Research on Humanities and Social Sciences                                                                                                                                    www.iiste.
org 
ISSN (Paper)2224-5766 ISSN (Online)2225-0484 (Online) 
Vol.4, No.17, 2014 
 
144 
Crime and Choice of Residence in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria: A 
Non-Parametric Analysis 
 
Uloma Jiburum
1*  
 Harold Chike Mba
2
   Josephine U. Ezeamama
3
 
1  Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, 
2  Centre for Environmental Management and Control, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus 
3  Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus 
*E-mail: [email protected] 
Abstract  
Urban residential patterns are influenced by individual and family choices and preferences of housing locations.  
The  economic,  socio-cultural  and  physical  environmental  features  of  urban  residential  pattern  may  have  some 
implication  for type and rate  of occurrence of crime and the reaction of residents to  it as regards to  where they 
choose to live.  This study investigates the effect crime has on households choice of residential location decision 
in  Enugu.    Crime  data  from  Nigerian    police  record  and  400  questionnaires  distributed  to  residents  of  Enugu 
were  used  for  the  study.    This  study  showed  that  crime  incidence  is  lowest  in  the  medium  density 
neighbourhoods  of  Enugu.    Crime  rate,  rent  and  income  are  the  major  factors  considered  by  households  while 
taking  decision  on  residential  location  in  Enugu.    The  study  also  showed  that  awareness  of  crime  in 
neighbourhood is associated with household choice of place of residence.  Crime rates need to be reduced in all 
neighbourhoods to ensure even development of the urban space. 
Key words: crime, crime rate, crime occurrence, residential choice 
 
1. Introduction 
Nigerian  cities  are  witnessing  an  upsurge  in  crime.  Crime  and  insecurity  are  among  the  factors  that  threaten 
quality of life and social and economic stability.  Crime does not allow for sustainable development.  Crime has 
been  referred  to  as  a  violation  of  criminal  law  which  its  formal  penalties  are  applied  by  some  government 
authority.    It  also  offends  the  morality  of  society,  or  violates  the  divine  law.    Nigerian    newspapers  report  one 
form  of  crime  occurrence  or  another  on  a  daily  basis.        According  to  Ahmed  (2012),  crime  occurrence  in 
Nigerian cities have shifted from simple crime such as stealing, burglary, rape etc to more sophisticated crime of 
terrorism, kidnapping, child trafficking etc.  The environmental, social health and economic ramifications of this 
situation in our cities have tremendous impact on urban economy and security (Ogboi 2009).   
It is assumed that high level of crime in a neighbourhood could constitute an obstacle to the development of that 
area.  This may be because of the fear of crime which also may increase the rate of uneven development within 
and  between  the  area  and  other  areas.  This  seriously  undermines  development  efforts  of  both  governments 
(Federal, State and Local) and individuals.  The situation  may equally result to increasing residential relocation 
and decreasing neighbourhood satisfaction.  This will adversely affect neighbourhood development. 
Urban  residential  patterns  are  influenced  by  individual  and  family  choices  and  preferences  of  housing  needs, 
finance capabilities and existing  housing  market  manipulations. The various socio-economic, socio-cultural and 
physical  environmental  features  of  urban  residential  pattern  may  have  some  implications  for  and  impact  on  the 
types as well as the rate of occurrence of crime and the reaction of residents to it as regards to where they choose 
to  live.    Studies  have  been  carried  out  on  the  relationship  between  crime  and  choice  of  residential  location  in 
developed  countries  (Cullen  and  Levitte  1992;  Taylor  1994;    Moreoff  and  Samson  1997;  Jargowsky  and 
Yoonhwan 2009 ).  In Nigeria, little or no effort has been made in this direction.   Existing studies are on crime 
rate  and  the  effect  of  crime  on  property  value  (Ekpeyong  1989;  Afon  2001;  Otu  2010  )  and  patterns  of  violent 
crime  in  urban  areas  (Agbola  1997  and  Ahmed  2012).    Enugu  the  capital  of  Enugu  state  in  Nigeria  has  been 
experiencing  rise  in  crime.    This  study  investigates  the  effect  crime  might  have  on  households  choice  of 
residential  location  decision  in  Enugu.    This  is  done  by  obtaining  the  incidence  of  different  crimes  within  the 
city.    The  study  also  used  non  parametric  analysis  to  ascertain  the  relationship  between  crime  and  choice  of 
residence and the type of crime that most influence this decision. 
 
