Ultra Wide Band
Ultra Wide Band
Introduction
What is UWB?
Now picture the same guy watering his lawn with a swiveling sprinkler that
shoots many, fast, short pulses of water. That's typically what UWB is like:
millions of very short, very fast, precisely timed bursts or pulses of energy,
measured in nanoseconds and covering a very wide area. By varying the pulse
timing according to a complex code, a pulse can represent either a zero or a
one: the basis of digital communications.
ULTRA-WIDEBAND OPERATION
This part sets out the regulations for unlicensed ultra-wideband transmission
systems.
Definitions.
(a) UWB Bandwidth. For the purpose of this subpart, the UWB bandwidth is
the frequency band bounded by the points that are 10 dB below the highest
radiated emission, as based on the complete transmission system including the
antenna. The upper boundary is designated fH and the lower boundary is
designated fL. The frequency at which the highest radiated emission occurs is
designated fM.
(b) Center frequency. The center frequency, fC, equals (fH + fL)/2.
(c) Fractional bandwidth. The fractional bandwidth equals 2(fH - fL)/ (fH + fL).
(f) Ground penetrating radar (GPR) system. A field disturbance sensor that is
designed to operate only when in contact with, or within one meter of, the
ground for the purpose of detecting or obtaining the images of buried objects or
determining the physical properties within the ground. The energy from the
GPR is intentionally directed down into the ground for this purpose.
(h) Wall imaging system. A field disturbance sensor that is designed to detect
the location of objects contained within a “wall” or to determine the physical
properties within the “wall.” The “wall” is a concrete structure, the side of a
bridge, the wall of a mine or another physical structure that is dense enough
and thick enough to absorb the majority of the signal transmitted by the imaging
system. This category of equipment does not include products such as “stud
locators” that are designed to locate objects behind gypsum, plaster or similar
walls that are not capable of absorbing the transmitted signal.
(k) EIRP. Equivalent isotropically radiated power, i.e., the product of the power
supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an
isotropic antenna. The EIRP, in terms of dBm, can be converted to a field
strength, in dBuV/m at 3 meters, by adding 95.2. As used in this subpart, EIRP
refers to the highest signal strength measured in any direction and at any
frequency from the UWB device.
(l) Law enforcement, fire and emergency rescue organizations. As used in this
subpart, this refers to those parties eligible to obtain a license from the FCC
under the eligibility requirements specified.
(m) Hand held. As used in this subpart, a hand held device is a portable
device, such as a lap top computer or a PDA, that is primarily hand held while
being operated and that does not employ a fixed infrastructure.
The concepts of communication and computation are so close that their tight
connection is obvious even for PR departments of major IT companies. Quite
often it makes no sense to separate these concepts. Today, speaking about
growing power of computing devices we imply both growing performance of
their processors and growing throughput of their communication channels. The
communication channels include internal:
• caches
• system buses
• memory interfaces
• interfaces of storage devices
...and external:
• interfaces of peripherals
• wireless network channels
• wired network channels
structures of data transfer.
Internal wired channels are switching over from specialized parallel interfaces
to high-level serial packet interface (Serial ATA, 3GIO/PCI Express, Hyper
Transport). It fosters a convergence of external and internal communication
technologies: in future separate components of a computer case will be
combined into a normal network. It's quite a logical solution - a modern chipset,
thus, works as a network switch equipped with multiple interfaces such as a
DDR memory bus or a processor bus and AGP/PCI.
Wireless channels are just at the formation stage now in terms of the range of
applications. Today they can be used effectively only for a small part of
communication tasks, including the most important problem of developing a
global network infrastructure. Wireless technologies are only partially suitable
for local communications, first of all, because of a low throughput. At present,
there are two prevailing wireless standards:
The BlueTooth and its followers will free your workplace from cables replacing
them with multiple low-speed peripheral interfaces (keyboard, mouse,
undemanding scanner or printer, IrDA). The 802 standard will play a role of the
"last network interface" connecting the infrastructure and end access points.
The first type of the 802 standard has a high throughput, over 50 Mbit, and is
primarily meant for saturated and compact networks of enterprises and offices.
The base frequency (5 GHz) penetrates much worse into neighboring rooms
than 2.4 GHz of the 11Mbit standard. The 802.11b standard is a match for
home and various residential and public structures such as airports, cafes,
cinemas, trade houses.
At first glance, it's impossible to combine these requirements in the near future.
