A RECOMMENDED JOURNAL CLUB FORMAT (From Dr.
Deb Grady, UCSF)
I. Background, Context, & Motivation II. Research Question III. Design (E.g., prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel, captopril-controlled clinical trial) IV. Subjects A. Inclusion criteria B. Exclusion criteria C. Sampling (number of centers, etc.) V. Measurements A. Predictor variables B. Outcomes (including primary, secondary, others) VI. Follow-up How often and how long VII. Analysis (Eg, logistic regression; intent-to-treat) VIII. Findings Tables, graphs Highlight key results * * * * * * * *
The following classic guidelines are from the JAMA series on Users Guides to the Medical Literature. References:
Oxman AD et al. Users guides to the medical literature: I: How to get started. JAMA 1993;270(17):2093-2095. Guyatt GH et al. Users guides to the medical literature: II: How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A: Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 1993;270(21):2598-2601. Guyatt GH et al. Users guides to the medical literature: II: How to use an article about therapy or prevention. B: What were the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 1994;271(1):59-63.
Jaeschke R et al. Users guides to the medical literature: III: How to use an article about a diagnostic test: A: Are the results of the test valid? JAMA 1994;271(5):389-391. Jaeschke R et al. Users guides to the medical literature: III: How to use an article about a diagnostic test: B: What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? JAMA 1994;271(9):703-707. Levine M et al. Users guides to the medical literature: IV: How to use an article about harm. JAMA 1994;271(20):1615-1619. Laupacis A et al. Users guides to the medical literature: V: How to use an article about prognosis. JAMA 1994;272(3):234-237.
Readers Guides for an Article About Therapy Are the results of the study valid? o Was the assignment of patients to treatments randomized? o Were all pts who entered the trial properly accounted for and attributed at its conclusion? Was follow-up complete? Were pts analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized? o Were patients, health workers, and study personnel blind to treatment? o Were the groups similar at the start of the trial? o Aside from the experimental intervention, were the groups treated equally? What were the results? o How large was the treatment effect? o How precise was the estimate of the treatment effect? Will the results help me in caring for my patients? o Can the results be applied to my patient care? o Were all clinically important outcomes considered? o Are the likely treatment benefits worth the potential harms and costs? Evaluating and Applying the Results of Studies of Diagnostic Tests Are the results of the study valid? o Was there an independent, blind comparison with a reference standard? o Did the patient sample include an appropriate spectrum of patients to whom the diagnostic test will be applied in clinical practice? o Did the results of the test being evaluated influence the decision to perform the reference standard? o Were the methods for performing the test described in sufficient detail to permit replication? What were the results? o Are likelihood ratios for the test presented or data necessary for their calculation provided? Will the results help me in caring for my patients?
o Will the reproducibility of the test result and its interpretation be satisfactory in my setting? o Are the results applicable to my patient? o Will the results change my management? o Will patients be better off as a result of the test? Users Guides to an Article About Harm Are the results of the study valid? o Were there clearly identified comparison groups that were similar with respect to important determinants of outcome, other than the one of interest? o Were the outcomes and exposures measured in the same way in the groups being compared? o Was follow-up sufficiently long and complete? o Is the temporal relationship correct? o Is there a dose-response gradient? What are the results? o How strong is the association between exposure and outcome? o How precise is the estimate of risk? Will the results help me in caring for my patients? o Are the results applicable to my practice? o What is the magnitude of the risk? o Should I attempt to stop the exposure? Users Guides to an Article About Prognosis Are the results of the study valid? o Was there a representative and well-defined sample of patients at a similar point in the course of the disease? o Was follow-up sufficiently long and complete? o Were objective and unbiased outcome criteria used? o Was there adjustment for important prognostic factors? What are the results? o How large is the likelihood of the outcome event(s) in a specified period of time? o How precise are the estimates of the likelihood? Will the results help me in caring for my patients? o Were the study patients similar to my own? o Will the results lead directly to selecting or avoiding therapy? o Are the results useful for reassuring or counseling patients?