2.  Methodology  
This research was carried out in Enugu a city with an estimated population of 787196.  It is located in the south 
eastern  part  of  Nigeria  about  200  kilometers  from  the  Atlantic  coast.        It  occupies  about  90  square  kilometers.   
Enugu  is  the  oldest  city  in  south  eastern  Nigeria.    It  represents  a  typical  example  of  a  rapidly  growing  state 
capital in Nigeria.  It is an administrative town with a high population of literate residents.  Residential land use 
takes the lion share of existing land use in the city.       
The  research  was  carried  out  using  survey  method.    Both  primary  and  secondary  data  were  utilized  in  the 
research.    Secondary  data  was  collected  from  the  State  Police  Headquarters  Enugu  (Criminal  Investigation 
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences                                                                                                                                    www.iiste.org 
ISSN (Paper)2224-5766 ISSN (Online)2225-0484 (Online) 
Vol.4, No.17, 2014 
 
145 
Department).    Data  collected  from  this  source  covered  2000  to  2011,  a  period  of  twelve  years.    Criminal  data 
from  this  source  was  categorized  into  two;  offences  against  persons  and  offences  against  property.    Offences 
against persons consists of crime such as murder, assault, rape and indecent assault, kidnapping  etc, while crime 
against  property  includes  armed  robbery,  theft  and  other  forms  of  stealing,  burglary,  housing  breaking,  arson, 
etc. 
A questionnaire with 28 questions was distributed to selected neighbourhoods in Enugu.  The questionnaire was 
designed  to  elicit  information  from  respondents  on  crime  and  its  influence  on  choice  of  residential  location.  
Neighbourhoods  were  first  stratified  according  to  housing  density  (low,  medium  and  high).    Four  high,  two 
medium  and  two  low  density  neighbourhoods  were  randomly  selected  from  the  list  (50%).    Three  streets  were 
also  randomly  picked  from  each  selected  neighbourhood.   A  total  of  440  questionnaires  were  distributed  in  the 
selected streets as follows:  Two hundred and thirty  questionnaires in the high density, one hundred and forty in 
the  medium  and  seventy  in  the  low  density  neighbourhoods.    The  number  distributed  was  based  on  household 
population  in  each  density.    Out  of  the  440  questionnaires  distributed  in  the  city,  300  were  used  for  the  study 
(143, 107 and 50 for the high, medium and low density areas respectively).  Data collected was analyzed, using 
descriptive  statistics  (mean  and  standard  deviation).    Chi  square  was  used  to  assess  the  relationship  between 
types  of  crime  that  occurs  in  a  neighbourhood  and  choice  of  residence.  These  were  done  using  SPSS  15.0 
version 
 
3.  Results and Discussion 
Table 1. and fig. 1 shows descriptive statistics and graphical representation of major crimes in Enugu from 2000 
to  2011.    The  table  shows  that  offence  against  persons  (assault)  had  the  highest  occurrence  peaking  in  2003 
(437cases) with a mean of 380, standard deviation of 51.  Theft and other stealing had the highest occurrence for 
crime against property for the 12 years with a peak in 2004 (387cases), mean of 336.33 and standard deviation of 
60.47.   Crime of kidnap has  been on the increase in the last 12 years under study.  The low density areas have 
the  highest  incidence  of  kidnap.    This  may  be  as  a  result  of  high  ransom  paid  before  each  kidnapped  victim  is 
released  thus  making  kidnapping  lucrative.    That  may  be  the  reason  why  kidnap  is  one  of  the  crimes  feared  by 
low density residents as shown on table 6.  
 