However:
can entirely change the wireless picture in the near future. The diagram given
below demonstrates the basic principle of the UWB:
The UWB is above and the traditional modulation is below which is called here
Narrow Band (NB), as opposed to the Ultra Wideband. On the left we can see a
signal on the time axis and on the right there is its frequency spectrum, i.e.
energy distribution in the frequency band. The most modern standards of data
transmission are NB standards - all of them work within a quite narrow
frequency band allowing for just small deviations from the base (or carrier)
frequency. Below on the right you can see a spectral energy distribution of a
typical 802.11b transmitter. It has a very narrow (80 MHz for one channel)
dedicated spectral band with the reference frequency of 2.4 GHz. Within this
narrow band the transmitter emits a considerable amount of energy necessary
for the following reliable reception within the designed range of distance (100 m
for the 802.11b). The range is strictly defined by FCC and other regulatory
bodies and requires licensing. Data are encoded and transferred using the
Now take a look at the UWB - here the traditional approach is turned upside
down. In the time space the transmitter emits short pulses of a special form
which distributes all the energy of the pulse within the given, quite wide,
spectral range (approximately from 3 GHz to 10 GHz). Data, in their turn, are
encoded with polarity and mutual positions of pulses. With much total power
delivered into the air and, therefore, a long distance of the reliable reception,
the UWB signal doesn't exceed an extremely low value (much lower than that of
the NB signals) in each given spectrum point (i.e. in each definite licensed
frequency band). As a result, according to the respective FCC regulation, such
signal becomes allowable although it also takes spectral parts used for other
purposes:
So, the most part of energy of the UWB signal falls into the frequency range
from 3.1 to 10.6 GHz. Below 3.1 GHz the signal almost disappears. The more
ideal the form of a pulse formed with the transmitter, the less the energy goes
out of the main range. The spectral range lower than 3.1 GHz is avoided not to
create problems for GPS systems. However, UWB is accurate to within 10
centimeters -- much better than the Global Positioning System satellites and
because it spans the entire frequency spectrum (licensed and unlicensed), it
can be used indoors and underground, unlike GPS. UWB could replace
communications of all types, ending forever our dependence on wires and
making worthless the ownership of radio frequencies.
The total energy of the transmitter which can fit into this band is defined by the
area of the spectral characteristic (see filled zones on the previous picture). In
case of the UWB it's much greater compared to the traditional NB signals such
as 802.11b or 802.11a. So, with the UWB we can send data for longer
distances, or send more data, especially if there are a lot of simultaneously
working devices located close to each other. Here is a diagram with the
designed maximum density of data transferred per square meter:
Density of transferred data able to coexist on the same square meter is much
higher for the UWB compared to the popular NB standards. That is, it will be
possible to use the UWB for the intrasystem communication or even for an
interchip communication within one device!
The UWB actually tries to solve the problem of inefficient spectrum utilization,
like the Hyper Threading solves the problem of idle time of functional processor
units. Frequency bands dedicated for different services remain unused for the
most part of time - even in a very dense city environment - at each given point
of time the most part of the spectrum is not used, that is why the radio spectrum
is used irrationally:
1. Most frequencies are not used all the time. That is a low frequency
effectiveness of the spectrum utilization.
2. Guard channels necessary for NB modulations (gaps between channels
to eliminate pickups). That is a low frequency effectiveness of the
spectrum utilization.
3. Excessive and, as a rule, uncontrolled power of transmission (and,
therefore, transmission range) of signals even if a distance is quite short.
That is a low spatial effectiveness of the spectrum utilization.
In case of the NB a frequency and width of the dedicated spectral range for the
most part (though the real situation is much more complicated) defines a
bandwidth of the channel, and the transmitter's power defines a distance range.
But in the UWB these two concepts interwine and we can distribute our
capabilities between the distance range and bandwidth. Thus, at small
distances, for example, in case of an interchip communication, we can get huge
throughput levels without increasing the total transferred power and without
cluttering up the air, i.e. other devices are not impeded. Look at how the
throughput of data transferred in the UWB modulation depends on distance:
One more interesting aspect of the UWB comes from radio location (where
wideband technologies were most often used before): a potential possibility to
create networks able to define geometrical positions of objects. It requires sets
(grids) of antennae which are very easy to make for the UWB. It can be very
useful for addressing objects - just imagine a universal control radio console
which knows which device it is aimed at the given moment. One more
application is creation of a dynamic antenna directivity diagram to improve
reception of signals from a definite device, ignoring signals from others. This
approach is going to improve even more the spatial effectiveness of the air
utilization.
