below 7.4 at the moment, you might incorrectly call it a “compensated respiratory alkalosis” or
a “compensated metabolic acidosis.” Always consider the clinical history. Then you can correctly decide whether a “compensation” is
really compensation, or a separate abnormality.
Like most everything else in medicine, blood gas interpretation requires a consideration of the patient history and your
examination findings. Let's review our completed "bedside" algorithm.
Metabolic Acidosis
Example:
pH = 7.21 PaCO2 = 40 HCO3 = 15.6
Go to Index.
Metabolic Alkalosis
Example:
pH = 7.51 PaCO2 = 39 HCO3 = 30.4
Example:
pH = 7.45 PaCO2 = 46 HCO3 = 31.2
Go to Index.
Respiratory Acidosis
Example:
pH = 7.21 PaCO2 = 55 HCO3 = 22
Example:
pH = 7.34 PaCO2 = 56 HCO3 = 29.5
Go to Index.
Respiratory Alkalosis
Example:
pH = 7.46 PaCO2 = 22 HCO3 = 15.3
Go to Index.
The treatment of respiratory acidosis isn’t difficult — in theory. All you have to do is increase the ventilation of the lungs. This
removes carbon dioxide from the blood stream, raising the pH. The increase in ventilation may be easy in the intubated cardiac arrest
or drug OD patient. Just turn up the ventilator, or tell the “bagger” to bag a little faster and deeper.
In the conscious patient with severe asthma or pulmonary edema, a decision must be made whether to await results from
conservative therapy, or to take control the airway through intubation and assisted ventilation. (This decision, in practice, is based
more on “gestault” of the clinical picture rather than on the level of carbon dioxide.) You either improve air motion with drugs, or
force better air motion with an artificial airway.
In a patient with poor gas exchange due to intrapulmonary causes — that is, disease within the lung itself — increasing ventilatory
rate and depth may be only marginally helpful. In this case, only improvement of the disease process will help.
Some cases of carbon dioxide retention are better untreated. For example, consider this patient with CHF and emphysema:
pH = 7.32 PaCO2 = 78 HCO3 = 39.3 PaO2 = 43
Review of past hospital records consistantly shows a CO2 around 70 at discharge. This patient has a chronic (compensated)
respiratory acidosis. Trying to “normalize” this patient’s blood gases would be dangerous. And even if you succeeded, once the patient
was breathing on his own he would retain CO2 again acutely, resulting in a severe acute respiratory acidosis of pH =7.1! If the patient
must be intubated, sufficient “dead space” must be provided within the ventilator tubing to keep the CO2 in the patient’s usual range.
Go to Index.
Mild cases of metabolic acidosis are best left alone. Usually no treatment is needed if the pH is above 7.1, and rarely is it needed if
the pH is above 7.2, although the patient’s level of discomfort and compensating hyperventilation must be considered.
Metabolic acidosis is treated with sodium bicarbonate, given intravenously. There is considerable question, however, how
beneficial acidosis treatment is for certain patients.
For the semi-comatose diabetic in ketoacidosis, there’s no question that bicarbonate will raise the serum pH. But as the acid is
neutralized in the blood, CO2 is formed (you remember the chemical reaction). The increase in pH decreases respiratory drive, which
slows the elimination of this extra carbon dioxide. The CO2 diffuses into the cerebrospinal fluid, causing a paradoxical lowing of pH
around the brain, with deepening of coma. The moral: give bicarb slowly and maintain the hyperventilatory state, even if bag-valve
assist or intubation is required.
For the patient in cardiac arrest, raising the pH hasn’t been shown to improve the ultimate outcome. And alkalosis caused by too
much bicarbonate is positively deadly for the arrest victim. On the other hand, since the American Heart Association changed its
standards to eliminate the routine use of bicarbonate, I’m seeing a lot of arrested patients from the field with pHs of 6.9 — which may
lengthen the “code time” if there's pulseless electrical activity because the patient can’t be declared dead until he's both “warm and
dead” and “acid-base normal and still dead.” For now, treat the cardiac arrest patient with bicarbonate only based on proven need by
blood gases.
Bicarbonate dosage recommendations vary widely — most sources recommend from 0.1 to 0.3 times the weight of the patient in
kilograms times the (negative) base excess (BE) expressed in milliequivalents per liter. In my experience, 0.2 x weight x BE is about
right for the typical patient. The calculated result of this formula will have units of milliequivalents — the number you calculate is the
dose in milliequivalents.
However, the recommendation I’ll give to you (and the formula given in both the Blood Gases disk and the ACLS training
software) is based on the more conservative recommendation of the American College of Emergency Physician’s textbook. This
formula is 0.1 x weight x BE. The minus sign on the base excess is ignored.
Bicarb = 0.1 x wt x BE
After giving bicarbonate, a repeat blood gas analysis should be performed (after a couple of minutes to “blow off” the CO2 that is
formed). Often, an additional dose must be given. If you decide that use of bicarbonate is needed in a situation where blood gases are
NOT available, for example with a tricyclic overdose or diabetic patient in coma far from a hospital, you need a reasonable way of
calculating an empiric dosage.
In this situation, give the patient one mEq for every kilogram of body weight:
In the cardiac arrest victim, a continuing dosage may be necessary IF BLOOD GASES ARE NOT AVAILABLE. This dose is 1/2
mEq per kilogram every 10 minutes. However, you’ll probably never use this 1) because you should be getting blood gases, and 2)
because if your CPR is so ineffective that acid continues to build up at that rate you’ll never save the patient anyway. The final words
on bicarbonate therapy are: Have a good reason for using it, be aware of its problems and complications, and monitor your therapy
with repeat blood gas analysis.