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of some crime incidence in Enugu from 2000 to 2011. 
 
Descriptive Statistics
12   23   52   425   35.42   9.100
12   288   437   4570   380.83   51.849
12   18   31   298   24.83   4.840
12   0   39   71   5.92   10.723
12   61   84   902   75.17   8.505
12   36   66   612   51.00   10.583
12   200   387   4036   336.33   60.471
12   49   84   833   69.42   12.573
12   43   76   770   64.17   9.360
12   2   5   42   3.50   1.000
12   59   82   876   73.00   7.471
12
Murder
Assault
Rape
Kidnapping
Other offences under
offences against persons
Armed robbery
Theft and other stealing
Burgery
Housebreaking
Arson
Other offences under
offences against property
Valid N (listwise)
N   Minimum   Maximum   Sum   Mean   Std. Deviation
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences                                                                                                                                    www.iiste.org 
ISSN (Paper)2224-5766 ISSN (Online)2225-0484 (Online) 
Vol.4, No.17, 2014 
 
146 
 
 
 The  economic  recession  in  the  country  might  have  led  to  increasing  incidence  of  robbery  cases  from  2007  to 
2011.  Armed robbery is usually  motivated by criminal intent to material acquisition.  According to Otu (2010) 
in  terms  of  number,  the  crime  problem  in  contemporary  Nigerian  society  is  primarily  a  problem  of  armed 
robbery.    Armed  robbery  in  Nigeria  is  an  imitated,  learned  and  borrowed  behavior,  embellished  by  learners 
within the constraints imposed by the socio-milieu. This may also explain the increase experienced in number of 
murder, burglary and house breaking cases within the same period.  All crime types under study occurred more 
in  the  high  density  areas  except  kidnapping.    This  agrees  with  other  studies  which  showed  that  crime  occurs 
more  in  areas  of  high  density,  overcrowding  and  economically  and  socially  marginalized  areas  (Stark  1987, 
Ludwing et al 2001, Willcox et al 2003).  Their studies also showed concentration of crime in the  high density 
areas.    This  is  consistent    with  the  findings  of  Freeman  et  al  (1996)    who  noted  that  crime  can  be  numerous  in 
high  density  areas  because    the  probability  of  being  caught  is  low  in  such  areas  and  criminals  creates  positive 
externalities  for  others  and  thereby  concentrate  in  such  localities.    Afon  (2001)  had  similar  results  in  llorin, 
Nigeria  where  crime  occurred  more  in  high  density  residential  areas.    He  found  particular  criminal  activities 
peculiar to certain densities.  This he attributed to the varying social and economic attributes of residents as well 
as  environmental  characteristics  of  the  residential  area.    Agbola    (1997)  also  noted  that  in    Lagos,  a  city  in 
Nigeria,  incidence  of burglary, armed robbery, street fighting, hooliganism and drug dealing were more in high 
density residential areas.  His study demonstrated that there are notable geographical variations in the pattern of 
crime location and that these variations differ with respect to type of crime.   Occurrence of some of the crime in 
Enugu is shown in Fig 1.   It can be seen that crime incidence is lowest in the medium density neighbourhoods as 
shown  in  Fig.  2.  This  is  consistent  with  the  findings  of  Erodogan  (2010)  who  found  crime  occurrence  to  be 
positively related to density.  Mukoro (1994) in contrast, reported high rates of violent crime in low and medium 
density areas of Lagos, Nigeria.  His interpretation was that areas where people with high socio-economic status 
resided recorded higher levels of violent crimes.  Closer analysis of his presentation, however, showed that this 
was not consistently so. 
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
N
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
t
i
m
e
s
Fig 1  Incidence of some crimes in Enugu 2000 to 2011
murder
rape
idnap
armed robber!
burger!
"ouse breaing
arson
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences                                                                                                                                    www.iiste.org 
ISSN (Paper)2224-5766 ISSN (Online)2225-0484 (Online) 
Vol.4, No.17, 2014 
 
147 
 
Source Police Headquarters Enugu (CID) 2012 
The socio economic status of  the respondents is shown on  Table 2.   Most of the respondents  had some formal 
education.  Only 6.3% of the respondents did not have any formal education. 
 