The first standards and products based on the UWB will be available in 2005.
Channel
Distance range, m Frequency Throughput
width
Up to 50 (at 3.1 to 10.6 Hundreds of
UWB The same
present) GHz Mbit
802.11b 100 2.4 GHz 80 MHz Up to 11 Mbit
802.11a 50 5 GHz 200 MHz Up to 54 Mbit
BlueTooth 10 2.4 GHz Up to 1 Mbit
C =B (log (1+S/N))/log2
Where:
C = Max Channel Capacity
(bits/sec)
B = Channel Bandwidth (Hz)
S = Signal Power (watts)
N = Noise Power (watts)
C grows linearly with B,
but only logarithmically
with S/N. Since B is very high C also become very high.
Its significance lies in the fact that it transmits several times the data possible
over current wireless technologies, using very low levels of power (in the order
of a few milliwatts). Current UWB devices can transmit data up to 100 Mbps,
compared to the 1 Mbps of Bluetooth and the 11 Mbps of 802.11b. It’s expected
to reach around 500 Mbps by 2004. Also, this low power pulse can penetrate
obstacles like doors, walls, metal etc, and suffers little or no interference from
other narrow band frequencies. Hence, it is useful in densely built-up areas. It
doesn’t require allocation of ‘precious’ or ‘paid for’ narrow-band spectrum, in
use now. Supporters of UWB say that its electro-magnetic noise is only as
much as that of a hair dryer or electric fan, and it doesn’t interfere with or
hamper other RFs. Best of all, it costs a fraction of current technologies like
Blue-tooth, WLANs and Wi-Fi.
Back to basics
To understand UWB, we’ll first look at radio communication and how data is
transmitted traditionally. All of us have dropped pebbles in a water pool at some
point in our lives. Remember the ripples traveling outwards from the point
where the pebble enters the water up to the boundary?
Normal radio waves are sine waves or smoothly fluctuating waves like these
ripples. Traditionally, radio communications stay within the allocated frequency
band. We normally use a carrier wave to transmit data. The carrier wave is
imprinted with data by modulating any of the following— amplitude, frequency
or phase of the carrier wave. Three common ways of modulating a sine wave
are AM (Amplitude Modulation), FM (Frequency Modulation) and PM (Pulse
Modulation). Refer to the above diagrams to understand how radio waves
transmit data).
What happens when you listen to news from an AM radio station, say an All
India Radio medium wave station? The sine wave of the announcer’s voice is
combined with the transmitter’s sine wave (carrier wave) to vary its amplitude,
and then transmitted. In AM, the amplitude of the sine wave or rather its peak-
to-peak voltage changes. FM stations and other wireless technologies including
cordless phones, cell phones and WLANs use FM, where based on the
information signal, the transmitter’s sine wave frequency changes slightly. In
PM, the carrier or sine wave is turned on and off to send data. In its simplest
form, it can be a kind of Morse code. (See diagrams for a basic idea of how
narrow-band communications work). The receiver in each case is specially
tuned to decode information in the carrier wave.
Usage of a carrier wave within a narrow band effectively means limiting amount
of data that can be imprinted on to it. Hence the importance of UWB.
Inner workings
Now, visualize what happens when you heave a large rock into a small pond. It
splashes out the water in one go (as seen with our naked eyes). If captured as
a still photo, we’ll see the millions of water droplets that splash out in a fraction
of a second and make the splash we see. If ripples are like normal transmission
of data between wireless devices (as in blue-tooth or Wi-Fi), UWB promises to
be the ‘huge rock’ in data transmission. Through several million monocycles, it
uses a wide range of frequencies to transmit large amounts of data in one go.
Only a receiver specifically tuned to the transmitter can receive transmitted
data. Hence, it is a comparatively more secure channel for data transmission.
Moreover, by using some amount of modulation, sharp spiking and subsequent
noise interference with other narrow band devices are reduced to minimal
levels. Any other device into whose band UWB pulses might spill over, will at
most, feel it as background noise as energy levels of the pulse are low.
• For one thing, because UWB pulses don't actually use a traditional radio
signal, called a carrier, UWB transmissions don't take up any of the radio
spectrum. Spectrum is limited, and demand for it is growing fast. That's
one reason for the FCC interest: UWB would allow a whole new class,
and volume, of voice and data communications that, in effect, wouldn't
take up any more "space" in the crowded radio spectrum.