Table 2. Socio-economic status 
Marital status  Highest Education attained  Age of Respondent 
Single                  65 
Married              170 
Divorced              2 
Widowed              63 
Total                    300 
No formal Education   19 
Primary level                  32 
Secondary level             86 
Tertiary level                 140 
Above tertiary                 23 
Total                                300 
Below 30 years         85 
30  40 years             55 
41  50 years              77 
51  60 years              39 
Above 60 years          44 
Total                            300 
Source : Field survey 2012 
The  major  types  of  criminal  activities  that  respondents  have  experienced  directly  or  indirectly  are  kidnap, 
robbery, auto theft, burger, larceny and rape/assault.  Table 3. shows the views of residents on reasons for crime 
occurrence  in  their  neighbourhoods  and  the  urban  area.    Residents  in  all  the  densities  see  poverty  as  a  major 
reason  for  criminal  activities  in  Enugu.    For  the  medium  and  low  densities,  52.3%  and  50.6%  respectively 
consider  poverty  as  a  reason  while  37%  of  residents  in  the  high  density  areas  consider  poverty  as  reason.  
Negligence by government is seen as another reason by 25.5%, 24.7% and 23.3% of residents of high,  medium 
and  low  density  areas  respectively.    Inadequate  security  in  the  neighbourhoods  is  another    reason  by  9.4%, 
11.2% and 4.7% in the high medium and low density areas respectively.   Unemployment is considered a reason 
by 20.9%, 11.2% and 11.6% of residents in the high, medium and low density areas respectively.  The residents 
do  not  see    lack  of  concern  for  their  neighbourhood  as  a  major  reason  for  crime  occurrence  in  the 
neighbourhood. 
 
Table 3. Reasons for criminal activities in neighbourhoods of Enugu. 
Density   Reasons for criminal activities 
Poverty   Inadequate 
security 
Negligence  by 
government 
unemployment  Lack of concern 
by residents 
High   145  37  100  82  28 
 Medium   45  10  22  10  2 
Low   45  4  20  10  7 
Total   225 (40.3%)  51 (9.6%)  142 (25%)  102 (18.3%)  37 (6.6%) 
 Source: Survey 2012 
In  considering  neighbourhoods  for  residence,  crime  rate,  rent,  income  and  building  type  are  some  of  the  main 
considerations by persons in the high density areas.  The medium density residents consider rent and crime rate 
more while for those in the low density areas, it is rent, crime rate and income.  Nearness to friends/ relations and 
social  class  are  not  considered  by  residents  of  the  high  and  medium  density  areas  while  they  are  considered  by 
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
idnapping #urg$ar! %uto t"eft &ape 'tea$ing %rmed
robber!
Fig( 2  )rime incidence in some neig"bour"oods in Enugu * 2000 to  
2011+
,ig"
-edium
.o/
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences                                                                                                                                    www.iiste.org 
ISSN (Paper)2224-5766 ISSN (Online)2225-0484 (Online) 
Vol.4, No.17, 2014 
 
148 
residents of low density areas. (See Table 4).  Molin et al (2003) study of Benelux summarized that regardless of 
the study area and model specification, accessibility considerations are significantly less important than housing 
attributes and the attributes related to neighbourhood.  
 
Table 4. Factor considered in choosing residence 
Density    
  Ren
t  
Aesthe
tics  
Prestig
e 
Buildi
ng 
type 
Incom
e  
Crime 
rate 
Accessibilit
y 
Infrastructure  Nearnes
s  to 
friend/r
elation 
Social 
class 
High   145  21  7  59  63  156  47  30  0  0 
Mediu
m  
45  10  2  10  2  34  4  8  0  0 
Low   44  28  20  10  42  43  17  15  6  24 
Total   234  59  29  79  107  233  68  53  6  24 
Source survey 2012 
The  types  of  crime  that  most  influence  residents  in  choosing  residential  location  are  shown  on  Table  5..   
Robbery is considered to influence the choice of residential location by 49.1%, 67.7%, and 43% of residents in 
high, medium and low density areas respectively.  In the low density areas, 37.8% of them consider kidnapping.   
The  Hiscox  Group  (2001)  placed  Nigeria  on  the  6
th
  highest  in  kidnapping.  Kidnapping  in  Nigeria  has  been 
attributed  to  ethnic  militia,  bloody  politics,  unemployment,  failure  of  government  to  provide  basic  amenities, 
dirty  politics,  traditional  rulers  and  communities  encouraging  crime  and  security  failures  (Akpan  2010)   
Kidnapping for ransom occurs more in the low density areas in Enugu.  The occurrence of rape/indecent assault 
is considered by many in the high density areas in choice of residence.  This may be due to the higher incidence 
of  rape  in  these  areas.    See  Fig.  2.  Rape  ranges  from  highly  predictor  and  harmful  stranger  perpetuated  act  to 
violations between acquaintances or even those romantically involved. In Enugu and most Nigerian cities, rape is 
under  reported  due  to  stigmatization.  The  incidence  of  rape  in  high  density  areas  may  be  due  to  the  type  of 
buildings  common  in  these  densities  (tenement)  where  many  households  live  in  a  building  and  share  toilet  and 
bathing  facilities.    Females  are  mostly  the  victims  of  rape/indecent  assault.    Linden  and  Rockoff  (2008)  found 
that individuals have a strong distaste for living in close proximity to sex offenders.   From the data collected it 
was found that  61.7% of the respondents have had cause to relocate or move residence because of crime either 
directly affecting them or in their neighbourhoods, while 38.3% have not had cause to relocate due to crime. The 
fear  of  being  a  victim  of  crime  as  shown  by  Farrel  et  al  (2007)  can  erode  public  health  and  can  alter  routine 
activities  and  contribute  to  some  places  turning  into  no  go  areas  through  withdrawal  from  community,  this  can 
drain community cohesion, trust and neighbourhood stability. One of the attributes of residential choice location 
is security.   Neighbourhoods become obsolete when security deteriorates as security causes value to change and 
demand  for  some  neighbourhoods  change  (Katzman  1980;  Dugan  1999;  Xie  and  Mc  Dowall  2008;  Jargowsky 
and Yoonhwan 2009). 
 
Table 5. Crimes that most influence residence choice 
Density              
  Kidnap  Robbery  Auto theft  Burglary  Larceny  Rape 
High   24  58  6  28  10  9 
Medium  21  70  0  7  3  0 
Low  77  89  30  8  0  0 
Total   121  216  36  43  13  9 
Source survey 2012 
  Chi square was used to test the hypothesis which states  that there is no significant relationship between choice 
of residential neighbourhood to  live in  and  type of crime that occurs  in the neighbourhood (i.e. that they fear 
more)  .    The  result  suggests  that  there  is  a  significant  relationship  with  X
2
  (8)  =  62.09,  (P  <  0.01.    The 
contingency  coefficient  was  .331.    This  suggests  a  medium  size  effect.    The  second  analysis  which  was  also 
tested  with  chi  square  suggests  that  a  significant  relationship  exists  between  residents  awareness  of  crime  in 
neighbourhoods and their choice of residence X
2
 (4) = 27.10, P< .001. This suggests that residents check out the 
incidence  of  crime  in  a  neighbourhood  before  making  decisions  on  whether  to  rent  or  build  in  that 
neighbourhood. This is consistent  with the findings of   Gibbon (2004), Moreoff and Samson (1997)  who  noted 
that  crime  has  negative  consequences  for  neighbourhoods  including  increased  mobility  and  decreased 
neighbourhood satisfaction.  Jargowsky and Yoonhwan (2009) asserted that crime is a  major factor for middle-
class flight and is a cause of suburbanization.   Gibbon (2004) also found out that spatial concentration of crime 
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences                                                                                                                                    www.iiste.org 
ISSN (Paper)2224-5766 ISSN (Online)2225-0484 (Online) 
Vol.4, No.17, 2014 
 