• Second, and partly as a result of the fact that UWB doesn't use a
traditional radio signal, UWB transmitters and receivers will be much
simpler to build, run and maintain than those in use today. For UWB, you
don't need complex radio frequency converters and modulators. We only
need a digital method to construct the pulses and modulate them. This
can all go on a single chip. One vendor already does this on a chip the
size of a penny.
• Third, because UWB operates in the electronic "noise" area of the
spectrum, it requires little power. These systems can use 50 to 70
milliwatts of power.That is one ten-thousandth the power of a cell phone.
The low power limits the range, but there are features of pulse
transmission and some tuning techniques that can, in effect, extend or
maintain the range.
• In addition, low power and the characteristic wide spread of the pulses
means the pulses don't use up already crowded chunks of the radio
spectrum, today occupied by 802.11b wireless LANs and Bluetooth
devices.
• Despite the low power, UWB also has greater capacity - higher
bandwidth for more users - compared with these other technologies.
Time Domain began testing its just-fabricated, second-generation UWB
chipset using silicon germanium technology created by IBM. The new
chipset can reach 40M bit/sec, compared with just 2.5M bit/sec for the
first chipset two years ago. Another start-up, Fantasma Networks, which
Pulse-Link acquired , claims to have reached 60M bit/sec.
Pulse signalling was first applied in radar, hence you will find similar attributes
such as object location and transmission security in a UWB system. A UWB
system communicates with very low power signals. This means that highly
portable and feature-rich wireless devices can be developed. For example, a
UWB device the size of a twenty-cent coin may be able to sense a person
behind a thin wall or detect water-level in a tank and send that information back.
In the near future, it is not unusual to find a person carrying a wireless device to
connect him wirelessly to various data sources and destinations, be it video,
audio, Internet, dumb or smart appliances. There isn't a method today that will
do all that efficiently and economically. The UWB method is ideal. Built with the
simplicity and robustness of the CellonicsTM technology, it becomes an even
more attractive solution.
Indeed, with UWB, a high-speed WPAN with smart appliances can become a
reality. Current Wireless LAN and Bluetooth solutions are limited and complex.
A UWB wireless network may carry speeds from 100 Mbps to 500 Mbps easily.
Devices in this network can be sentient, sending critical status information back
to a user.
There is also a CellonicsTM UWB Wireless Audio Demo System , this 11.4-
Mbps/50-microwatt system employs the simplest CellonicsTM transmitter
design - just two basic electronic components. The transmitter is also unique in
its Frequency Translation ability.
In recent months, UWB technology has garnered much interest and attention.
The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) of the United States allowed
the user of UWB will encourage greater development of UWB systems for real-
world application. Already, reports are coming out highlighting UWB
deployment in near-car avoidance, in search and rescue operations, and in
secure field military communications. More and more applications are expected
to find UWB wireless expression in the near future. The breakthrough
CellonicsTM UWB method can bring this about quickly. With it, the next
generation wireless technology is no longer a remote aspiration promising
'wireless everywhere', but is here now for serious consideration.
that such a scenario can be realised simply and at speed. In the past, no single
method and technology could allow that. Today, we show that it is possible.
This opens up a whole new game plan for the Wireless Communications
industry. The future of wireless is indeed here.
APPLICATIONS
1) Communications Applications
2) Positioning Applications
UWB devices can be used to measure both distance and position. UWB
positioning systems could provide real time indoor and outdoor precision
tracking for many applications. Some potential uses include locator beacons for
emergency services and mobile inventory, personnel and asset tracking for
increased safety and security, and precision navigation capabilities for vehicles
and industrial and agricultural equipment.
3) Radar Applications
UWB technology has been used for some time in Ground Penetrating Radar
(GPR) applications and is now being developed for new types of imaging
systems that would enable police, fire and rescue personnel to locate persons
hidden behind a wall or under debris in crises or rescue situations. UWB
imaging devices also could be used to improve the safety of the construction
and home repair industries by locating steel reinforcement bars (i.e., re-bar) in
concrete, or wall studs, electrical wiring and pipes hidden inside walls. UWB
devices could improve automotive safety with collision avoidance systems and
air bag proximity measurement for safe deployment. Potential medical uses
include the development of a mattress-installed breathing monitor to guard
against Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and heart monitors that measure the
heart's actual contractions. Some potential home safety uses include intrusion
detection systems that are less susceptible to false alarms, and space heaters
that turn themselves off when a child comes nearby.