149 
can  have  dynamic  effect  driven  by  household  location  decision.    Fear  and  direct  cost  associated  with  property 
crime may discourage home buyers, inhibit local regeneration and catalyse a downward spiral in neighbourhood 
status.    High  crime  rates  deter  new  residents  and  motivate  those  who  can  to  move  out  to  lower-  crime  rate 
neighbourhoods.  Cullen and Levitte (1992) got results consistent with a strong relationship between changes in 
crime  rate  and  urban  flight.    They  found  out  that  almost  all  impact  of  crime  on  city  population  results  from 
increased  out-migration.    Highly  educated  households  and  households  with  children  were  most  responsive  to 
crime.  They causally linked rising crime rate to city depopulation.   
 
4.  Conclusion  
This  study  has  looked  at  the  incidence  of  some  crimes  in  Enugu.    The  study  showed  that  since  2007  the 
incidence  of  most  crimes  has  been  on  the  increase  especially  in  high  density  residential  neighbourhoods.  This 
result  is  consistent  with  results  of  other  studies  in  developed  and  developing  countries  where  crime  rates  are 
more in high density neighbourhoods. The study also showed that residents of Enugu do consider occurrence of 
different types of crime in the neighbourhoods before taking decisions on where to live.  Some crimes influence 
this decision more than other crimes.  Different crimes influence low, medium and high density residents in their 
choice of residence. To ensure even development of Enugu and indeed all cities in Nigeria, crime rates especially 
that of kidnap and house robbery has to be  reduced. 
 
References 
Agbola, T. (1997) The architecture of fear: Urban design and construction response to urban violence in Lagos, 
Nigeria, IFRA, Ibadan. 
Afon,  A. O., (2001) Residential diversity factor in perception of and response to  fear of  crime in Nigeria Paper 
Presented  at  the  International  Conference  on  Security,  Segregation  and  Social  Network  in  West  African  Cities 
19
th
  20
th
 Centuries, Held at International Centre for African Studies, University of Ibadan. 
Ahmed, Y.A., (2012) The pattern and distribution of crime  incidence in an urban environment; A case study of 
Osun State, south western Nigeria, International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 2(5).178  188. 
Akpan, N. (2010) Kidnapping in Nigeria  Niger Delta:  An  exploratory  study, Journal of Social Sciences 24 (1) 
33-42 
Cullen, J. B., Levitte, S.D., (1992) Crime, urban flight and the consequence for cities. The Review of Economics 
and Statistics 81 (2) 159  169 
Dugan, L. (1999) The effects of criminal victimization on households moving decision.  Criminology. 37 (9) 903 
 930 
Erodogan,  A.,  (2010)  What  do  place-based  crime  prevention  strategies  mean  for  the  Turkish  planning  system 
and urban transformation?, Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 3(11) 271  296.  
Ekpeyong, S. (1989) Social collision and armed robbery in Nigerian cities British Journal of Criminology. 29 (2) 
21  34. 
Farrell, S., Jackson, J., Gray, E. (2009) Social order and the fear of crime in contemporary times. Oxford: Oxford 
University Press. 
Freeman, S., Grogger, J., Sonstelie (1996)  The spatial concentration of crime Journal of Urban Economics, 40 
216  231 
Gibbon, Steve (2004) The cost of urban property crime The Economic Journal 114(499) F441  F463 
Hiscox  Group  (2001)  Kidnapping  in  foreign  countries  http://danger.mongabay.com/kidnapping.stats.htm,  
http://geography.berkley.edu/projecResource/ND%20  
Jargowsky,  P.A,    Yoonhwan  ,  P.  (2009)  Cause  or  consequence  suburbanization  and  crime  in  us  metropolitan 
area, Crime and Delinquency 55(11) 28  50. 
Katzman, MT (1980)  The contribution of crime to urban decline,  Urban Studies 17 (3) 277  286. 
linden,  l.,  Rockoff,  J.,  (2008)  Estimates  of  the  impact  of  crime  risk  on  property  values  from  megans  law,  
American Economic Review 98 (3) 1103  1127. 
Ludwing,  J.,  Duncan,  G.T.,  Hirschfield,  P.,(2001)  Urban  poverty  and  juvenile  crime:  evidence  from  randomize 
housing-mobility experiment The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2) 655  679 
Molin,  E  Timmermans  H  (2003)  Accessibility  and  considerations  in  residential  choice  decisions:  accumulated 
evidence from the benelux,. Proceedings  of 82
nd
 Annual  meeting of Transportation Research Board.  Accessed 
3/7 2012 
Moreoff,  J.D.,  Samson,  R.J.,  (1997)  Violent  crimes  and  the  spatial  dynamics  of  neighborhood  transition 
:Chicago 1970  1990 Social Forces 76 (1) 31  64. 
Mukoro, S. I.,(1994) Intra-Urban pattern of violent crimes  in  African cities: The case of Lagos, Nigeria,  Paper 
Prepared for Conference for International Conference on Urban Management and Urban Violence IFRA. 
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences                                                                                                                                    www.iiste.org 
ISSN (Paper)2224-5766 ISSN (Online)2225-0484 (Online) 
Vol.4, No.17, 2014 
 
150 
Ogboi,  K.  C.  (2009)  )  Towards  a  holistic  approach  to  urban  security  problems  in  Nigeria:  Veiling  the  other 
dimensions.  A Paper Presented at the 40
th
 NITP Annual Conference. Awka , Nigeria. 
Otu,  S.  E.  (2010)  Armed  robbery  and  armed  robbers  in  contemporary  Nigeria:  The  social  learning  and  model  
visited , International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory,  3 (2) 438-456 
Stark, R (1987) Deviant places: A theory of the ecology of crime.  Criminology 25 (4) 893  910 
Taylor, R. B. (1995) The impact of crime on communities.  Annals of American Academy of Political and Social 
Science  vol. 539 28  45 
Willcox  P  Quisenberry,  N  Jones,  S  (2003)  The  built  environment  and  community  crime  risk  interpretation  
Journal of Research in Crime Delinquency 40 (3) 322  345 
Xie,  Min,  Mc  Dowall,  D  (2008)  Escaping  crime:  The  Effect  of  direct  and  indirect  victimization  on  moving  
Criminology 46 (4) 809  840 
 
The  IISTE  is  a  pioneer  in  the  Open-Access  hosting  service  and  academic  event 
management.  The aim of the firm is Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing. 
 
More information about the firm can be found on the homepage:  
http://www.iiste.org 
 
CALL FOR JOURNAL PAPERS 
There  are  more  than  30  peer-reviewed  academic  journals  hosted  under  the  hosting 
platform.   
Prospective  authors  of  journals  can  find  the  submission  instruction  on  the 
following  page:  http://www.iiste.org/journals/    All  the  journals  articles  are  available 
online  to  the  readers  all  over  the  world  without  financial,  legal,  or  technical  barriers 
other than those inseparable from gaining  access  to the internet itself.  Paper version 
of the journals is also available upon request of readers and authors.  
 
MORE RESOURCES 
Book publication information: http://www.iiste.org/book/ 
 
IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners 
EBSCO,  Index  Copernicus,  Ulrich's  Periodicals  Directory,  JournalTOCS,  PKP  Open 
Archives  Harvester,  Bielefeld  Academic  Search  Engine,  Elektronische 
Zeitschriftenbibliothek  EZB,  Open  J-Gate,  OCLC  WorldCat,  Universe  Digtial 
Library , NewJour, Google Scholar