Other applications
ADVANTAGES
Apart from low-power usage, inherent security and minimal noise generation,
UWB doesn’t suffer from multi-path interference (where signals reach the
receiver after traveling through two or more paths). Something similar happens
when your car is at an intersection surrounded by tall buildings. Your radio
might not give a clear reception as it’s receiving both direct signals and those
that have bounced off the buildings. Often, the static disappears when you
In many ways, UWB is the successor to spread spectrum radio, a World War II
technology for splitting a broadcast among many radio frequencies to avoid
jamming. Spread spectrum, which was patented in 1942 by actress Hedy
Lamar and composer George Antheil (I am not making this up), operates today
in every mobile phone. But where spread spectrum used just a few dozen
frequencies and used them one at a time, UWB uses every frequency there is,
and uses them all at the same time, which means the data-carrying capacity of
UWB is enormous.
A UWB phone uses so little power it can remain on for weeks without
recharging. And UWB will ultimately be cheaper to make than conventional
radios since it is built entirely of commercial grade computer chips and requires
no tuning.
Among the most important advantages of UWB technology, however, are those
of low system complexity and low cost. UWB systems can be made nearly "all-
digital", with minimal RF or microwave electronics. Because of the inherent RF
simplicity of UWB designs, these systems are highly frequency adaptive,
enabling them to be positioned anywhere within the RF spectrum. This feature
avoids interference to existing services, while fully utilizing the available
spectrum.
DISADVANTAGES
As with any technology, there are always applications that may be better served
by other approaches. For example, for extremely high data rate (10’s of
Gigabits/second and higher), point-to-point or point-to-multipoint applications, it
is difficult today for UWB systems to compete with high capacity optical fiber or
optical wireless communications systems. Of course, the high cost associated
with optical fiber installation and the inability of an optical wireless signal to
penetrate a wall dramatically limit the applicability of optically-based systems for
in-home or in-building applications. In addition, optical wireless systems have
extremely precise pointing requirements, obviating their use in mobile
environments.
UWB is an RF wireless technology, and as such is still subject to the same laws
of physics as every other RF technology. Thus, there are obvious tradeoffs to
be made in signal-to-noise ratio versus bandwidth, range versus peak and
average power levels, etc.
Basic transceiver functions can be provided with a simple circuit in UWB, so the
key will be slashing costs for the above four points.
CONCLUSION
The U.S. Navy, plans to put a UWB location marker on almost everything it
ships overseas, just to keep track of all the stuff and keep it from being stolen.
UWB products will probably begin to hit the market in the next 18 to 24 months.
In addition to radios, these products will include radar and electronic positioning
devices.
The bottom line is that the FCC's move to make more unlicensed spectrum
available is proving to be a huge success for the wireless industry and for
consumers. The latest entrant, UWB, is entering an industry and market
dramatically matured through the experience of its predecessors Bluetooth and
WiFi. If UWB proponents can quickly knock out the issues of standards and
interoperability it will allow the powerful forces of Moore's law and economies of
scale to start their work early bringing consumers cost effective products within
a few short years from today. If the industry has learned from its past mistakes
and it looks like it has, UWB is poised for dramatic growth and success in a way
not witnessed before for any wireless technology.
The first standards and products based on the UWB will be available in 2005.
BIBILOGRAPHY
• www.PcQuest.com
• www.uwb.com
• www.Tech-online.com
• www.digit-life.com
ABSTRACT
CONTENTS
1) INTRODUCTION
What is UWB?
2) ULTRA WIDE BAND OPERATIONS
Definitions
3) ULTRA WIDE BAND – WIRELESS DATA TRANSFER TECHNOLOGY
UWB
4) Why is UWB so Effective?
5) ULTRA WIDE BAND IS ULTRA FAST
Back to basics
Inner workings
6) IMPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENCE IN THE TRANSMISSION
METHOD
7) CELLONICS INCORPORATED DEMONSTRATES UWB AS A NEXT
GENERATION WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY
8) APPLICATIONS
Communication applications
Positioning applications
Radar applications
Other applications
9) ADVANTAGES
10) DISADVANTAGES
11) KEY ISSUES OF UWB
12) UWB CHIPset company
13) CONCLUSION
14) BIBILOGRAPHY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Nisheena.T.I